Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Variations and Seasonal Climatic Driving Factors of Stable Vegetation Phenology Across China over the Past Two Decades
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning for Urban Air Quality Prediction Using Google AlphaEarth Foundations Satellite Embeddings: A Case Study of Quito, Ecuador
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning and Geospatial-Sentinel-1 SAR Integration for Enhanced Early Warning Systems

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA
2
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(20), 3471; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203471
Submission received: 13 August 2025 / Revised: 8 October 2025 / Accepted: 13 October 2025 / Published: 17 October 2025

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive framework for flood susceptibility mapping by integrating geospatial factors with both statistical and machine learning models. Thirteen Flood-related factors, including DEM, slope, TWI, NDVI, etc., are extracted as features of models, and historical flood data derived from Sentinel-1 SAR from 2018 to 2023 are used as the target variables of the models. These datasets are analyzed using a frequency-based statistical model and three machine learning models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and CNN, to generate flood susceptibility maps. The performance of each model is evaluated through AUC; and SHAP scores are separately generated for Machine learning (ML) models to explain each feature contribution in the ML model. The generated susceptibility maps are validated by high-flood-risk locations monitored by flood sensors, BLE inundation models, and flood-prone areas suggested by the Local Community Task Force. The results indicate that the XGBoost model outperforms all other models, with an AUC of 0.92 and demonstrates the highest alignment with recommended high-flood-risk locations, while the frequency-based statistical model showed the weakest performance with an AUC of 0.65. SHAP value graphs highlight the elevation, slope, and TWI as the most influential features across all models. The susceptibility maps generated by the machine learning model show strong agreement with the BLE map and high-flood-risk areas identified by the local Community Task Force.
Keywords: flood susceptibility map; machine learning; Sentinel-1 SAR; frequency ratio; Google Engine; early warning systems; Southeast Texas; Jefferson County flood susceptibility map; machine learning; Sentinel-1 SAR; frequency ratio; Google Engine; early warning systems; Southeast Texas; Jefferson County

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feizbahr, M.; Brake, N.; Arbabkhah, H.; Hariri Asli, H.; Woods, K. Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning and Geospatial-Sentinel-1 SAR Integration for Enhanced Early Warning Systems. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203471

AMA Style

Feizbahr M, Brake N, Arbabkhah H, Hariri Asli H, Woods K. Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning and Geospatial-Sentinel-1 SAR Integration for Enhanced Early Warning Systems. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(20):3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feizbahr, Mahdi, Nicholas Brake, Homayoon Arbabkhah, Hossein Hariri Asli, and Kolby Woods. 2025. "Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning and Geospatial-Sentinel-1 SAR Integration for Enhanced Early Warning Systems" Remote Sensing 17, no. 20: 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203471

APA Style

Feizbahr, M., Brake, N., Arbabkhah, H., Hariri Asli, H., & Woods, K. (2025). Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning and Geospatial-Sentinel-1 SAR Integration for Enhanced Early Warning Systems. Remote Sensing, 17(20), 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop