Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Research Questions
- RQ: What is the state of the art of DT technology in implementing real-life applications?
- SQ1: What are the challenges of implementing a DT-based system using the current technology?
- SQ2: What are the limitations when implementing a DT-based smart city platform in Latin America and around the world?
- SQ3: What are the trends in the use of enabling technology for the future?
1.2. Contributions
- A clear view of trending enabling technologies and specific tools for DT development: by using the comparative table in Section 4, this work aims to highlight the trends in the use of enabling technologies for domain-specific applications but also for DTs in general. In comparison with other works which only provide a list of enabling technologies, we also discuss the specific tools (sensors, devices and software) in Section 3.
- Identifying the general implementation challenges around the world and in the Latin American context: highlighting the centralized efforts from all industries around the world and their different approaches.
- Building a layered analysis and evaluation of DT applications across various domains in terms of the integrity level, the technology readiness level (TRL), the societal readiness level (SRL) and the maturity level: using the evaluation tools of TRL, SRL and the maturity index, this paper presents an overview of the state of the art based on real applications and studies.
2. Methodology
2.1. Protocol
- Search criteria: publications with the term “digital twin” in the keywords or in the title.
- Year of publication from 2017 to present.
- Publications were selected from different application industries such as smart cities, freight logistics, medicine, engineering, automotive, etc. The domains discussed in this work were chosen based on their relevance with respect to the initially collected publications.
2.2. Systematic Search of Related Literature
2.3. Selection
2.4. Revision and Synthesis
2.5. The Digital Twin Architecture
2.6. Types of Digital Twins
- Digital twin instance (DTI): A digital twin instance is described as a type of digital twin that represents its physical counterpart throughout all its lifecycle [10], meaning there is a continuous monitoring of the state of the physical twin and any changes or evolution experienced by the physical twin will impact the digital twin. In this sense, this concept accompanies a product or process from its inception and through its lifetime while monitoring and predicting its behavior. It is useful to validate the expected behavior and performance of a product or object.
- Digital twin prototype (DTP): When it comes to manufacturing and production processes for products, a digital twin prototype gathers and stores valuable information and characteristics about the physical twin. Some data might include computer aided designs (CADs), bill of materials (BOM), drawings or even information that might link the manufacturing process with the production chain stakeholders [10]. In accordance with DT characteristics, the DTP is able to simulate manufacturing scenarios and perform validation testing, evaluation and even quality control testing prior to the actual manufacturing process itself. This approach effectively reduces production costs and operational time by identifying flaws or possible risks of the physical twin before production. In this sense, DTPs can also be called experimentable DTs where, according to [11], a virtual prototype becomes available whose level of detail increases successively while virtual test results give a sufficiently reliable statement about the design quality and reduce the number of usually expensive hardware prototypes.
- Performance digital twin (PDT): In more real and unpredictable conditions for physical twins, the PDT is able to monitor, aggregate and analyze data from products [10]. By aggregating smart capabilities, the PDT is able to process the information being monitored from the physical counterpart and generate actionable data that can be used for design optimization, maintenance strategy generation and drawing conclusions from a product’s performance [12].
2.7. Integration Levels
- Digital model: In its basic concept, the digital model will not integrate any automatic information flow from the physical world to the virtual world. This means that the virtual and physical world are not automatically connected, so any change must be reflected through manual modification.
- Digital shadow: The digital shadow will integrate unidirectional automatic information flow from the physical world to the virtual world [13]. This is best represented by a system where sensors measure information from the physical model and transfer signals to the virtual model. Regardless of whether information flows in a polling or interrupt method, as long as it is automatic, the integration level can be determined as a digital shadow.
- Digital twin: A fully integrated twin where the virtual and physical world interact in a bidirectional fashion. This means that information flows automatically to and from each world. In this case, information flowing from the virtual world will be useful to perform changes in the physical model or to instruct actuators to perform an operation. Conversely, data from the physical twin may influence the virtual twin automatically in such a way that the virtual twin accurately represents the current state and the evolution of its physical counterpart.
2.8. Maturity Spectrum
3. Literature Review on Digital Twin Progress by Domain Area
3.1. Smart Cities and Urban Spaces
- Infrastructure data = 91% (such as data from traffic, renewable energy, industrial appliances).
- Sensor data = 88% (gathered by domestic appliances and smart street meters).
