Next Article in Journal
Improving the Downscaling of Diurnal Land Surface Temperatures Using the Annual Cycle Parameters as Disaggregation Kernels
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning Based Oil Palm Tree Detection and Counting for High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(1), 24;

Comparison of SEVIRI-Derived Cloud Occurrence Frequency and Cloud-Top Height with A-Train Data

National Meteorological Satellite Center, Korea Meteorological Administration, 64-18 Guam-gil, Gwanghyewon-myeon, Jincheon-gun, Chuncheonbuk-do 27803, Korea
Met Office, FitzRoy road, Exeter, Devon EX1 3PB, UK
Department of Atmosphere Sciences, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Alexander A. Kokhanovsky, Richard Müller and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 7 October 2016 / Revised: 13 December 2016 / Accepted: 22 December 2016 / Published: 30 December 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [4835 KB, uploaded 30 December 2016]   |  


To investigate the characteristics of Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI)-derived products from the UK Met Office algorithm, one year of cloud occurrence frequency (COF) and cloud-top height (CTH) data from May 2013 to April 2014 was analysed in comparison with Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) and Cloud-Aerosol LiDAR with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) cloud products observed from the A-Train constellation. Because CPR operated in daylight-only data collection mode, daytime products were validated in this study. It is important to note that the different sensor characteristics cause differences in CTH retrievals. The CTH of active instruments, CPR and CALIOP, is derived from the return time of the backscattered radar or LiDAR signal, while the infrared sensor, SEVIRI, measures a radiatively effective CTH. Therefore, some systematic differences in comparison results are expected. However, similarities in spatial distribution and seasonal variability of COFs were noted among SEVIRI, CALIOP, and CPR products, although COF derived by the SEVIRI algorithm showed biases of 14.35% and −3.90% compared with those from CPR and CALIOP measurements, respectively. We found that the SEVIRI algorithm estimated larger COF values than the CPR product, especially over oceans, whereas smaller COF was detected by SEVIRI measurements over land and in the tropics than by CALIOP, where multi-layer clouds and thin cirrus clouds are dominant. CTHs derived from SEVIRI showed better agreement with CPR than with CALIOP. Further comparison with CPR showed that SEVIRI CTH was highly sensitive to the CO2 bias correction used in the Minimum Residual method. Compared with CPR CTHs, SEVIRI has produced stable CTHs since the bias correction update in November 2013, with a correlation coefficient of 0.93, bias of −0.27 km, and standard deviation of 1.61 km. View Full-Text
Keywords: SEVIRI; cloud-top height; validation; CPR; CALIOP; bias correction SEVIRI; cloud-top height; validation; CPR; CALIOP; bias correction

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chung, C.-Y.; Francis, P.N.; Saunders, R.W.; Kim, J. Comparison of SEVIRI-Derived Cloud Occurrence Frequency and Cloud-Top Height with A-Train Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 24.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top