Next Article in Journal
Relative Radiometric Correction Method Based on Temperature Normalization for Jilin1-KF02
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Methodology to Correct Chlorophyll-a Concentrations from Satellite Data and Assess Credible Phenological Patterns
Previous Article in Journal
Euler Kernel Mapping for Hyperspectral Image Clustering via Self-Paced Learning
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Likelihood-Based Triangulation Method for Uncertainties in Through-Water Depth Mapping

Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4098; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214098
by Mohamed Ali Ghannami 1,2, Sylvie Daniel 1,*, Guillaume Sicot 2 and Isabelle Quidu 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4098; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214098
Submission received: 2 September 2024 / Revised: 20 October 2024 / Accepted: 29 October 2024 / Published: 2 November 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see the attachment, is the review report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

none

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

anuscript:

A Likelihood-based Triangulation Method for Uncertainties in Through-Water Depth Mapping

Submitted by:

Mohamed Ali GHANNAMI, Sylvie DANIEL, Guillaume SICOT and Isabelle QUIDU

 

Bathymetric measurements today are conducted using acoustic methods with the use of single-beam SBES and multi-beam MBES echo sounders. Many years ago, LIDAR systems were used to estimate depths in a limited range of 50-75 meters, without in-depth analysis of beam trajectory and accuracy in determining the shape of the seabed.

 

In the article, the authors presented a more complex method for assessing the uncertainties of measurements in order to achieve higher accuracy in seabed shape determination.

 

The structure of the article is correct and well thought out. It contains an in-depth literature analysis in the introduction. The research problem is described in both mathematical and graphical form. Comments regarding graphical presentation are included in the further part of the review. The discussion and conclusions are based on the analysis of the conducted research and are valid.

 

The axes on the figures are not labeled. 

It is unclear what parameter is being shown in the figure. 

Figure 6: What are the parameters and their units? 

Figure 8: Are the X, Y, Z axes in meters? Figure 9: Same as above.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop