Self-Attention and Convolution Fusion Network for Land Cover Change Detection over a New Data Set in Wenzhou, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The usability and generalization of DL-based change detection methods in practical application scenarios still need to be verified.
- It is potentially meaningful to flexibly and comprehensively use one or more of the existing methods to meet the goal of real-change detection application scenarios.
- (1)
- We created a new and challenging Wenzhou change detection data set, which is mainly used to acquire timely and effective land cover changes induced by urbanization in Wenzhou city, China. Based on the Wenzhou data set, we systematically tested the adaptability and performance of some existing popular and SOTA change detection approaches.
- (2)
- We constructed a self-attention and convolution fusion network (SCFNet) for land cover change detection, which can integrate multiple existing change detection networks or modules to enhance the performance of the model further. The constructed SCFNet can basically meet the practical application requirements of land cover change detection in Wenzhou city, China.
- (3)
- Compared with other SOTA methods, experiments on our created Wenzhou data set demonstrated that our SCFNet can acquire better and more balanced precision and recall. That is, the precision and recall both reach an accuracy of more than 85%. Furthermore, the effectiveness of our SCFNet is also validated on the public Guangzhou data set and achieves a good performance.
2. Materials and Methodology
2.1. Study Area
- (1)
- Bi-temporal images of the Wenzhou data set were collected from multiple periods (from 2017 to 2021). This may increase the difficulty of change detection since the bi-temporal images are shot under different atmospheric conditions, such as the sun height and moisture, etc.
- (2)
- The changes in the built-up area of the Wenzhou data set are complex. Due to a large number of demolition and reconstruction projects in the Wenzhou urban area, the old and new houses in the old urban area and “urban villages” alternate, and high-rise buildings and low-rise buildings coexist. These conditions make land cover change detection in the Wenzhou data set more challenging.
- (3)
- Since the primary type of change in the Wenzhou data set is a built-up area, and other types of changes are relatively small, this may lead to an imbalance in the number of different types of ground objects.
- (4)
- To avoid secondary manual editing in practical applications, DL-based change detection methods require both precision and recall to be higher than 85%.
2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. Overview of Self-Attention and Convolution Fusion Network
2.2.2. Self-Attention and Convolution Fusion Module
2.2.3. Residual Refinement Module
3. Experiments and Results
3.1. Experimental Settings
3.1.1. Data Set Descriptions
3.1.2. Evaluation Metrics
3.1.3. Benchmark Methods
- (1)
- FC-EF [44]: This method is a benchmark change detection model, which is a simplified U-shaped network. It employs an early fusion strategy to fuse bi-temporal images for change detection. This is a widespread end-to-end change detection framework.
- (2)
- FC-Siam-Conc [44]: The model is also a U-shaped network. The difference is that it adopts a post-fusion strategy to fuse the features of bi-temporal images. Specifically, this model first extracts the deep features of the bi-temporal images by means of a Siamese encoder. Then, these deep features can be fused by the concatenation operation, and input into the decoder to obtain the change detection results. This is another attractive Siamese-based end-to-end change detection framework.
- (3)
- SiUnet [45]: The method is a Siamese U-Net framework for building extraction. It uses a down-sampled counterpart of original bi-temporal images to enhance the multi-scale features of the network, resulting in improved detection performance. To this end, we adopted an early fusion strategy to deploy the SiUnet for the change detection task.
- (4)
- (5)
- (6)
- BIT [56]: The model is a SOTA transformer-based change detection network. It exploits a transformer encoder and decoder to build the contexts within the spatial-temporal domain for change detection. This network acquires a promising performance on the LEVIR-CD [46], WHU [45], and DSIFN [52] data sets.
3.1.4. Implementation Details
3.2. Results
3.2.1. Results on Wenzhou Data Set
3.2.2. Results on Guangzhou Data Set
3.3. Ablation Study
4. Discussion
- (1)
- FC-EF [44] and FC-Siam-Conc [44]: FC-EF [44] can achieve a better performance than FC-Siam-Conc on the Wenzhou data set, while FC-Siam-Conc [44] has higher accuracy than FC-EF [44] on the Guangzhou data set. Overall, these two models performed poorly on both the Wenzhou and Guangzhou data sets. This is because the capacity of these two models is too small to handle complex data sets.
- (2)
- SiUnet [45]: it achieves the second- and third-best performance on Wenzhou and Guangzhou data sets, respectively. The SiUnet [45] exploits the down-sampled counterpart of the original bi-temporal images as a branch of the Siamese network, enhancing the network’s ability to represent multi-scale features. Hence, SiUnet [45] is a simple and effective model for the Wenzhou and Guangzhou data sets compared with other benchmark methods. This strategy is worthy of follow-up research.
- (3)
- SNUNet [55]: Surprisingly, SNUNet [55] did not perform satisfactorily on the both Wenzhou and Guangzhou data sets. Although SNUNet [55] combines the Siamese network and NestedUNet to reduce the loss of localization, NestedUNet may introduce too many shallow features leading to incorrect semantic discrimination for facing the complex scene.
- (4)
- SLGPNet [49]: SLGPNet [49] can reach a relatively stable accuracy on both the Wenzhou and Guangzhou data sets. This model is composed of a local–global pyramid feature extractor and a change detection head. The local–global pyramid feature extractor combines the position attention module, local feature pyramid, and global spatial pyramid, which has a robust multi-scale feature representation ability for change detection. However, the accuracy of this method still has some limitations for practical applications. The reason may be that the change detection head of this method contains only a few parameters, which makes the feature fusion of the final bi-temporal image insufficient for change detection.
- (5)
- BIT [56]: Furthermore, BIT [56] is a SOTA transformer-based network for change detection. This model acquires the third-best and second-best accuracy on the Wenzhou and Guangzhou data sets, respectively. That is because BIT [56] can employ a transformer encoder to build the context of semantic tokens and exploit a Siamese transformer decoder to project semantic tokens into the pixel space for effective feature extraction. Nonetheless, BIT [56] is difficult to balance between P and R. This limits the overall performance of BIT [56].
- (6)
- Proposed SCFNet: Unlike the above methods, our SCFNet achieves the best performance on the both Wenzhou and Guangzhou data sets. Moreover, our SCFNet obtains precision and recall balanced accuracy on the Wenzhou data set, and its precision, recall, and F1-Score are higher than 85%. The core reasons include two aspects. First, the introduction of SCFM can improve the feature extraction capability of complex scenes. Second, the RRM deployed in SCFNet is able to refine the initial change results to obtain more accurate and complete change detection maps. Based on the above discussion, there are still some limitations in extending the existing methods to practical applications, such as the Wenzhou data set.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yu, Z.; Yao, Y.; Yang, G.; Wang, X.; Vejre, H. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of remotely sensed region heat islands during the rapid urbanization (1995–2015) of Southern China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 674, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Murayama, Y.; Morimoto, T. Impacts of land cover/use on the urban thermal environment: A comparative study of 10 megacities in China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ridd, M.K.; Liu, J. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 63, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Li, W.; Tao, R.; Du, Q. Graph-based block-level urban change detection using Sentinel-2 time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2022, 274, 112993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban, Y.; Yousif, O.A. Multitemporal spaceborne SAR data for urban change detection in China. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2012, 5, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Wang, F.; Cui, G.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Lei, T.; Sun, W. Spatial-Spectral Attention Network Guided With Change Magnitude Image for Land Cover Change Detection Using Remote Sensing Images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Lei, L.; Guan, D.; Li, M.; Kuang, G. Sparse-constrained adaptive structure consistency-based unsupervised image regression for heterogeneous remote-sensing change detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2021, 60, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Liu, T.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Falco, N. Land cover change detection techniques: Very-high-resolution optical images: A review. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 2021, 10, 44–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viana, C.M.; Girão, I.; Rocha, J. Long-term satellite image time-series for land use/land cover change detection using refined open source data in a rural region. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sun, Y.; Lei, L.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Kuang, G. Nonlocal patch similarity based heterogeneous remote sensing change detection. Pattern Recognit. 2021, 109, 107598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruzzone, L.; Prieto, D.F. Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2000, 38, 1171–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lv, Z.; Liu, T.; Zhang, P.; Atli Benediktsson, J.; Chen, Y. Land cover change detection based on adaptive contextual information using bi-temporal remote sensing images. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, D.; Mausel, P.; Brondizio, E.; Moran, E. Change detection techniques. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 2365–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban, Y.; Yousif, O. Change detection techniques: A review. Multitemporal Remote Sens. 2016, 19–43. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Du, Q.; Tong, X.; Samat, A.; Bruzzone, L.; Bovolo, F. Multiscale morphological compressed change vector analysis for unsupervised multiple change detection. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2017, 10, 4124–4137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, H.; Deng, K.; Fan, H.; Yu, M. Strategies combining spectral angle mapper and change vector analysis to unsupervised change detection in multispectral images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2016, 13, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ZhiYong, L.; Wang, F.; Xie, L.; Sun, W.; Falco, N.; Benediktsson, J.A.; You, Z. Diagnostic analysis on change vector analysis methods for LCCD using remote sensing images. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2021, 14, 10199–10212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 1979, 9, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Celik, T. Unsupervised change detection in satellite images using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2009, 6, 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Liu, T.; Shi, C.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Du, H. Novel land cover change detection method based on K-means clustering and adaptive majority voting using bitemporal remote sensing images. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 34425–34437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, P.; Shi, W.; He, P.; Hao, M.; Zhang, X. Novel approach to unsupervised change detection based on a robust semi-supervised FCM clustering algorithm. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bovolo, F.; Bruzzone, L.; Marconcini, M. A novel approach to unsupervised change detection based on a semisupervised SVM and a similarity measure. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46, 2070–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lv, Z.; Wang, F.; Sun, W.; You, Z.; Falco, N.; Benediktsson, J.A. Landslide Inventory Mapping on VHR Images via Adaptive Region Shape Similarity. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiaolu, S.; Bo, C. Change detection using change vector analysis from Landsat TM images in Wuhan. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2011, 11, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, P.; Khanduri, K. Land use and land cover change detection through remote sensing & GIS technology: Case study of Pathankot and Dhar Kalan Tehsils, Punjab. Int. J. Geomat. Geosci. 2011, 1, 839–846. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S.; Sood, V.; Taloor, A.K.; Prashar, S.; Kaur, R. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of topographically derived CVA algorithms using MODIS and Landsat-8 data over Western Himalayas, India. Quat. Int. 2021, 575, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemmour, H.; Chibani, Y. Multiple support vector machines for land cover change detection: An application for mapping urban extensions. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2006, 61, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Liu, T.; Shi, C.; Benediktsson, J.A. Local histogram-based analysis for detecting land cover change using VHR remote sensing images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2020, 18, 1284–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Gong, M.; Jiang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H. Landslide Inventory Mapping Method Based on Adaptive Histogram-Mean Distance with Bitemporal VHR Aerial Images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2021, 19, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, D.; Huang, X.; Bovolo, F.; Li, J.; Ke, X.; Zhang, A.; Benediktsson, J.A. Change detection from very-high-spatial-resolution optical remote sensing images: Methods, applications, and future directions. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 2021, 9, 68–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafique, A.; Cao, G.; Khan, Z.; Asad, M.; Aslam, M. Deep learning-based change detection in remote sensing images: A review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.X.; Tuia, D.; Mou, L.; Xia, G.S.; Zhang, L.; Xu, F.; Fraundorfer, F. Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 2017, 5, 8–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Yuan, Y.; Qin, A.K.; Miao, Q.G.; Gong, M.G. Commonality Autoencoder: Learning Common Features for Change Detection from Heterogeneous Images. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2022, 33, 4257–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, M.; Jiang, F.; Qin, A.K.; Liu, T.; Zhan, T.; Lu, D.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, M. A Spectral and Spatial Attention Network for Change Detection in Hyperspectral Images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2021, 60, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Li, G.; Jin, Z.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Foody, G.M. Iterative training sample expansion to increase and balance the accuracy of land classification from VHR imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2020, 59, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Mu, G.; Qin, C.; Miao, Q.; Ma, W.; Zhang, X. Semi-supervised hyperspectral image classification via spatial-regulated self-training. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gong, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, M. Two-Path Aggregation Attention Network with Quad-Patch Data Augmentation for Few-Shot Scene Classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Lin, S.; Ding, L.; Bruzzone, L. Multi-scale context aggregation for semantic segmentation of remote sensing images. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, K.; Wan, G.; Cheng, G.; Meng, L.; Han, J. Object detection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2020, 159, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Peng, M.; Zhong, Y.; Xie, H.; Hao, Z.; Lin, J.; Ma, X.; Hu, X. A Survey on Deep Learning-Based Change Detection from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, R.; Chen, S.; Zhan, Z. Change detection based on artificial intelligence: State-of-the-art and challenges. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Gong, M.; Liu, J.; Jiao, L. Deep learning to classify difference image for image change detection. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Beijing, China, 6–11 July 2014; pp. 411–417. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, T.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Nandi, A.K. Landslide inventory mapping from bitemporal images using deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2019, 16, 982–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daudt, R.C.; Le Saux, B.; Boulch, A. Fully convolutional siamese networks for change detection. In Proceedings of the 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Athens, Greece, 7–10 October 2018; pp. 4063–4067. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, S.; Wei, S.; Lu, M. Fully convolutional networks for multisource building extraction from an open aerial and satellite imagery data set. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2018, 57, 574–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Shi, Z. A spatial-temporal attention-based method and a new dataset for remote sensing image change detection. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.; Lu, Y.; Chen, H.; Wei, H.; Xie, D.; Yue, J.; Chen, R.; Lv, S.; Jiang, B. S2Looking: A satellite side-looking dataset for building change detection. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, K.; Jiang, J. AGCDetNet: An attention-guided network for building change detection in high-resolution remote sensing images. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2021, 14, 4816–4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Gong, M.; Lu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, H.; Jiang, F.; Zhang, M. Building Change Detection for VHR Remote Sensing Images via Local–Global Pyramid Network and Cross-Task Transfer Learning Strategy. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, Y.; Fu, K.; Yan, M.; Sun, X.; Wang, H.; Qiu, X. Change detection based on deep siamese convolutional network for optical aerial images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2017, 14, 1845–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Song, S.; Li, F.; Huang, G. Deep Siamese networks based change detection with remote sensing images. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Yue, P.; Tapete, D.; Jiang, L.; Shangguan, B.; Huang, L.; Liu, G. A deeply supervised image fusion network for change detection in high resolution bi-temporal remote sensing images. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2020, 166, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, D.; Bruzzone, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, H.; Ding, H.; Huang, X. SemiCDNet: A semisupervised convolutional neural network for change detection in high resolution remote-sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2020, 59, 5891–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, H.; Gong, M.; Liu, T.; Jiang, F.; Zhan, T.; Lu, D.; Zhang, M. HFA-Net: High frequency attention siamese network for building change detection in VHR remote sensing images. Pattern Recognit. 2022, 129, 108717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, S.; Li, K.; Shao, J.; Li, Z. SNUNet-CD: A Densely Connected Siamese Network for Change Detection of VHR Images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2022, 19, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Qi, Z.; Shi, Z. Remote sensing image change detection with transformers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2021, 60, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Tian, S.; Ma, A.; Zhang, L. ChangeMask: Deep multi-task encoder-transformer-decoder architecture for semantic change detection. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2022, 183, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Cheng, S.; Li, Y. SwinSUNet: Pure Transformer Network for Remote Sensing Image Change Detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Dong, Z.; Wang, G. Machine-Learning-Based Change Detection of Newly Constructed Areas from GF-2 Imagery in Nanjing, China. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, X.; Ge, C.; Lu, R.; Song, S.; Chen, G.; Huang, Z.; Huang, G. On the integration of self-attention and convolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 19–22 June 2022; pp. 815–825. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, Z.; Tang, P.; Wang, Z.; Saleem, N.; Yam, S.; Sommai, C. BRRNet: A fully convolutional neural network for automatic building extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lebedev, M.; Vizilter, Y.V.; Vygolov, O.; Knyaz, V.; Rubis, A.Y. Change detection in remote sensing images using conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the ISPRS TC II Mid-Term Symposium “Towards Photogrammetry 2020”, Riva del Garda, Italy, 4–7 June 2018; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
Methods | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-Score (%) | IoU (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
FC-EF [44] | 67.14 | 56.24 | 61.21 | 44.10 |
FC-Siam-Conc [44] | 52.39 | 53.18 | 52.79 | 35.85 |
SiUnet [45] | 84.49 | 73.58 | 78.66 | 64.83 |
SNUNet [55] | 73.83 | 61.33 | 67.00 | 50.38 |
SLGPNet [49] | 78.39 | 75.84 | 77.09 | 62.72 |
BIT [56] | 80.83 | 75.27 | 77.95 | 63.87 |
Proposed SCFNet | 86.60 | 85.31 | 85.95 | 75.36 |
Methods | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-Score (%) | IoU (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
FC-EF [44] | 77.62 | 56.97 | 65.71 | 48.94 |
FC-Siam-Conc [44] | 83.02 | 55.42 | 66.47 | 49.78 |
SiUnet [45] | 85.54 | 73.48 | 79.05 | 65.36 |
SNUNet [55] | 49.17 | 50.00 | 49.58 | 32.96 |
SLGPNet [49] | 85.25 | 80.88 | 83.00 | 70.95 |
BIT [56] | 87.86 | 71.84 | 79.05 | 65.36 |
Proposed SCFNet | 87.35 | 80.96 | 84.03 | 72.46 |
Backbone | SCFM | RRM | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-Score (%) | IoU (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✓ | 85.79 | 76.80 | 81.04 | 68.13 | ||
✓ | ✓ | 86.29 | 77.33 | 81.57 | 68.87 | |
✓ | ✓ | 85.04 | 81.39 | 83.17 | 71.20 | |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 86.60 | 85.31 | 85.95 | 75.36 |
Backbone | SCFM | RRM | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-Score (%) | IoU (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✓ | 85.27 | 79.40 | 82.23 | 69.82 | ||
✓ | ✓ | 84.35 | 82.02 | 83.17 | 71.19 | |
✓ | ✓ | 83.54 | 83.91 | 83.72 | 72.01 | |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 87.35 | 80.96 | 84.03 | 72.46 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhu, Y.; Jin, G.; Liu, T.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, M.; Liang, S.; Liu, J.; Li, L. Self-Attention and Convolution Fusion Network for Land Cover Change Detection over a New Data Set in Wenzhou, China. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5969. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235969
Zhu Y, Jin G, Liu T, Zheng H, Zhang M, Liang S, Liu J, Li L. Self-Attention and Convolution Fusion Network for Land Cover Change Detection over a New Data Set in Wenzhou, China. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(23):5969. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235969
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhu, Yiqun, Guojian Jin, Tongfei Liu, Hanhong Zheng, Mingyang Zhang, Shuang Liang, Jieyi Liu, and Linqi Li. 2022. "Self-Attention and Convolution Fusion Network for Land Cover Change Detection over a New Data Set in Wenzhou, China" Remote Sensing 14, no. 23: 5969. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235969
APA StyleZhu, Y., Jin, G., Liu, T., Zheng, H., Zhang, M., Liang, S., Liu, J., & Li, L. (2022). Self-Attention and Convolution Fusion Network for Land Cover Change Detection over a New Data Set in Wenzhou, China. Remote Sensing, 14(23), 5969. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235969