- Smart city IoT data = 86%(data collected from smart and connected sensor networks in major utility services such as energy, gas and water).
- Social media data = 86% (from websites such as LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, etc.).
- Online sources = 85% (from search engines and websites such as Google and YouTube).
3.1.1. Remote Sensing Technologies
- Real-time demand-based energy production = 86% (using smart city IoT sensors to determine energy demand and production).
- Wearables for remote patient diagnostics = 94% (opening the possibilities of the human DT concept).
- Body sensors to monitor chronic conditions = 88% (wearable devices).
- Real-time information on public transportation and traffic = 96% (using smart sensing technologies to enhance public transportation and mobility infrastructure).
- Predictive maintenance for building management systems = 91% (integrating technologies such as ML and AI to process real information).
- Drones for site inspections = 88% (using tools such as cameras, LIDAR and ultrasonic sensors, drones can be used for property management and monitoring).
3.1.2. Building Information Models
3.2. Freight Logistics
3.3. Medicine
3.4. Engineering
3.5. Automotive
- Functional prototype twin (FPT twin): This is the basis for a functional representation of the vehicle using model-based systems engineering.
- Harness twin: A DT that aims to represent and optimize complete wiring harnesses in the vehicle.
- Prototype twin: Representation of a fully developed vehicle that is useful for scenario simulation. This may have a great impact on reducing time and costs in testing phases and future design and development stages.
- Geometric twin: Geometric prototype of the vehicle that integrates information on the physical manufacturing and assembly of the car as well as information necessary to connect individual car parts.
- Virtual reality twin (VR twin): Visualization twin that presents a visual aid for simulation, rendering and optimization of manual assembly work on the vehicle.
- Simulation twin: Primarily used to develop software solutions or updates for existing car models. Has the capabilities of experimentable DTs.
- Reuse twin: Digital representation of the end of the lifecycle of the vehicle where information is enabled to draw conclusions on recycling strategies and optimization solutions for a new series of vehicles.
Electric Vehicles
4. Results and Findings on Enabling Technologies
5. Discussion
5.1. Application Challenges and Limitations
- Issues related to data (trust, privacy, cybersecurity, convergence and governance, acquisition and large-scale analysis) [10]. It is difficult for designers to mimic or model behaviors that cannot be explained by numbers. Such is the case of social conflicts, sociopolitical issues, social inequality [79] and environmental sustainability [80]. These developments in the social and environmental domains will target lower levels of SRL where there is a clear understanding of the potential impact on identified stakeholders, the entire society and the environment. Furthermore, this challenge relates to maturity levels 3 and 4 in Table 1 where enriching models with real-time and bidirectional flow of information presents a relevant limit when it comes to complex DT implementations.
- Lack of standards, frameworks and regulations for DT implementations [15]. The authors of [77] discuss that implementations of DTs are limited due to a lack of standards and recognized interoperability, especially in the manufacturing domain. Articles that explore the benefits, define concepts and architectures of DTs and review the technology’s state of the art are important for adopting a widespread, concrete understanding of DTs and their relevance. Furthermore, targeting this specific challenge with surveys and literature reviews, researchers may impact lower levels of the TRL to make basic principles and concepts widely known.
- High costs of implementation due to the increased amount of sensors and computational resources needed [10,18]. Due to the expensiveness of DT implementations, their accessibility is limited by the accessibility of such resources, which is often poor in developing countries [79]. The increase in the amount of sensors needed comes with an added complexity with regard to data connectivity and processing which poses a challenge to reach level 3 in the maturity spectrum from Table 1 (where the digital model needs to be enriched with real-time information). This challenge also poses a limitation for practitioners to enable higher levels of TRL where pilot systems are demonstrated, DTs are incorporated in a commercial design or full-scale deployment.
- The use of AI and big data to satisfy the long-term and large-scale requirements for data analysis [13,81]. With the large amount of data generated and analyzed in DT systems, big data algorithms and the IoT technology are powerful allies that can provide support to a great extent to successful DT implementations [75]. Furthermore, information flowing from various levels of indicator systems presents a challenge for developing common policies and standards [82]. Effectively targeting levels 4 and 5 of the maturity spectrum, this challenge could enable bidirectional flow of information, control of the physical world from the digital model and even autonomous operations and asset maintenance.
- Communication network-related obstacles. There is a need to build faster and more efficient communication interfaces such as 5G. The authors of [42] mention an urgent demand for using the 5G technology for smart cities, such as the ability to connect many more sensors and devices, the high-speed ubiquitous connectivity, the improved reliability and redundancy and ultra-low power consumption; the authors believe that it is of great value to enable real-time data connectivity and operational efficiency for the DT.
5.2. Digital Twin Challenges in Latin America
5.3. Contribution Benefits and Implications
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Higgins, J.P.T.; Thomas, J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2021; Chapter Part 2: Core Methods. [Google Scholar]
- Botin-Sanabria, D.M.; Lozoya-Reyes, J.G.; Vargas-Maldonado, R.C.; Rodríguez-Hernández, K.L.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A.; Ramírez-Moreno, M.A.; Lozoya-Santos, J.J. Digital Twin for Urban Spaces: An Application. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Monterrey, Mexico, 3–5 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL); Extract from Part 19–Commission Decision C(2014)4995; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Denmark, I.F. Societal Readiness Levels (SRL) defined according to Innovation Fund Denmark. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/isa/files/technology_readiness_revisited_-_icegov2020.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2021).
- Evans, S.; Savian, C.; Burns, A.; Cooper, C. Digital Twins for the Built Environment: An Introduction to the Opportunities, Benefits, Challenges and Risks. Built Environmental News. 2019. Available online: https://www.theiet.org/impact-society/sectors/built-environment/built-environment-news/digital-twins-for-the-built-environment/ (accessed on 15 October 2021).
- Biesinger, F.; Weyrich, M. The Facets of Digital Twins in Production and the Automotive Industry. In Proceedings of the 2019 23rd International Conference on Mechatronics Technology (ICMT), Salerno, Italy, 23–26 October 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F.; Hu, T.; Anwer, H.; Liu, A.; Wei, Y.; Wang, L.; Nee, A. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 53, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quirk, D.; Lanni, J.; Chauhan, N. Digital Twins: Details of Implementation: Part 2. AHRAE J. 2020, 62, 20–24. [Google Scholar]
- Campos-Ferreira, A.; Lozoya-Santos, J.J.; Vargas-Martínez, A.; Mendoza, R.; Morales-Menéndez, R. Digital Twin Applications: A review. In Memorias del Congreso Nacional de Control Automático; Asociación de México de Control Automático: Puebla, Mexico, 2019; pp. 606–611. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, M.; Fuenmayor, E.; Hinchy, E.P.; Qiao, Y.; Murray, N.; Devine, D. Digital Twin: Origin to Future. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahmen, U.; Rossmann, J. Experimentable Digital Twins for a Modeling and Simulation-based Engineering Approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE), Rome, Italy, 1–3 October 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Kosasih, E.; Zhang, J.; Brintrup, A.; Calinescu, A. Digital Twins: State of the Art Theory and Practice, Challenges, and Open Research Questions. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2011.02833. [Google Scholar]
- Juarez, M.; Botti, V.; Giret, A. Digital Twins: Review and Challenges. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2021, 21, 030802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Autiosalo, J.; Vepsalainen, J.; Viitala, R.; Tammi, K. A Feature-Based Framework for Structuring Industrial Digital Twins. IEEE Access 2019, 8, 1193–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, K.; Zheng, P.; Chen, C. A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: Techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 1313–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ran, Y.; Lin, P.; Zhou, X.; Wen, Y. A Survey of Predictive Maintenance: Systems, Purposes and Approaches. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2019. Available online: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1912.07383 (accessed on 9 July 2021).
- Sharma, M.; George, J.P. Digital Twin in the Automotive Industry: Driving Physical-Digital Convergence; TCS White Papers; Tata Consultancy Services Limited: Mumbai, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Rathore, M.; Shah, S.; Shukla, D.; Bentafat, E.; Bakiras, S. The Role of AI, Machine Learning, and Big Data in Digital Twinning: A Systematic Literature Review, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 32030–32052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quirk, D.; Lanni, J.; Chauhan, N. Digital twins: Answering the hard questions. ASHRAE J. 2020, 62, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
- Briggs, B.; Buchholz, S. Deloitte Tech Trends 2020. Insights 2020, 2020, 1–130. [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov, S.; Nikolskaya, K.; Radchenko, G.; Sokolinsky, L.; Zymbler, M. Digital Twin of City: Concept Overview. In Proceedings of the 2020 Global Smart Industry Conference (GloSIC), Chelyabinsk, Russia, 17–19 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wright, L.; Davidson, S. How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin. Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci. 2020, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dembski, F.; Wossner, U.; Letzgus, M.; Ruddat, M.; Yamu, C. Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhou, M.; Yan, J.; Feng, D. Digital Twin Framework and Its Application to Power Grid Online Analysis. CSSE J. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 5, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haiyuan, Y.; Dachuan, W.; Mengcha, S.; Qi, Y. Application of Digital Twins in Port System. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandar, A.; Ahmed, A.; Zulfiqar, S.; Hua, Z.; Hanai, M.; Theodoropoulos, G. A Decision Support System for Urban Agriculture Using Digital Twin: A Case Study With Aquaponics. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 35691–35708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guevara, N.; Diaz, C.; Sguerra, M.; Martinez, M.; Agudelo, O.; Suarez, J.; Rodriguez, A.; Acuña, G.; Garcia, A. Towards the design and implementation of a Smart City in Bogotá, Colombia. Rev. Fac. DeIng. Univ. Antioq. 2019, 93, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentley Systems Incorporated. Discover OpenCities Planner–Connect The Data, People, Workflows, and Ideas Necessary to Support Today’s Infrastructure Projects. Report P-18. Available online: https://www.bentley.com/es/products/brands/opencities-planner (accessed on 15 October 2021).
- Tagliabue, L.; Cecconi, F.; Maltese, S.; Rinaldi, S.; Ciribini, A.; Flammini, A. Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building. Sustainability 2021, 13, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conejos, P.; Martínez, F.; Hervas, M.; Alonso, J.C. Building and Exploiting a Digital Twin for the Managmenet of Drinking Water Distribution Networks. Urban Water J. 2020, 17, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomin, N.; Kurbatsky, V.; Borisov, V.; Musalev, S. Development of Digital Twin for Load Center on the Example of Distribution Network of an Urban District. Energy 2020, 209, 02029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, G.; Zink, A.; Codecá, L.; Clarke, S. A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities 2021, 110, 103064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrotter, G.; Hurzeler, C. The Digital Twin of the City of Zurich for Urban Planning. J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 2021, 88, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raes, L.; Michiels, P.; Adolphi, T.; Tampere, C.; Dalianis, T.; Mcaleer, S.; Kogut, P. DUET: A Framework for Building Secure and Trusted Digital Twins of Smart Cities. IEEE Internet Comput. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, A.; Borup, M.; Brink-Kjaer, A.; Christiansen, L.; Mikkelsen, P. Living and Prototyping Digital Twins for Urban Water Systems: Towards Multi-Purpose Value Creation Using Models and Sensors. Water 2021, 13, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Microsoft. What is Azure Digital Twins? Available online: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/digital-twins/ (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Dassault Systemes. Beyond Digital Twin: Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers Enjoy Big-Enterprise Benefits and ROI with Virtual Twin Experience on the Cloud. Available online: https://discover.3ds.com/beyond-digital-twin (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Beil, C.; Kolbe, T.H. Combined Modelling of Multiple Transportation Infrastructure Within 3D City Models and its Implementation in CityGML 3.0. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2020, 6, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nativi, S.; Mazzetti, P.; Craglia, M. Digital Ecosystems for Developing Digital Twins of the Earth: The Destination Earth Case. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Jain, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Son, Y.J. A Multi-Paradigm Simulation for the Implementation of Digital Twins in Surveillance Applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 IISE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 30 May–2 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Marcucci, E.; Gatta, V.; Le-Pira, M.; Hansson, L.; Brathen, S. Digital Twins: A Critical Discussion on Their Potential for Supporting Policy-Making and Planning in Urban Logistics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, H. Sustainable Urban Governance Networks: Data-driven Planning Technologies and Smart City Software Systems. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relations 2020, 12, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.; Snider, C.; Nassehi, A.; Yon, J.; Hicks, B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf.g Sci. Technol. 2020, 29A, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakdirat, K.; Rungskunroch, P.; Welsh, J. A Digital-Twin Evaluation of Net Zero Energy Building for Existing Buildings. Sustainability 2019, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yitmen, I.; Alizadehsalehi, S.; Akiner, I.; Akiner, M. An Adapted Model of Cognitive Digital Twins for Building Lifecycle Management. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godager, B.; Onstein, E.; Huang, L. The Concept of Enterprise BIM: Current Research Practice and Future Trends. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 42265–42290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 19650-3:2020. Int. Stand. Civ. Eng. 2020, 10. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/75109.html (accessed on 7 February 2022).
- Carvalho, A.; Melo, P.; Oliveira, M.; Barros, R. The 4-corner model as a synchromodal and digital twin enabler in the transportation sector. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Cardiff, UK, 15–17 June 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutierrez-Franco, E.; Mejia-Argueta, C.; Rabelo, L. Data-Driven Methodology to Support Long-Lasting Logistics and Decision Making for Urban Last-Mile Operations. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, S.; Zhou, W.; Piramuthu, S.; Giannikas, V.; Chen, C. Smart city for sustainable urban freight logistics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 2079–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shengli, W. Is Human Digital Twin possible? Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. Update 2021, 1, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barricelli, B.; Casiraghi, E.; Gliozzo, J.; Petrini, A.; Valtolina, S. Human Digital Twin for Fitness Management. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 26637–26664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laubenbacher, R.; Sluka, J.; Glazier, J. Using digital twins in viral infection. Science 2021, 371, 1105–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laamarti, F.; Badawi, H.; Ding, Y.; Arafsha, F.; Hafidh, B.; El Saddik, A. An ISO/IEEE 11073 Standardized Digital Twin Framework for Health and Well-Being in Smart Cities. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 105950–105961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laaki, H.; Miche, Y.; Tammi, K. Prototyping a Digital Twin for Real Time Remote Control Over Mobile Networks: Application of Remote Surgery. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 20325–20336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, J.; Huang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Li, J.; Cai, Z. Collaborative City Digital Twin for the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Federated Learning Solution. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2021, 26, 759–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Ren, L.; Wang, F.; Liu, R.; Pang, Z.; Deen, M. A Novel Cloud-Based Framework for the Elderly Healthcare Services Using Digital Twin. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 49088–49101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, R.; Quiza, R.; Villalonga, A.; Arenas, J.; Castaño, F. Digital Twin-Based Optimization for Ultraprecision Motion Systems With Backlash and Friction. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 93462–93472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Nee, A. Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Access 2018, 15, 2405–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottani, E.; Assunta, C.; Murino, T.; Vespoli, S. From the Cyber-Physical System to the Digital Twin: The process development for behaviour modelling of a Cyber Guided Vehicle in M2M logic. In Proceedings of the Conference: XXII Summer School Francesco Turco–Industrial Systems Engineering, Paris, France, 19–22 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rassolkin, A.; Orosz, T.; Demidova, G.; Kuts, V.; Rjabtsikov, V.; Vaimann, T.; Kallaste, A. Implementation of Digital Twins for electrical energy conversion systems in selected case studies. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. 2021, 70, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Weeber, M.; Birke, K. Advancing digital twin implementation: A toolbox for modelling and simulation. Procedia CIRP 2021, 99, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aivaliotis, P.; Georgoulias, K.; Arkouli, Z.; Makris, S. Methodology for enabling Digital Twin using advanced physics-based modelling in predictive maintenance. Procedia CIRP 2019, 81, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oyekan, J.; Farnsworth, M.; Hutabarat, W.; Miller, D.; Tiwari, A. Applying a 6 DoF Robotic Arm and Digital Twin to Automate Fan-Blade Reconditioning for Aerospace Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Sensors 2020, 20, 4637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Wenyan, B.; Ziuli, D.; Anshan, Z.; Zezhong, X. Digital Twin-based Safety Evaluation of Prestressed Steel Structure. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8888876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, M.; Salgado, O.; Croes, J.; Pluymers, B.; Desmet, W. A Digital Twin for Operational Evaluation of Vertical Transportation Systems. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 114389–114400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Wu, Q.; Guo, K.; Xiong, S.; Feng, W.; Xue, J. Study on the Construction and Application of Digital Twins on High Voltage Transmission Line Live Working Scenes. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 111587–111594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chukhno, O.; Chukhno, N.; Araniti, G.; Campolo, C.; Iera, A.; Molinaro, A. Optimal Placement of Social Digital Twins in Edge IoT Networks. Sensors 2020, 20, 6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Merkle, L.; Pothig, M.; Schmid, F. Estimate e-Golf Battery State Using Diagnostic Data and a Digital Twin. Batteries 2021, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szalay, Z. Next Generation X-in-the-Loop Validation Methodology for Automated Vehicle Systems. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 35616–35632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Mierlo, J.; Berecibar, M.; El Baghdadi, M.; De Cauwer, C.; Messagie, M.; Coosemans, T.; Jacobs, V.; Hegazy, O. Beyond the State of the Art of Electric Vehicles: A Fact-Based Paper of the Current and Prospective Electric Vehicle Technologies. World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Widanage, W.; Yang, S.; Liu, X. Battery digital twins: Perspectives on the fusion of models, data and artificial intelligence for smart battery management systems. Energy AI 2021, 1, 100016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, B.; Sanjurjo, E.; Tranchero, M.; Romano, C.; González, F. Thermal Parameter and State Estimation for Digital Twins of E-Powertrain Components. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 97384–97400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Tan, W.; Sepasgozar, S. Digital Twin and CyberGIS for Improving Connectivity and Measuring the Impact of Infrastructure Construction Planning in Smart Cities. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oracle. Developing Applications with Oracle Internet of Things Cloud Service: Digital Twins. Oracle 2018. Available online: https://docs.oracle.com/en/cloud/paas/iot-cloud/iotgs/oracle-iot-digital-twin-implementation.html (accessed on 7 February 2022).
- Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L.; Macchi, M. A review of the roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, R.; Vera, D.; Ahmad, B. A Connective Framework to Support the Lifecycle of Cyber–Physical Production Systems. Proc. IEEE 2021, 109, 568–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavakolibasti, M.; Meszmer, P.; Bottger, G.; Kettelgerdes, M.; Elger, G.; Erdogan, H.; Seshaditya, A.; Wunderle, B. Thermo-mechanical-optical coupling within a digita twin development for automotive LIDAR. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), St. Julian, Malta, 19–21 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Kshetri, N. The Economics of Digital Twins. Computer 2021, 54, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, R.; Da Silva, A. Sustainability Requirements of Digital Twin-Based Systems: A Meta Systematic Literature Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koturwar, P.; Girase, S.; Mukhopadhyay, D. A Survey of Classification Techniques in the Area of Big Data. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1503.07477. [Google Scholar]
- Orozco-Messana, J.; Iborra-Lucas, M.; Calabuig-Moreno, R. Neighbourhood Modelling for Urban Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Chang, R.; Zhang, J.; Sun, H.; Luan, W.; Li, N. Research on BIM Technology in Smart City. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, K.; Malakuti, S.; Ganz, C. Digital Twin Architecture and Standards. Ind. Internet Consort. J. Innov. 2019, 12, 72–83. [Google Scholar]
Level | Principle | Usage |
---|---|---|
0 | Reality capture (e.g., point cloud, drones, photogrammetry or drawings/sketches) | Brownfeld (existing) as-built survey |
1 | 2D map/system or 3D model (e.g., object-based, with no metadata or building information models) | Design/asset optimization and coordination |
2 | Connect model to persistent (static) data, metadata and building information model (BIM) Stage 2 (e.g., documents, drawings, asset management systems) | 4D/5D simulation, design/asset management, BIM Stage 2 |
3 | Enrich with real-time data (IoT, sensors) | Operational efficiency |
4 | Two-way data integration and interaction | Remote and immersive operations; control the physical from the digital |
5 | Autonomous operations and maintenance | Complete self-governance with total oversight and transparency |
Domain | Ref. | Objective | Physical Twin | Computing | Simulation | Communication | Data Analysis | Sensors | Eval. | TRL | SRL | Matur. Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smart Cities and Urban Spaces | [30] | DT for water distribution system | Water distribution system | - | GIS | IoT | Big data | Level, pressure, flow, quality, etc. | 7 | 0 | 3 | |
Smart Cities and Urban Spaces | [74] | Smart city management | Urban Space | - | ArcGIS | - | ML (ICP, C2C, M3C2), Big data | LIDAR, UAVs, satellites, ranging sensors | - | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Smart Cities and Urban Spaces | [21] | SoA of implemented DTs | Urban Space | Fog/cloud computing | ANSYS | Bluetooth, NFC, MQTT, HTTP, Ethernet | ML (ANN, CNN) | Camera, pressure, vehicle GPS, travel cards, temp., etc. | - | 3 | 1 | - |
Smart Cities and Urban Spaces | [31] | Electricity network DT | Electricity distribution network | - | Python | - | Reinforcement learning (Markov decision process) | IoT electricity meters | 77-node test scheme | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Smart Cities and Urban Spaces | [29] | Implementation of SDT | Educational building | - | OPAL-RT | IoT, Ethernet, LoRa | AI | Temp., humidity, light, CO2, VOC, sound, etc. | Sustainable building rating systems | 7 | 4 | 3 |
Smart Manufacturing | [75] | Lifecycle monitoring and business projections | Industrial machines | Cloud | - | JSON, IoT, REST API | ML, Big Data | - | - | 8 | 0 | 3 |
Smart Manufacturing | [60] | Implementation of smart manuf. cyber-physical system prototype | Manufact. process, AGV | Arduino (edge) | DES | WiFi | Indus. Big Data | Proximity | - | 5 | 0 | 1 |
Smart Manufacturing | [76] | Role of DT in manufacturing | - | - | Matlab/Simulink, Mathematica, Dassault Systems | IoT | Big Data | - | - | - | - | - |
Smart Manufacturing | [77] | Framework for CPPS-DT implementation | - | Cloud | V-Hub | IoT (MQTT, OPC, WebSocket) | Indus. Big Data | - | Continuous model calibration | 7 | 2 | 3 |
Freight Logistics | [49] | Proposing data- and model-driven framework for urban logistics DT | Distribution network | - | GIS | Mobile | ML, DL, AI | GPS, RFID, customer service | Walk-forward metric | 7 | 4 | 3 |
Medicine | [54] | Framework for HDT | Human | Cloud | - | X73 | ML (CNN) | Wearables | - | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Engineering | [40] | DT for surveillance | Urban space | - | Multi-paradigm | IoT | Markov decision process policy generator | Camera, drones, seismic, humidity, audio, etc. | - | 3 | 2 | - |
Engineering | [65] | Multi-dimensional DT for prestressed steel | Steel cable | - | ABAQUS, ANSYS | Serial | ML (SVM) | Pressure transducer | Error percentage | 5 | 0 | - |
Engineering | [63] | Methodology for advanced physics-based PdM modeling | Industrial robot | - | Open Modelica, Matlab | - | - | Virtual sensors | - | 5 | 0 | 3 |
Engineering | [64] | Automation for reconditioning of aircraft component using DT | Industrial grinding robot | - | Coppelia- Sim | - | Markovian chain | RGB-D camera, depth and force sensors | RMSE | 6 | 0 | 3 |
Automotive | [69] | Battery pack DT for monitoring | Battery pack | Cloud | - | 4G IoT (MQTT), REST API, HTTP | Python | GPS, OBD-II, voltage, acc., etc. | - | 7 | 0 | 2 |
Automotive | [70] | DT for vehicle testing | Car | Cloud | Unreal, Matlab/ Simulink, Python, CarSim | 5G | ML, AI | LIDAR, RADAR, GPS, CAN | Accuracy testing, ISO standards | 7 | 3 | 3 |
Automotive | [78] | DT for automotive LIDAR | LIDAR | - | ANSYS | - | ML (NN) | LIDAR | Accuracy and precision testing | 4 | 0 | - |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Botín-Sanabria, D.M.; Mihaita, A.-S.; Peimbert-García, R.E.; Ramírez-Moreno, M.A.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A.; Lozoya-Santos, J.d.J. Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335
Botín-Sanabria DM, Mihaita A-S, Peimbert-García RE, Ramírez-Moreno MA, Ramírez-Mendoza RA, Lozoya-Santos JdJ. Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(6):1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335
Chicago/Turabian StyleBotín-Sanabria, Diego M., Adriana-Simona Mihaita, Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García, Mauricio A. Ramírez-Moreno, Ricardo A. Ramírez-Mendoza, and Jorge de J. Lozoya-Santos. 2022. "Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review" Remote Sensing 14, no. 6: 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335
APA StyleBotín-Sanabria, D. M., Mihaita, A. -S., Peimbert-García, R. E., Ramírez-Moreno, M. A., Ramírez-Mendoza, R. A., & Lozoya-Santos, J. d. J. (2022). Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Remote Sensing, 14(6), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335