Next Article in Journal
Micronutrient Deficiencies, Over- and Undernutrition, and Their Contribution to Anemia in Azerbaijani Preschool Children and Non-Pregnant Women of Reproductive Age
Next Article in Special Issue
Active Image-Assisted Food Records in Comparison to Regular Food Records: A Validation Study against Doubly Labeled Water in 12-Month-Old Infants
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiota and Derived Parameters in Fecal Samples of Infants with Non-IgE Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy under a Restricted Diet
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Qualitative Evaluation of the eaTracker® Mobile App
Open AccessArticle

Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities

1
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, College of Nursing, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
2
Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Department of Nursing Research, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
3
Medical College of Wisconsin-Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
4
Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96789, USA
5
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2018, 10(10), 1482; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482
Received: 12 September 2018 / Revised: 3 October 2018 / Accepted: 8 October 2018 / Published: 11 October 2018
Obesity prevalence is higher in children with developmental disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. Research on dietary intake assessment methods in this vulnerable population is lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and compare the nutrient intakes of two technology-based dietary assessment methods in children with-and-without developmental disabilities. This cross-sectional feasibility study was an added aim to a larger pilot study. Children (n = 12; 8–18 years) diagnosed with spina bifida, Down syndrome, or without disability were recruited from the larger study sample, stratified by diagnosis. Participants were asked to complete six days of a mobile food record (mFR™), a 24-h dietary recall via FaceTime® (24 HR-FT), and a post-study survey. Analysis included descriptive statistics for survey results and a paired samples t-test for nutrient intakes. All participants successfully completed six days of dietary assessment using both methods and acceptability was high. Energy (kcal) and protein (g) intake was significantly higher for the mFR™ as compared to the 24 HR-FT (p = 0.041; p = 0.014, respectively). Each method had strengths and weaknesses. The two technology-based dietary assessment tools were well accepted and when combined could increase accuracy of self-reported dietary assessment in children with-and-without disability. View Full-Text
Keywords: dietary assessment; mobile food record; 24-h recall; developmental disabilities; children; spina bifida; down syndrome; technology; pediatrics dietary assessment; mobile food record; 24-h recall; developmental disabilities; children; spina bifida; down syndrome; technology; pediatrics
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Polfuss, M.; Moosreiner, A.; Boushey, C.J.; Delp, E.J.; Zhu, F. Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482

AMA Style

Polfuss M, Moosreiner A, Boushey CJ, Delp EJ, Zhu F. Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities. Nutrients. 2018; 10(10):1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Polfuss, Michele; Moosreiner, Andrea; Boushey, Carol J.; Delp, Edward J.; Zhu, Fengqing. 2018. "Technology-Based Dietary Assessment in Youth with and Without Developmental Disabilities" Nutrients 10, no. 10: 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101482

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop