A Continuous Cryosphere Index for Snow and Ice Reflectance
Highlights
- NASA’s EMIT imaging spectrometer is used to characterize the spectral feature space of snow and ice over a range of compositions and a diversity of cryospheric environments.
- The spectral feature space of snow and ice is continuous with distinct spectral endmembers corresponding to specular, dry and wet snow, white and blue ice.
- A linear spectral mixture model for snow and ice alone is unstable, but a standardized SVD + snow model is shown to be stable and has low RMS misfit across a variety of environments.
- An optimized Continuous Cryosphere Index (CCI) representing the snow–ice continuum can distinguish dry and wet snow and white and blue ice consistently across all 56 EMIT granules used, as well as on a sub-decameter resolution AVIRIS line spanning the snow–ice gradient on the Greenland Ice Sheet.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Data
3. Methods
4. Results
4.1. The Cryospheric Spectral Feature Space
4.2. Example Comparisons
4.2.1. Seasonal Snow on Mountainous Landscapes
4.2.2. Temporal Variation in Seasonal Snow Reflectance on Elevated Plains
4.2.3. Temporal Variation in Seasonal Snow Reflectance on Mountain Slopes
4.2.4. Variations in Lake Ice Reflectance
4.2.5. Snow–Ice Reflectance Continua on Mountain Glaciers
4.2.6. Spectral Feature Space Topology
4.2.7. The Continuous Crysophere Index
5. Discussion
5.1. The Apparent Paradox of Cryospheric Spectral Mixing and Feature Space Reflectance Continua
5.2. Spectral Decay Optimization of Normalized Difference Indices; Why It Works
5.3. Limitations
6. Future Work
7. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1. Spectral Feature Space Convergence

Appendix A.2. BRDF Amplitude Continua Within the Spectral Feature Space

Appendix A.3. Stability of the SVD + Snow Linear Mixture Model

Appendix A.4. Snow Grain Size Analysis for the Snow–Ice Continuum

Appendix A.5. CCI Application to Greenland Ice Sheet AVIRIS

Appendix A.6. EMIT Granules
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20220912T154138_2225510_002 | Patagonian Ice Field |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230202T053834_2303304_006 | Tibetan Plateau |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230202T071622_2303305_057 | Tien Shan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230203T075810_2303406_039 | Elburz |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230206T040234_2303703_001 | Tibetan Plateau |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230207T044948_2303804_006 | Karakoram |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230219T185448_2305012_009 | Colorado Great Plains |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230220T085221_2305106_007 | Plateau of Iran |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230220T102026_2305107_004 | Val d’Aosta |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230223T172031_2305411_004 | Colorado Great Plains |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230224T054459_2305504_010 | Hindu Kush |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230331T212627_2309014_005 | Sierra Nevada |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230402T103749_2309207_044 | Caucasus |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230406T181831_2309612_018 | Colorado Rockies |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230418T074250_2310805_037 | Hengduan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230418T200106_2310813_005 | Colorado Rockies |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230423T051254_2311304_017 | Tien Shan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230423T191034_2311313_007 | Sierra Nevada |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230427T033502_2311702_002 | Tien Shan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230427T051041_2311703_012 | Hindu Kush |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230530T063117_2315005_005 | Hengduan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230623T062245_2317404_023 | Karakoram |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230904T172442_2324711_001 | Patagonian Ice Field |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230907T163549_2325011_003 | Patagonian Ice Field |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230918T155520_2326110_010 | Patagonian Andes |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230919T150703_2326209_020 | Patagonian Ice Field |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230921T150821_2326409_034 | Patagonian Ice Field |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20230922T142012_2326509_041 | Patagonian Ice Field |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20231006T052426_2327904_021 | Karakoram |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240215T083534_2404606_006 | Karakoram |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240217T192125_2404813_004 | Colorado Rockies |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240217T192149_2404813_006 | Colorado Rockies |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240322T092207_2408206_013 | Tibetan Plateau |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240325T101048_2408507_024 | Hindu Kush |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240326T105614_2408607_023 | Elburz |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240402T070209_2409305_021 | Tien Shan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240412T035336_2410303_002 | Lake Baikal |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240412T035348_2410303_003 | Lake Baikal |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240412T131839_2410309_001 | Vanoise Alps |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240413T123038_2410408_007 | Tyrolian Alps |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240415T075706_2410605_016 | Hengduan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240416T210144_2410714_009 | Sierra Nevada |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240424T052328_2411504_005 | Karakoram |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240620T164536_2417211_004 | Pacific Ranges B.C. |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240701T162551_2418310_003 | Southern Andes |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240811T190706_2422413_002 | Pacific Ranges B.C. |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240812T181901_2422512_002 | Pacific Ranges B.C. |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240831T161911_2424410_004 | Southern Andes |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240904T144506_2424809_004 | Southern Andes |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20241005T052013_2427904_029 | Tien Shan |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240326T074743_2408605_011 | Tibetan Plateau |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20240330T061224_2409004_021 | Tibetan Plateau |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20241008T043058_2428203_009 | Alai |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20241010T200830_2428413_004 | Pacific Ranges B.C. |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20241012T092726_2428606_022 | Karakoram |
| EMIT_L2A_RFL_001_20241118T143814_2432309_006 | Patagonian Ice Field |
References
- Warren, S.G. Optical properties of ice and snow. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2019, 377, 20180161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kyle, H.L.; Curran, R.J.; Barnes, W.L.; Escoe, D. A cloud physics radiometer. In Third Conference on Atmospheric Radiation; American Meteorological Society: Davis, CA, USA, 1978; p. 107. [Google Scholar]
- Crane, R.G.; Anderson, M.R. Satellite discrimination of snow/cloud surfaces. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1984, 5, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dozier, J. Spectral signature of alpine snow cover from the landsat thematic mapper. Remote Sens. Environ. 1989, 28, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenthal, W.; Dozier, J. Automated mapping of montane snow cover at subpixel resolution from the landsat thematic mapper. Water Resour. Res. 1996, 32, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, D.K.; Riggs, G.A.; Salomonson, V.V. Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1995, 54, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riggs, G.; Hall, D.; Román, M.O. VIIRS Snow Cover Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD); NASA Goddard Space Flight Center: Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2015; p. 38.
- Adams, J.B.; Smith, M.O.; Gillespie, A.R. Imaging Spectroscopy: Interpretation based on spectral mixture analysis. In Remote Geochemical Analysis: Elemental and Mineralogical Composition; Pieters, C.M., Englert, P., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 145–166. [Google Scholar]
- Adams, J.B.; Smith, M.O.; Johnson, P.E. Spectral mixture modeling; A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 site. J. Geophys. Res. 1986, 91, 8098–8122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillespie, A.R.; Smith, M.O.; Adams, J.B.; Willis, S.C.; Fischer, A.F.; Sabol, D.E. Interpretation of residual images: Spectral mixture analysis of AVIRIS images, Owens Valley, California. In Proceedings of the 2nd Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop; Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Pasadena, CA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Salomonson, V.V.; Appel, I. Estimating fractional snow cover from MODIS using the normalized difference snow index. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 89, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, J.B.; Gillespie, A.R. Remote Sensing of Landscapes with Spectral Images; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; p. 362. [Google Scholar]
- Boardman, J.W.; Green, R.O. Exploring the Spectral Variability of the Earth as Measured by AVIRIS in 1999. In NASA JPL AVIRIS Workshop; Green, R.O., Ed.; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Green, R.O.; Boardman, J. Exploration of the relationship between information content and signal/noise ratio and spatial resolution in AVIRIS spectral data. In Proceedings of the Ninth JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, D.R.; Boardman, J.W.; Eastwood, M.L.; Green, R.O. A large airborne survey of Earth’s visible-infrared spectral dimensionality. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 9186–9195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Small, C.; Das, I. The cryospheric spectral mixing space. In American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Small, C.; Milesi, C. Multi-scale Standardized Spectral Mixture Models. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 136, 442–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Small, C.; Sousa, D. Joint Characterization of the Cryospheric Spectral Feature Space. Front. Remote Sens. Image Anal. Classif. 2022, 2, 793228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boardman, J.W. Inversion of imaging spectrometry data using singular value decomposition. In Proceedings of the IGARSS’89 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 10–14 July 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Boardman, J.W. Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts. In Fourth Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Airborne Geoscience Workshop; Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Pasadena, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Boardman, J.W. Geometric mixture analysis of imaging spectrometery data. Proc. Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 1994, 4, 2369–2371. [Google Scholar]
- Green, R.O.; Thompson, D.R.; EMIT Team. NASA’s Earth Surface Mineral Dust Source Investigation: An Earth Venture Imaging Spectrometer Science Mission. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, Brussels, Belgium, 11–16 July 2021. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. [Google Scholar]
- Bradley, C.L.; Thingvold, E.; Moore, L.B.; Haag, J.M.; Raouf, N.A.; Mouroulis, P.; Green, R.O. Optical Design of the Earth Surface Mineral Dust Source Investigation (EMIT) Imaging Spectrometer. In Proceedings of the Imaging Spectrometry XXIV: Applications, Sensors, and Processing, Online, 24 August–4 September 2020; p. 1150402. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, D.R.; Green, R.O.; Bradley, C.; Brodrick, P.G.; Mahowald, N.; Dor, E.B.; Bennett, M.; Bernas, M.; Carmon, N.; Chadwick, K.D.; et al. On-orbit calibration and performance of the EMIT imaging spectrometer. Remote Sens. Environ. 2024, 303, 113986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eckart, C.; Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika 1936, 1, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boardman, J. Inversion of high spectral resolution data. In Imaging Spectroscopy of the Terrestrial Environment; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 1990; Volume 1298, pp. 222–233. [Google Scholar]
- Small, C. The landsat ETM plus spectral mixing space. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 93, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Small, C.; Sousa, D. The Standardized Spectroscopic Mixture Model. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, J.C. Using spatial context in satellite data to infer regional scale evapotranspiration. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1990, 28, 940–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Meer, F.D.; Jia, L. Collinearity and orthogonality of endmembers in linear spectral unmixing. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2012, 18, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nolin, A.W.; Dozier, J. A hyperspectral method for remotely sensing the grain size of snow. Remote Sens. Environ. 2000, 74, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Small, C. A Continuous Cryosphere Index for Snow and Ice Reflectance. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101505
Small C. A Continuous Cryosphere Index for Snow and Ice Reflectance. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(10):1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101505
Chicago/Turabian StyleSmall, Christopher. 2026. "A Continuous Cryosphere Index for Snow and Ice Reflectance" Remote Sensing 18, no. 10: 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101505
APA StyleSmall, C. (2026). A Continuous Cryosphere Index for Snow and Ice Reflectance. Remote Sensing, 18(10), 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101505

