Next Article in Journal
Review on Active and Passive Remote Sensing Techniques for Road Extraction
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying Biochemical Traits over the Patagonian Sub-Antarctic Forests and Their Relation to Multispectral Vegetation Indices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fractal-Based Retrieval and Potential Driving Factors of Lake Ice Fractures of Chagan Lake, Northeast China Using Landsat Remote Sensing Images

1
Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
School of Geomatics and Prospecting Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
3
Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China
4
School of Water and Environment, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(21), 4233; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214233
Submission received: 25 September 2021 / Revised: 16 October 2021 / Accepted: 17 October 2021 / Published: 21 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Remote Sensing)

Abstract

:
A thorough understanding of the freshwater ice process received considerable critical attention due to increasing winter recreations and ice engineering. The development of the lake ice process of Chagan Lake was monitored using MODIS and Landsat images over eight consecutive snow seasons from October 2013 to April 2021. We derived the lake ice phenology from an eight-day time series of lake water skin temperature (LWST) provided by MODIS, including freeze-up date, break-up date, and ice cover duration. We discovered a large-scale fracture extending from northwest to southeast that repeatedly appeared on Landsat images since 1986. A novel fractal-based auto-extraction is proposed to extract the length and angle of these fractures. We also carried out a field campaign and an ice ridge was found at the southernmost part of what we observed from the images. Moreover, we explained the fracturing development by thermal changes, wind in lake, and underlying flow. Results show that the lake ice fracture is nearly perpendicular to the dominant wind direction in the cold season, which indicates the crucial role of wind on lake ice fracturing.

1. Introduction

The freeze–thaw cycle of lake ice is an essential process of the cryosphere and hydrosphere, and serves as a sensitive indicator to climate changes [1,2]. About 65% of lakes throughout the world experience the seasonal freeze–thaw change during the winter, approximately 2.4 million km2 [3]. The thaw–freeze cycle of lake ice is mainly controlled by thermal exchange, the displacement of water and ice, and water level variations, leading to lake ice fracturing. The existence of ice cracks could modify the optical transmission and then influence the algal communities and biological productivity beneath the surface ice [4]. During different stages of the ice process, the expansion and contracts of lake ice could exert a huge thrust on slope protection because of the bank, which could endanger the human infrastructure along the rivers and lakes. A thorough understanding of the lake ice process has significant implications for the geophysical, engineering, and biological utilization of freshwater ice during the cold season [5,6].
Previous work has mainly been attentive to the physical and thermal properties of ice cracks and has ignored the morphological features of lake ice cracking. The physical properties of snow and ice on freshwaters and the related mechanical strength tests have been systematically investigated because the lake ice mechanics closely correlated with the bearing capacity of surface ice [7,8]. A new fracture model is developed to describe the fracture toughness or crack development considering the energy balance referencing the remote sensing images [9]. Recently, various remote platforms could provide digital images for lake ice cracks, such as unmanned airship vehicles (UVA) [10], active microwave sensors [11], ground-penetrating radar [12], and so on. We need to consider both the image coverage and the spatial resolution when monitoring lake ice cracks. As the resolution decreases, the data coverage expands, which enables the platforms more suitable for a lake-based scale instead of a fixed point or part of the lake area. The satellite images overcome the limited field measurement range and provide a potential tool for further application in ice engineering.
Mandelbrot firstly proposed the fractal concept to describe the detailed structure of digital images [13,14]. Since then, fractal analysis has become a valuable technique to analyze remote sensing images, involving image classification, spatial complexity, and scale effect [15]. The spatial and temporal features of several cryosphere elements have been explored by fractal theory, such as sea ice [16,17], lake ice [10], river ice [18], snow cover [19], glacier [20], and so on. Few studies have investigated lake ice fracturing combining remote sensing and fractal analysis, especially for lake-based scales [21]. The remotely sensed images displayed spatially complex patterns with detailed texture, which is further measured by fractal dimension D. Sun et al. (2007) summarized six methods to calculate the D values, including triangle prism, differential box counting, variogram, isarithm, robust fractal estimator, and power spectrum [15]. The fractal dimension D computed from each remote sensing image provided a powerful tool for characterizing texture features and exploring spatial and geometric patterns.
Climate factors influencing the lake ice process have been explored in several studies, such as North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), air temperature, wind, snow cover, and so on [22]. Considerable existing research usually compared several climate factors through the correlation coefficients across relatively large areas and recognized the most crucial role played by the air temperature [23,24,25]. Furthermore, the cumulative negative air temperature, rather than air temperate, controls the thermal dynamics of lake ice for a given lake [26]. The passive remote sensing provided an effective tool to explore the large-scale snow cover, but the resolution is too coarse to detect the existence of snow cover on the lake or river ice [27]. Thus, the research on snow cover mainly relies on field measurement rather than the fixed station. It has been concluded that the snow cover is closely related to ice thickness, especially when the freshwater is completely frozen; the air temperature is closely associated with the ice phenology [27,28]. The wind promotes the formation of ice cover during the ice-on process and influences the heat exchange from the atmosphere during the ice-off process [22,29,30]. Previous work emphasized the mechanical effect of wind [5,22], and little work has been carried out for the association between wind and surface morphology of ice cracks, which is the main concern of our work herein.
This study is the first to extract the morphological characteristics of lake ice fractures at the lake-based scale from remote singing images. We carried out a reasonable survey of lake ice fractures of Chagan Lake using 42 Landsat OLI remote sensing images over eight consecutive cold seasons from October 2013 to April 2021. Our objectives are: (1) to carry out a comprehensive investigation for lake ice process in Chagan Lake, including lake ice phenology and fracturing; (2) to extract the quantitative information of lake ice fracture; (3) to explore the potential controls of lake ice cracks and present a reasonable explanation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Chagan lake, located in the southwest of Songnen Plain, Northeast China, is the largest natural lake in the Jilin Province and one of the ten largest lake areas in China, which have important implications for the fishery, agriculture uses, and winter recreations [31,32]. The geographic location of the study area is shown in Figure 1. It has a coverage area of 372 km2 and a volume of 5.98 × 108 m3 [33]. The water depth has an average value of 2.5 m and a maximum of 4.5 m [34]. The nineteenth edition of the Chagan Lake Ice and Snow Fishing and Hunting Cultural Tourism Festival was successfully held in 2020, which have created great social and economic benefits.
The Chagan Lake belongs to a mid-temperate, semi-arid, continental monsoon climate with well-marked seasons [32,33]. The region has an average temperature of 5.5 °C, total precipitation of 450 mm, and an annual sunshine duration of 2880 hours [33]. The average runoff and evaporations are 451 and 1206 mm, respectively [24]. In winter, the Chagan Lake begins to freeze in late November and stops melting in the middle of April. The ice cover exists for as long as 150 days with a completely frozen duration of 130 days [25]. The ice thickness ranges from 0.8 m to 1.1 m [35]. The primary water source of Chagan Lake mainly consists of precipitation, groundwater, and irrigation discharge from three adjacent districts, including Da’ an, Qian’an, and Qianguo [36]. The inflow and outflow of ground water in Chagan is 0.90 × 108 m3 and 0.24 × 108 m3 in summer, respectively, and the flow direction of groundwater is displayed in Figure 1.
We carried out a winter investigation around Chagan lake for ice regime in December 2020, and a fall investigation for water depth on 17 September 2021. An artificial dike has been built on the lake’s eastern shore, where a lakeside road with several viewing platforms and country lanes enabled us to investigate along the east coast of the lake. The fishing field in Figure 1 is the main place for winter recreation. The surface of lake ice along this side was flatter and smoother. The western shore has not been developed by human beings where wetlands and marshes are prevalent in summer. The surface of lake ice along this side was uneven; ice ridges and stacked ice are widely distributed. Figure 2 displays the recent spatial distribution of water depth measured using hand-held sonar detector SpeedTech SM-5 on 17 September 2021. The water depth measured ranged from 1.9 to 3.9 m with an average value of 3.3 m.

2.2. Data Source

2.2.1. Landsat

Landsat 8 Satellite was launched on 11 February 2013, with Operational Land Image (OLI) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS). The satellite products have been widely used in freshwater monitoring and information extraction with eleven bands. The spatial resolution of bands 1–7 and 9–11 is 30 m, and the spatial resolution of band 8 is 15 m; the temporal resolution is 16 days. We downloaded the Landsat 8 OLI images from USGS. Global visualization viewer web (http://glovis.usgs.gov/), with the cloud cover less than 20% (Table 1). Forty-two images with fractures covered the cold seasons from 2013 to 2020. A cold season ranges from October to April of the following year, which characterizes the annual cycle of lake growth and decay. The row and column of satellite images are 119 and 29. The pre-processing steps include radiation correction, atmospheric correction, geometric correction, and mosaic.

2.2.2. MODIS LST Products

Land surface temperature (LST) is an influential physical parameter of thermal exchange between atmosphere and lake, and remote sensing could provide long-term and reliable LST products [37]. To analyze the thermal changes of Chagan Lake, we extracted the lake water surface temperature (LWST) from the MODIS land surface temperature (LST) product, including MOD11A2 and MYD11A2 with the grid title of h26v04. The MODIS LST products averaged daily LWST during eight days and offered reliable LWST with a spatial resolution of 1 km. The data processing followed the strategies proposed by Song et al. (2016) and developed by Du et al. (2020), including MRT pre-processing, mosaicking based on quality control filter, band math, and time-series generation [38,39]. The mean average LWST is defined as the mean values of all the pixels in the Chagan lake for a given day. The time series of average daily LWST is calculating the average values of day-time and night-time LWST, and diurnal temperature differences that are calculated by day-time LWST minus night-time LWST.

2.2.3. Climate Records

Daily air temperature (AT), ground surface temperature (GST), wind direction, and wind speed of three stations around the Chagan Lake are provided by China Meteorological Data Service Centre for Climate Data (http://data.cma.cn/) for eight recent cold seasons since October 2013. Table 2 lists the details of three climate stations used in this paper, including Da’an, Qian’an, and Qianguo. MODIS-derived LWST were validated by the AT and GST values of three meteorological stations, marked as the red circle in Figure 1. The wind speed and wind direction are measured at an altitude of 10 m above the surface.

2.3. Methods

With the development of remote sensing, the geospatial resolution has become more refined, and the texture information of remote sensing images has been greatly enriched. To start with, we extracted the lake ice phenology, which provides a temporal reference to check whether the textures on images are caused by snow and ice. Then, we proposed a fractal-based method to extract the length and angle for the large-scale fractures. Finally, we calculated the fractal dimension D to characterize the spatial distribution of lake ice fracture.

2.3.1. The Extraction of Lake Ice Phenology

Lake ice can be directly derived from a diverse set of physical properties, such as albedo, brightness temperature, backscatter coefficient, lake surface water temperature, and so on [25,28]. Herein, we derived the lake ice phenology from the time series of MODIS LWST. A variety of definitions of the lake ice phenology have been developed [28,40]. We define the freeze-up date as the day when the LWST fall below 0 °C in early winter, and the break-up date as the day when the LWST rise above 0 °C in the spring of the following year; and ice cover duration describes the time duration between freeze-up date and break-up date [38,39].

2.3.2. The Fractal-Based Auto-Extraction

We implemented the following steps to find the lake ice fracture on satellite images, and calculated the longest length and angle, as shown in Figure 3. The blue band with a wavelength ranging from 0.450 to 0.515 μm is prepared and transformed into binary images for further analysis after pre-processing. Firstly, we extracted the linear structure using the Canny operator and generated the initial boundary. The linear structure is considered as the boundary of homogenous regions with different texture features. Secondly, we carried out the edge detection and excluded the outer boundaries. The removing part is determined by opening, filling, and eroding sequentially. Thirdly, the contour of the maximum connected domain of inter part was extracted. Finally, we located the south and north end of this fracture to calculate the angle and chose the shortest path for calculating the crack length. The angle referenced the 16-degree angle of wind direction and is defined as the angle between lake ice fracture and north direction in a clockwise direction.

2.3.3. The Calculation of Fractal Dimension

The fractal dimension of strictly self-similar objects can be derived mathematically and is given by Mandelbrot [13,14]:
D = log   ( N r ) log ( 1 / r )
where Nr represents an object of N parts scaled down by a ratio of r. The D derived from Equation (1) is the shape’s similarity dimension [13,14,15]. We used the differential box counting method to calculate D [15]. The image with a size of M × M has been scaled down to a new image of s × s, then:
r = s/M
the maximum value and minimum value calculate the gray level of each grid:
nr (i, j) = zmax − zmin + 1
Nr is the sum of contributions of each grid,
N r = i , j n r   ( i , j )
Substituting Equations (2)–(4) into Equation (1) gives,
D   = log ( i , j n r   ( i , j ) log   ( M / s )

3. Results

3.1. The Changes of Lake Ice Phenology Derived from LWST

3.1.1. The Changes of MODIS-Derived LWST

We compared the MODIS-derived LWST with GST and AT from the three climate stations, and the scatter plot is shown in Figure 4. MODIS products provide eight-day records by averaging LWST within specific eight days. If the date of field falls within these eight days, we matched the LWST with in-situ climate records. Three hundred and forty-six in-situ records were selected for comparing the difference of MODIS LWST, GST, and AT from October 2013 to April 2021. The coefficient of determination (R2) between GST and MODIS LWST had high values of 0.92 with the of RMSE (4.049). Meanwhile, a higher R2 of 0.94 was found between MODIS LWST and AT with the RMSE of 3.432. These results reveal that the MODIS-derived LWST has good agreement with both GST and AT. Therefore, the MODIS LWST is reliable for describing the spatial-temporal changes of lake water skin temperature.
We present the annual and seasonal changes of AT, GST, and mean LWST in Figure 5. AT showed a slightly decreasing trend in view of yearly changes, and the GST and LWST displayed a flat trend. Compared with GST, the LWST was closer to AT. What is interesting is that AT, GST, and LWST are almost identical in the cold season 2019. The seasonal changes in Figure 4b suggested that the difference between AT and GST is minor, common in the relatively shallow natural lakes. The air is warmer than water in summer, and the water is warmer than the air in winter, suggesting the temperature index is a good indicator of thermal changes. Generally, the LWST and AT showed the same trend except for the cold season of 2015. The errors source of MODIS-derived LWST could be explained by the time difference of satellite overpass and field measurement, the scale difference between pointed-based filed measurement and pixel-based satellite images, emissivity estimation errors, the spatial gap caused by cloud, and so on [33,41,42].

3.1.2. The Changes of Lake Ice Phenology

Table 3 lists the lake ice phenology derived from the LWST time series, including freeze-up date, break-up date, and ice cover duration. The freeze-up date fluctuated around the yearly average day of year (DOY) of 317 (November 13); the break-up date exhibited more significant changes than the freeze-up date and showed a decaying trend. The ice cover duration had average values of 140.44 ± 12 days. The cold season of 2017 and 2018 had the two longest ice cover durations over 150 days, with earlier freeze-up dates and later break-up dates. Meanwhile, the three temperatures of these two ice seasons were the two lowest years. In general, the LST-derived ice cover duration underwent minor changes, which were consistent with our previous work (Yang et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2019).

3.2. The Changes of Landsat-Derived Lake Ice Fracture

3.2.1. The Comparison between Auto-Extraction and Visual Interpretation

Figure 6 displays the comparison of the auto-extraction and visual interpretation. The angle based on auto extraction had mean values of 335°28′34″ ± 0°13′34″, and the length had mean values of 21,141.57 ± 68.36 km. We compared the angle and length of lake ice cracks using auto-image extraction and visual interpterion, as listed in Table 4. The R2 of angle and distance between auto-extraction and visual interpterion was 0.96 and 0.98; the MAE was 3.99% and 2.48%. These results show that the auto-extraction method agrees with visual interpterion well, and the auto-extraction results are reliable.

3.2.2. The Results Based on Landsat Images

The fractal analysis has a wide range of applications in diverse fields, such as geoscience, materials, meteorology, and so on [15]. We calculated D values of 42 Landsat images for these eight cold seasons. Figure 7 shows the boxplot of D values and the Landsat images with the highest D values within the given cold season. Generally, the fractal dimension D at the lake-based scales varied slightly within the range of 1.8569 and 1.8756 during these eight cold seasons. The cold season from 2014 to 2018 showed a relatively wide distribution, ranging from 1.8596 to 1.8759, with a mean value of 1.8663. The cold season from 2018 to 2019 exhibited a concentrated distribution, ranging from 1.8586 to 1.8605 with mean values of 1.8595. The Landsat image of this cold season also has good image quality due to scarce snow and clouds and offers excellent material for fracture analysis. The fractal demission D expressed an overall statistical indicator for the whole image. The mono-fractal dimension index is not sufficient to explain the complex nature phenomena beneath the lake ice surface.
We checked the quick images of three sensors of Landsat since 1986, including TM, ETM+, and OLI. A similar linear structure had been found on the Landsat quick images during 18 of those 35 cold seasons. Figure 8 illustrates the images with the best quality in each cold season and corresponding dates. One scene with the best image quality is presented herein for a given cold season. Liu et al. (2018) also identified similar lake fractures and analyzed the impact factors of the mechanical processes on three lakes in northeast China. These findings pointed out that image crack is a common phenomenon that has not attracted the interest of humans.
The infiltrated lake snow ice played an unavoidable role in the development of lake ice fracture. Substantial snowfall is prevalent in temperate areas like northeast China. When the weight of snowfall exceeds the capacity of surface lake ice, it generates the lake ice fracture [43]. To sum up, the lake ice cracks may be caused by snow cover, self-similarity, and image quality from the view of satellite images. Previous work showed that the large-scale fractures usually appear in the blue ice regions, where snow cover is blown away by the wind and showed a rarely distributed [5]. No matter if snow-covered or not, the fractal analysis provided an effective solution to analyze the texture features of lake ice surface on satellite images.
Self-similarity and fractal dimension, a key concept of fractal theories, means that the fractal dimension is supposed to be stable when applied to remote sensing images. The D dimension showed a minor change in Figure 6, which suggests that the remote sensing data used are not strictly fractal. Previous work concluded that natural phenomena have a statistical self-similarity over a limited range of scales [15]. Besides, we also used fractal-based edge detection to calculate the length and angle of image fractures. Self-similarity is not a prerequisite when applying fractal theories to extract textural information [44,45].

3.2.3. The Field Investigation

We carried out a field investigation to justify our findings at the end of December 2020. We located two spots around the southernmost edge of the lake ice fracture to identify the lake ice fracture on 20 December 2020. There existed an ice ridge around Spot A (124°18′35.25″E, 45°9′56.71″N), as shown in Figure 9. As seen from Figure 9b and Figure 7c, unshaped oval ice cubes were widely distributed in this area. There existed a transparent frozen water path with a lighter tone and smoother surface than the neighborhood around Spot B (124°17′59.2476″E, 45°9′59.68″N), as shown in Figure 9c. The action of squeezing pressure made the crushed ice clutter together and formed a hill-like pile of ice. More field photos can be found in Figure A1. The rugged surface suggested that the lake ice deforms along the shore due to thermal and mechanical stress. Therefore, we concluded that the image fracture generated from ice ridges or stacked ice is one of the reasonable explanations for what we observed from Landsat.

3.3. The Wind Field of Chagan Lake

We examined the recent eight cold seasons’ wind speed and direction data collected by three meteorological stations around the lake area. Figure 10 shows the monthly changes of wind speed using average values of eight years. The daily wind speed had mean values of 2.87 m/s during the recent eight cold seasons. The mean values of wind speed in November and March were 2.92 and 3.11 m/s, higher than other months in the cold season, indicating the critical role of wind during the freeze-up and break-up periods. Both the relatively high mean wind and maximum speed values fall within the freeze-up or break-up periods. During the cold season of 2018–2019, the daily mean wind speed was 7.10 and 6.73 m/s on November 26 and 27, respectively, which just happened in the freeze-up periods; the daily mean wind speed was 5.77 m/s on 21 March, which just happened in the break-up periods.
The wind rose in Figure 11 displays spatial distribution and frequency of wind direction and velocity. Chagan Lake is normally characterized by strong easterly and southerly in the warm season. The dominant wind direction differed among different months. The wind domain from August to October was SSW, and that from November to March was SW, and that of April was SSW. Moreover, SW, SSW, and WSW had the three highest frequencies in the winter. The lake fracture had an average angle of 335°28′34″, the WSW and SW direction had the angle of 247°30′ and 225°. The angle between fracture and WSW is 87°58′34″, nearly perpendicular. We treated the fractures as straight lines instead of curves when calculating the angle. A closer look at the cracks on the ice surface reveals that the cracks were not straight lines, but along several major cracks that extended, diverged, crossed with other cracks, and then extended and bifurcated. The direction of lake fracture is nearly perpendicular to the wind domain direction in the cold season, which is responsible for the direction of lake ice fraction. The prevailing direction also forced the lake ice to drift from the southwest to the middle, revealing that the southwest side is unsuitable for human recreation or fishing. Interestingly, the direction of lake ice fractures is also perpendicular to the flow direction of groundwater. Both inflow and outflow get slow in winter and make the water level come down, leading to perpendicular cracks.

4. Discussion

A comprehensive understanding of the lake ice process is increasingly significant due to prevailing human recreation and fishing. The evolution of the lake ice is controlled by a balanced exchange of mass, heat, and momentum between lake and atmosphere, which largely depends on the local climatology [5]. Although the earliest lake ice phenology could trace back to the 1800s, the long-term record is available for limited lake areas in cold regions [46]. Temperature has been considered the most significant impact factor of the frozen–thaw cycle of lake surface [22,25]. Ice formation is governed by intense radiative and turbulent heat losses between the warmer lake surface and the colder atmosphere. Herein, we considered three types of temperature (AT, GST, and LWST). All of them underwent minor changes during the past eight cold seasons, showed the same trend with lake ice phenology. In other words, the heat changes rather than the air temperature index control the lake ice process.
During the freezing process of Chagan Lake, the water body is subjected to different degrees of expansion forces, resulting in dry cracks, wet cracks, and wide cracks in sequence [5]. The surface ice contracts as the surface temperature decrease, resulting in dry cracks. The water comes up, fills the air gap, and freezes under the wind and waves’ synoptic effect. The dry crack just happens on the upper layer of ice without penetrating. Then, narrow wet fractures accumulate rapidly and supply continuous materials for a steady ice sheet. After that, wind waves with long and narrow ice lead appear and last for several days until it complete freeze. Meanwhile, a thin ice bridge usually formed, and the ice thickness is supposed to be less than 20 cm [5], which was consistent with our results from satellite images and further confirmed by the fieldwork.
As the temperature increases in the break-up process, the surface ice expands, generating small displacement and occasional ice drift. A steady ice sheet could be broken by the wind. Taking Chagan Lake as an example, the wind blows in the southeastern direction synchronously and creates intense pressure to the windward side of the lake. Thus, the Chagan Lake begins to melt along the southeast side and expand across the lake area. Herein, we used the climate records to describe wind changes, and the difference of wind field between lake areas and surrounding land is ignored. The pointed-based climate record had limited abilities to characterize lake-based or basin-based climate changes. Wind, air temperature, and humidity together influence the turbulent transfer over the air–lake interaction. The semi-elliptical ice egg found in field investigation also suggested that the lake ice deforms along with the lake–land interaction under wind and waves. Notably, the formation of recurrent ice fracture closely associates with the shoreline geometry and topography [5], which requires a detailed bathymetric measurement in future work.
The role of the flow field under the ice cover has been ignored in previous work, especially before freeze-up. Liu et al. (2020) constructed a hydrodynamic model for Lake Chagan based on the Delft3D platform [32]. The hydrodynamic field of Lake Chagan in October was driven by the wind direction and the digital elevation model (DEM) of the lake bottom and calibrated by the water depth and water temperature from field measurement. From the planar distribution map of flow velocity (Figure A2), the lake water showed a clockwise flow along the western shore and a counterclockwise flow from along the eastern shore, and the junction line showed a northwest-southeast direction. Under the influence of lake hydrodynamics, the dynamics interfacial reaction of lake ice is intense when the lake ice freezes, which provides a beneficial condition for lake ice fractures. We concluded that lake hydrodynamics before the freeze-up also provide reasonable explanation the lake ice fracture of Chagan Lake shows a northwest-southeast trend caused by lake hydrodynamics before the freeze-up process.

5. Conclusions

Remote sensing provided a promising tool for exploring the large-scale lake ice fracturing over different lakes, which may have promising applications in ice engineering. Chagan lake froze on November 13 in winter and melted on April 1 in spring, leading to the ice cover duration of 140.44 ± 12 days during these eight years. The large-scale lake ice fracture appeared repeatedly in the Chagan Lake, 18 times of 35 cold seasons since 1986. We proposed a fractal-based method to calculate the angle and length, and the large-scale fractures had an average angle of 335°28′34″ ± 0°13′34″ and the length of 21,141.57 ± 68.36 km. Fractal geometries supply a helpful tool for exploring the spatial distribution in remotely sensed images, especially for the linear structure.
Moreover, we carried out a field investigation to validate the existence of the lake ice feature in December 2020. The lake ice surface along the southwestern side of the Chagan lake differed greatly from the other side due to complex underwater topography and lakeside landscape. An ice ridge has been found on the southernmost edge of fractures on satellite images and explained what we have observed. We also analyzed the influence of temperature, snow, and wind on fracture generation, and found out the lake ice fracture is nearly perpendicular to the domain wind direction in winter. The flow field of October showed a northwest-southeast direction, which implies that lake hydrodynamics before the freeze-up process also played a crucial role in fracturing.
The work herein reveals that remote sensing provides a macro perspective to monitoring the large-scale lake ice fracturing using fractal methods. We plan to carry out a bathymetric measurement along the southeast shore to find the relationship between surface morphology and underwater topography. Further exploration explores more texture measures and the related computing methods for multifractal modelling and consider the scale effects of multi-source remote sensing data with the multi-band information and spectral features on physically-based ice processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.H. and Q.Y.; methodology, X.H.; software, X.S. and Y.M.; validation, X.S.; investigation X.L. and X.S.; formal analysis, L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.H., W.H. and Q.Y.; funding acquisition, Q.Y., X.H. and W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41801283, 41971325, and 41730104), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFE0197600), and 14th Five-Year Plan of Technical and Social Research Project for Jilin Colleges of China (JJKH20210290KJ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Earthdata Search for providing MODIS, and Landsat data. Thanks are given to Professor Zhijun Li for the guidance for field validation. The anonymous reviewers to improve the quality of this manuscript are greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. The field photos of lake ice captured around the southern side of Chagan Lake on 20 December 2020: (a) long-range view; (b) short-range view; (c) vertical view.
Figure A1. The field photos of lake ice captured around the southern side of Chagan Lake on 20 December 2020: (a) long-range view; (b) short-range view; (c) vertical view.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g0a1
Figure A2. The planar distribution map of flow velocity of Chagan Lak in October simulated by Delft3D platform (Liu et al., 2020).
Figure A2. The planar distribution map of flow velocity of Chagan Lak in October simulated by Delft3D platform (Liu et al., 2020).
Remotesensing 13 04233 g0a2

References

  1. Zhang, G.; Yao, T.; Xie, H.; Yang, K.; Zhu, L.; Shum, C.; Bolch, T.; Yi, S.; Allen, S.; Jiang, L. Response of Tibetan Plateau’s lakes to climate changes: Trend, pattern, and mechanisms. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2020, 208, 103269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pointner, G.; Bartsch, A. Interannual Variability of Lake Ice Backscatter Anomalies on Lake Neyto, Yamal, Russia. GI Forum J. 2020, 8, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Benson, B.J.; Magnuson, J.J.; Jensen, O.P.; Card, V.M.; Hodgkins, G.; Korhonen, J.; Livingstone, D.M.; Stewart, K.M.; Weyhenmeyer, G.A.; Granin, N.G. Extreme events, trends, and variability in Northern Hemisphere lake-ice phenology (1855–2005). Clim. Chang. 2012, 112, 299–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hampton, S.E.; Galloway, A.W.; Powers, S.M.; Ozersky, T.; Woo, K.H.; Batt, R.D.; Labou, S.G.; O’Reilly, C.M.; Sharma, S.; Lottig, N.R.; et al. Ecology under lake ice. Ecol. Lett. 2017, 20, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Leppäranta, M. Freezing of Lakes and the Evolution of Their Ice Cover; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Woolway, R.I.; Kraemer, B.M.; Lenters, J.D.; Merchant, C.J.; O’Reilly, C.M.; Sharma, S. Global lake responses to climate change. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 388–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arp, C.D.; Cherry, J.E.; Brown, D.; Bondurant, A.C.; Endres, K.L. Observation-derived ice growth curves show patterns and trends in maximum ice thickness and safe travel duration of Alaskan lakes and rivers. Cryosphere Discuss. 2020, 14, 3595–3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, W.; Li, Z.; Leppäranta, M.; Han, H.; Wang, N. Residual Strain in a Reservoir Ice Cover: Field Investigations, Causes, and Its Role in Estimating Ice Stress. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2018, 144, 04018048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, X.; Li, B.; Li, Z.; Shen, W. A new fracture model for reservoir ice layers in the northeast cold region of China. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 191, 795–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, W.; Lu, P.; Li, Z.; Zhuang, F.; Lu, Z.; Li, G.Y. Analysis of ice cracks morphology on lake surface of Lake Wuliangsuhai in the winter of 2017–2018. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2020, 42, 919–926. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeffries, M.O.; Morris, K.; Kozlenko, N. Ice Characteristics and Processes, and Remote Sensing of Frozen Rivers and Lakes. In Remote Sensing in Northern Hydrology: Measuring Environmental Change; Pietroniro, C.R.D.A., Ed.; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gusmeroli, A.; Grosse, G. Ground penetrating radar detection of subsnow slush on ice-covered lakes in interior Alaska. Cryosphere 2012, 6, 1435–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mandelbrot, B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; W.H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mandelbrot, B.B. An Introduction to Multifractal Distribution Functions. In Random Fluctuations and Pattern Growth: Experiments and Models; Stanley, H.E., Ostrowsky, N., Eds.; NATO ASI Series (Series E: Applied Sciences); Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; Volume 157. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun, W.; Xu, G.; Gong, P.; Liang, S. Fractal analysis of remotely sensed images: A review of methods and applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2007, 27, 4963–4990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hibler, W.D., III. Sea ice fracturing on the large scale. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2001, 68, 2013–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nomura, D.; Aoki, S.; Simizu, D.; Iida, T. Influence of Sea Ice Crack Formation on the Spatial Distribution of Nutrients and Microalgae in Flooded Antarctic Multiyear Ice. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2018, 123, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deng, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. The experiment of fracture mechanics characteristics of Yellow River Ice. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2019, 168, 102896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mendoza, P.A.; Musselman, K.N.; Revuelto, J.; Deems, J.S.; López-Moreno, J.I.; McPhee, J. Interannual and Seasonal Variability of Snow Depth Scaling Behavior in a Subalpine Catchment. Water Resour. Res. 2020, 56, e2020WR027343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Emetc, V.; Tregoning, P.; Morlighem, M.; Borstad, C.; Sambridge, M. A statistical fracture model for Antarctic ice shelves and glaciers. Cryosphere 2018, 12, 3187–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lam, N.S.N. Description and Measurement of Landsat TM Images Using Fractals. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1990, 56, 187–195. [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown, L.C.; Duguay, C.R. The response and role of ice cover in lake-climate interactions. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 2010, 34, 671–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Qiu, Y.; Juha, L.J.; Xie, P.; Cheng, B.; Liang, W. Comparison to Changes of Lake Ice Phenology and Air Temperature over Northern Europe, Tibetan Plateau and Mongolian Plateau. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 502, 012033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, L.; Zheng, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wen, M.; Fan, L.; Zhang, B. Responses of Lake Ice Phenology to Climate Change at Tibetan Plateau. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2020, 13, 3856–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Q.; Song, K.S.; Wen, Z.D.; Hao, X.H.; Fang, C. Recent trends of ice phenology for eight large lakes using MODIS products in Northeast China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2019, 40, 5388–5410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Graf, R.; Tomczyk, A.M. The Impact of Cumulative Negative Air Temperature Degree-Days on the Appearance of Ice Cover on a River in Relation to Atmospheric Circulation. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yang, Q.; Song, K.; Hao, X.; Wen, Z.; Tan, Y.; Li, W. Investigation of spatial and temporal variability of river ice phenology and thickness across Songhua River Basin, northeast China. Cryosphere 2020, 14, 3581–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duguay, C.R.; Bernier, M.; Gauthier, Y.; Kouraev, A. Remote sensing of lake and river ice. Remote Sens. Cryosphere 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duguay, C.R.; Prowse, T.D.; Bonsal, B.R.; Brown, R.D.; Lacroix, M.P.; Ménard, P. Recent trends in Canadian lake ice cover. Hydrol. Process. 2006, 20, 781–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sharma, S.; Meyer, M.F.; Culpepper, J.; Yang, X.; Hampton, S.; Berger, S.A.; Brousil, M.R.; Fradkin, S.C.; Higgins, S.N.; Jankowski, K.J.; et al. Integrating Perspectives to Understand Lake Ice Dynamics in a Changing World. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2020, 125, e2020JG005799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Song, K.; Wang, Z. Assessment of chlorophyll-a concentration and trophic state for Lake Chagan using Landsat TM and field spectral data. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 129, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Y.J.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Sun, G.; Chen, Y.; Ma, H. Effects of Irrigation Discharge on Salinity of a Large Freshwater Lake: A Case Study in Chagan Lake, Northeast China. Water 2020, 12, 2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Song, K.; Wang, Z.; Blackwell, J.; Zhang, B.; Li, F.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, G. Water quality monitoring using Landsat Themate Mapper data with empirical algorithms in Chagan Lake, China. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2011, 5, 3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Ju, H. Spatiotemporal dynamics of succession and growth limitation of phytoplankton for nutrients and light in a large shallow lake. Water Res. 2021, 194, 116910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wen, Z.; Song, K.; Shang, Y.; Lyu, L.; Yang, Q.; Fang, C.; Du, J.; Li, S.; Liu, G.; Zhang, B.; et al. Variability of chlorophyll and the influence factors during winter in seasonally ice-covered lakes. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 276, 111338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, X.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Y.J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H. Assessment of water quality of best water management practices in lake adjacent to the high-latitude agricultural areas, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 3338–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guillevic, P.; Göttsche, F.; Nickeson, J.; Hulley, G.; Ghent, D.; Yu, Y.; Trigo, I.; Hook, S.; Sobrino, J.A.; Remedios, J.; et al. Land Surface Temperature Product Validation Best Practice Protocol. Version 1.1. In Best Practice for SatelliteDerived Land Product Validation; Guillevic, P., Göttsche, F., Nickeson, J., Román, M., Eds.; Land Product Validation Subgroup (WGCV/CEOS): Washington, DC, USA, 2018; p. 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, J.; Jacinthe, P.A.; Zhou, H.; Xiang, X.; Zhao, B.; Wang, M.; Song, K. Monitoring of water surface temperature of Eurasian large lakes using MODIS land surface temperature product. Hydrol. Process. 2020, 34, 3582–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, K.; Wang, M.; Du, J.; Yuan, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, M.; Mu, G. Spatiotemporal Variations of Lake Surface Temperature across the Tibetan Plateau Using MODIS LST Product. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Livingstone, D.M.; Adrian, R.; Blenckner, T.; George, G.; Weyhenmeyer, G.A. Lake Ice Phenology. In The Impact of Climate Change on European Lakes; George, G., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duan, S.; Li, Z.; Li, H.; Göttsche, F.M.; Wu, H.; Zhao, W.; Leng, P.; Zhang, X.; Coll, C. Validation of Collection 6 MODIS land surface temperature product using in situ measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 225, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Minns, C.K.; Shuter, B.J.; Davidson, A.; Wang, S. Factors influencing peak summer surface water temperature in Canada’s large lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2018, 75, 1005–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Weeks, W.F.; Assu, A. Fracture of lake and sea ice. In Fracture of Nonmetals and Composites; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ding, Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, X.; Dai, H. Blind image quality assessment based on fractal description of natural scenes. Electron. Lett. 2015, 51, 338–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pentland, A.P. Fractal-based descriptions of natural scenes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984, PAMI-6, 661–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Magnuson, J.J.; Robertson, D.M.; Benson, B.J.; Wynne, R.H.; Livingstone, D.M.; Arai, T.; Assel, R.A.; Barry, R.G.; Card, V.; Kuusisto, E.; et al. Historical trends in lake and river ice cover in the Northern Hemisphere. Science 2000, 289, 1743–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The geographic location of Chagan Lake, China: (a) geographic map of Northeast China; (b) the spatial coverage of Chagan Lake using the Landsat image on 15 April 2019. Three climate stations (red circle) are involved, including Da’an (50945), Qian’an (50948), and Qianguo (50949).
Figure 1. The geographic location of Chagan Lake, China: (a) geographic map of Northeast China; (b) the spatial coverage of Chagan Lake using the Landsat image on 15 April 2019. Three climate stations (red circle) are involved, including Da’an (50945), Qian’an (50948), and Qianguo (50949).
Remotesensing 13 04233 g001
Figure 2. The water depth of Chagan Lake measured by hand-held sonar detector SpeedTech SM-5 on 17 September 2021.
Figure 2. The water depth of Chagan Lake measured by hand-held sonar detector SpeedTech SM-5 on 17 September 2021.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g002
Figure 3. The extraction result of lake ice fracture. The Landsat OLI remote sensing data were acquired on 8 December 2018.
Figure 3. The extraction result of lake ice fracture. The Landsat OLI remote sensing data were acquired on 8 December 2018.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g003
Figure 4. The comparison between climate records and MODIS-derived results in Chagan Lake.: (a) ground surface temperature (GST) vs. lake water surface temperature (LWST); (b) air temperature (AT) vs lake water surface temperature (LWST).
Figure 4. The comparison between climate records and MODIS-derived results in Chagan Lake.: (a) ground surface temperature (GST) vs. lake water surface temperature (LWST); (b) air temperature (AT) vs lake water surface temperature (LWST).
Remotesensing 13 04233 g004
Figure 5. The changes of mean lake water surface temperature (LWST), ground surface temperature (GST), air temperature (AT), and ice cover duration for eight cold seasons from December 2013 to April 2021. The two former were provided by climate satiation, and the last one is derived from remote sensing data.
Figure 5. The changes of mean lake water surface temperature (LWST), ground surface temperature (GST), air temperature (AT), and ice cover duration for eight cold seasons from December 2013 to April 2021. The two former were provided by climate satiation, and the last one is derived from remote sensing data.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g005
Figure 6. The lake ice cracks of Landsat OLI original images (ad),auto-extraction results (eh) and visual interpretation (il) of four satellite images during the cold season from December 2018 to March 2019.
Figure 6. The lake ice cracks of Landsat OLI original images (ad),auto-extraction results (eh) and visual interpretation (il) of four satellite images during the cold season from December 2018 to March 2019.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g006
Figure 7. The satellite images of the frozen Chagan Lake (ah) with the largest D values for each cold season and the boxplot of fractal dimension D (i).
Figure 7. The satellite images of the frozen Chagan Lake (ah) with the largest D values for each cold season and the boxplot of fractal dimension D (i).
Remotesensing 13 04233 g007
Figure 8. The quick images of Landsat with similar cracks. We checked three sensors of Landsat for 35 cold seasons since 1986, including TM, ETM+, and OLI.
Figure 8. The quick images of Landsat with similar cracks. We checked three sensors of Landsat for 35 cold seasons since 1986, including TM, ETM+, and OLI.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g008
Figure 9. The field validation of lake ice fracture: (a) Landsat OLI image on 25 February 2019; (b,c): field photos of the lake ice ridge on 20 December 2020.
Figure 9. The field validation of lake ice fracture: (a) Landsat OLI image on 25 February 2019; (b,c): field photos of the lake ice ridge on 20 December 2020.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g009
Figure 10. The seasonal changes of average wind speed of the Chagan lake during the recent eight cold season from October 2013 to 2015: (a) the time series of daily wind speed; (b) the bar chart of monthly mean values.
Figure 10. The seasonal changes of average wind speed of the Chagan lake during the recent eight cold season from October 2013 to 2015: (a) the time series of daily wind speed; (b) the bar chart of monthly mean values.
Remotesensing 13 04233 g010
Figure 11. The wind rose of the Chagan Lake in different months: (a) October (b) November; (c) December; (d) January; (e) February; (f) March. The wind direction is expressed by 16-degree angle, including north (N), north northeast (NNE), northeast (NE), east northeast (ENE), east (E), east southeast (ESE), southeast (SE), south southeast (SSE), south(S), south southwest (SSW), southwest (SW), west southwest (WSW), west (W), west northwest (WNW), northwest (NW), north northwest (NNW).
Figure 11. The wind rose of the Chagan Lake in different months: (a) October (b) November; (c) December; (d) January; (e) February; (f) March. The wind direction is expressed by 16-degree angle, including north (N), north northeast (NNE), northeast (NE), east northeast (ENE), east (E), east southeast (ESE), southeast (SE), south southeast (SSE), south(S), south southwest (SSW), southwest (SW), west southwest (WSW), west (W), west northwest (WNW), northwest (NW), north northwest (NNW).
Remotesensing 13 04233 g011
Table 1. The summary of Landsat OLI images used during the cold season from 2013 to 2020.
Table 1. The summary of Landsat OLI images used during the cold season from 2013 to 2020.
Cold SeasonDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchTotal
201310012
201411215
201511114
201612205
201712227
201812227
201912216
202022116
Table 2. The list of climate stations around Chagan Lake and the spatial distribution is shown in Figure 1.
Table 2. The list of climate stations around Chagan Lake and the spatial distribution is shown in Figure 1.
CodeStation NameLatitude
(°)
Longitude
(°)
Elevation (m)
50945Da’an45.5005124.267137.4
50948Qian’an44.998124.011146.3
50949Qianguo45.1117124.823134.7
Table 3. The lake ice phenology derived from MODIS LST products for eight cold seasons from 2013 to 2021. FUD, BUD, and ICD represent freeze-up date, break-up date, and ice cover duration, respectively.
Table 3. The lake ice phenology derived from MODIS LST products for eight cold seasons from 2013 to 2021. FUD, BUD, and ICD represent freeze-up date, break-up date, and ice cover duration, respectively.
Cold SeasonFUDBUDICD (day)
20142013/11/172014/03/22126
20152014/11/172015/04/07142
20162015/11/092016/03/19131
20172016/10/312017/03/30151
20182017/11/172018/04/18153
20192018/11/172019/03/22126
20202019/11/172020/03/29134
20212020/11/162021/03/30135
Means11/1304/01140.44
Table 4. The comparison of lake ice fracture using visual interpretation and auto extraction using fractal theory during the cold season between 2018 and 2019.
Table 4. The comparison of lake ice fracture using visual interpretation and auto extraction using fractal theory during the cold season between 2018 and 2019.
DateAngleLength (m)
LandsatVisual LandsatVisual
2018-12-08335°45′56″339°24′05″21,101.9922,063.61
2018-01-25335°34′49″338°31′27″21,052.7823,199.51
2019-02-16335°24′26″338°09′25″21,183.9824,906.53
2019-03-14335°09′06″336°18′26″21,227.5322,179.47
R20.960.98
MAE3.99%2.48%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hao, X.; Yang, Q.; Shi, X.; Liu, X.; Huang, W.; Chen, L.; Ma, Y. Fractal-Based Retrieval and Potential Driving Factors of Lake Ice Fractures of Chagan Lake, Northeast China Using Landsat Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214233

AMA Style

Hao X, Yang Q, Shi X, Liu X, Huang W, Chen L, Ma Y. Fractal-Based Retrieval and Potential Driving Factors of Lake Ice Fractures of Chagan Lake, Northeast China Using Landsat Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13(21):4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hao, Xiaohua, Qian Yang, Xiaoguang Shi, Xuemei Liu, Wenfeng Huang, Liwen Chen, and Yue Ma. 2021. "Fractal-Based Retrieval and Potential Driving Factors of Lake Ice Fractures of Chagan Lake, Northeast China Using Landsat Remote Sensing Images" Remote Sensing 13, no. 21: 4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214233

APA Style

Hao, X., Yang, Q., Shi, X., Liu, X., Huang, W., Chen, L., & Ma, Y. (2021). Fractal-Based Retrieval and Potential Driving Factors of Lake Ice Fractures of Chagan Lake, Northeast China Using Landsat Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing, 13(21), 4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214233

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop