Next Article in Journal
Folic Acid and Vitamin B12 Administration in CKD, Why Not?
Previous Article in Journal
R. verniciflua and E. ulmoides Extract (ILF-RE) Protects against Chronic CCl4-Induced Liver Damage by Enhancing Antioxidation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Free Fatty Acids’ Level and Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients and Association with Outcomes: A Prospective Sub-Study of PermiT Trial

Nutrients 2019, 11(2), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020384
by Yaseen M. Arabi 1,2,*, Waleed Tamimi 1,3, Gwynne Jones 4, Dunia Jawdat 5, Hani Tamim 6,7, Hasan M. Al-Dorzi 1,2, Musharaf Sadat 1,2, Lara Afesh 7, Maram Sakhija 1,2 and Abdulaziz Al-Dawood 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2019, 11(2), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020384
Submission received: 27 January 2019 / Revised: 5 February 2019 / Accepted: 5 February 2019 / Published: 13 February 2019

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

this is a well written paper that is easy to understand. the findings relating FFA levels to glucose metabolism are not unexpected but are unique given the patient population studied.

The relation ship to propofol infusion (usually in 10% lipid) and the implications of this can be expanded upon.

Author Response

03.02.2019

Prof. Dr. Lluis Serra-Majem

Editor-in-Chief

Nutrients

 Dear Prof. Serra-Majem

 Thank you for considering " Free Fatty Acids and Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients and Association with Outcomes " for publication in Nutrients.

We also thank the reviewers for their additional valuable comments, which has further improved the manuscript. We have addressed all the comments and tried to provide line-by-line response to them. All the modifications in the manuscript were made in track changes. A clean copy is also attached.

Sincerely,

Yaseen Arabi, MD, FCCP, FCCM

Chairman, Intensive Care Department

Medical Director, Respiratory Services

Professor, College of Medicine

King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

King Abdulaziz Medical City

ICU 1425 PO Box 22490 Riyadh, 11426

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

+966(11)801-1111 Ext. 18855/18877

arabi@ngha.med.sa

 

Reviewer 1

This is a well written paper that is easy to understand. the findings relating FFA levels to glucose metabolism are not unexpected but are unique given the patient population studied.

Reply

Thank you for your acknowledgement

Comment

The relationship to propofol infusion (usually in 10% lipid) and the implications of this can be expanded upon.

Reply

The following statement was added to the discussion;

“The slightly lower dose of propofol given to patients with high-FFAs level was likely be related to being older and more susceptible to sedation, therefore, these patients would normally receive smaller doses of propofol”.

Reviewer 2 Report

Congratulations on this interesting substudy which adds to our understanding of free fatty acids in critical illness. I have only a few minor points to make:

1. need to include some interpretation of the difference in nitrogen balance and urinary N losses between groups. The anabolic effect of the extra insulin might be a potential factor?

2. discussion of propofol use should acknowledge that the high-FFA group were much older, therefore would normally receive much smaller doses of propofol, this is likely to be a major reason for the difference in the propofol doses given to the two groups. 

3. the whole article needs some minor language editing for clarity. eg line 184 and 244 use 'baseline glucose' or 'initial glucose' rather than 'inclusion glucose', if this is what you mean here.

Author Response

03.02.2019

Prof. Dr. Lluis Serra-Majem

Editor-in-Chief

Nutrients

Dear Prof. Serra-Majem

Thank you for considering " Free Fatty Acids and Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients and Association with Outcomes " for publication in Nutrients.

We also thank the reviewers for their additional valuable comments, which has further improved the manuscript. We have addressed all the comments and tried to provide line-by-line response to them. All the modifications in the manuscript were made in track changes. A clean copy is also attached.

Sincerely,

Yaseen Arabi, MD, FCCP, FCCM

Chairman, Intensive Care Department

Medical Director, Respiratory Services

Professor, College of Medicine

King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

King Abdulaziz Medical City

ICU 1425 PO Box 22490 Riyadh, 11426

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

+966(11)801-1111 Ext. 18855/18877

arabi@ngha.med.sa

Reviewer 2

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Congratulations on this interesting sub study which adds to our understanding of free fatty acids in critical illness. I have only a few minor points to make:

Comment 1

Need to include some interpretation of the difference in nitrogen balance and urinary N losses between groups. The anabolic effect of the extra insulin might be a potential factor?

Reply

We agree with your implication. As a result, the following sentence has been added to the discussion section;

“Interestingly, patients with high FFAs level had less 24-hour urinary nitrogen excretion and less negative nitrogen balance. This may be related to lower muscle mass in this older population and more frequent insulin therapy”.

Comment 2.

Discussion of propofol use should acknowledge that the high-FFA group were much older, therefore would normally receive much smaller doses of propofol, this is likely to be a major reason for the difference in the propofol doses given to the two groups. 

Reply

Thank you for the suggestion. We have added the following statement to the discussion;

“The slightly lower dose of propofol given to patients with high-FFAs level was likely be related to being older and more susceptible to sedation, therefore, these patients would normally receive smaller doses of propofol”.

 Comment 3

The whole article needs some minor language editing for clarity. eg line 184 and 244 use 'baseline glucose' or 'initial glucose' rather than 'inclusion glucose', if this is what you mean here.

Reply

Thank you for the suggestion. The article has been edited as suggested and the word “inclusion” has been replaced with “baseline” wherever application.

 

 

 

Back to TopTop