Spatial–Spectral Mamba Model Integrating Topographic Information for Pegmatite Dike Segmentation in Deeply Incised Terrain
Highlights
- A remote sensing segmentation method for pegmatite dikes integrating topographic information was proposed. A high-resolution DEM was incorporated into the Spatial–Spectral Mamba framework to enable the joint use of spectral and terrain information for dike identification in deeply incised mountainous areas.
- Experiments conducted in the Xichanggou lithium deposit of the Altyn region showed that the proposed method achieved high segmentation accuracy under complex terrain conditions (OA = 98.15%, AA = 98.30%, Kappa = 0.9725) and improved the spatial continuity of the identified dikes.
- The consistency between remote sensing results and the actual geological spatial structure was enhanced, enabling traditional two-dimensional pegmatite dike identification to evolve toward a terrain-integrated recognition paradigm.
- Technical support is provided for lithium exploration using remote sensing in complex mountainous regions.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data
2.3. Methods
2.3.1. Model Construction
2.3.2. Model Training and Evaluation Indicators
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DEM | Digital Elevation Model |
| UAV | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
| VNIR | Visible and Near-Infrared |
| SWIR | Short-Wave Infrared |
| DN | Digital Number |
| 2D | Two-Dimensional |
| 3D | Three-Dimensional |
| SSM | State Space Model |
| KNN | K-Nearest Neighbors |
| SVM | Support Vector Machine |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| HybridSN | Hybrid Spectral–Spatial Network |
| SSTN | Spectral–Spatial Transformer Network |
| SS-Mamba | Spatial–Spectral Mamba |
| OA | Overall Accuracy |
| AA | Average Accuracy |
| TP | True Positive |
| TN | True Negative |
| FP | False Positive |
| FN | False Negative |
References
- Li, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, D. The Metallogenic Regularity of Lithium Deposits in China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2014, 88, 2269–2283. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, J.; Dai, H.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, C.; Gao, Y. The Supply and Demand Status and Resource Guarantee Degree of Lithium in China. Geol. Bull. China 2025, 44, 245–258. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Dai, H.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Lou, D.; Yang, Y.; Li, P. New Progress and Trend in Ten Aspects of Lithium Exploration Practice and Theoretical Research in China in the Past Decade. J. Geol. 2022, 28, 743–764. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, M.; Liu, L.; Yu, M.; Lin, Y. Lithium Resources Safety Assessment and Early Warning of China. Geol. Bull. China 2024, 43, 197–205. [Google Scholar]
- Balaram, V.; Santosh, M.; Satyanarayanan, M.; Srinivas, N.; Gupta, H. Lithium: A Review of Applications, Occurrence, Exploration, Extraction, Recycling, Analysis, and Environmental Impact. Geosci. Front. 2024, 15, 101868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, K.J.; DeYoung, J.H.; Seal, R.R.; Bradley, D.C. Critical Mineral Resources of the United States: Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply; Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017.
- Gruber, P.W.; Medina, P.A.; Keoleian, G.A.; Kesler, S.E.; Everson, M.P.; Wallington, T.J. Global Lithium Availability: A Constraint for Electric Vehicles? J. Ind. Ecol. 2011, 15, 760–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, X.-Y.; Li, B.; Chen, X.-D.; Lei, J.; Lu, A.-H.; Zhao, L.; Li, X.; Tan, D.-B.; Xiao, Y. Lithium Isotopic Systematics and Numerical Simulation for Highly-Fractionated Granite-Pegmatite System: Implications for the Pegmatite-Type Rare-Metal Mineralization. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 163, 105722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, A.; Brönner, M.; Menuge, J.; Williamson, B.; Haase, C.; Tassis, G.; Pohl, C.; Brauch, K.; Saalmann, K.; Teodoro, A. The Greenpeg Project Toolset to Explore for Buried Pegmatites Hosting Lithium, High-Purity Quartz, and Other Critical Raw Materials. Econ. Geol. 2025, 120, 745–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J. A Brief Analysis of Metallogenic Characteristics of Typical Pegmatite-Type Lithium Deposits. Nonferr. Met. World 2020, 14, 143–144. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, T.; Hu, M.; Tang, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Xu, X. Metallogenic Characteristics of Superimposed Deformation and Mineralization of the Dahongliutan Granite–Pegmatite-Type Lithium Deposit Belt in West Kunlun, Xinjiang. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2024, 40, 553–570. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, D.; Chou, I.M.; Yan, Q.; Xiong, X. Origin of Pegmatitic Melts from Granitic Magmas in the Formation of the Jiajika Lithium Deposit in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2022, 229, 105147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Mei, J.; Lin, L.; Liu, L.; Wen, H.; Wang, L. Sorting Carbonate Clay-Type Lithium Ores Using a Deep Learning Model with Adaptive Spectral-Texture Feature Fusion. Geosci. Front. 2026, 17, 102185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Yin, C.; Wen, H.; Zhang, G. Mapping Lithium Hosting Claystone Using WorldView-3 Image and Deep Learning Method. Gondwana Res. 2026, 151, 18–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, H.; Zhang, S.; Du, X.; Huang, L.; Cai, M.; Chen, G.; Zhu, B.; Wang, Q.; Wang, K.; et al. Discovery of the Huanglongling Giant Lithium Pegmatite Deposit in Altyn Tagh, Xinjiang, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2023, 39, 3307–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartley, R.; Zisserman, A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee, R.S.; Prabakaran, B.; Jha, V.K. Fusion of Surface Relief Data with High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Satellite Remote Sensor Data for Deciphering Geological Information in a Mature Topographic Terrain. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24, 4761–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellian, J.A.; Beck, R.; Kerans, C. Analysis of Hyperspectral and Lidar Data: Remote Optical Mineralogy and Fracture Identification. Geosphere 2007, 3, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurz, T.H.; Buckley, S.J.; Howell, J.A.; Schneider, D. Geological Outcrop Modelling and Interpretation Using Ground-Based Hyperspectral and Laser Scanning Data Fusion. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2008, 37, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar]
- Kurz, T.H.; Buckley, S.J.; Howell, J.A.; Schneider, D. Close Range Hyperspectral and Lidar Data Integration for Geological Outcrop Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, Grenoble, France, 26–28 August 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Kurz, T.H.; Buckley, S.J.; Howell, J.A.; Schneider, D. Integration of Panoramic Hyperspectral Imaging with Terrestrial Lidar Data. Photogramm. Rec. 2011, 26, 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiele, S.T.; Bnoulkacem, Z.; Lorenz, S.; Bordenave, A.; Menegoni, N.; Madriz, Y.; Dujoncquoy, E.; Gloaguen, R.; Kenter, J. Mineralogical Mapping with Accurately Corrected Shortwave Infrared Hyperspectral Data Acquired Obliquely from UAVs. Remote Sens. 2021, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huynh, H.H.; Yu, J.; Wang, L.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, B.H.; Koh, S.-M.; Cho, S.; Pham, T.H. Integrative 3D Geological Modeling Derived from SWIR Hyperspectral Imaging and UAV-Based 3D Models. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booysen, R.; Lorenz, S.; Thiele, S.T.; Fuchsloch, W.C.; Marais, T.; Nex, P.A.M.; Gloaguen, R. Accurate Hyperspectral Imaging of Mineralised Outcrops: Example from Lithium-Bearing Pegmatites at Uis, Namibia. Remote Sens. Environ. 2022, 269, 112790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, G.; Huang, L.; Han, R.; Zuo, L.; Chen, M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, W.; Li, G.; et al. Big Data Mining and Intelligent Management of Mines: Example of Hebei Yanshan Iron Deposit. Earth Sci. Front. 2024, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Chen, Y.; He, X. Spectral-Spatial Mamba for Hyperspectral Image Classification. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Kang, L.; Cao, Y.; Yang, W. Early Paleozoic Granitic Magmatism in South Altyn. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2015, 58, 1513–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Liu, L.; Yang, W.; Zhu, X.; Cao, Y.; Kang, L.; Chen, S.; Li, R.; He, S. Provenance and Ages of the Altyn Complex. Precambrian Res. 2013, 230, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, N.; Wu, C.; Zheng, K.; Gao, D. Petrogenesis of Mangya A-Type Granites. Acta Geol. Sin. 2020, 94, 1431–1449. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, S.; Yuan, G. Geochronology of Precambrian Magmatism in Altyn Tagh. Acta Geol. Sin. 2003, 1, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Meng, F.; Yu, S.; Chen, W.; Chen, S. 40Ar/39Ar Geochronology of Blueschist. Geol. China 2007, 4, 558–564. [Google Scholar]
- Gehrels, G.E.; Yin, A.; Wang, X. Detrital-Zircon Geochronology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2003, 115, 881–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, J.; Wei, C.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J. P–T–T Path of Garnetites. J. Geophys. Res. 2020, 125, e2019JB018881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, J.; Wei, C.; Clarke, G.L.; Zhang, J. Metamorphic Evolution of Continental Crust. J. Petrol. 2018, 59, 1965–1990. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Hong, T.; Zhang, P.; Liu, S.; Yang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Kang, K.; Li, H. Metallogeny of Lithium–Beryllium Granites. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2024, 40, 2679–2702. [Google Scholar]
- Huo, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Han, F.; Wang, W.; Du, X.; Zhuang, M.; Meng, X.; Li, C.; et al. Coupling of Tectonic Evolution and Lithium Mineralization. Ore Geol. Rev. 2025, 187, 106946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Chen, J.; Liu, B.; Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Dai, H. Genetic Analysis of Pegmatite Lithium Deposits. Xinjiang Geol. 2024, 42, 259–263. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B.; Du, X.; Li, B.; Liu, L.; He, H.; Yu, W.; Wang, H. Geochronology of Huanglongling Lithium Deposit. Ore Geol. Rev. 2025, 187, 107002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L.; Wang, K.; Du, X.; Cai, M.; Shen, M. Geology of Huanglongling Lithium Deposit. Ore Geol. Rev. 2025, 184, 106692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantrell, S.J.; Christopherson, J.; Anderson, C.; Stensaas, G.L.; Chandra, S.N.R.; Kim, M.; Park, S. System Characterization Report on the WorldView-3 Imager; USGS: Reston, Virginia, 2021.
- Fang, F.; McNeil, B.E.; Warner, T.A.; Maxwell, A.E.; Dahle, G.A.; Eutsler, E.; Li, J. Tree Species Classification Using WorldView-3. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 246, 111811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pancorbo, J.L.; Lamb, B.T.; Quemada, M.; Hively, W.D.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, I.; Molina, I. Atmospheric Correction for Sentinel-2 and WorldView-3. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 2021, 173, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, X. Research on a Model-Based Three-Dimensional Target Recognition System. Ph.D. Thesis, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, G.P.; Charland, J.; Hegde, D.; Laddha, A.; Vallespi-Gonzalez, C. Sensor Fusion for 3D Object Detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF CVPR Workshops, Long Beach, CA, USA, 15–20 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Robert, D.; Raguet, H.; Landrieu, L. Efficient 3D Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF ICCV, Paris, France, 1–6 October 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, A.; Dao, T. Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language Modeling, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 7–9 October 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Huang, F.; Xia, S.; Wang, G.; Zhang, L. Vision Mamba: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2025, 37, 505–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, C.; Najarian, K. Rethinking Long-Range Dependency in Mamba Models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.04226. [Google Scholar]
- Melgani, F.; Bruzzone, L. Classification of Hyperspectral Images with SVM. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2004, 42, 1778–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, K.; Li, S.; Kang, X.; Fang, L. Spectral–Spatial Classification Based on KNN. Sens. Imaging 2016, 17, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Yuan, Z.; Du, Q.; Li, X. GETNET: CNN for Hyperspectral Change Detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2019, 57, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Q. 3D CNN for Hyperspectral Classification. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.K.; Krishna, G.; Dubey, S.R.; Chaudhuri, B.B. HybridSN for Hyperspectral Classification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2019, 17, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Chen, Y.; Lin, Z. Spatial-Spectral Transformer. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, X.; Xiang, X.; Li, S.; Benediktsson, J.A. PCA-Based Edge-Preserving Features. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2017, 55, 7140–7151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Category | Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|---|
| WorldView-3 Satellite | Orbital altitude | 617 km |
| Swath width | 13.1 km | |
| Radiometric resolution | Pan/VNIR: 11 bit; SWIR: 14 bit | |
| Spatial resolution | 0.3 m | |
| Number of spectral bands | 16 | |
| Spectral range | 400–2365 nm | |
| Image coverage area | 28 km2 | |
| UAV Platform | Power system | Hybrid fuel–electric propulsion |
| Maximum take-off weight | 150 kg | |
| Maximum payload | 40 kg | |
| Cruise speed | 120 km/h | |
| Flight endurance | 2.5 h | |
| Take-off elevation | 3000 m | |
| Flight altitude | 1500 m | |
| DV-LiDAR 60 | Scanning angle | 100° |
| Operating wavelength | 1550 nm | |
| Number of returns | 15 | |
| Pulse repetition frequency | 50 kHz–2000 kHz | |
| Maximum ranging distance | 4000 m | |
| Point cloud density | 2 points/m2 |
| Model Architecture | Used | OA% | AA% | Kappa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original Spatial–Spectral Mamba | No | - | 97.44 | 97.76 | 0.9620 |
| Spatial–Spectral Mamba + Terrain Module | Yes | 0 | 97.47 | 97.92 | 0.9654 |
| Spatial–Spectral Mamba + Terrain Module | Yes | 0.1 | 97.85 | 97.91 | 0.9671 |
| Spatial–Spectral Mamba + Terrain Module | Yes | 0.3 | 98.02 | 98.21 | 0.9708 |
| Spatial–Spectral Mamba + Terrain Module | Yes | 0.5 | 98.15 | 98.30 | 0.9725 |
| Spatial–Spectral Mamba + Terrain Module | Yes | 0.8 | 95.94 | 95.12 | 0.9396 |
| Layer/Module | Input Shape | Output Shape | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input Projection | (B,L, d_model) | (B, L, d_inner2) | Upscale |
| x/z Split | (B,L, d_inner2) | x, z:(B, L, d_inner) | Split features |
| x Projection | (B×L, d_inner) | (B×L, dt_rank+2d_state) | Generate params |
| dt Projection | (dt_rank) | (d_inner, BL) | Init dt |
| A_logParameter | (d_inner, d_state) | (d_inner, d_state) | State matrix |
| D Parameter | (d_inner) | (d_inner) | Skip connection |
| Selective Scan | x:(B, d_inner,L), dt, A, B, C, D | (B, d_inner, L) | State recursion |
| Nonlinear Fusion | (B, L, d_inner) | (B, L, d_inner) | Fuse aux info |
| Layer Norm | (B, L, d_inner) | (B, L, d_inner) | Normalize |
| Output Projection | (B, L, d_inner) | (B, L, d_model) | Restore dim |
| No. | Class | Total Pixels | Training (80%) | Validation (20%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | Biotite-bearing marble of the Changchengian System | 23,894 | 19,115 | 4779 |
| Class 2 | Quaternary sediments | 119,243 | 95,394 | 13,849 |
| Class 3 | Riverbed alluvium | 82,021 | 65,617 | 16,404 |
| Class 4 | Pegmatite dikes | 39,179 | 31,343 | 7836 |
| Methods | KNN | SVM | 2D-CNN | 3D-CNN | HybridSN | SSTN | SS-Mamba | Our Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input Type | Spectral | Spectral | Spectral | Spatial + Spectral | Spatial + Spectral | Spatial + Spectral | Spatial + Spectral | Spatial+ Spectral+ Terrain |
| Learning Rate | - | - | 1 × 10−3 | 1 × 10−3 | 1 × 10−3 | 5 × 10−4 | 5 × 10−4 | 5 × 10−4 |
| Batch size | - | - | 128 | 128 | 256 | 64 | 512 | 512 |
| Epochs | - | - | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Loss Function | - | - | Lseg | Lseg | Lseg | Lseg | Lseg | Lseg + Lz |
| Methods | KNN | SVM | 2D-CNN | 3D-CNN | HybridSN | SSTN | SS-Mamba | Our Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | 90.08 | 89.24 | 93.31 | 95.75 | 97.51 | 98.04 | 99.06 | 99.15 |
| Class 2 | 90.22 | 91.92 | 93.56 | 96.01 | 94.25 | 96.86 | 96.92 | 97.36 |
| Class 3 | 96.18 | 94.24 | 94.89 | 93.91 | 97.80 | 98.24 | 97.83 | 99.41 |
| Class 4 | 80.54 | 85.32 | 90.71 | 92.00 | 95.43 | 97.03 | 97.22 | 97.29 |
| OA (%) | 90.62 | 91.27 | 93.52 | 94.74 | 96.19 | 97.39 | 97.44 | 98.15 |
| AA (%) | 89.26 | 89.68 | 93.08 | 94.42 | 96.25 | 97.54 | 97.76 | 98.30 |
| Kappa | 0.8604 | 0.8699 | 0.9040 | 0.9223 | 0.9460 | 0.9485 | 0.9620 | 0.9725 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Jing, J.; Zhang, N.; Guan, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, L.; Chang, J.; Tao, J.; Yao, Y.; Liao, S. Spatial–Spectral Mamba Model Integrating Topographic Information for Pegmatite Dike Segmentation in Deeply Incised Terrain. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081215
Jing J, Zhang N, Guan H, Zhang H, Chen L, Chang J, Tao J, Yao Y, Liao S. Spatial–Spectral Mamba Model Integrating Topographic Information for Pegmatite Dike Segmentation in Deeply Incised Terrain. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(8):1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081215
Chicago/Turabian StyleJing, Jianpeng, Nannan Zhang, Hongzhong Guan, Hao Zhang, Li Chen, Jinyu Chang, Jintao Tao, Yanqiang Yao, and Shibin Liao. 2026. "Spatial–Spectral Mamba Model Integrating Topographic Information for Pegmatite Dike Segmentation in Deeply Incised Terrain" Remote Sensing 18, no. 8: 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081215
APA StyleJing, J., Zhang, N., Guan, H., Zhang, H., Chen, L., Chang, J., Tao, J., Yao, Y., & Liao, S. (2026). Spatial–Spectral Mamba Model Integrating Topographic Information for Pegmatite Dike Segmentation in Deeply Incised Terrain. Remote Sensing, 18(8), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081215

