Next Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effect of Astaxanthin on Oxidative Stress-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction-A Mini-Review
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Melatonin Supplementation Could Be a Promising Preventing/Therapeutic Approach for a Variety of Liver Diseases
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Nutrients 2018, 10(9), 1136; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091136

The Role of Choice in Weight Loss Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 6, Ireland
2
Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 6, Ireland
3
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 July 2018 / Revised: 7 August 2018 / Accepted: 16 August 2018 / Published: 21 August 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [1162 KB, uploaded 26 August 2018]   |  

Abstract

Effective strategies to achieve weight loss and long-term weight loss maintenance have proved to be elusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore whether the choice of weight loss strategy is associated with greater weight loss. An electronic search was conducted using the MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, or MEDLARS Online), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and PsycINFO (Database of Abstracts of Literature in the Field of Psychology, produced by the American Psychological Association and distributed on the association’s APA PsycNET) databases for clinical trials and randomized controlled trials, investigating the role of choice in weight loss strategies. A total of nine studies were identified as meeting the pre-specified criteria. All of the studies included a ‘Choice’ or preference arm and a ‘No Choice’ arm or group who did not receive their preference as a control. A total of 1804 subjects were enrolled in these studies, with weight loss observed in both experimental and control groups of all studies, irrespective of dietary intervention, study duration, or follow-up length. Twelve interventions in nine trials were used for the meta-analysis, with results indicating a greater weight loss in the control groups, 1.09 ± 0.28 (overall mean difference in weight loss between groups ± standard error; p = 0). There was no significant effect of duration or attrition. In this meta-analysis, the choice of weight loss strategy did not confer a weight loss benefit. View Full-Text
Keywords: choice; weight loss; preference; diet; overweight; obesity; weight reduction choice; weight loss; preference; diet; overweight; obesity; weight reduction
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Leavy, J.M.; Clifton, P.M.; Keogh, J.B. The Role of Choice in Weight Loss Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1136.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top