Next Article in Journal
Effect of Mixed Meal and Leucine Intake on Plasma Amino Acid Concentrations in Young Men
Next Article in Special Issue
Low Diversity of Human Milk Oligosaccharides is Associated with Necrotising Enterocolitis in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Previous Article in Journal
Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels: An International Comparative Experimental Study across 12 Countries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbiota and Derived Parameters in Fecal Samples of Infants with Non-IgE Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy under a Restricted Diet
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Nutrients 2018, 10(10), 1541; doi:10.3390/nu10101541

Review
Microbial and Nutritional Programming—The Importance of the Microbiome and Early Exposure to Potential Food Allergens in the Development of Allergies
Immunology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, Aleja Dzieci Polskich 20, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland
Received: 30 September 2018 / Accepted: 16 October 2018 / Published: 18 October 2018

Abstract

:
The “microbiota hypothesis” ties the increase in allergy rates observed in highly developed countries over the last decades to disturbances in the gut microbiota. Gut microbiota formation depends on a number of factors and occurs over approximately 1000 days of life, including the prenatal period. During this period the microbiota helps establish the functional immune phenotype, including immune tolerance. The development of immune tolerance depends also on early exposure to potential food allergens, a process referred to as nutritional programming. This article elaborates on the concepts of microbial and nutritional programming and their role in the primary prevention of allergy.
Keywords:
microbiome; intestinal microbiota; microbial programming; nutritional programming; allergy; prevention

1. Introduction

Allergies are one of the key medical problems in highly developed countries, where the proportion of those affected exceeds 30% and continues to grow [1]. The observed increase in allergy rates is associated with the type of lifestyle and involves excessive cleanliness and antibiotic use, small families, increased Cesarean section (CS) rates, altered dietary habits (increased use of processed foods, ready meals), rapid urbanization, and increasingly limited contact with nature [2,3]. These factors immensely affect the composition of the gut microbiota, which is currently believed to be essential for immune system functioning and the development of immune tolerance. The gut microbiota establishes itself over approximately 1000 initial days of life. During this time, the microbiota programs the baby’s immature immune system [4]. Another key factor determining the composition of gut microbiota is nutrition. The baby’s diet affects the composition of microbiota (e.g., in the breastfed infants, predominantly bifidobacteria occur) and is a source of exposure to potential allergens. Studies show that the diet of both the mother (during pregnancy and lactation) and the baby influence the development of allergies later in life [5].
This article presents the role of the gut microbiota and controlled exposure to food allergens in allergy development as well as the possible preventive measures intended to stem the rise in allergy rates.

2. Gut Microbiota and Allergic Conditions

The gut microbiota is a complex of microorganisms colonizing the mucous membranes (mainly the intestinal mucosa) and constitutes an integral part of the human body. The number of bacteria colonizing the gastrointestinal tract (1014 cells) is comparable to that of all the cells in the body and, as demonstrated by recent calculations, exceeds the number of nucleated human cells 10-fold [6]. However, the microbiome (all the genetic material within the microbiota, i.e., the microbiota genome) is over a hundred-fold bigger than that of the human genome [7]. Modern molecular methods show the intestinal microbiome to be very diverse and individually specific [8,9]. In addition, the composition of the intestinal microbiome undergoes short- and long-term changes throughout life, which are induced by numerous factors such as diet, antibiotic therapy, stress, infections etc. However, the largest modifications of the microbiome, which seem to be permanent, occur during the period of intestinal biocenosis formation [9]. Studies by Lozupone et al. comparing the microbiomes of the citizens of the Republic of Malawi and the United States showed considerable differences in microbiota composition between developing and highly developed countries [10]. By comparing the microbiome of Malavians (Malawi-born individuals who emigrated to the US) and citizens of United States, the study demonstrated that the “Westernized” diet had limited effects on the microbiome established in early childhood. This confirms the theory that the window of opportunity for changing the intestinal microbiome extends over no more than the first two years of a child’s life and any microbiome disturbances (dysbiosis) occurring in this period may result in an abnormal immune system activation and development of pathological conditions such as allergy [3,4].
Studies show that the microbiota in children with allergies are less diversified, with the observed bacterial colonization (predominantly with Bacteoidetes, and Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species) reportedly delayed and less numerous in this age group [11,12]. One important fact in microbial programming is that the differences in microbiota composition between children with allergies and healthy children occur during early infancy, even before the first signs of allergy. Assessing 3-week-old neonates who developed allergic symptoms during their first year of life, Kalliomaki et al. demonstrated an increased number of Clostridium species, with a concurrent decrease in Bifidobacterium genera, compared with healthy children [13]. Moreover, a reduced biodiversity of gut-colonizing bacteria at the age of 1 year was associated with increased allergy rates at age 6 years and the development of asthma at age 7 years [14,15]. Furthermore, a reduced colonization with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species at the age of 1–2 months induced the development of allergy by the age of 5 years [16].

3. The Impact of Gut Microbiota on Immune System Development

Despite developed lymphatic organs, the immune system of neonates is immature. Neonatal lymphocytes are referred to as naïve, i.e., never before exposed to external antigens [17]. Gut-colonizing bacteria are among the first antigens to activate the body’s defense mechanisms, and help seal the intestinal barrier, establish immune tolerance, and modify the body’s response to potential allergens [18]. The gut microbiota forms the first line of defense against pathogens, activates the synthesis of secretory immunoglobulins A (IgA), and increases the expression of the proteins (e.g., zonulin, occludin) that form intraepithelial junctions.
Studies carried out on gnotobiotic experimental models demonstrated that in contrast to conventionally raised mice, germ-free (GF) mice have hypoplastic Peyer’s patches and decreased number of both IgA-secreting plasma cells and lymphocytes located in the lamina propria [19,20]. Colonization of GF animals with components of the gut microbiota induced production of secretory IgA, which are natural antibodies reacting with a wide spectrum of microorganisms and food molecules including allergens. Recently, using transmission electron microscopy we have presented that the gut microbiota improves the immature intestinal epithelium of GF mice [20]. Brush borders of GF-mouse enterocytes were irregularly arranged with decreased numbers of cytoskeletal microfilaments and a lack of elongation into the terminal web. Colonization of GF mice with Lactobacillus species obtained from the stool of healthy infants significantly improved this condition. In addition, the adherens junctions of Lactobacillus colonized mice were significantly elongated and narrow compared with those in the GF mice and resembled those found in mice colonized with physiological microbiota. This fortification of the intestinal barrier was further evident from the increased levels of the zonulin and occludin proteins in Lactobacillus-colonized animals [20].
Gut-colonizing bacteria, which react with Toll-like receptors located on the intestinal epithelium and dendritic cells, stimulate also signaling pathways that activate a number of immune effector cells, such as macrophages, B cells, NK cells, helper T cells (Th1 and Th2), cytotoxic T cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells [18]. Treg cells regulate the immune response and are characterized by a specific cytokine profile. They produce interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta 1. Treg cells are responsible for maintaining Th1/Th2 cytokine equilibrium and the development of immune tolerance [21]. Our results obtained in gnotobiotic animals showed that stimulation of the immune system by defined components of the intestinal microbiota in early ontogeny is followed by the induction of regulatory mechanisms that maintain the stability of both the local mucosal and systemic immunity [19,20]. This is especially important during the infancy period, as the T cell cytokine profile during early life is pro-allergenic (Th2-like), while Th1 capacity to produce cytokines (IL-12, IFN-gamma) is impaired during this period [17].

4. Factors Affecting Gut Microbiota Formation

Despite reports demonstrating the presence of bacteria in the amniotic fluid and placenta, which could indicate the formation of the gut microbiota already in the prenatal period [22,23], in 2017 a study contradicting this theory was published [24]. The assertion that the fetal gastrointestinal tract is sterile and the first gut-colonizing bacteria appear during delivery is believed to be true, and the delivery is the time when the newborn is in direct contact with the microorganisms of the mother or environment [24]. However, the child’s intestinal ecosystem may be affected by the mother’s microbiota as early as during the prenatal period, e.g., via low-molecular-weight metabolites, such as butyric acid. During the prenatal period, butyric acid can induce colonocyte proliferation and growth as well as activate adhesion receptors (on the intestinal epithelium) for the bacteria constituting the newborn’s microbiome [25].
In newborns 98% of intestinal bacteria belong to one of these four phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria [9]. From the second week of life, the gastrointestinal tracts of breastfed infants contain predominantly bifidobacteria. As the child develops and solids are introduced into its diet, the microbiota composition becomes more diversified [26]. At the age of approximately 2 years, the gut microbiota stabilizes and the proportion of individual types of bacteria is similar to that observed in adults (i.e., predominantly Bacteroidetes). There are a number of factors that shape the infant gut microbiota: the mother’s microbiome, gestational age, mode of delivery, hospital environment, diet (both of the mother and the child), hospitalization period, medication, e.g., antibiotics [26,27,28]. The optimal microbiota composition that may reduce the risk of developing an allergy is observed in infants whose mothers are healthy, did not take antibiotics during pregnancy or lactation, as well as infants who were delivered vaginally, breastfed, living in contact with nature, animals, peers, and siblings, with no antibiotics or excessively sanitized living conditions [27].
The 1000-day pre- and postnatal period of gut ecosystem formation marks the formation of the microbiome—a new organ, which programs mainly the function of the immature immune system but also metabolism and the gut–brain axis [29].

5. The Impact of the Mode of Delivery on the Gut Microbiome and Allergy Development

During vaginal delivery, the baby is in contact with the microbiota of the mother’s gastrointestinal tract and birth canal and this microbiota is the main source of microorganisms colonizing the newborn [9]. During the first day of life, neonatal intestines are colonized predominantly by facultative anaerobic bacteria (Escherichia coli and enterococci), which proliferate in an oxygen-rich infant gut and prepare the conditions for further colonization with bacteria of the genera: Bifidibacterium, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and Clostridium [26]. One beneficial effect observed in vaginally delivered newborns is a decrease in the number of Clostridium bacteria in favor of Bifidobacterium bacteria as early as on day 3 of life [30]. Newborns delivered via a CS are deprived of any contact with the mother’s intestinal microbiota, which results in dysbiosis (an imbalance in the composition of the gut microbiota) observed as early as in the first few hours after birth and over the next days. One-day-old CS-born neonates were shown to be colonized predominantly by the microorganisms colonizing the mother’s skin [31]. These 1-day-old neonates had also a smaller number of Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis, with higher rates of Clostridium difficile isolates and hospital-derived bacteria (including antibiotic-resistant strains) [30]. Despite being breastfed, 3-day-old CS-born neonates exhibited no bifidobacteria [31]. It seems that neonatal period dysbiosis observed after CS delivery may lead to disturbances in microbiotic homeostasis in the subsequent months and years of life. Children delivered via CS demonstrated microbiotic abnormalities such as reduced microbiotic biodiversity, delayed and reduced colonization with Bacteroidetes also at the age of 3, 6, 12, and even 24 months [32]. Our studies confirmed an absence of Bacteroidetes in the gut of preterm, CS-born neonates one week after birth, with this absence persisting for a period of at least 8 weeks independently on supplementation with Saccharomyces boulardii [33].
Disturbances of gut microbiota resulting from CS may affect the development of allergies in the future, which is suggested by epidemiological studies. These studies show that CS deliveries correlate with higher incidence of food allergy and asthma [34,35,36,37]. American cohort studies conducted in 136,098 children indicated that the risk of developing asthma by children aged 4.5–6 years was over seven-fold higher (odds ratio (OR) = 7.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.25–9.65) in the presence of additional factors (besides CS), which negatively affect the gut microbiome. These additional factors included antibiotic therapy during pregnancy and infancy as well as a lack of siblings [38].

6. The Effect of Gut Microbiome and Breastfeeding on Allergy Development

Breast milk is the best food for infants, providing the child with all essential nutrients (except vitamins D and K), supporting the function of immature gastrointestinal and immune systems and optimally shaping the development of the gut microbiota [39]. The gut of breastfed infants is colonized predominantly by bifidobacteria [26]. The microbiota of formula-fed children is more diversified and includes Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus species, and Bacteroides species [9,26].
The most important component of breast milk (absent from cow’s milk) responsible for the formation of the microbiome are human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) [40]. There are more than 200 currently known HMOs (resistant to digestive enzymes) which become a selective medium for Bifidobacteria, inducing their proliferation in the gut, increasing short-chain fatty acid (e.g., butyric acid) levels, and lowering stool pH. HMOs can also bind to specific intestinal epithelial receptors, which prevents the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria.
Recent studies demonstrated that apart from natural prebiotics (HMOs), breast milk also contains live probiotic bacteria from the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [41,42]. The most commonly isolated Bifidobacterium species found in breast milk was Bifidobacterium breve, and the most commonly isolated Lactobacilli were Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus fermentum. Therefore, breast milk is a natural synbiotic containing both probiotics and prebiotics. However, not all mothers’ breastmilk contains probiotic bacteria. The breastmilk of over 50% of women yields no bifidobacterial isolates; moreover, the breastmilk of approximately 30% of women contains no Lactobacillus species. The microbiotic profile of breastmilk depends on a number of factors, including the composition of the woman’s gut and skin microbiota, the woman’s health, medication (mainly antibiotics), and the type of delivery [43,44,45]. Antibiotic therapy during pregnancy and lactation dramatically lowers the number of Lactobacillum and Bifidobacterium genera in breastmilk [43]. The breastmilk of women who delivered via CS contains a lower number of bifidobacteria compared with that of women after a vaginal delivery [44]. The breastmilk of obese mothers was shown to contain a lower number of bifidobacteria and higher number of Staphylococcus species as well as to exhibit an altered immunomodulatory capacity, which was associated with lowered levels of such immunostimulating factors as TGF-beta2 and soluble CD14 [45].
Despite the observed differences in the composition of breast milk, studies demonstrate that breast-feeding has a beneficial effect on the occurrence of many diseases associated with the improper functioning of the immune system. Reduced immunity, immaturity of the intestinal barrier and intestinal dysbiosis is primarily associated with premature births. Thus, preterm infants are particularly vulnerable to severe infections such as necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis. It is now believed that mother’s milk is the optimal diet for such newborns. Human milk has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in preterm newborns [46] and protects against necrotizing enterocolitis in early life [47].
In studies on the impact of breast feeding on occurrence of allergies exclusive breastfeeding for 3 months was proven to reduce the risk of atopic dermatitis in genetically predisposed children as well as in those without genetic predisposition [48]. The CHILD (Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development Birth Cohort) study involving 3296 children showed that, compared with exclusive breastfeeding for the first three months, other diets (such as formula feeding (OR = 2.14; 95% CI 1.37–3.35) or mixed feeding (OR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.17–2.57)) increase the risk of developing asthma at the age of 3 years [49]. Moreover, studies by Chu et al. indicated that breastfeeding for the first 6 months may lower the elevated risk of asthma in children born via CS [50].

7. Infant Formulas Supplemented with Prebiotics and Probiotics in Allergy Prevention

Formula-fed or mixed-fed children are more prone to developing allergy. Infant formulas are based on cow’s milk, whose composition is fundamentally different from that of human breast milk. This is why, manufacturers supplement infant formulas with bioactive ingredients present in human breast milk, including substances directly affecting the baby’s microbiome, such as oligosaccharides with prebiotic properties or probiotic bacteria derived from human breast milk (e.g., Bifidobacterium breve). There are also synbiotic formulas containing both oligosaccharides and probiotic bacteria.
The most thoroughly studied oligosaccharides are a mixture of short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides (scGOS) and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (lcFOS) in a 9:1 ratio, at a dose of 8 g per liter. It was demonstrated that supplementation of infant formulas with a scGOS/lcFOS mixture shifts the microbiotic profile in formula-fed infants towards the profile observed in breastfed infants [51,52]. Consequently, these infants were shown to bear an increased number of bacteria from the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. In addition, formula supplementation with scGOS/lcFOS helped resolve post-antibiotic-therapy dysbiosis, lowered stool pH (the pH reached the values similar to those observed in breastfed infants), and made the short-chain fatty acid profile similar to that present in breastfed infants. The use of a synbiotic formula supplemented with scGOS/lcFOS and the probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium breve M-16V in infants born via CS induced elimination of dysbiosis by increasing the number of bifidobacteria [53]. In older, healthy children aged 1–3 years, a 3-month-long diet of synbiotic formula also resulted in an increase in bacteria of the genus Bifidobacterium [54].
Moro et al. are the authors of the first randomized placebo-controlled clinical study on the use of scGOS/lcFOS-supplemented infant formulas conducted in infants at risk of developing allergy [55]. The study group was fed with a partially hydrolyzed whey formula supplemented with scGOS/lcFOS at 8 g/L for 6 months. After this period, the risk of developing atopic dermatitis was halved in the group fed a scGOS/lcFOS-supplemented formula. This beneficial effect persisted for at least 2 years. A 2-year-long prospective study by Arslanoglu et al. demonstrated that feeding infants formulas containing extensively hydrolyzed whey and supplemented with scGOS/lcFOS for 6 months not only lowers the rates of atopic dermatitis, but also significantly reduces the number of children with wheezing and urticaria in comparison with those rates in the group receiving formula without prebiotic supplementation [56]. A 5-year follow-up confirmed persistent, long-term benefits of the evaluated dietary intervention [57].
In 2016, World Allergy Organization (WAO) experts issued their guidelines on the use of prebiotics in allergy prevention [58]. These guidelines suggest that all formula-fed infants should receive formulas supplemented with prebiotics. This WAO guideline was based on an analysis of 18 randomized placebo-controlled trials, which demonstrated that supplementing the diet of healthy formula-fed infants with prebiotics during the first year of life lowers the risk of asthma and recurrent wheezing (relative risk (RR): 0.37; 95% CI 0.17–0.80) as well as the risk of food allergy (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08–1.00). The published guidelines emphasized that there is no need to provide prebiotic supplementation either to breastfed infants or to lactating mothers.
One year earlier, by analyzing randomized placebo-controlled studies, WAO experts issued a statement suggesting the potential use of probiotics in primary prevention of allergy in high-risk families (in pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants) [59]. A 2013 meta-analysis of 25 randomized placebo-controlled clinical studies involving 4031 children showed probiotics administered both pre- and postnatally to be the most effective [60]. Probiotic supplementation was demonstrated to reduce total IgE levels over a long-term (at least 2-year) follow-up and to lower the risk of allergy, but they had no effect on reducing the incidence of asthma. The WAO guideline does not recommend specific strains for primary prevention of allergy. The authors emphasize that the recommendations are conditional and depend on the results of the further research. Recently, Szajewska and Horvath published a meta-analysis of randomized double blind placebo controlled studies, which presented that pre- and/or postnatal supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG strain does not affect the occurrence of atopic dermatitis, and this strain should not be recommended in allergy prevention [61]. However, it is necessary to remember that probiotic effects are both strain- and population-specific. Thus, the clinical efficacy may be dependent on the strain, but also on a mode of birth (CS or vaginal delivery) or geographical place of birth (northern or southern countries), and these determinants were not taken into account in the meta-analysis. On the other hand, it should be emphasized that the Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG strain does not originate from breast milk, only from the intestine. How much it can affect the specific action of probiotics we do not know, and further research is necessary.

8. The Effect of Nutritional Programming on Allergy Development

A baby’s diet affects the development of allergies by acting at least bi-directionally (Figure 1). On the one hand food influences the composition of the gut microbiota influencing the development and functioning of the immune system. On the other hand an induction of immune tolerance can be achieved by direct exposure to potential allergens during pregnancy, lactation, and weaning. The contact of the immune system with small doses of allergens activates the formation of Treg lymphocytes [21]. The 20th century was an era of eliminating potential allergens from the diet of both the mother (during pregnancy and lactation) and child (late—often over the age of 1 year—introduction of allergenic foods). The advent of the 21st century completely altered our attitudes toward exposure to potential allergens. The PASTURE study (Protection against Allergy: Study in Rural Environments) of 2014 demonstrated that the less varied the diet during the first year, the higher the risk of developing food allergy at the age of 4, 5, and 6 years [62]. This study also showed a significant reduction of 26% for the development of asthma, with each additional food item introduced in the first year of life. Likewise, a study called LEAP (Learning Early about Peanut Allergy) demonstrated that introducing a potential allergen (in this case: peanuts) at small doses into the diet early (at the age of 4–6 months) reduced the incidence of allergy to this allergen by 80% [63]. Recent studies confirmed that allergen introduction reduced peanut allergy incidence most effectively when peanuts were introduced into the mother’s diet during pregnancy and lactation and then into the infant’s diet [64]. Thus, dietary interventions during gestation and lactation period include a balanced diet without elimination of potential allergens (Table 1). In the postnatal period breastfeeding for a minimum of 4–6 months, the introduction of solid foods according to the recent recommendation of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition from week 17 and no later than at week 26 including potential allergens may also have a positive impact on allergy development [65].
The development of cow’s milk (CM) allergy in formula-fed infants may depend on the degree of CM protein hydrolysis [66,67]. Formulas with extensively hydrolyzed proteins and amino acid-based elemental formulas are not intended for healthy infants. Instead, they are for infants with symptomatic allergy to CM proteins. In contrast, partially hydrolyzed formulas (pHF), also called hypoallergenic formulas, which contain partially broken down proteins are especially recommended for children from families at risk of allergy (i.e., when the parents and/or siblings have allergies). It seems that partially hydrolyzed CM proteins can be more effective in induction of specific Treg cells. Gouw et al. identified specific peptides with tolerogenic potential in a whey-based pHF [68]. They presented that partial hydrolysis induced the occurrence of peptides overlapping the specific regions of beta-lactoglobulin, which were found to contain T-cell epitopes with tolerogenic potential. In experimental mice studies partially hydrolyzed whey proteins increased the percentage of Treg cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes leading to a significantly reduced acute allergic skin response to whey [69]. Also, in a clinical trial performed by Boyle et al. the effect of whey-based pHF on Treg cells was investigated. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study after 6 months of intervention, increased percentages of CD4+CD25highFoxp3high Treg lymphocytes were detected in infants who received pHF compared to the ones who received a standard infant formula. In spite of positive effects on T reg cells, pHF did not prevent eczema in the first year in high-risk infants [70]. In contrast, an update meta-analysis performed by Szajewska and Horvath in 2017 showed that 100% whey-based pHF (manufactured by a single manufacturer), given to infants at risk of allergy development decreased the occurrence of eczema, and reduced the risk of eczema and all allergic diseases among children at high risk of allergy at different time points [66]. Although the certainty of the evidence is low, as the authors underline, such intervention could have beneficial effects in primary prevention of allergies. In a review article by Vandeplas, it is suggested that pHF may be used for all infants, irrespective of family history of allergy [67]; however, at this time, there are no studies confirming the effectiveness of such action.

9. Conclusions and Recommendations

Current preventive measures intended to stem the development of allergies focus on inducing immune tolerance via microbial and nutritional programing. Primary prevention of allergies is focused on dietary intervention during both pre- and postnatal periods, and includes a balanced diet without elimination of potential allergens in pregnant and lactating mothers as well as promoting breast feeding for a minimum of 4–6 months, with early introduction of solid foods in the infant diet. To prevent dysbiosis in infants, CS should be only performed when medically indicated, and antibiotic therapy should be limited in both pregnant/lactating women and in infants. In formula- or non-exclusively fed infants, the introduction of synbiotic formulas or those supplemented with prebiotic oligosaccharides can have positive effects on allergy development; however, additional research in this field would be still needed.

Funding

The study was support by the grant of the Children’s Memorial Health Institute S156/2017 and S163/2018.

Conflicts of Interest

B.C. has served as a speaker for Nutritia, Mead Johnson, Bayer, Apotex, and Polpharma.

Abbreviations

CIConfidence interval
CMCow milk
CSCesarean section
GFGerm-free
HMOsHuman milk oligosaccharides
IgA (E)immunoglobulins A (E)
ILinterleukin
lcFOSlong chain fructo-oligosaccharides
OROdds ratio
pHFpartially hydrolyzed formula
RRRelative risk
scGOSshort chain galacto-oligosaccharides
TGFtransforming growth factor
ThT helper
Tregregulatory T cells
WAOWorld Allergy Organization

References

  1. Von Mutius, E. The Rising Trends in Asthma and Allergic Diseases. Clin. Exp. Allergy 1998, 28 (Suppl. 5), 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Holt, P.G.; Inouye, M.; Logan, A.C.; Prescott, S.L.; Sly, P.D. An Exposome Perspective: Early-Life Events and Immune Development in a Changing World. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 140, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shreiner, A.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Noverr, M.C. The “Microflora Hypothesis” of Allergic Diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 635, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wopereis, H.; Oozeer, R.; Knipping, K.; Belzer, C.; Knol, J. The First Thousand Days—Intestinal Microbiology of Early Life: Establishing a Symbiosis. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2014, 25, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Greer, F.R.; Sicherer, S.H.; Burks, A.W. Effects of Early Nutrition Interventions on the Development of Atopic Disease in Infants and Children: The Role of Maternal Dietary Restriction, Breastfeeding, Timing of Introduction of Complementary Foods, and Hydrolyzed Formulas. Pediatrics 2008, 121, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sender, R.; Fuchs, S.; Milo, R. Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e1002533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Human Microbiome Project Consortium, Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome. Nature 2012, 486, 207–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Eckburg, P.B.; Bik, E.M.; Bernstein, C.N.; Purdom, E.; Dethlefsen, L.; Sargent, M.; Gill, S.R.; Relman, D.A. Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora. Science 2005, 308, 11635–11638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Collado, M.C.; Cernada, M.; Baüerl, C.; Vento, M.; Pérez-Martínez, G. Microbial Ecology and Host-Microbiota Interactions During Early Life Stages. Gut Microbes 2012, 3, 352–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lozupone, C.A.; Stombaugh, J.I.; Gordon, J.I.; Jansson, J.K.; Knight, R. Diversity, Stability and Resilience of the Human Gut Microbiota. Nature 2012, 489, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Björksten, B.; Naaber, P.; Sepp, E.; Mikelsaar, M. The Intestinal Microflora in Allergic Estonian and Swedish 2-year-old Children. Clin. Exp. Allergy 1999, 29, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Abrahamsson, T.R.; Jakobsson, H.E.; Andersson, A.F.; Björkstén, B.; Engstrand, L.; Jenmalm, M.C. Low Diversity of the Gut Microbiota in Infants with Atopic Eczema. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 129, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kalliomäki, M.; Kirjavainen, P.; Kero, P.; Salminen, S.; Isolauri, E. Distinct Patterns of Neonatal Gut Microflora in Infants in Whom Atopy Was Not Developing. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001, 107, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bisgaard, H.; Li, N.; Bonnelykke, K.; Chawes, B.L.; Skov, T.; Paudan-Müller, G.; Stokholm, J.; Smith, B.; Krogfelt, K.A. Reduced Diversity of the Intestinal Microbiota During Infancy Is Associated With Increased Risk of Allergic Disease at School Age. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Abrahamsson, T.R.; Jakobsson, H.E.; Andersson, A.F.; Björkstén, B.; Engstrand, L.; Jenmalm, M.C. Low Gut Microbiota Diversity in Early Infancy Precedes Asthma at School Age. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2014, 44, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sjögren, Y.M.; Jenmalm, M.C.; Böttcher, M.F.; Björkstén, B.; Sverremark-Ekström, E. Altered Early Infant Gut Microbiota in Children Developing Allergy up to 5 Years of Age. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brugman, S.; Perdijk, O.; van Neerven, R.J.; Savelkoul, H.F. Mucosal Immune Development in Early Life: Setting the Stage. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2015, 63, 251–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tlaskalová-Hogenová, H.; Stepánková, R.; Hudcovic, T.; Tucková, L.; Cukrowska, B.; Lodinová-Zádníková, R.; Kozáková, H.; Rossmann, P.; Bártová, J.; Sokol, D.; et al. Commensal Bacteria (Normal Microflora), Mucosal Immunity and Chronic Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases. Immunol. Lett. 2004, 93, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cukrowska, B.; Kozakova, H.; Rehakova, Z.; Sinkora, J.; Tlaskalova-Hogenova, H. Specific Antibody and Immunoglobulin Responses after Intestinal Colonization of Germ-Free Piglets with Non-Pathogenic Escherichia coli O86. Immunobiology 2001, 204, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kozakova, H.; Schwarzer, M.; Tuckova, L.; Srutkova, D.; Czarnowska, E.; Rosiak, I.; Hudcovic, T.; Schabussova, I.; Hermanova, P.; Zakostelska, Z.; et al. Colonization of Germ-Free Mice with a Mixture of Three Lactobacillus Strains Enhances the Integrity of Gut Mucosa and Ameliorates Allergic Sensitization. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2016, 13, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Akdis, C.A.; Akdis, M. Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance to Allergens: Role of IL-10 and Tregs. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 4678–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Aagaard, K.; Ma, J.; Antony, K.M.; Ganu, R.; Petrosino, J.; Versalovic, J. The Placenta Harbors a Unique Microbiome. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 237ra65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Collado, M.C.; Rautava, S.; Aakko, J.; Isolauri, E.; Salminen, S. Human Gut Colonisation May be Initiated in Utero by Distinct Microbial Communities in the Placenta and Amniotic Fluid. Sci. Rep. 2016, 22, 23129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Perez-Muñoz, M.E.; Arrieta, M.C.; Ramer-Tait, A.E.; Walter, J. A Critical Assessment of the “Sterile Womb” and “in Utero Colonization” Hypotheses: Implications for Research on the Pioneer Infant Microbiome. Microbiome 2017, 28, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tan, J.; McKenzie, C.; Potamitis, M.; Thorburn, A.N.; Mackay, C.R.; Macia, L. The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Health and Disease. Adv. Immunol. 2014, 121, 91–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Penders, J.; Thijs, C.; Vink, C.; Stelma, F.F.; Snijders, B.; Kummeling, I.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Stobberingh, E.E. Factors Influencing the Composition of the Intestinal Microbiota in Early Infancy. Pediatrics 2006, 118, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Prescott, S.L.; Larcombe, D.L.; Logan, A.C.; West, C.; Burks, W.; Caraballo, L.; Levin, M.; Etten, E.V.; Horwitz, P.; Kozyrskyj, A.; et al. The Skin Microbiome: Impact of Modern Environments on Skin Ecology, barrier Integrity, and Systemic Immune Programming. World Allergy Organ. J. 2017, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Martin, R.; Makino, H.; Cetinyurek Yavuz, A.; Ben-Amor, K.; Roelofs, M.; Ishikawa, E.; Kubota, H.; Swinkels, S.; Sakai, T.; Oishi, K.; et al. Early-Life Events, Including Mode of Delivery and Type of feeding, Siblings and Gender, Shape the Developing Gut Microbiota. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Holzer, P.; Farzi, A. Neuropeptides and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 817, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Costello, E.K.; Contreras, M.; Magris, M.; Hidalgo, G.; Fierer, N.; Knight, R. Delivery Mode Shapes the Acquisition and Structure of the Initial Microbiota Across Multiple Body Habitats in Newborns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11971–11975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Biasucci, G.; Benenati, B.; Morelli, L.; Bessi, E.; Boehm, G. Cesarean Delivery May Affect the Early Biodiversity of Intestinal Bacteria. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 1796S–1800S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jakobsson, H.E.; Abrahamsson, T.R.; Jenmalm, M.C.; Harris, K.; Quince, C.; Jernberg, C.; Björkstén, B.; Engstrand, L.; Andersson, A.F. Decreased Gut Microbiota Diversity, Delayed Bacteroidetes Colonisation and Reduced Th1 Responses in Infants Delivered by Caesarean Section. Gut 2014, 63, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zeber-Lubecka, N.; Kulecka, M.; Ambrozkiewicz, F.; Paziewska, A.; Lechowicz, M.; Konopka, E.; Majewska, U.; Borszewska-Kornacka, M.; Mikula, M.; Cukrowska, B.; et al. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and Mode of Delivery on the Early Development of the Gut Microbial Community in Preterm Infants. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Papathoma, E.; Triga, M.; Fouzas, S.; Dimitriou, G. Cesarean Section Delivery and Development of Food Allergy and Atopic Dermatitis in Early Childhood. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 27, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Magnus, M.C.; Håberg, S.E.; Stigum, H.; Nafstad, P.; London, S.J.; Vangen, S.; Nystad, W. Delivery by Cesarean Section and Early Childhood Respiratory Symptoms and Disorders the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 174, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guibas, G.V.; Moschonis, G.; Xepapadaki, P.; Roumpedaki, E.; Androutsos, O.; Manios, Y.; Papadopoulos, N.G. Conception via in vitro Fertilization and Delivery by Caesarean Section Are Associated with Paediatric Asthma Incidence. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2013, 43, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tollånes, M.C.; Moster, D.; Daltveit, A.K.; Irgens, L.M. Cesarean Section and Risk of Severe Childhood Asthma: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J. Pediatrics 2008, 153, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wu, P.; Feldman, A.S.; Rosas-Salazar, C.; James, K.; Escobar, G.; Gebretsadik, T.; Li, S.X.; Carroll, K.N.; Walsh, E.; Mitchel, E.; et al. Relative Importance and Additive Effects of Maternal and Infant Risk Factors on Childhood Asthma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Musilova, S.; Rada, V.; Vlkova, E.; Bunesova, V. Beneficial Effects of Human Milk Oligosaccharides on Gut Microbiota. Benef. Microbes 2014, 5, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chen, X. Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOS): Structure, Function, and Enzyme-Catalyzed Synthesis. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 2015, 72, 113–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fernández, L.; Langa, S.; Martín, V.; Jiménez, E.; Martín, R.; Rodríguez, J.M. The Microbiota of Human Milk in Healthy Women. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2013, 59, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Martín, R.; Jiménez, E.; Heilig, H.; Fernández, L.; Marín, M.L.; Zoetendal, E.G.; Rodríguez, J.M. Isolation of Bifidobacteria from Breast Milk and Assessment of the Bifidobacterial Population by PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis and Quantitative Real-Time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 965–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Soto, A.; Martín, V.; Jiménez, E.; Mader, I.; Rodríguez, J.M.; Fernández, L. Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria in Human Breast Milk: Influence of Antibiotherapy and Other Host and Clinical factors. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2014, 59, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Khodayar-Pardo, P.; Mira-Pascual, L.; Collado, M.C.; Martínez-Costa, C. Impact of Lactation Stage, Gestational age and Mode of Delivery on Breast Milk Microbiota. J. Perinatol. 2014, 34, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Collado, M.C.; Laitinen, K.; Salminen, S.; Isolauri, E. Maternal Weight and Excessive Weight Gain During Pregnancy Modify the Immunomodulatory Potential of Breast Milk. Pediatr. Res. 2012, 72, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abrams, S.A.; Schanler, R.J.; Lee, M.L.; Rechtman, D.J. Greater Mortality and Morbidity in Extremely Preterm Infants Fed a Diet Containing Cow Milk Protein Products. Breastfeed. Med. 2014, 9, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Quigley, M.; McGuire, W. Formula versus Donor Breast Milk for Feeding Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 20, CD002971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kramer, M.S. Breastfeeding and Allergy: The Evidence. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 59 (Suppl. 1), 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Klopp, A.; Vehling, L.; Becker, A.B.; Subbarao, P.; Mandhane, P.J.; Turvey, S.E.; Lefebvre, D.L.; Sears, M.R.; CHILD Study Investigators; Azad, M.B. Modes of Infant Feeding and the Risk of Childhood Asthma: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study. J. Pediatr. 2017, 190, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chu, S.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Y.; Bao, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, J. Cesarean Section Without Medical Indication and Risk of Childhood Asthma, and Attenuation by Breastfeeding. PLoS ONE 2017, 18, e0184920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Moro, G.E.; Mosca, F.; Miniello, V.; Fanaro, S.; Jelinek, J.; Stahl, B.; Boehm, G. Effects of a New Mixture of Prebiotics on Faecal Flora and Stools in Term Infants. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 91, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Knol, J.; Scholtens, P.; Kafka, C.; Steenbakkers, J.; Gro, S.; Helm, K.; Klarczyk, M.; Schöpfer, H.; Böckler, H.M.; Wells, J. Colon Microflora in Infants Fed Formula with Galacto- and Fructo-Oligosaccharides: More Like Breast-Fed Infants. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2005, 40, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chua, M.C.; Ben-Amor, K.; Lay, C.; Neo, A.G.E.; Chiang, W.C.; Rao, R.; Chew, C.; Chaithongwongwatthana, S.; Khemapech, N.; Knol, J.; et al. Effect of Synbiotic on the Gut Microbiota of Cesarean Delivered Infants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 65, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kosuwon, P.; Lao-Araya, M.; Uthaisangsook, S.; Lay, C.; Bindels, J.; Knol, J.; Chatchatee, P. A Synbiotic Mixture of scGOS/lcFOS and Bifidobacterium breve M-16V Increases Faecal Bifidobacterium in Healthy Young Children. Benef. Microbes 2018, 9, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Moro, G.; Arslanoglu, S.; Stahl, B.; Jelinek, J.; Wahn, U.; Boehm, G. A Mixture of Prebiotic Oligosaccharides Reduces the Incidence of Atopic Dermatitis During the First Six Months of Age. Arch. Dis. Child. 2006, 91, 814–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Arslanoglu, S.; Moro, G.E.; Schmitt, J.; Tandoi, L.; Rizzardi, S.; Boehm, G. Early Dietary Intervention with a Mixture of Prebiotic Oligosaccharides Reduces the Incidence of Allergic Manifestations and Infections During the First Two Years of Life. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 1091–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Arslanoglu, S.; Moro, G.E.; Boehm, G.; Wienz, F.; Stahl, B.; Bertino, E. Early Neutral Prebiotic Oligosaccharide Supplementation Reduces the Incidence of Some Allergic Manifestations in the First 5 Years of Life. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2012, 26 (Suppl. 3), 49–59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Cuello-Garcia, C.A.; Fiocchi, A.; Pawankar, R.; Yepes-Nuñez, J.J.; Morgano, G.P.; Zhang, Y.; Ahn, K.; Al-Hammadi, S.; Agarwal, A.; Gandhi, S.; et al. World Allergy Organization-McMaster University Guidelines for Allergic Disease Prevention (GLAD-P.): Prebiotics. World Allergy Organ J. 2016, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fiocchi, A.; Pawankar, R.; Cuello-Garcia, C.; Ahn, K.; Al-Hammadi, S.; Agarwal, A.; Beyer, K.; Burks, W.; Canonica, G.W.; Ebisawa, M.; et al. World Allergy Organization-McMaster University Guidelines for Allergic Disease Prevention (GLAD-P.): Probiotics. World Allergy Organ J. 2015, 27, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Elazab, N.; Mendy, A.; Gasana, J.; Vieira, E.R.; Quizon, A.; Forno, E. Probiotic Administration in Early Life, Atopy, and Asthma: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials. Pediatrics 2013, 132, e666–e676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Szajewska, H.; Horvath, A. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the Primary Prevention of Eczema in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roduit, C.; Frei, R.; Depner, M.; Schaub, B.; Loss, G.; Genuneit, J.; Pfefferle, P.; Hyvärinen, A.; Karvonen, A.M.; Riedler, J.; et al. Increased Food Diversity in the First Year of Life is Inversely Associated with Allergic Diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 1056–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Du Toit, G.; Roberts, G.; Sayre, P.H.; Bahnson, H.T.; Radulovic, S.; Santos, A.F.; Brough, H.A.; Phippard, D.; Basting, M.; Feeney, M.; et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pitt, T.J.; Becker, A.B.; Chan-Yeung, M.; Chan, E.S.; Watson, W.T.A.; Chooniedass, R.; Azad, M.B. Reduced Risk of Peanut Sensitization Following Exposure through Breast-Feeding and Early Peanut Introduction. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 620–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fewtrell, M.; Bronsky, J.; Campoy, C.; Domellöf, M.; Embleton, N.; Fidler Mis, N.; Hojsak, I.; Hulst, J.M.; Indrio, F.; Lapillonne, A.; Molgaard, C. Complementary Feeding: A Position Paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Szajewska, H.; Horvath, A. A Partially Hydrolyzed 100% Whey Formula and the Risk of Eczema and Any Allergy: An Updated Meta-analysis. World Allergy Organ J. 2017, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Vandenplas, Y. Prevention and Management of Cow’s Milk Allergy in Non-Exclusively Breastfed Infants. Nutrients 2017, 9, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gouw, J.W.; Jo, J.; Meulenbroek, L.A.P.M.; Heijjer, S.; Kremer, E.; Sandalova, E.; Knulst, A.C.; Jeurink, P.; Garssen, J.; Rijnierse, A.; Knippels, L.M.J. Identification of Peptides with Tolerogenic Potential in a Hydrolyzed Whey-Based Infant Formula. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Van Esch, B.C.; Schouten, B.; de Kivit, S.; Hofman, G.A.; Knippels, L.M.; Willemsen, L.E.; Garssen, J. Oral Tolerance Induction by Partially Hydrolyzed Whey Protein in Mice is Associated with Enhanced Numbers of Foxp3+ Regulatory T-Cells in the Mesenteric Lymph Nodes. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2011, 22, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Boyle, R.J.; Tang, M.L.; Chiang, W.C.; Chua, M.C.; Ismail, I.; Nauta, A.; Hourihane, J.O.B.; Smith, P.; Gold, M.; Ziegler, J.; et al. Prebiotic-Supplemented Partially Hydrolysed Cow’s Milk Formula for the Prevention of Eczema in High-Risk Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Allergy 2016, 71, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Immune tolerance development in children. Regulatory (Treg) T lymphocytes are activated by the gut microbiota and contact with potential food allergens.
Figure 1. Immune tolerance development in children. Regulatory (Treg) T lymphocytes are activated by the gut microbiota and contact with potential food allergens.
Nutrients 10 01541 g001
Table 1. Dietary intervention in pre- and postnatal period which could play role in induction of immune tolerance.
Table 1. Dietary intervention in pre- and postnatal period which could play role in induction of immune tolerance.
Prenatal PeriodPostnatal Period
  • Balanced and varied diet
  • No elimination of potential allergens
  • The use of probiotics may be considered in families at risk of allergy
  • Breastfeeding for a minimum 4–6 months
  • Introduction of solid foods starting from week 17; no later than at week 26
  • No elimination of potential allergens
  • Formulas supplemented with prebiotic oligosaccharides may be considered in formula-fed and non-exclusively fed infants
  • Partially hydrolyzed formulas, optionally supplemented with prebiotics and/or probiotics may be considered in formula-fed and non-exclusively fed infants in families at risk of allergy

© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top