Previous Article in Journal
Hail Damage Detection: Integrating Sentinel-2 Images with Weather Radar Hail Kinetic Energy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stepwise Building Damage Estimation Through Time-Scaled Multi-Sensor Integration: A Case Study of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Assessing Wildfire Impacts from the Perspectives of Social and Ecological Remote Sensing

College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, 1 East Third Road, Chengdu 610059, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(23), 3851; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233851 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 October 2025 / Revised: 22 November 2025 / Accepted: 25 November 2025 / Published: 27 November 2025

Abstract

Wildfires in the Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) pose escalating threats to socio-ecological systems, challenging regional resilience and sustainable recovery. Understanding the compound impacts of such fires requires an integrated, data-driven assessment of both ecological disturbance and social response. This study develops a multi-dimensional framework combining multisource remote sensing data (Landsat/Sentinel-2 NDVI and VIIRS nighttime light) with socio-structural indicators. A Composite Disturbance Index (ImpactIndex) was constructed to quantify ecological, population, and socioeconomic disruption across six fire clusters in the January 2025 Southern California wildfires. Mechanism analysis was conducted using Fixed-Effects OLS (M2) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR, M3) models. The ImpactIndex revealed that Eaton and Palisades experienced the most severe compound disturbances, while Border 2 showed purely ecological impacts. During-disaster CNLI signals were statistically decoupled from ecological disturbance (ΔNDVI) and dominated by site-specific effects (p < 0.001). GWR results (Adj. R2 = 0.354) confirmed asymmetric spatial heterogeneity: high-density clusters (Palisades, Kenneth) exhibited a significant “Structural Burden” effect, whereas low-density areas showed weak, nonsignificant recovery trends. This “Index-to-Mechanism” framework redefines the interpretation of nighttime light in disaster contexts and provides a robust, spatially explicit tool for targeted WUI resilience planning and post-fire recovery management.
Keywords: nighttime light remote sensing; disaster recovery; wildfire disturbance; wildland-urban interface nighttime light remote sensing; disaster recovery; wildfire disturbance; wildland-urban interface

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Liu, S. Assessing Wildfire Impacts from the Perspectives of Social and Ecological Remote Sensing. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233851

AMA Style

Wang X, Liu S. Assessing Wildfire Impacts from the Perspectives of Social and Ecological Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(23):3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233851

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiaolin, and Shaoyang Liu. 2025. "Assessing Wildfire Impacts from the Perspectives of Social and Ecological Remote Sensing" Remote Sensing 17, no. 23: 3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233851

APA Style

Wang, X., & Liu, S. (2025). Assessing Wildfire Impacts from the Perspectives of Social and Ecological Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 17(23), 3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233851

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop