Use of Online Dietary Recalls among Older UK Adults: A Feasibility Study of an Online Dietary Assessment Tool
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participant Recruitment
2.2. Myfood24
2.3. Technology Readiness Index
2.4. Statistical Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization WHO. Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles 2018; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, F.E.; Subar, A.F. Dietary Assessment Methodology. In Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 5–48. [Google Scholar]
- Freedman, L.S.; Commins, J.M.; Moler, J.E.; Arab, L.; Baer, D.J.; Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Moshfegh, A.J.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Prentice, R.L.; et al. Pooled Results From 5 Validation Studies of Dietary Self-Report Instruments Using Recovery Biomarkers for Energy and Protein Intake. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 180, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Freedman, L.S.; Commins, J.M.; Moler, J.E.; Willett, W.; Tinker, L.F.; Subar, A.F.; Spiegelman, D.; Rhodes, D.; Potischman, N.; Neuhouser, M.L.; et al. Pooled Results From 5 Validation Studies of Dietary Self-Report Instruments Using Recovery Biomarkers for Potassium and Sodium Intake. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 181, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Subar, A.F.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Mittl, B.; Zimmerman, T.P.; Thompson, F.E.; Bingley, C.; Willis, G.; Islam, N.G.; Baranowski, T.; McNutt, S.; et al. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): A resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2012, 112, 1134–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, B.; Young, H.; Crowe, F.L.; Benson, V.S.; Spencer, E.A.; Key, T.J.; Appleby, P.N.; Beral, V. Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 1998–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Touvier, M.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Méjean, C.; Pollet, C.; Malon, A.; Castetbon, K.; Hercberg, S. Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 105, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, M.C.; Albar, S.A.; Morris, M.A.; Mulla, U.Z.; Hancock, N.; Evans, C.E.; Alwan, N.A.; Greenwood, D.C.; Hardie, L.J.; Frost, G.S.; et al. Development of a UK Online 24-h Dietary Assessment Tool: myfood24. Nutrients 2015, 7, 4016–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Thompson, F.E.; Dixit-Joshi, S.; Potischman, N.; Dodd, K.W.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Kushi, L.H.; Alexander, G.L.; Coleman, L.A.; Zimmerman, T.P.; Sundaram, M.E.; et al. Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 181, 970–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Subar, A.F.; Douglass, D.; Zimmerman, T.P.; Thompson, F.E.; Kahle, L.L.; George, S.M.; Dodd, K.W.; Potischtnan, N. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wark, P.A.; Hardie, L.J.; Frost, G.S.; Alwan, N.A.; Carter, M.; Elliott, P.; Ford, H.E.; Hancock, N.; Morris, M.A.; Mulla, U.Z.; et al. Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: Comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews. BMC Med. 2018, 16, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ettienne-Gittens, R.; Boushey, C.J.; Au, D.; Murphy, S.P.; Lim, U.; Wilkens, L. Evaluating the Feasibility of Utilizing the Automated Self-administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Recall in a Sample of Multiethnic Older Adults. Procedia Food Sci. 2013, 2, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gilsing, A.; Mayhew, A.; Payette, H.; Shatenstein, B.; Kirkpatrick, S.; Amog, K.; Wolfson, C.; Kirkland, S.; Griffith, L.; Raina, P.; et al. Validity and Reliability of a Short Diet Questionnaire to Estimate Dietary Intake in Older Adults in a Subsample of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frankenfeld, C.L.; Poudrier, J.K.; Waters, N.M.; Gillevet, P.M.; Xu, Y. Dietary Intake Measured from a Self-Administered, Online 24-Hour Recall System Compared with 4-Day Diet Records in an Adult US Population. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2012, 112, 1642–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Galante, J.; Adamska, L.; Young, A.; Young, H.; Littlejohns, T.J.; Gallacher, J.; Allen, N. The acceptability of repeat Internet-based hybrid diet assessment of previous 24-h dietary intake: Administration of the Oxford WebQ in UK Biobank. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arab, L.; Wesseling-Perry, K.; Jardack, P.; Henry, J.; Winter, A. Eight Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Using the Internet Are Feasible in African Americans and Whites: The Energetics Study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 110, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Boeckner, L.S.; Pullen, C.H.; Walker, S.N.; Abbott, G.W.; Block, T. Use and reliability of the World Wide Web version of the Block Health Habits and History Questionnaire with older rural women. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2002, 34 (Suppl. 1), S20–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gianfrancesco, C.; Darwin, Z.; McGowan, L.; Smith, D.; Haddrill, R.; Carter, M.; Scott, E.; Alwan, N.; Morris, M.; Albar, S.; et al. Exploring the Feasibility of Use of An Online Dietary Assessment Tool (myfood24) in Women with Gestational Diabetes. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, M.E.; Curry, L.; Mastellos, N.; Robb, C.; Car, J.; Middleton, L.T. Development of the CHARIOT Research Register for the Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia and Other Late Onset Neurodegenerative Diseases. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Randolph, C.; Tierney, M.C.; Mohr, E.; Chase, T.N. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary Clinical Validity. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1998, 20, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carter, M.C.; Hancock, N.; Albar, S.A.; Brown, H.; Greenwood, D.C.; Hardie, L.J.; Frost, G.S.; Wark, P.A.; Cade, J.E. Development of a New Branded UK Food Composition Database for an Online Dietary Assessment Tool. Nutrients 2016, 8, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rose, J.; Fogarty, G. Technology Readiness and Segmentation Profile of Mature Consumers. In Proceedings of the 4th Biennial Conference of the Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development, Oulu, Finland, 12–15 July 2010; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Parasuraman, A. Technology Readiness Index (Tri). J. Serv. Res. 2000, 2, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhee, J.J.; Sampson, L.; Cho, E.; Hughes, M.D.; Hu, F.B.; Willett, W.C. Comparison of methods to account for implausible reporting of energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 181, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carroll, R.J.; Midthune, D.; Subar, A.F.; Shumakovich, M.; Freedman, L.S.; Thompson, F.E.; Kipnis, V. Taking Advantage of the Strengths of 2 Different Dietary Assessment Instruments to Improve Intake Estimates for Nutritional Epidemiology 18. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 175, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cade, J.E. Measuring diet in the 21st century: Use of new technologies. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aigner, A.; Grittner, U.; Becher, H. Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Golomb, B.A.; Chan, V.T.; Evans, M.A.; Koperski, S.; White, H.L.; Criqui, M.H. The older the better: Are elderly study participants more non-representative? A cross-sectional analysis of clinical trial and observational study samples. BMJ Open 2012, 2, e000833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, S.-C.; Jong, D.; Lai, M.-T. Assessing the Relationship between Technology Readiness and Continuance Intention in an E-Appointment System: Relationship Quality as a Mediator. J. Med. Syst. 2014, 38, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atkinson, K.M.; Westeinde, J.; Ducharme, R.; Wilson, S.E.; Deeks, S.L.; Crowcroft, N.; Hawken, S.; Wilson, K. Can mobile technologies improve on-time vaccination? A study piloting maternal use of ImmunizeCA, a Pan-Canadian immunization app. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2016, 12, 2654–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Vries, J.H.M.; de Groot, L.C.P.G.M.; van Staveren, W.A. Dietary assessment in elderly people: Experiences gained from studies in the Netherlands. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, S69–S74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volkert, D.; Schrader, E. Dietary assessment methods for older persons. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2013, 16, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Guenther, P.M.; Douglass, D.; Zimmerman, T.; Kahle, L.L.; Atoloye, A.; Marcinow, M.; Savoie-Roskos, M.R.; Dodd, K.W.; Durward, C. The Provision of Assistance Does Not Substantially Impact the Accuracy of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-H Dietary Assessment Tool among Women with Low Incomes. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahar, D.R.; Yu, B.; Houston, D.K.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Newman, A.B.; Sellmeyer, D.E.; Tylavsky, F.A.; Lee, J.S.; Harris, T.B. Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Misreporting of energy intake in the elderly using doubly labeled water to measure total energy expenditure and weight change. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2010, 29, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Total | Women (n = 159) | Men (n = 160) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recruited (n = 319) | n (%) | n (%) | Age, years Median, (IQR) | n (%) | Age, years Median, (IQR) |
Consented | 299 (93.7) | 150 (94.3) | 71.3 (68.1–76.7) | 149 (93.1) | 72.5 (68.1–75.2) |
Refused | 20 (6.3) | 9 (5.7) | 80.2 (77.9–82.0) | 11 (6.9) | 75.3 (73.4–78.0) |
Recalls ompleted (n = 282) | n (%) | Age, years Median, (IQR) | n (%) | Age, years Median, (IQR) | |
0 | 94 (33.3) | 51(36.2) | 71.9 (68.7–76.7) | 43 (30.5) | 72.9 (68.3–75.4) |
1 | 54 (19.1) | 23 (16.3) | 71.3 (67.5–77.1) | 31 (22.0) | 70.7 (68.0–74.9) |
2 | 59 (20.9) | 21(14.9) | 74.1 (67.6–77.4) | 38 (27.0) | 71.4 (68.9–74.6) |
3 | 75 (26.6) | 46 (32.6) | 69.1 (67.3–74.2) | 29 (20.6) | 71.3 (66.9–74.3) |
Completed Zero Recalls (n = 94) | Completed One Recall (n = 54) | Completed Two or Three Recalls (n = 134) | |
---|---|---|---|
n (%) † | n (%) ‡ | n (%) § | |
Women | 51 (54.3) | 23 (42.6) | 67 (50.0) |
Education, years †† | 15.5 (13–18) | 16 (13–18) | 17 (15–18) |
Aged 70 years or older | 62 (65.9) | 31 (57.4) | 73 (54.8) |
Previously completed diet diary: no | 41 (56.9) | 14 (45.2) | 56 (51.9) |
Previously completed diet diary: yes | 31 (43.1) | 17 (54.8) | 52 (48.1) |
Previously completed online/smartphone diet record: no | 63 (87.5) | 25 (80.6) | 86 (79.6) |
Previously completed online/smartphone diet record: yes | 9 (12.5) | 6 (19.4) | 22 (20.4) |
Self-rated ability to use the Internet | |||
Poor | 6 (8.3) | 2 (6.5) | 1 (0.9) |
Fair | 17 (23.6) | 6 (19.4) | 11 (10.2) |
Good | 23 (31.9) | 9 (29.0) | 35 (32.4) |
Very good | 14 (19.4) | 8 (25.8) | 34 (31.5) |
Excellent | 12 (16.7) | 6 (19.4) | 27 (25.0) |
Frequency of using the Internet at home | |||
Less than once a week | 3 (4.2) | 2 (6.5) | 2 (1.9) |
1–6 times per week | 10 (13.9) | 1 (3.2) | 6 (5.6) |
Daily | 59 (81.9) | 28 (90.3) | 100 (92.6) |
Median, IQR | Median, IQR | Median, IQR | |
Self-rated confidence with technology (scale 1–10) | 7 (5–8) | 7 (5–9) | 8 (7–9) |
TR score | 3.2 (2.8–3.6) | 3.2 (2.8–3.5) | 3.5 (2.9–3.8) |
OR | (95% CI) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | |||
Technology readiness score *: | |||
One recall | 0.98 | (0.49–1.97) | 0.96 |
Two recalls | 1.40 | (0.75–2.63) | 0.29 |
Three recalls | 1.70 | (0.96–3.01) | 0.068 |
Model 2 | |||
Technology readiness score *: | |||
One recall | 1.10 | (0.44–2.75) | 0.85 |
Two recalls | 0.87 | (0.37–2.03) | 0.75 |
Three recalls | 1.35 | (0.63–2.8) | 0.44 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ward, H.A.; McLellan, H.; Udeh-Momoh, C.; Giannakopoulou, P.; Robb, C.; Wark, P.A.; Middleton, L. Use of Online Dietary Recalls among Older UK Adults: A Feasibility Study of an Online Dietary Assessment Tool. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071451
Ward HA, McLellan H, Udeh-Momoh C, Giannakopoulou P, Robb C, Wark PA, Middleton L. Use of Online Dietary Recalls among Older UK Adults: A Feasibility Study of an Online Dietary Assessment Tool. Nutrients. 2019; 11(7):1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071451
Chicago/Turabian StyleWard, Heather A., Heather McLellan, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Parthenia Giannakopoulou, Catherine Robb, Petra A. Wark, and Lefkos Middleton. 2019. "Use of Online Dietary Recalls among Older UK Adults: A Feasibility Study of an Online Dietary Assessment Tool" Nutrients 11, no. 7: 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071451