Next Article in Journal
An Integrated Algorithm Fusing UWB Ranging Positioning and Visual–Inertial Information for Unmanned Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
Ethical Framework to Assess and Quantify the Trustworthiness of Artificial Intelligence Techniques: Application Case in Remote Sensing
 
 
Technical Note
Peer-Review Record

Initial Cross-Validation of the OI 135.6 nm and LBH Radiances from FY3E/TriIPM and TIMED/GUVI

Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4528; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234528
by Qian Ye 1,2,†, Qian Song 1,2,†, Tian Mao 1,2,* and Xiaoxin Zhang 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4528; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234528
Submission received: 6 October 2024 / Revised: 11 November 2024 / Accepted: 15 November 2024 / Published: 3 December 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please find attached comments and suggestions for authors.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Far ultraviolet detection has important scientific value, and quantifying data is even more challenging. This article introduces the preliminary results of radiance cross comparison between FY3E/TriIPM and TIMED/GUVI, The analysis reveals that the consistency of the OI 135.6 nm and LBH radiation is better at 1700 LT than those at 0500 LT in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, and the consistency of the LBH radiation is better than those of the OI 135.6 nm in both Hemispheres at 0500 LT and 1700 LT. Moreover, the measures of FY3E/TriIPM and 15 TIMED/GUVI agreement well in summer and winter compare to the equity, especially at 1700 LT. The conclusion has important value, and four suggestions are provided for the authors:

1. Please provide the calibration results and radiance uncertainty analysis of TriIPM in laboratory, which are the basis and prerequisite for quantitative comparison;

2. Please provide information on performance parameters of GUVI and TriIPM, such as spectral response function, field of view angle, response linearity, dark current, stability, radiometric calibration results, measurement uncertainty, etc;

3. It is recommended to provide an analysis of the impact of TriIPM laboratory and in orbit radiometric calibration on the cross comparison results;

4. Please explain the meaning of the spectral responsivity unit: counts/s/R in Figure 1.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The author answered the questions carefully and made revisions and additions. I think this paper can be accepted.

Back to TopTop