Dietary Acid Load and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors—A Narrative Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. DAL and Blood Pressure/Hypertension
3. DAL and Carbohydrate Metabolism
4. DAL and Lipid Metabolism
5. Discussion
5.1. Demographic, Health and Lifestyle Confounders
5.2. Dietary Pattern/Nutritional Confounders
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Remer, T.; Manz, F. Potential renal acid load of foods and its influence on urine pH. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1995, 95, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frassetto, L.; Morris, R.C.; Sellmeyer, D.E.; Todd, K.; Sebastian, A. Diet, evolution and aging-the pathophysiologic effects of the post-agricultural inversion of the potassium-to-sodium and base-to-chloride ratios in the human diet. Eur. J. Nutr. 2001, 40, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akter, S.; Eguchi, M.; Kurotani, K.; Kochi, T.; Pham, N.M.; Ito, R.; Kuwahara, K.; Tsuruoka, H.; Mizoue, T.; Kabe, I.; et al. High dietary acid load is associated with increased prevalence of hypertension: The Furukawa Nutrition and Health Study. Nutrition 2015, 31, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haghighatdoost, F.; Najafabadi, M.M.; Bellissimo, N.; Azadbakht, L. Association of dietary acid load with cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Nutrition 2015, 31, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, E.; Kim, G.; Hong, N.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, D.W.; Shin, J.H.; Lee, B.W.; Kang, E.S.; Lee, I.K.; Cha, B.S. Association between dietary acid load and the risk of cardiovascular disease: Nationwide surveys (KNHANES 2008–2011). Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2016, 15, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kiefte-de Jong, J.C.; Li, Y.; Chen, M.U.; Curhan, G.C.; Mattei, J.; Malik, V.S.; Forman, J.P.; Franco, O.H.; Hu, F.B. Diet-dependent acid load and type 2 diabetes: Pooled results from three prospective cohort studies. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tylavsky, F.A.; Spence, L.A.; Harkness, L. The importance of calcium, potassium, and acid-base homeostasis in bone health and osteoporosis prevention. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 164–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robey, I.F. Examining the relationship between diet-induced acidosis and cancer. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 9, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trinchieri, A.; Maletta, A.; Lizzano, R.; Marchesotti, F. Potential renal acid load and the risk of renal stone formation in a case-control study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 67, 1077–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frassetto, L.A.; Todd, K.M.; Morris, R.C.; Sebastian, A. Estimation of net endogenous noncarbonic acid production in humans from diet potassium and protein contents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Remer, T.; Manz, F. Estimation of the renal net acid excretion by adults consuming diets containing variable amounts of protein. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994, 59, 1356–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michaud, D.S.; Troiano, R.P.; Subar, A.F.; Runswick, S.; Bingham, S.; Kipins, V.; Schatzkin, A. Comparison of estimated renal net acid excretion from dietary intake and body size with urine pH. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2003, 103, 1001–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Curhan, G.C.; Forman, J.P. Diet-dependent net acid load and risk of incident hypertension in United States women. Hypertension 2009, 54, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murakami, K.; Sasaki, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Uenishi, K. Association between dietary acid-base load and cardiometabolic risk factors in young Japanese women. Brit. J. Nutr. 2008, 100, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghadam, S.K.; Bahadoran, Z.; Mirmiran, P.; Tohidi, M.; Azizi, F. Association between dietary acid load and insulin resistance: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 21, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rebholz, C.M.; Coresh, J.; Grams, M.E.; Steffen, L.M.; Anderson, C.A.M.; Appel, L.J.; Crews, D.C. Dietary acid load and incident chronic kidney disease: Results from the ARIC Study. Am. J. Nephrol. 2015, 42, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bahadoran, Z.; Mirmiran, P.; Khosravi, H.; Azizi, F. Associations between dietary acid-base load and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults: The Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 30, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikizler, H.O.; Zelnick, L.; Ruzinski, J.; Curtin, L.; Utzschneider, K.M.; Kestenbaum, B.; Himmelfarb, J.; de Boer, I.H. Dietary acid load is associated with serum bicarbonate but not insulin sensitivity in chronic kidney disease. J. Ren. Nutr. 2016, 26, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krupp, D.; Shi, L.; Maser-Gluth, C.; Pietzarka, M.; Remer, T. 11β Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 and dietary acid load are independently associated with blood pressure in healthy children and adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Engberink, M.F.; Bakker, S.J.L.; Brink, E.J.; van Baak, M.A.; van Rooji, F.J.A.; Hofman, A.; Witteman, J.A.M.; Geleijnse, J.M. Dietary acid load and risk of hypertension: The Rotterdam study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 95, 1438–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iwase, H.; Tanaka, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Wada, S.; Kuwahata, M.; Kido, Y.; Hamaguchi, M.; Asano, M.; Yamazaki, M.; Hasegawa, G.; et al. Lower vegetable protein intake and higher dietary acid load associated with lower carbohydrate intake are risk factors for metabolic syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analysis of a cross-sectional study. J. Diabetes Investig. 2015, 6, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, B.-J.; Chang, Y.; Ryu, S.; Kim, E.M.; Lee, M.Y.; Hyun, Y.Y.; Lee, K.-B. Dietary acid load and chronic kidney disease in elderly adults: Protein and potassium intake. PLoS ONE. 2017, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kucharska, A.M.; Szostak-Wȩgierek, D.E.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Piotrowski, W.; Stepaniak, U.; Pająk, A.; Kozakiewicz, K.; Tykarski, A.; Rutkowski, M.; Bielecki, W.J.; et al. Dietary acid load and cardiometabolic risk in the Polish adult population. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 27, 1347–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luis, D.; Huang, X.; Riserus, U.; Sjogren, P.; Lindholm, B.; Arnlov, J.; Cederholm, T.; Carrero, J.J. Estimated dietary acid load Is not associated with blood pressure or hypertension incidence in men who are approximately 70 years old. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- van den Berg, E.; Engberink, M.F.; Brink, E.J.; van Baak, M.A.; Joosten, M.M.; Gans, R.O.B.; Navis, G.; Bakker, S.J.L. Dietary acid load and metabolic acidosis in renal transplant recipients. Clin. J. Am. SocNephrol. 2012, 7, 1811–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, H.; Jia, T.; Huang, X.; Riserus, U.; Cederholm, T.; Arnlov, J.; Sjogren, P.; Lindholm, B.; Carrero, J.J. Dietary acid load, insulin sensitivity and risk of type 2 diabetes in community-dwelling older men. Diabetologia 2014, 57, 1561–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amodu, A.; Abramowitz, M.K. Dietary acid, age, and serum bicarbonate levels among adults in the United States. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 8, 2034–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daneshzad, E.; Haghighatdoost, F.; Azadbakht, L. Dietary acid load and cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Public Health Nutr. 2019, 22, 2823–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghan, P.; Farhangi, M.A. Dietary acid load, blood pressure, fasting blood sugar and biomarkers of insulin resistance among adults: Findings from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2020, 74, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao-Wei, C.; Zi-Hui, C.; Yu-Hui, L.; Wang, P.; Peng, J.W. Elevated hypertension risk associated with higher dietary acid load: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2019, 33, 171–177. [Google Scholar]
- Parohan, M.; Sadeghi, A.; Nasiri, M.; Maleki, V.; Khodadost, M.; Pirouzi, A.; Sadeghi, O. Dietary acid load and risk of hypertension: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 29, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rylander, R.; Tallheden, T.; Vormann, J. Acid–base conditions regulate calcium and magnesium homeostasis. Magnes. Res. 2009, 22, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adrogue, H.J.; Madias, N.E. Sodium and potassium in the pathogenesis of hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 1966–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maurer, M.; Riesen, W.; Muser, J.; Hulter, H.N.; Krapf, R. Neutralization of Western diet inhibits bone resorption independently of K intake and reduces cortisol secretion in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2003, 284, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taylor, E.N.; Mount, D.B.; Forman, J.P.; Curhan, G.C. Association of prevalent hypertension with 24-hour urinary excretion of calcium, citrate, and other factors. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2006, 47, 780–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weiner, I.D.; Verlander, J.W. Ammonia Transporters and Their Role in Acid-Base Balance. Physiol. Rev. 2017, 97, 465–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koeppen, B.M. The kidney and acid-base regulation. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2009, 33, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, T.; Tucker, K.; Griswold, M.; Wyatt, S.B.; Harman, J.; Young, B.; Taylor, H.; Powe, N.R. Dietary potential renal acid load and risk of albuminuria and reduced kidney function in the Jackson Heart Study. J. Ren. Nutr. 2018, 28, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gæde, J.; Nielsen, T.; Madsen, M.L.; Toft, U.; Jorgensen, T.; Overvad, K.; Tjonneland, A.; Hansen, T.; Allin, K.H.; Pedersen, O. Population-based studies of relationships between dietary acidity load, insulin resistance and incident diabetes in Danes. Nutr. J. 2018, 17, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagherazzi, G.; Vilier, A.; Bonnet, F.; Lajous, M.; Balkau, B.; Boutron-Rualt, M.-C.; Clavel-Chapelon, F. Dietary acid load and risk of type 2 diabetes: The E3N-EPIC cohort study. Diabetologia. 2014, 57, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jayedi, A.; Shab-Bidar, S. Dietary acid load and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2018, 23, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akter, S.; Kurotani, K.; Kashino, I. High Dietary Acid Load Score Is Associated with Increased Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Japanese Men: The Japan Public Health Center–based Prospective Study. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 1076–1083. [Google Scholar]
- Kabasawa, K.; Hosojima, M.; Takachi, R.; Nakamura, K.; Ito, Y.; Saito, A.; Sawada, N.; Tsugane, S.; Tanaka, J.; Narita, I. Association of estimated dietary acid load with albuminuria in Japanese adults: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2019, 20, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozaffari, H.; Namazi, N.; Larijani, B.; Bellissimo, N.; Azadbakht, L. Association of dietary acid load with cardiovascular risk factors and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iranian women: A cross-sectional study. Nutrition 2019, 67–68, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krupp, D.; Esche, J.; Mensink, G.B.M.; Klenow, S.; Thamm, M.; Remer, T. Dietary acid load and potassium intake associate with blood pressure and hypertension prevalence in a representative sample of the German adult population. Nutrients 2018, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farhangi, M.A.; Nikniaz, L.; Nikniaz, Z. Higher dietary acid load potentially increases serum triglyceride and obesity prevalence in adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PoLS ONE 2019, 9, e0216547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guardia, L.D.; Thomas, M.A.; Cena, H. Insulin Sensitivity and Glucose Homeostasis Can Be Influenced by Metabolic Acid Load. Nutrients 2018, 10, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mehrabian, F.; Farmanbar, R.; Mahdavi-Roshan, M.; Omidi, S.; Aghebati, R. The Effect of Nutrition Education Based on DASH Diet on Blood Pressure and Dietary Adherence Among Patients With Hypertension. Casp. J. Health Res. 2018, 3, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, R.S.; Kozan, P.; Samocha-Bonet, D. The role of dietary acid load and mild metabolic acidosis in insulin resistance in humans. Biochimie 2016, 124, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Hernández, A.I.; Catalan, I.; Gomez-Ambrosi, J.; Rodríguez, A.; Frühbeck, G. Mechanisms Linking Excess Adiposity and Carcinogenesis Promotion. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Martínez-Fernández, L.; Laiglesia, L.; Huerta, A.; Martínez, J.A.; Moreno-Aliaga, M.J. Omega-3 fatty acids and adipose tissue function in obesity and metabolic syndrome. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2015, 121, 24–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mach, F.; Baigent, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Koskinas, K.C.; Casula, M.; Delgado, V.; Ference, B.A.; Halliday, A.; Landmesser, U.; Mihaylova, B.; et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 111–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, S.S.; Qi, L.; Fahey, G.; Klurfeld, D.M. Consumption of cereal fiber, mixtures of whole grains and bran, and whole grains and risk reduction in type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 594–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davison, K.M.; Temple, N.J. Cereal fiber, fruit fiber, and type 2 diabetes: Explaining the paradox. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2018, 32, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weickert, M.; Pfeiffer, A. Impact of Dietary Fiber Consumption on Insulin Resistance and the Prevention of Type 2. Diabetes J. Nutr. 2018, 148, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Drehmer, M.; Pereira, M.A.; Schmidt, M.I.; Del Carmen, B.; Molina, M.; Alvim, S.; Lotufo, P.A.; Duncan, B.B. Associations of dairy intake with glycemia and insulinemia, independent of obesity, in Brazilian adults: The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 101, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Feeney, E.L.; O’Sullivan, A.; Nugen, A.P.; McNulty, B.; Walton, J.; Bibney, E.R. Patterns of dairy food intake, body composition and markers of metabolic health in Ireland: Results from the National Adult Nutrition Survey. Nutr. Diabetes 2017, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gijsbers, L.; Ding, E.; Malik, V.; Goede, J.; Geleijnse, J.M.; Soedamah-Muthu, S.S. Consumption of dairy foods and diabetes incidence: A dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Comerford, K.; Pasin, G. Emerging evidence for the importance of dietary protein source on glucoregulatory markers and type 2 diabetes: Different effects of dairy, meat, fish, egg, and plant protein foods. Nutrients 2016, 8, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wen, L.; Duffy, A. Factors influencing the gut microbiota, inflammation, and type 2 diabetes. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 1468–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jafari, T.; Faghihimani, E.; Feizi, A.; Iraj, B.; Javanmard, S.H.; Esmaillzadeh, A.; Fallah, A.A.; Askari, G. Effects of vitamin D-fortified low-fat yogurt on glycemic status, anthropometric indexes, inflammation, and bone turnover in diabetic postmenopausal women: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 35, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madjd, A.; Taylor, M.A.; Mousavi, N.; Delavari, A.; Malekzadeh, R.; Macdonald, I.A.; Farshchi, H.R. Comparison of the effect of daily consumption of probiotic compared with low-fat conventional yogurt on weight loss in healthy obese women following an energy-restricted diet: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 2016, 103, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tremblay, B.L.; Rudkowska, I. Nutrigenomic point of view on effects and mechanisms of action of ruminant trans fatty acids on insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nutr. Rev. 2017, 75, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, C.-H.; Choi, K.M. Impact of High-Carbohydrate Diet on Metabolic Parameters in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Nutrients 2017, 9, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanhope, K.L.; Schwarz, J.M.; Keim, N.L.; Griffen, S.C.; Bremer, A.A.; Graham, J.L.; Havel, P.J. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1322–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Brouwer, I.A.; Wanders, A.J.; Katan, M.B. Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular health: Research completed? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 67, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yin, R.X.; Li, Y.-Y.; Liu, W.-Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, J.-Z. Interactions of the Apolipoprotein A5 Gene Polymorphisms and Alcohol Consumption on Serum Lipid Levels. PoLS ONE 2011, 6, e17954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Crandall, J.P.; Polsky, S.; Howard, A.A.; Perreault, L.; Bray, G.A.; Barrett-Connor, E.; Brown-Friday, J.; Whittington, T.; Foo, S.; Ma, Y.; et al. Alcohol consumption and diabetes risk in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 90, 595–601. [Google Scholar]
First Author/Country/Reference Number | Year | Study Design | Sample (n) | Gender/Age Range/Mean Age | DAL Assessment Method Related to the Result | Dietary Intake Assessment Tool | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statistically significant positive association | |||||||
Murakami et al./Japan [14] | 2008 | Cross-sectional | 1136 (dietetic students) | Women, 18–22 y | PRAL, A:P | BDHQ | Higher PRAL and A:P associated with higher SBP and DBP values (p for trend = 0.028 and 0.035 for PRAL, and 0.012 and 0.009 for A:P, respectively). |
Zhang et al./the USA [13] | 2009 | Cohort—NHS-II | 87 293 (women without prior hypertension) | Women, 31–41 y | NEAP, A:P | FFQ | NEAP and A:P positively associated with the risk of hypertension (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05–1.24 for NEAP and RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08–1.41 for A:P, respectively). The association between NEAP and risk of hypertension higher among lean women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). |
Engberink et al./ the Netherlands [20] * | 2012 | Cross-sectional baseline data | 2241 (participants without hypertension at baseline) | Both, ≥55 y | PRAL | FFQ | SBP significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest tertile of PRAL (122.4 ± 11.7 mmHg vs. 121.1 ± 12.2 mmHg; p < 0.05). |
Krupp et al./Germany [19] | 2013 | Cross-sectional | 267 (children) | Both, 4–14 y | PRAL, NAE | 3d-FD | SBP increased by 4.3 mmHg and 3.2 mmHg from the lowest to the highest tertiles of PRAL and NAE, respectively. DAL significantly (p < 0.01) directly related to SBP. |
Akter et al./Japan [3] | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 2028 (working population) | Both, 18–70 y | PRAL, NEAP | BDHQ | The increased risk of hypertension in the highest vs. lowest tertile of PRAL (OR: 1.31; Cl: 1.01–1.70) and NEAP (OR: 1.40; CI: 1.08–1.82). |
Haghighatdoost et al./Iran [4] | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 547 (patients with diabetic nephropathy) | Both, 66.8 y (mean age) | PRAL | FFQ | SBP significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories (106.1 ± 0.7 mmHg vs. 103.6 ± 0.7 mmHg; p < 0.05). |
Rebholz et al./the USA [16] | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 15,055 (general population) | Both, 54 y (mean age) | PRAL | FFQ | The prevalence of hypertension significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL quartile (37.7% vs. 31.9%). |
Bahadoran et al./Iran [17] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 5620 (general population) | Both, 19–70 y | PRAL, A:P | 147-item FFQ | DBP positively associated with dietary PRAL (standardized β coefficient = 0.062; p < 0.01) and A:P ratio (standardized β coefficient = 0.026; p < 0.05). |
Han et al./Korea [5] | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 11,601 (subjects without prior CVD) | Both, 40–79 y | PRAL, NEAP | 24HR | PRAL and NEAP positively associated with the prevalence of hypertension (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31), as well as SBP and DBP values. |
Moghadam et al./Iran [15] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 925 (general population) | Both, 22–80 y | PRAL | FFQ | DBP significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest quartile of PRAL (73.5 ± 10.5 mmHg vs. 72.8 ± 10.9 mmHg; p < 0.05). |
Ikizler et al./the USA [18] | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 42 (patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3–5) | Both, 60.8 (mean age) | NEAP | 3-day prospective FD | SBP and DBP significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest NEAP tertile (133 mmHg vs. 131 mmHg and 80.1 mmHg vs. 78.5 mmHg, respectively). |
Kiefte-de Jong et al./the USA [6] * | 2017 | Cohort—NHS Follow-up data | 67,433 (women without T2DM, CVD and cancer at baseline) | Women, 30–55 y | NEAP | FFQ | A higher prevalence of hypertension in the highest vs. lowest categories of NEAP (24.4% vs. 21.3%). |
Cohort—NHS-II Follow-up data | 84,310 (women without T2DM, CVD and cancer at baseline) | Women, 25–42 y | A higher prevalence of hypertension in the highest vs. lowest categories of NEAP (15.2% vs. 9.3%). | ||||
Cohort—HPFS Follow-up data | 35,743 (men without T2DM, CVD and cancer at baseline) | Men, 40–75 y | A higher prevalence of hypertension in the highest vs. lowest categories of NEAP (36.6% vs. 35.6%). | ||||
Daneshzad et al./Iran [28] | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (16 cohort studies; 17 cross-sectional studies) | 92,478 | Both, >1 y | NEAP, PRAL, NAE | All mentioned assessment tools | A significant relationship between SBP (WMD = 1.74, 95% CI: 0.25–3.24 mmHg; p < 0.05), DBP (WMD = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.07–1.42 mmHg; p < 0.05) and DAL in cross-sectional studies. |
Parohan et al./Iran [31] * | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (3 cohort studies; 11 cross-sectional studies) | 306,183 | Both, >18 y | PRAL | All mentioned assessment tools | A significant association between PRAL and hypertension in prospective studies (p < 0.01) In linear dose-response analysis, a 20-unit increase in PRAL values associated with the risk of hypertension increased by 3% (combined effect size: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.06, p < 0.05). |
Shao-Wei et al./China [30] | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (4 cohort studies; 6 cross-sectional studies) | 135,072 | Both, >18 y | PRAL, NEAP | All mentioned assessment tools | Hypertension significantly associated with higher PRAL (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02–1.17). PRAL categories associated with higher DBP (WMD = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.67–1.26) and SBP (WMD = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.12–2.03). A 35% increase in the risk of hypertension associated with higher NEAP (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03–1.78). |
Dehghan et al./Iran [29] | 2020 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (2 cohort studies; 12 cross-sectional studies) | 519,262 | Both, >18 y | PRAL | All mentioned assessment tools | The highest PRAL categories associated with higher SBP (WMD = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.51, 1.45 mmHg; p < 0.001) and DBP (WMD = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.09, 1.14 mmHg; p < 0.05). |
Statistically significant inverse association | |||||||
Amodu et al./the USA [27] | 2013 | Cross-sectional | 13,274 (general population) | Both, ≥20 y | NEAP | 24HR | The prevalence of hypertension in the lowest categories of NEAP significantly higher than in the highest one (43.5% vs. 34.9%, p < 0.001). |
No statistically significant association | |||||||
van-den Berg et al./Denmark [25] | 2012 | Cross-sectional | 707 (renal transplant patients) | Both, 53 y (mean age) | NEAP | FFQ | No difference the prevalence of hypertension, SBP, DBP and between the tertiles of NEAP. |
Engberink et al./the Netherlands [20] * | 2012 | Cross-sectional baseline data | 2241 (participants without hypertension at baseline) | Both, ≥55 y | PRAL | FFQ | No significant difference in DBP in the highest vs. lowest PRAL tertile. |
Luis et al./Sweden [24] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | 673 (general population) | Male, 70–71 y | PRAL | 7d-FD | No significant difference in the prevalence of hypertension, SBP, DBP, and between the tertiles of PRAL. No significant difference in SBP, DBP after 7 y follow-up and cross-sectionally between the quartiles of PRAL. |
Iwase et al./Japan [21] | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 149 (patients with T2DM) | Both, 65.7 ± 9.3 (mean age) | PRAL, NEAP | BDHQ | No significant difference in SBP in the highest vs. lowest PRAL and NEAP tertile. |
Bahadoran et al./Iran [17] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 5620 (general population) | Both, 19–70 y | PRAL, A:P | 147-item FFQ | No significant association between SBP and dietary PRAL, as well as A:P ratio. |
Moghadam et al./Iran [15] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 925 (general population) | Both, 22–80 y | PRAL | FFQ | No significant difference in SBP, DBP after 3 y follow-up between PRAL categories. |
Xu et al./Sweden [26] | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 911 (general population) | Both, 70–71 y | PRAL | 7d-FD | No significant difference in the prevalence of hypertension between PRAL categories. |
Ko et al./Korea [22] | 2017 | Cross-sectional | 1369 (general population) | Both, ≥65 y | NEAP | FFQ | No significant difference in the prevalence of hypertension, SBP, DBP and between the lowest and highest NEAP categories. |
Kucharska et al./Poland [23] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 6170 (general population) | Both, ≥20 y | NEAP, PRAL | 24HR | No significant differences in the prevalence of hypertension and SBP, DBP across PRAL and NEAP tertiles. |
Parohan et al./Iran [31] * | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (3 cohort studies; 11 cross-sectional studies) | 306,183 | Both, >18 y | PRAL | All mentioned assessment tools | No significant association between PRAL and hypertension in cross-sectional studies. |
First Author/Country/Reference Number | Year | Study Design | Sample (n) | Gender/Age Range/Mean Age | DAL Assessment Method Related to the Result | Dietary Intake Assessment Tool | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statistically significant positive association | |||||||
Fagherazzi et al./France [40] | 2014 | Cohort study | 66,485 (general population) | Women, >18y | PRAL, NEAP | 208-item diet-history questionnaire | NEAP and PRAL positively associated with the risk of T2DM (HR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.29–1.90; p < 0.0001 for PRAL, RR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.30–1.89; p < 0.0001 for NEAP). PRAL and NEAP: a stronger association in women with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (HR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.43–2.69; p < 0.001 for PRAL, HR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.50–2.76; p < 0.0001 for NEAP) than in overweight women (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.00–1.64; p = 0.05 for PRAL, HR 1.25; 95% CI: 0.98–1.60; p = 0.05 for NEAP). |
Haghighatdoost et al./Iran [4] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 547 (patients with diabetic nephropathy) | Both, 66.8 y (mean age) | PRAL, A:P | FFQ | HbA1c significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories (7.8 ± 0.5% vs. 5.7 ± 0.5%; p = 0.01). HbA1c significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest A:P categories (7.6 ± 0.5% vs. 5.8 ± 0.5%; p = 0.03). |
Rebholz et al./the USA [16] | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 15,055 (general population) | Both, 54 y (mean age) | PRAL | FFQ | A significantly higher prevalence of T2DM in the highest vs. lowest PRAL quartile (13.8% vs. 10%). |
Akter et al./Japan [3] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 1732 (working population) | Both, 19–69 y | PRAL, NEAP | BDHQ | PRAL and NEAP positively associated with HOMA-IR. Positive associations limited to subjects with BMI < 23 kg/m2. |
Han et al./Korea [5] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 11,601 (general population) | Both, 40–79 y | PRAL, NEAP | 24HR | Insulin significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest NEAP categories (10.4 ± 6.7 μU/mL vs. 9.5 ± 4.8 μU/mL; p < 0.001). HOMA-IR significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest NEAP tertile (2.6 ± 2.6 vs. 2.4 ± 1.8; p < 0.001). |
Kiefte-de Jong et al./the USA [6] | 2016 | Cohort—NHS Follow-up data | 67,433 (women without T2DM, CVD and cancer at baseline) | Women, 30–55 y | PRAL, NEAP, A:P | FFQ | NEAP, PRAL and A:P positively associated with the risk of T2DM (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18–1.38; p < 0.0001 for NEAP, RR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16–1.36; p < 0.0001 for PRAL and HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16–1.36; p < 0.0001 for A:P. |
Cohort—NHS-II Follow-up data | 84,310 (women without T2DM, CVD and cancer at baseline) | Women, 25–42 y | PRAL, NEAP and A:P positively associated with the risk of T2DM (HR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17–1.44; p < 0.0001 for NEAP, RR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.20–1.48; p < 0.0001 for PRAL and HR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.21–1.50; p < 0.0001 for A:P. | ||||
Cohort—HPFS Follow-up data | 35,743 (men without T2DM, CVD and cancer at baseline) | Men, 40–75 y | PRAL, NEAP and A:P positively associated with the risk of T2DM (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.18–1.47; p < 0.0001 for NEAP, HR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.16–1.44; p < 0.0001 for PRAL and HR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25–1.55; p < 0.0001 for A:P. | ||||
Moghadam et al./Iran [15] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 925 (general population) | Both, 22–80 y | PRAL, NEAP | FFQ | PRAL and NEAP positively associated with the risk of insulin resistance (OR 2.81, 95% CI: 1.32–5.97; p = 0.005 for PRAL an OR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.03–4.61; p = 0.021 for NEAP). |
Akter et al./Japan [42] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 27,809 (general population) | Men, 56.5 y (mean age) | PRAL, NEAP | 147-item FFQ | PRAL positively associated with the risk of T2DM (OR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.16–1.24; p < 0.01 for PRAL. |
36,851 (general population) | Women, 53.8 y (mean age) | ||||||
Gæde et al./Denmark [39] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 56,479 (general population) | Both, 30–64 y | PRAL | FFQ | PRAL positively associated with the risk of T2DM (HR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.14–1.35; p < 0.05). HOMA-IR, PG at 120 min, fasting insulin and insulin at 120 min significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories. |
Kucharska et al./Poland [23] * | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 2760 (general population) | Men,49 y (mean age) | NEAP, PRAL | 24HR | |
3409 (general population) | Women, 52 y (mean age) | A significantly higher prevalence of T2DM in the highest vs. lowest NEAP quartile (11.33% vs. 8.47%; p for trend = 0.05). Fasting blood sugar significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest NEAP categories (5.4 vs. 5.07 mmol/L; p < 0.01). | |||||
Banerjee et al./the USA [38] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 3257 (African-Americans from the Jackson) | Both, 21–84 y | PRAL, NAE | FFQ | HOMA-IR significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories (90.9 ± 8.7 vs. 75.8 ± 8.6; p = 0.03). |
Jayedi et al./Iran [41] | 2018 | A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies (7 cohort studies) | 319,542 (general population) | Both, >18 y | PRAL, NEAP, A:P | All mentioned assessment tools | NEAP, PRAL and A:P positively associated with the risk of T2DM (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.04; p = 0.04 for NEAP, HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.06; p < 0.0001 for PRAL and HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07–1.15; p < 0.05 for A:P). |
Dehghan et al./Iran [29] * | 2020 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (2 cohort studies; 12 cross-sectional studies) | 519,262 (general population) | Both, >18 y | PRAL | All mentioned assessment tools | The highest PRAL categories associated with higher insulin (WMD = −0.235, 95% CI: 0.070–0.400 μIU/mL; p < 0.005), higher odds of T2DM (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.092–1.311; p < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of T2DM (13% and 11% in the highest vs. lowest category). |
Statistically significant inverse association | |||||||
Amodu et al./the USA [27] | 2013 | Cross-sectional | 13,274 (general population) | Both, ≥20 y | NEAP | 24HR | The prevalence of T2DM in the lowest quartile of NEAP significantly higher than in the highest (7.7% vs. 6.2%; p < 0.05). |
Haghighatdoost et al./Iran [4] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 547 (patients with diabetic nephropathy) | Both, 66.8 y (mean age) | PRAL, A:P | FFQ | Fasting blood sugar significantly lower in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories (129.4 ± 1.0 mg/dL vs. 133.7 ± 1.0 mg/dL; p = 0.01). |
No statistically significant association | |||||||
Murakami et al./Japan [14] | 2008 | Cross-sectional | 1136 (dietetic students) | Women, 18–22 y | PRAL, A:P | BDHQ | No significant association between fasting blood sugar, HbAc1 and dietary PRAL, as well as A:P ratio. |
van-den Berg et al./Denmark [25] | 2012 | Cross-sectional | 707 (renal transplant patients) | Both, 53 y (mean age) | NAE | FFQ | No significant difference in the prevalence of T2DM across the tertiles of NAE. |
Luis et al./Sweden [24] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | 673 (general population) | Men, 70–71 y | PRAL | 7d-FD | No significant difference in the prevalence of T2DM across the tertiles of PRAL. |
Bahadoran et al./Iran [17] | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 5620 (general population) | Both, 19–70 y | PRAL, A:P | 147-item FFQ | No significant association between fasting blood sugar and dietary PRAL, as well as A:P ratio. |
Haghighatdoost et al./Iran [4] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 547 (patients with diabetic nephropathy) | Both, 66.8 y (mean age) | PRAL, A:P | FFQ | No significant association between fasting blood sugar and A:P ratio. |
Han et al./Korea [5] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 11,601 (general population) | Both, 40–79 y | PRAL, NEAP | 24HR | No significant difference in HOMA-IR, fasting blood sugar and insulin in the highest vs. lowest PRAL tertile. No significant difference in fasting blood sugar in the highest vs. lowest NEAP tertile. |
Xu et al./Sweden [26] | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 911 (general population) | Both, 70–71 y | PRAL | 7d-FD | No significant difference in the prevalence of T2DM and insulin sensitivity between PRAL tertiles. |
Ikizler et al./the USA [18] | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 42 (patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3–5) | Both, 60.8 (mean age) | NEAP, PRAL | 3-day prospective FD | No significant association between insulin sensitivity and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. |
Akter et al./Japan [1] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 1732 (working population) | Both, 19–69 y | PRAL, NEAP | BDHQ | No significant association between DAL score and fasting blood sugar or HbA1c levels. |
Akter et al./Japan [42] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 27,809 (general population) | Men, 56.5 y (mean age) | PRAL, NEAP | 147-item FFQ | No significant association between T2DM and dietary NEAP. |
36,851 (general population) | Women, 53.8 y (mean age) | No significant difference in the prevalence of T2DM and dietary NEAP and PRAL. | |||||
Ko et al./Korea [22] | 2017 | Cross-sectional | 1369 (general population) | Both, ≥65 y | NEAP | FFQ | No significant difference in the prevalence of T2DM across the quartiles of NEAP. |
Kucharska et al./Poland * [23] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 2760 (general population) | Men, 49 y (mean age) | NEAP, PRAL | 24HR | No significant differences in the prevalence of T2DM across the tertiles of PRAL and NEAP. No significant association between fasting blood sugar and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. |
3409 (general population) | Women, 52 y (mean age) | No significant differences across the tertiles of PRAL concerning the prevalence of T2DM. No significant association between fasting blood sugar and dietary PRAL. | |||||
Daneshzad et al./Iran [28] | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (16 cohort studies; 17 cross-sectional studies) | 92,478 (general population) | Both, >1 y | NEAP, PRAL, NAE | All mentioned assessment tools | No significant association between fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, serum insulin, HOMA-IR and dietary PRAL, NAE, as well as NEAP. |
Kabasawa et al./Japan [43] | 2019 | Cross-sectional | 6684 (patients with chronic kidney disease) | Both, 40–97 y | PRAL, NEAP | FFQ | No significant association between fasting blood sugar and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. |
Mozaffari et al./Iran [44] | 2019 | Cross-sectional | 371 (Iranian healthy women | Women, 20–50 y | NEAP, PRAL | FFQ | No significant association between fasting blood sugar and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. |
Dehghan et al./Iran [29] * | 2020 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (2 cohort studies; 12 cross-sectional studies) | 519,262 (general population) | Both, >18 y | PRAL | All mentioned assessment tools | No significant association between fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, HOMA-IR and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. |
First Author/Country/Reference Number | Year | Study Design | Sample (n) | Gender/Age Range/Mean Age | DAL Assessment Method Related to the Result | Dietary Intake Assessment Tool | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statistically significant positive association | |||||||
Murakami et al./Japan [14] | 2008 | Cross-sectional | 1136 (dietetic students) | Women, 18–22 y | PRAL, A:P | BDHQ | Total cholesterol, LDL-C significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories (1925.0 ± 21.0 mg/L vs. 1866.0 ± 21 mg/L; p = 0.042 for total cholesterol, 1103.0 ± 18.0 mg/L vs. 1043.0 ± 18 mg/L; p = 0.021 for LDL-C). |
Haghighatdoost et al./Iran [4] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 547 (patients with diabetic nephropathy) | Both, 66.8 y (mean age) | PRAL, A:P | FFQ | TAG significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories (257.4 ± 2.3 mg/dL vs. 146.9 ± 2.3 mg/dL; p = 0.006). |
Bahadoran et al./Iran [17] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 5620 (general population) | Both, 19–70 y | PRAL, A:P | 147-item FFQ | PRAL and A:P positively associated with TG (β = 0.143, p < 0.01 for PRAL, β = 0.03, p < 0.05 for A:P). |
Iwase et al./Japan [21] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 149 (patients with T2DM) | Both, 65.7 ± 9.3 (mean age) | PRAL, NEAP | BDHQ | LDL-C, TG higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL tertile (2.7 ± 0.8 mmol/L vs. 2.5 ± 0.8 mmol/L; p = 0.05 for LDL-C, 1.7 ± 1.1 mmol/L vs. 1.3 ± 0.7 mmol/L; p = 0.03 for TG). TG higher in the highest vs. lowest NEAP tertile (1.7 ± 1.2 mmol/L vs. 1.3 ± 0.7 mmol/L; p = 0.005). |
Han et al./Korea [5] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 11,601 (general population) | Both, 40–79 y | PRAL, NEAP | 24HR | TG higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL tertile (144.7 ± 113.5 mg/dL vs. 138.8 ± 102.7 mg/dL; p = 0.004). LDL-C higher in the highest vs. lowest PRAL tertile (119.0 ± 32.3 mg/dL vs. 119.0 ± 32.4 mg/dL; p = 0.043). TG higher in the highest vs. lowest NEAP tertile (148.7 ± 118.9 mg/dL vs. 137.4 ± 110.9 mg/dL; p < 0.001). |
Kucharska et al./Poland * [23] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 2760 (general population) | Men, 49 y (mean age) | NEAP, PRAL | 24HR | |
3409 (general population | Women, 52 y (mean age) | The prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest quartile of NEAP (22.33% vs. 18.82%; p < 0.01). TG significantly higher in the highest vs. lowest NEAP categories (1.18 vs. 1.13 mmol/L; p < 0.05). | |||||
Farhangi et al./Iran [46] * | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis (17 observational studies) | 181,282 (general population) | Both, >18 y | PRAL, NEAP | All mentioned assessment tools | High PRAL associated with serum TG concentrations higher by 3.47 mg/dL (WMD: 3.468; CI: −0.231, 7.166, p < 0.05). |
Statistically significant inverse association | |||||||
Haghighatdoost et al./Iran [4] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 547 (patients with diabetic nephropathy) | Both, 66.8 y (mean age) | PRAL, A:P | FFQ | LDL-C significantly lower in the highest vs. lowest A:P categories (129.4 ± 1.6 mg/dL vs. 140.1 ± 1.6 mg/dL; p < 0.0001). |
Bahadoran et al./Iran [17] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 5620 (general population) | Both, 19–70 y | PRAL, A:P | 147-item FFQ | PRAL and A:P inversely associated with HDL-C (β = –0.11, p < 0.01 for PRAL, β = −0.06, p < 0.01 for A:P). |
Han et al./Korea [5] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 11,601 (general population) | Both, 40–79 y | PRAL, NEAP | 24HR | HDL-C significantly lower in the highest vs. lowest NEAP tertiles (50.7 ± 12.3 mg/dL vs. 51.5 ± 12.4 mg/dL, p = 0.031). |
Kucharska et al./Poland [23] * | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 2760 (general population) | Men,49 y (mean age) | PRAL, NEAP | 24H | HDL-C significantly lower in the highest vs. lowest PRAL and NEAP categories (1.24 vs. 1.26 mmol/L; p < 0.01 for PRAL, 1.25 vs. 1.28 mmol/L; p < 0.05 for NEAP). |
3409 (general population | Women, 52 y (mean age) | HDL-C significantly lower in the highest vs. lowest PRAL and NEAP categories (1.53 vs. 1.50 mmol/L; p < 0.05 for PRAL, 1.51 vs. 1.54 mmol/L; p < 0.05 for NEAP). | |||||
Krupp et al./Germany [45] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 6797 (general population) | Both, >18 y | PRAL | FFQ | Total cholesterol significantly lower in the highest vs. lowest PRAL categories (192 mg/dL vs. 203.6 mg/dL; p < 0.0001). |
No statistically significant association | |||||||
Murakami et al./Japan [14] | 2008 | Cross-sectional | 1136 (dietetic students) | Women, 18–22 y | PRAL, A:P | BDHQ | No significant association between HDL-C, TAG and dietary PRAL. No significant association between total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, TAG and dietary A:P. |
Engberink et al./the Netherlands [8] | 2012 | Cross-sectional baseline data | 2241 (participants without hypertension at baseline) | Both, ≥55 y | PRAL | FFQ | No significant association between total cholesterol, HDL-C and dietary PRAL. |
van-den Berg et al./Denmark [25] | 2012 | Cross-sectional | 707 (renal transplant patients) | Both, 53 y (mean age) | NAE | FFQ | No significant difference between the tertiles of NAE, HDL-C and TG. |
Luis et al./Sweden [24] | 2014 | Cross-sectional | 673 (general population) | Men, 70–71 y | PRAL | 7d-FD | No significant difference in the prevalence of hyperlipidemia between the tertiles of PRAL. |
Haghighatdoost et al./Iran [4] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 547 (patients with diabetic nephropathy) | Both, 66.8 y (mean age) | PRAL, A:P | FFQ | No significant association between total cholesterol, HDL-C and dietary PRAL. No significant association between TAG, total cholesterol and dietary A:P. |
Iwase et al./Japan [21] * | 2015 | Cross-sectional | 149 (patients with T2DM) | Both,65.7 ± 9.3 (mean age) | PRAL, NEAP | BDHQ | No significant association between total cholesterol, LDL-C and dietary PRAL. |
Han et al./Korea [5] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 11,601 (general population) | Both, 40–79 y | PRAL, NEAP | 24HR | No significant association between LDL-C and dietary PRAL. No significant association between total cholesterol, LDL-C and dietary NEAP. |
Moghadam et al./Iran [15] * | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 925 (general population) | Both, 22–80 y | PRAL, NEAP | FFQ | No significant association between HDL-C, LDL-C, TG and dietary PRAL. |
Xu et al./Sweden [26] | 2016 | Cross-sectional | 911 (general population) | Both, 70–71 y | PRAL | 7-d FD | No significant difference in the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia between PRAL tertiles. |
Ko et al./Korea [22] | 2017 | Cross-sectional | 1369 (general population) | Both, ≥65 y | NEAP | FFQ | No significant association between total cholesterol, TG and dietary NEAP. |
Kucharska et al./Poland * [23] | 2018 | Cross-sectional | 2760 (general population) | Men, 49 y (mean age) | NEAP, PRAL | 24HR | No significant differences in the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia across the tertiles of PRAL and NEAP. No significant association between total cholesterol, LDL-C, TG and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. |
3409 (general population) | Women, 52 y (mean age) | No significant differences in the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia across the tertiles of PRAL. No significant differences across the tertiles of NEAP concerning the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia. No significant association between total cholesterol, LDL-C, TG and dietary PRAL. No significant association between total cholesterol, LDL-C and dietary NEAP. | |||||
Daneshzad et al./Iran [28] | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (16 cohort studies; 17 cross-sectional studies) | 92,478 (general population) | Both, >1 y | NEAP, PRAL, NAE | All mentioned assessment tools | No significant association between total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, TAG and dietary PRAL, NAE, as well as NEAP. |
Mozaffari et al./Iran [44] | 2019 | Cross-sectional | 371 (Iranian healthy women) | Women, 20–50 y | NEAP, PRAL | FFQ | No significant association between total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. |
Farhangi et al./Iran [46] | 2019 | A systematic review and meta-analysis (17 observational studies) | 181,282 (general population) | Both, >18 y | PRAL, NEAP | All mentioned assessment tools | No significant association between total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C and dietary PRAL, as well as NEAP. No significant association between TG and dietary NEAP. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ostrowska, J.; Janiszewska, J.; Szostak-Węgierek, D. Dietary Acid Load and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors—A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113419
Ostrowska J, Janiszewska J, Szostak-Węgierek D. Dietary Acid Load and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors—A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11):3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113419
Chicago/Turabian StyleOstrowska, Joanna, Justyna Janiszewska, and Dorota Szostak-Węgierek. 2020. "Dietary Acid Load and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors—A Narrative Review" Nutrients 12, no. 11: 3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113419
APA StyleOstrowska, J., Janiszewska, J., & Szostak-Węgierek, D. (2020). Dietary Acid Load and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors—A Narrative Review. Nutrients, 12(11), 3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113419