Next Article in Journal
Selenium Analysis and Speciation in Dietary Supplements Based on Next-Generation Selenium Ingredients
Next Article in Special Issue
Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels: An International Comparative Experimental Study across 12 Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Low-Fat Diet in Obese Mice Lacking Toll-like Receptors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nutrients 2018, 10(10), 1465; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101465

Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods’ Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective

1
School of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia
2
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 855, West Perth 6872, Western Australia, Australia
3
School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia
4
East Metropolitan Health Service, Kirkman House, 20 Murray Street, East Perth 6004, Western Australia, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 12 September 2018 / Revised: 1 October 2018 / Accepted: 4 October 2018 / Published: 9 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label and Public Health)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1291 KB, uploaded 9 October 2018]   |  

Abstract

Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia’s two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL. View Full-Text
Keywords: Health Star Rating; Daily Intake Guide; front-of-pack label; supermarket; supermarket own brand; private label; nutrition Health Star Rating; Daily Intake Guide; front-of-pack label; supermarket; supermarket own brand; private label; nutrition
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pulker, C.E.; Trapp, G.S.A.; Scott, J.A.; Pollard, C.M. Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods’ Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1465.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top