Abstract
Urban green spaces (UGSs) play a critical role in human thermal comfort, energy consumption and urban ecology. Although the heat mitigation capability of UGSs has been frequently reported, many of the current understandings are based on short-term observations, and the long-term temporal dynamics of UGS cooling effects are still lacking. This gap may cause over- or underestimation and largely ignores how the cooling effects change with climate change and urban growth. Accordingly, we used Landsat-based time series data to analyze the changes in permanent UGS greenness, surface-cooling effects and their biophysical responses in Beijing in the past 40 years (1984–2020). The results demonstrate segmented changes in UGS surface cooling that were mainly linked to the responses of canopy transpiration and albedo to vegetation conditions. During a rapid greening of UGSs in the recent two decades, transpiration cooling dominated albedo-induced warming to provide a discernable cooling enhancement. In addition, such enhancement showed seasonal differences ranging from less than 1 °C to more than 2 °C, and the most evident enhancement occurred on summer days (~2.4 °C) when vegetation is most needed to provide cooling. The highlighted dynamics of UGSs help urban planners better balance the maintenance costs and the environmental gains for UGS management.
1. Introduction
Urban green spaces (UGSs) are defined as vegetated open spaces in urban areas []. They improve environmental sustainability and residents’ well-being in multiple ways. For instance, UGSs play an essential role in maintaining high levels of urban biodiversity []. They also reduce air pollutants and mitigate urban floods [,]. Additionally, UGSs facilitate people’s mental health and reduce mortality by providing elevated exposure to nature, which helps alleviate stress and enhance physical activity [,]. Another major function of UGSs is climate mitigation. It is well known that UGSs reduce urban heat through both shading and transpiration. A large tree canopy with dense leaves forms solid shadows that prevent heating from solar radiation, while the process of transpiration consumes this solar energy to evaporate liquid water from leaves to the atmosphere, consequently reducing both the leaf surface temperature and surrounding air temperature []. This cooling effect of UGSs will be increasingly important in future urban development, since urban areas have been projected to experience more serious warming than regional background warming [].
There are currently three main methods used to measure UGS cooling effects. First, tree-level field measurements are conducted for various species to find potential drivers (such as leaf area index (LAI), canopy geometry, stress tolerance, microclimate factors and growing conditions) that affect the cooling efficiency [,,]. Second, remotely sensed images at the city scale are widely utilized to map UGSs [] and explore the relationship between UGS cooling intensity/distance and their bio and geometric features [,,]. The cooling intensity is defined as the thermal difference between the UGS and its surroundings [], while the cooling distance measures the spatial extent beyond which the UGS ceases to provide local cooling effects []. Third, the cooling effects at the neighborhood scale are estimated by mechanistic models, which consider street scenarios with different planting patterns and urban morphologies [,]. Despite the remarkable contributions of these studies, most of them were conducted during a single period (from a few months [] to a few years []), and the long-term temporal dynamics of permanent UGS cooling effects have rarely been reported. In drylands, plant physiology is tightly linked to changes in precipitation and frequency [,]. For plants in dry cities, their physiological traits could be more variable due to the need for human management and irrigation []. Consequently, changes in vegetation greenness (e.g., greening or browning) alter land–atmosphere interactions through biophysical processes, and the cooling effects are therefore modified over time. For instance, a field campaign conducted in a semiarid shrub ecosystem observed that deep-soil moisture led to an increase in LAI and a decrease in canopy albedo []. In this process, a higher LAI increases canopy transpiration to result in more cooling effects, while a lower albedo absorbs more solar energy to cause warming effects. Finally, the two biophysical responses collectively determine the change in vegetation thermal effects [].
Remote sensing techniques intrinsically have advantages in land surface monitoring due to satellite repeatability. Landsat sensors have circled the Earth since 1972, providing the longest and richest continuous satellite observations. With a spatial resolution of 30 m, Landsat images are capable of featuring finer-scale anthropogenic impacts and detailed UGS (e.g., parks, urban forests, street trees, lawns) characteristics and are thus widely used for UGS monitoring and modeling [,,]. Landsat time series data provide more dynamic and comprehensive land processes than bitemporal image comparisons and capture abrupt, stochastic events, as well as subtle changes, over long periods []. Hence, the data are well suited for the long-term monitoring of UGSs and can be used to report how UGSs grow, decline and potentially change with urbanization and management.
Based on Landsat-based observations, this study performed time series analyses (1984–2020) on permanent UGSs in Beijing, a typical semiarid metropolis located in northern China. Seasonal cycles and stochastic noise were removed to extract the trends of various surface parameters, including the vegetation index, land surface temperature (LST), evapotranspiration (ET) and albedo. We also applied segmented regressions to time series data to find potential breakpoints. In general, we aimed to explore the dynamics of permanent UGSs and the changes in their environmental benefits by answering the following questions: (i) did the greenness of these UGSs change over the past 40 years, and when did the changes happen?; (ii) did these changes provide variant cooling effects?; and (iii) how do vegetation physiological processes account for these changing cooling effects?
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
Beijing is one of the leading metropolises in China and has over 3000 years of history. As of 2018, there were more than 21 million people who resided in Beijing. The city is located on the North China Plain between 39°28′–41°05′N and 115°25′–117°30′E, experiencing a warm temperate semiarid continental monsoon climate that features four distinct seasons. The city has an annually averaged daily temperature of 10–12 °C, with monthly mean values varying between −5 °C and 30 °C. The annual precipitation in Beijing is approximately 650 mm, which mostly occurs in July and August. The growing season typically starts in April and lasts until the end of October.
The study was carried out in permanent UGSs in Beijing located within the 4th Ring Road (Figure 1). These UGSs were identified from the Chinese urban park dataset by Li et al. [] and the Google historical images. We selected the UGSs that cover at least 100 Landsat pixels (approximately equal to 10 ha) because too small UGSs are easily affected by their surroundings and thus raise uncertainty. Formed before 1949, most of these UGSs are famous historical parks, e.g., North Lake Park and Coal Hill Park, consisting of abundant arbors, shrubs, herbaceous species and water bodies []. Due to their outstanding historical and cultural values, both landscape patterns and garden elements are well protected. Thus, these permanent UGSs provide us with a suitable testbed to quantify the long-term cooling dynamics of urban vegetation.
Figure 1.
Geographic map of the study area. Outlined permanent urban green spaces (UGSs) with an area greater than 10 ha are located in the Beijing main city within the 4th Ring Road.
2.2. Overall Workflow
Figure 2 illustrates the overall workflow of the study. We first combined Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 surface reflectance datasets to form a long-term time series from 1984 to 2020. Next, based on the dataset, we retrieved four surface parameters including the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), LST, ET and albedo using different algorithms. Finally, we analyzed the greenness and cooling dynamics of UGSs and their biophysical responses using time series tools. Detailed descriptions of these steps are shown in the following sections.
Figure 2.
Overall workflow of the study. The main steps consist of data preprocessing, parameter retrieval and dynamic cooling assessment of UGSs. Note that SR refers to surface reflectance.
2.3. Landsat Surface Reflectance Collection
With a 16-day revisit cycle, the Landsat images provide long, continuous and global records of the Earth’s surface at a mesoscale (30 m × 30 m). In this study, we used atmospherically corrected Landsat 5/8 surface reflectance images covering our study area from 1984 to 2020, which are freely available on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform []. For Landsat 5, atmospheric distortion is corrected using the Landsat Ecosystem Disturbance Adaptive Processing System (LEDAPS) algorithm [], while for Landsat 8, atmospheric effects are eliminated using the Land Surface Reflectance Code (LaSRC, []). These images consist of visible, near-infrared and shortwave-infrared bands processed to orthorectified surface reflectance and thermal infrared bands processed to orthorectified brightness temperature. For each image, cloud and cloud shadows were masked based on the CFMASK algorithm []. We excluded images in which none of the UGSs could be seen. Landsat 7 images were not used because of the data gaps caused by the failure of the scan-line corrector. These processes finally gave us 287 Landsat 5 (1984–2012) and 103 Landsat 8 (2013–2020) images (Figure 3). The image metadata is given in Appendix A.
Figure 3.
Number of Landsat images used for each year from 1984 to 2020. A total of 390 (287 of Landsat 5 and 103 of Landsat 8) images were used.
Directly combining Landsat 8 data with those from previous Landsat sensors is not suitable for long-term dynamic monitoring and trend analysis because Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS has spectrally narrower bands than those of previous Landsat sensors []. To improve the temporal continuity of the Landsat 8 data, we adjusted the surface reflectance of visible (blue, green, red), near-infrared and two shortwave bands of each Landsat 8 image to be compatible with Landsat 5 surface reflectance by using Roy’s between-sensor transformation functions [] as follows:
where is the surface reflectance of Landsat 8 bands and is adjusted surface reflectance. The functions are derived using the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression from almost 60 million 30 m common pixel values extracted from more than 6000 Landsat 7 ETM+ and Landsat 8 OLI overlapped images acquired over three winter and three summer months for all the conterminous United States []. Other applications of the functions to long time series analyses of vegetation in the Tibetan Plateau [] and Hindu Kush Himalaya [] further indicate their universality.
2.4. Landsat-Based Surface Parameter Retrieval
2.4.1. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
We employed the most widely used vegetation index, i.e., NDVI, to quantify vegetation greenness, density and conditions. NDVI is computed as the difference between the reflectance of the near-infrared and red bands, divided by their sum as follows:
2.4.2. Land Surface Temperature
We employed a generalized single-channel algorithm [] to retrieve LST from at-sensor brightness temperature using the following equations:
with
where is the surface emissivity that is first spectrally adjusted from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) global emissivity dataset and then modified for vegetation phenology and snow-cover changes following the procedures given by Malakar et al. []; is the at-sensor radiance converted from raw Landsat digital numbers (DNs); is the brightness temperature; is the effective wavelength; and are Planck’s radiation constants; and , and are the atmospheric functions of total atmospheric water vapor content (), given by the following:
where values are fitted using atmospheric sounding databases for different Landsat sensors [].
The total atmospheric water vapor content was extracted from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) combined multiangle implementation of atmospheric correction (MAIAC) land aerosol optical depth (AOD) gridded Level 2 product (MCD19A2) with a spatial resolution of 1 km []. Because the dataset is available after 2000, we used the water vapor from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis data as an alternative before 2000. When the MODIS water vapor was masked due to cloud contamination, the NCEP/NCAR data were used. The NCEP/NCAR water vapor has a 6-h temporal resolution (00:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00 UTC) and 2.5-degree spatial resolution []. The water vapor at each Landsat acquisition time was approximated by linearly interpolating the two closest water vapor values [].
We validated the retrieved LST with cloud cover less than 30% using in situ measurements of six surface radiation budget (SURFRAD) stations in the United States (Figure 4). The stations primarily record the downwelling and upwelling components of broadband solar radiation and thermal infrared irradiance in 3 min intervals before January 2009 and every minute thereafter. The data are quality controlled and cover multiple land cover types (e.g., vegetation, grassland and cropland) in diverse climates []. The measurements used to validate LST were from 1995–2020. To minimize the uncertainty caused by spatial heterogeneity, we removed the Landsat LSTs that had a standard deviation of 3 × 3 pixels surrounding the station larger than 1 °C []. We also removed potential outliers based on the robust “3σ-Hampel identifier” [,,]. These processes finally resulted in a total of 1468 Landsat observations that were matched with those of SURFRAD for the closest time. The overall biases (root mean square error) for Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 were 1.0 °C and 0.6 °C, respectively.
Figure 4.
Scatterplots of Landsat-retrieved land surface temperature (LST) versus in situ LST at six SURFRAD stations (i.e., Bondville, Illinois (BND); Desert Rock, Nevada (DRA); Fort Peck, Montana (FPK); Goodwin Creek, Mississippi (GWN); Penn. State Univ., Pennsylvania (PSU); and Sioux Falls, South Dakota (SXF)). Parentheses in each figure legend indicate the number of observations used for validation. The data are from the years 1995–2020.
2.4.3. Evapotranspiration
We transferred the MODIS terrestrial ET algorithm [] to retrieve fine-resolution ET by using the Landsat-based fractional vegetation cover. The algorithm is based on the Penman–Monteith equation []:
where is the slope of the saturation water vapor pressure curve; is the available energy partitioned between sensible heat, latent heat and soil heat fluxes on the land surface; is the mean air density at constant pressure; is the specific heat of the air; is the saturation vapor pressure; is the actual water vapor pressure; represents the vapor pressure deficit of the air; is the psychometric constant and and are the aerodynamic and surface resistance, respectively. The derivation of these inputs requires climate variables such as daily surface net radiation, air temperature and relative humidity, which were extracted from the NCEP climate forecast system version 2 (CFSv2) 6-h products [].
Then, the total daily ET is the sum of the evaporation from the wet canopy surface, vegetation transpiration and evaporation from the soil surface calculated from Equation (7). When the relative humidity is less than 70%, the surface is assumed to be not covered by water, and the wet canopy surface evaporation and soil surface evaporation are then zero. A detailed calculation of these components can be found in [].
In the MODIS algorithm, parameters that affect stomatal conductance, such as the mean potential stomatal conductance per unit leaf area, were parameterized globally using 46 AmeriFlux tower-based ET for 11 different biomes, i.e., evergreen needleleaf forest; evergreen broadleaf forest; deciduous needleleaf forest; deciduous broadleaf forest; mixed forest; woody savannas; savannas; closed shrubland; open shrubland; grassland, urban and built-up land; barren or sparsely vegetated land; and cropland. To determine which set of these parameters should be used for the UGSs in the study, we merged a high-resolution (100 m) land-cover scheme from the Copernicus global land-cover layers [] in 2015 to correspond to the 11 biomes above. The land cover types of the permanent UGSs in this study are assumed to be unchanged during the study period.
2.4.4. Albedo
We converted narrowband surface reflectance to broadband albedo in total shortwave using the formula given by Liang [] as follows:
where , , , and are the narrowband surface reflectance of the Landsat blue band, red band, near-infrared band, shortwave-infrared band 1 and shortwave-infrared band 2, respectively. The MODIS daily albedo product (MCD43A3) was successfully used for change detection [] and thus we employed it to help detect the albedo dynamics of UGSs.
2.5. Surface-Cooling Dynamics and Time Series Analysis
The surface-cooling effects of UGSs at time t are defined as the LST difference between UGSs and Tian’anmen Square (Figure 1), namely,
Tian’anmen Square was chosen as a typical urban impervious surface for comparison because of its homogeneity and invariance since 1954. Given this, a negative indicates that the surface temperature of UGSs is lower than that of urban impervious surfaces; therefore, they represent cooling effects and smaller values suggest stronger cooling.
To detect and explain the dynamic cooling effects of UGSs, we first generated four time series for the NDVI, , ET and albedo of the selected permanent UGSs (Figure 1) from 1984–2020. Then, we imputed the missing data (due to the removal of cloudy images) of each time series by using the seasonal Kalman filter and deconstructed the four completed time series into an additive seasonal component (), trend component () and residual component () using a locally weighted regression smoother (LOESS) [], as follows:
where the seasonal component represents the vegetation phenology cycle, and the trend component detects the temporal vegetation dynamics. Hereafter, we implemented an iterative procedure of linear fitting [] on the four trend series to examine potential breakpoints and whether segmented relationships existed in the time series.
3. Results
3.1. Greenness Dynamics
Based on the reconstructed Landsat NDVI time series from 1984 to 2020 (Figure 5b), we extracted the NDVI trend of UGSs and observed overall greening (Figure 5d). In 1986, even in the growing seasons, UGSs were in poor condition with a very low NDVI of approximately 0.2 (Figure 5b), and they were hardly distinguished from non-vegetated areas (Figure 5f1). By 2020, however, the annual UGS NDVI had risen to 0.4 (Figure 5d), with the growing season NDVI reaching 0.5 (Figure 5b). Such changes were achieved through three segmented relationships before 1996, during 1996–2000 and after 2000. Before 1996, the NDVI slowly increased at a rate of +0.004/year After 1996, however, the UGSs experienced short-term deforestation (with an NDVI decrease rate of −0.012/year) until 2000, reducing their greenness almost back to the level of 1984. Hereafter, UGSs rapidly grew with a sharply increased NDVI rate of +0.013/year, which was particularly true for large UGSs (circled in Figure 5f).
Figure 5.
Dynamics of UGS greenness. The figures in the left panel are (a) the original normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series, (b) reconstructed NDVI time series, (c) seasonal component of the NDVI, (d) extracted trend of the NDVI and (e) residual component. Each NDVI value is averaged from all pixels of the UGSs (Figure 1). The dashed lines indicate the breakpoints (1996 and 2000, respectively). The figures in the right panel (f1–f8) are NDVI images in the growing seasons (April to October) approximately every five years since 1984.
3.2. Responses of Urban Green Space Surface Cooling to Greening
By comparing the temporal LST difference () between UGSs and Tian’anmen Square (a typical permanent impervious surface in Beijing, Figure 1), we observed a positive response of most UGS daytime surface-cooling effects () to their greenness (Figure 5 and Figure 6). UGS greening (before 1996 and after 2000) led to cooling enhancements, while their browning (during 1996–2000, Figure 5d) resulted in cooling attenuation (Figure 6c). The overall cooling enhancement made UGSs recently experience an approximately 2 °C lower annual surface temperature than impervious surfaces compared to the value of no more than 1.5 °C in 1984 (Figure 6c). A spatial comparison of this cooling enhancement was illustrated by using the image composites from 2000 and 2020. This is because 2000 was a trough representing poor vegetation performance, which could be sharply compared with 2020, when the vegetation condition had grown to its peak. In contrast with 1984, 2000 also had sufficient images to make an annual composite (Figure 6a). Spatially, almost all UGSs experienced a distinctly lower LST in 2020 (Figure 6e), which was true only for approximately half of the UGSs in 2000 (Figure 6d).
Figure 6.
Dynamics of UGS daytime surface cooling. The figures in the left panel are (a) the original (defined as the LST difference between the UGSs and Tian’anmen Square) time series, (b) the reconstructed time series and (c) the extracted trend of . Each value is averaged from all pixels in the UGSs (Figure 1). The dashed lines indicate the breakpoints (1996 and 2000, respectively). The figures in the right panel are the mean annual composites from 2000 (d) and 2020 (e).
We also found that UGS daytime surface cooling significantly increased (p < 0.05, t-test) to varying degrees in different seasons except for winter (Figure 7). The most noticeable cooling enhancement occurred on summer days (Figure 7a2–c2). Although vegetation provides strong cooling effects in summer, UGSs in the summer of 2000 did not show much lower values than those in spring and autumn, with a mean of approximately −2 °C. However, this was not the case in the summer of 2020, when the distribution of integrally shifted to the left (Figure 7c2), and the mean cooling effects increased to more than 4 °C. This change was also illustrated by the fact that 88% of USG pixels represented a negative in 2000, while the proportion had increased to 97% in 2020 (Figure 7c2). For spring and autumn, although the boundaries of remained almost unchanged during the two periods (Figure 7c1,c3), we observed evident left movements of the wave crests that resulted in mean cooling effect increases of 0.7 °C for spring and 0.5 °C for autumn. In winter, we failed to observe a significant cooling difference for UGSs. UGSs in both 2000 and 2020, on average, had a near-zero positive (Figure 7c4), implying their dim warming effects.
Figure 7.
Dynamics of UGS surface cooling in different seasons. The figures in the first row are (a1) the (defined as the LST difference between UGSs and Tian’anmen Square) in the spring of 2000, (a2) summer, (a3) autumn and (a4) winter. The figures in the second row are (b1) the in the spring of 2020, (b2) summer, (b3) autumn and (b4) winter. The figures in the third row are (c1) the comparisons of the probability density distributions in 2000 and 2020 for spring, (c2) summer, (c3) autumn and (c4) winter with expectation (μ). The means of in spring, summer and autumn in 2000 were significantly larger (p < 0.05, t-test) than those in 2020.
3.3. Biophysical Mechanisms
To explain the change in UGS surface-cooling effects, we established the dynamics of two main biophysical parameters (i.e., ET and albedo) that largely regulated vegetation heat exchange. ET characterizes the capability of vegetation to transfer sensible heat into latent heat, and vegetation with higher ET provides more cooling effects (transpiration cooling). In contrast, albedo represents how much incidental radiation can be absorbed by vegetation, and low albedo values imply that more energy will be absorbed to produce warming effects. Thus, a combined effect of transpiration cooling and albedo warming determines the final thermal responses to changes in vegetation conditions. As UGSs continued to turn greener, their ET and albedo values were positively and negatively responsive, respectively (Figure 8). For example, an increase in the NDVI before 1996 resulted in an increased mean annual ET (0.50 W/m2/year, Figure 8c2) and decreased mean annual albedo (−0.0007/year, Figure 8d2). After 2000, both Landsat and MODIS albedo showed negative responses (Figure 8d1) to the fast greenness increases in UGSs (Figure 8a1). These results indicate that the greening of UGS induced both the enhancement of transpiration cooling and albedo warming and vice versa in the period of greenness declination (1996–2000).
Figure 8.
Dynamics of UGS evapotranspiration (ET) and albedo. The figures in the first panel are (a1) the reconstructed NDVI time series, (b1) the reconstructed time series, (c1) the reconstructed ET time series and (d1) the reconstructed albedo time series. The second panel shows (a2) the trend of the NDVI, (b2) the trend of the , (c2) the trend of the ET and (d2) the trend of the albedo. The dashed lines indicate the breakpoints (1996 and 2000, respectively). The third and fourth panels show the mean annual evapotranspiration (ET) (e,g) and albedo (f,h) composites from 2000 and 2020.
Such competing biophysical changes resulted in segmented changes in UGS surface cooling (Figure 8b2). Due to the opposite thermal effects of ET and albedo, transpiration cooling dominated albedo warming in both the two greening periods (1984–1996 and 2000–2020) to provide discernable cooling enhancements. However, we found that a higher greening rate resulted in a lower cooling increase rate since the increase rate of UGS surface cooling after 2000 (−0.018 °C/year, Figure 8b2) was even less than half of that before 1996 (−0.050 °C/year, Figure 8b2). This could be related to the fact that albedo is more sensitive to UGS greening than ET with a comparison of the relative decrease rate of albedo (, Figure 8d2) and the relative increase rate of ET (, Figure 8c2) in the two greening stages. Therefore, the cooling increase rate of UGS in the latter stage was largely offset by albedo-induced warming.
4. Discussion
4.1. Greening of Urban Green Spaces
The highlighted dynamics of UGS daytime cooling for the long run closely correlate with UGS vegetation conditions. Our results showed an overall increase in permanent UGS greenness during the past 40 years (1984–2020, Figure 5), implying that vegetation, at least in large UGSs, is healthier and more ecologically functional than it was before. This result may not be surprising because mainly due to CO2 fertilization, nitrogen deposition and climate changes, most of the planet has observed a phenomenon of ‘greening’ in recent decades [,]. High-intensity urbanization leads to higher radiation forces and temperatures, further enhancing vegetation growth and prolonging vegetation phenology to advance/delay the start/end of the growing season [,]. Furthermore, most Chinese UGSs are managed by municipal governments, and thus, they are more frequently influenced by human activities than UGSs in western cities []. After 2000, the Beijing Municipal Forestry and Parks Bureau implemented extensive park improvements, such as planting/replanting, transplanting, maintenance, protection from fire and diseases and the introduction of nonnative species. The activities play a critical role in vegetation (e.g., trees, shrubs, herbaceous plants) conditions and overall greenery coverage. For instance, more sophisticated management practices, e.g., better irrigation increases soil moisture to trigger vegetation greening [], which is especially true for water-limited drylands. Other adverse effects, such as particulate matter accumulation, may decrease the photosynthetic rate to cause the poor performance of UGSs []. Indeed, a short-term greenness decline in 1996–2000 (Figure 5d) revealed a trough in UGSs, which was consistent with the contemporaneous field surveys conducted in the central part of Beijing that indicate trees in 2002 were mainly dominated by younger age classes and were in poor condition [].
4.2. The Necessity of Dynamic Monitoring of Urban Green Space Cooling Effects
Because many of these possible driving forces vary with urban development and climate change, long-term monitoring becomes particularly important for urban vegetation eco-functional assessments. However, most existing conclusions related to UGS cooling effects have been drawn from contrast experiments conducted over a few years [,,,] or even on a single day [,]. Short-term observations might cause an over- or underestimation of long-term cooling potential to varying degrees, depending on how fast the urban area grows and how well UGSs are managed, as well as their interactions with changing environments. In this study, UGSs in the past 40 years suggested surface-cooling enhancements in all seasons ranging from less than 1 °C to more than 2 °C. On warm summer days when UGSs are most needed to provide cooling, the large enhancements not only further reduce the surface temperature, but contribute to the formation of a convection cycle to provide canopy-layer cooling by subsiding the warmer urban air from above into UGSs and blowing their cooler air [].
The cooling increase rate of UGS is not as fast as its greening rate because increasing transpiration cooling was largely offset by albedo-induced energy absorption, given the sharp decline of albedo since 2000 (Figure 8d2). This implies that more irrigation water might have been used to fulfill the increasing canopy transpiration demands, while the annually averaged surface-cooling benefits compared to 1984 were observed to be less than 1 °C (Figure 6c). Although this study was conducted on permanent UGSs, the results have important implications for urban afforestation, since these changes in urban vegetation physiology could be harbingers of newly built green belts and urban parks and those areas that will be a large area of green spaces in the next decade. According to the Beijing urban master plan (2016–2035), multiple urban afforestation and greening programs will be conducted to increase per capita green space [], and the city’s overall forest cover rate should increase to no less than 45% in 2035. Therefore, urban planners and policymakers should consider the dynamics of the biophysical features of vegetation found in this study to balance the maintenance costs and the environmental gains in future UGS management.
4.3. Limitations and Future Work
The use of a series of Landsat-based datasets in this study is mainly due to its long temporal coverage (since 1984) and capacity to discern human-scale processes, such as the managed UGSs in Beijing. Because of its instantaneous imaging, which occurs at the satellite overpass time (~10:53 a.m. local time in Beijing), our results represent the long-term dynamics of the biophysical characteristics of vegetation close to midday when illumination and water vapor reach their maximum and minimum, respectively. Thus, they inevitably sacrifice diurnal changes in and thus, UGS cooling effects. Additionally, due to the lack of nighttime high-resolution thermal infrared data, the temporal changes in are not evaluated at night when the urban heat island (UHI) intensity is generally strong. In addition, both LST and air temperature have been commonly used as key indicators measuring the UHI intensity or UGS cooling effects. However, despite high correlation, they are hardly comparable at the city scale because LST is the radiative skin temperature of the land surface that mainly depends on land use and land cover. In contrast, air temperature represents the thermal conditions of urban canopy layers, which are largely affected by geometry-induced advection []. Accordingly, future studies focusing on the dynamics of air temperature differences inside and outside growing UGSs are highly encouraged.
5. Conclusions
Long-term dynamic monitoring plays a key role in the development and management of UGSs. Revealed by Landsat time series data on the past 40 years, we found segmented changes in UGS cooling effects that were mainly linked to the responses of canopy transpiration and albedo to vegetation conditions. During a rapid greening of UGSs in the recent two decades, transpiration cooling dominated albedo-induced warming to provide a discernable cooling enhancement, despite relatively more sensible changes in albedo. Such enhancement showed seasonal differences ranging from less than 1 °C to more than 2 °C, and the most evident enhancements occurred on summer days (~2.4 °C). These findings extend the current understanding of UGS cooling effects and provide insights into how changes in vegetation physiology affect urban climate by altering the surface energy balance and the hydrologic cycle.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.Z. and X.Z.; methodology, J.Z.; software, J.Z.; formal analysis, J.Z., X.Z., H.W. and D.W.; data curation, J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.Z., X.Z., S.L., H.W., N.L., P.L. and D.W.; visualization, J.Z.; supervision, X.Z. and S.L.; project administration, X.Z. and S.L.; funding acquisition, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42090012) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0600103).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Chinese urban park dataset is available at https://www.beijingcitylab.com/data-released-1/data21-40/, accessed on 18 August 2021. Landsat surface reflectance images, MODIS images and NCEP/NCAR climate data are freely available on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. Original time series data can be downloaded from Google Drive Cloud Storage (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X9-EcTeK3nPrNHvJWtMUhk-jRToSIg3F/view?usp=sharing, accessed on 18 August 2021).
Acknowledgments
We thank the three anonymous reviewers, academic editor and Qiang Liu at Beijing Normal University for their valuable comments on the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A
Table A1.
Metadata of the Landsat images used in this study.
Table A1.
Metadata of the Landsat images used in this study.
| Image Id | Date | Path | Row |
|---|---|---|---|
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19840512_20170220_01_T1 | 12 May 1984 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19840629_20170220_01_T1 | 29 June 1984 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19840816_20170220_01_T1 | 16 August 1984 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19841003_20170220_01_T1 | 3 October 1984 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19841019_20170220_01_T1 | 19 October 1984 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19841120_20170220_01_T1 | 20 November 1984 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19841222_20170219_01_T1 | 22 December 1984 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19850312_20170219_01_T1 | 12 March 1985 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19851022_20170218_01_T1 | 22 October 1985 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19860110_20170218_01_T1 | 10 January 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19860227_20170218_01_T1 | 27 February 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19860315_20170218_01_T1 | 15 March 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19860331_20170218_01_T1 | 31 March 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19860416_20170221_01_T1 | 16 April 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19860603_20170221_01_T1 | 3 June 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19861025_20170221_01_T1 | 25 October 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19861110_20170221_01_T1 | 10 November 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19861126_20170221_01_T1 | 26 November 1986 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19870403_20170213_01_T1 | 3 April 1987 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19870708_20170212_01_T1 | 8 July 1987 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19870910_20170211_01_T1 | 10 September 1987 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19870926_20170418_01_T1 | 26 September 1987 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19871215_20170210_01_T1 | 15 December 1987 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19871231_20170418_01_T1 | 31 December 1987 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880116_20170221_01_T1 | 16 January 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880201_20170209_01_T1 | 1 February 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880217_20170209_01_T1 | 17 February 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880304_20170209_01_T1 | 4 March 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880405_20170209_01_T1 | 5 April 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880421_20170221_01_T1 | 21 April 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880507_20170221_01_T1 | 7 May 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880811_20170207_01_T1 | 11 August 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19880928_20170205_01_T1 | 28 September 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19881014_20170206_01_T1 | 14 October 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19881030_20170221_01_T1 | 30 October 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19881201_20170205_01_T1 | 1 December 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19881217_20170205_01_T1 | 17 December 1988 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19890307_20170204_01_T1 | 7 March 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19890408_20170204_01_T1 | 8 April 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19890526_20170203_01_T1 | 26 May 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19890627_20170202_01_T1 | 27 June 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19890814_20170202_01_T1 | 14 August 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19890830_20170214_01_T1 | 30 August 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19891001_20170214_01_T1 | 1 October 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19891017_20170201_01_T1 | 17 October 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19891102_20170201_01_T1 | 2 November 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19891118_20170201_01_T1 | 18 November 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19891204_20170201_01_T1 | 4 December 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19891220_20170201_01_T1 | 20 December 1989 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900105_20170201_01_T1 | 5 January 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900121_20170214_01_T1 | 21 January 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900206_20170131_01_T1 | 6 February 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900326_20170131_01_T1 | 26 March 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900427_20170131_01_T1 | 27 April 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900513_20170214_01_T1 | 13 May 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900529_20170131_01_T1 | 29 May 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900614_20170129_01_T1 | 14 June 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900716_20170129_01_T1 | 16 July 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900902_20170129_01_T1 | 2 September 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19900918_20170129_01_T1 | 18 September 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19901020_20170129_01_T1 | 20 October 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19901121_20180620_01_T1 | 21 November 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19901207_20170128_01_T1 | 7 December 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19901223_20170214_01_T1 | 23 December 1990 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910108_20170128_01_T1 | January 8, 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910124_20170128_01_T1 | 24 January 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910225_20170127_01_T1 | 25 February 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910313_20170127_01_T1 | 13 March 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910329_20170127_01_T1 | 29 March 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910516_20170127_01_T1 | 16 May 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910617_20170126_01_T1 | 17 June 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910804_20170125_01_T1 | 4 August 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910905_20170125_01_T1 | 5 September 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19910921_20170125_01_T1 | 21 September 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19911007_20180619_01_T1 | 7 October 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19911023_20170125_01_T1 | 23 October 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19911108_20170125_01_T1 | 8 November 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19911124_20170125_01_T1 | 24 November 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19911210_20170124_01_T1 | 10 December 1991 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920127_20170123_01_T1 | 27 January 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920212_20170123_01_T1 | 12 February 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920228_20170124_01_T1 | 28 February 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920416_20170123_01_T1 | 16 April 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920518_20170122_01_T1 | 18 May 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920603_20170124_01_T1 | 3 June 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920619_20170123_01_T1 | 19 June 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920822_20170214_01_T1 | 22 August 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19920907_20170122_01_T1 | 7 September 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19921009_20170214_01_T1 | 9 October 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19921025_20170214_01_T1 | 25 October 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19921110_20170214_01_T1 | 10 November 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19921126_20170121_01_T1 | 26 November 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19921212_20170214_01_T1 | 12 December 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19921228_20170121_01_T1 | 28 December 1992 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930113_20170120_01_T1 | 13 January 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930129_20170120_01_T1 | 29 January 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930214_20170120_01_T1 | 14 February 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930302_20170120_01_T1 | 2 March 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930318_20170119_01_T1 | 18 March 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930606_20170118_01_T1 | 6 June 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930622_20170118_01_T1 | 22 June 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930809_20180620_01_T1 | 9 August 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19930825_20170117_01_T1 | 25 August 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19931215_20170116_01_T1 | 15 December 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19931231_20170117_01_T1 | 31 December 1993 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19940321_20170114_01_T1 | 21 March 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19940406_20180619_01_T1 | 6 April 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19940508_20170114_01_T1 | 8 May 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19940609_20170113_01_T1 | 9 June 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19940913_20170112_01_T1 | 13 September 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19940929_20170112_01_T1 | 29 September 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19941031_20170112_01_T1 | 31 October 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19941202_20170110_01_T1 | 2 December 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19941218_20170110_01_T1 | 18 December 1994 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19950409_20170108_01_T1 | 9 April 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19950425_20170108_01_T1 | 25 April 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19950612_20170107_01_T1 | 12 June 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19950628_20170107_01_T1 | 28 June 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19950730_20170107_01_T1 | 30 July 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19950815_20170107_01_T1 | 15 August 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19950916_20170107_01_T1 | 16 September 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19951018_20170107_01_T1 | 18 October 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19951119_20170107_01_T1 | 19 November 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19951205_20170106_01_T1 | 5 December 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19951221_20170106_01_T1 | 21 December 1995 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960207_20170106_01_T1 | 7 February 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960223_20170106_01_T1 | 23 February 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960310_20170105_01_T1 | 10 March 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960326_20170105_01_T1 | 26 March 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960411_20170105_01_T1 | 11 April 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960427_20170105_01_T1 | 27 April 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960513_20170104_01_T1 | 13 May 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960529_20170104_01_T1 | 29 May 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960614_20170104_01_T1 | 14 June 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960630_20170104_01_T1 | 30 June 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19960817_20180620_01_T1 | 17 August 1996 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19970209_20180620_01_T1 | 9 February 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19970430_20161231_01_T1 | 30 April 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19970516_20161231_01_T1 | 16 May 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19970804_20161230_01_T1 | 4 August 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19970921_20161229_01_T1 | 21 September 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19971007_20180620_01_T1 | 7 October 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19971023_20161229_01_T1 | 23 October 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19971108_20161229_01_T1 | 8 November 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19971210_20161228_01_T1 | 10 December 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19971226_20161228_01_T1 | 26 December 1997 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19980417_20161225_01_T1 | 17 April 1998 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19980823_20161223_01_T1 | 23 August 1998 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19980924_20161221_01_T1 | 24 September 1998 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19981111_20161220_01_T1 | 11 November 1998 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19981127_20161222_01_T1 | 27 November 1998 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19981213_20161220_01_T1 | 13 December 1998 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19981229_20161222_01_T1 | 29 December 1998 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990114_20161219_01_T1 | 14 January 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990130_20161219_01_T1 | 30 January 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990303_20161220_01_T1 | 3 March 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990506_20161218_01_T1 | 6 May 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990607_20161217_01_T1 | 7 June 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990623_20161217_01_T1 | 23 June 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990709_20161217_01_T1 | 9 July 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990725_20161219_01_T1 | 25 July 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990810_20161216_01_T1 | 10 August 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19990826_20161216_01_T1 | 26 August 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19991013_20161216_01_T1 | 13 October 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19991029_20161216_01_T1 | 29 October 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19991114_20180620_01_T1 | 14 November 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_19991130_20161216_01_T1 | 30 November 1999 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000117_20161215_01_T1 | 17 January 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000202_20161216_01_T1 | 2 February 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000305_20161215_01_T1 | 5 March 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000321_20161214_01_T1 | 21 March 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000406_20161214_01_T1 | 6 April 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000524_20161214_01_T1 | 24 May 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000828_20161213_01_T1 | 28 August 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000913_20161214_01_T1 | 13 September 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20000929_20161213_01_T1 | 29 September 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20001031_20161213_01_T1 | 31 October 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20001218_20161212_01_T1 | 18 December 2000 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20010103_20161212_01_T1 | 3 January 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20010119_20161212_01_T1 | 19 January 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20010324_20161212_01_T1 | 24 March 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20010628_20161211_01_T1 | 28 June 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20010730_20161210_01_T1 | 30 July 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20010831_20161210_01_T1 | 31 August 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20011018_20161209_01_T1 | 18 October 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20011103_20161209_01_T1 | 3 November 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20011119_20161210_01_T1 | 19 November 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20011221_20161210_01_T1 | 21 December 2001 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20020122_20161209_01_T1 | 22 January 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20020207_20161209_01_T1 | 7 February 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20020223_20161208_01_T1 | 23 February 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20020311_20161209_01_T1 | 11 March 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20020717_20161207_01_T1 | 17 July 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20020802_20161207_01_T1 | 2 August 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20020818_20161207_01_T1 | 18 August 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20021005_20161206_01_T1 | 5 October 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20021106_20161206_01_T1 | 6 November 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20021208_20161207_01_T1 | 8 December 2002 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20030109_20161206_01_T1 | 9 January 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20030210_20161206_01_T1 | 10 February 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20030226_20161206_01_T1 | 26 February 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20030517_20161206_01_T1 | 17 May 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20030922_20161204_01_T1 | 22 September 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20031024_20161204_01_T1 | 24 October 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20031211_20161204_01_T1 | 11 December 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20031227_20161203_01_T1 | 27 December 2003 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20040112_20161202_01_T1 | 12 January 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20040128_20161203_01_T1 | 28 January 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20040401_20161203_01_T1 | 1 April 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20040519_20161201_01_T1 | 19 May 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20040706_20161130_01_T1 | 6 July 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20040823_20161129_01_T1 | 23 August 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20040908_20161129_01_T1 | 8 September 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20041026_20161128_01_T1 | 26 October 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20041127_20161128_01_T1 | 27 November 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20041213_20161127_01_T1 | 13 December 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20041229_20161129_01_T1 | 29 December 2004 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20050319_20161128_01_T1 | 19 March 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20050522_20161127_01_T1 | 22 May 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20050607_20161125_01_T1 | 7 June 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20050709_20161125_01_T1 | 9 July 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20050725_20161125_01_T1 | 25 July 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20050911_20161124_01_T1 | 11 September 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20050927_20161124_01_T1 | 27 September 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20051029_20161123_01_T1 | 29 October 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20051114_20161124_01_T1 | 14 November 2005 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060202_20161123_01_T1 | 2 February 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060218_20161123_01_T1 | 18 February 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060306_20161123_01_T1 | 6 March 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060407_20161123_01_T1 | 7 April 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060610_20161121_01_T1 | 10 June 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060626_20161121_01_T1 | 26 June 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060712_20161120_01_T1 | 12 July 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20060930_20161119_01_T1 | 30 September 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20061101_20161118_01_T1 | 1 November 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20061203_20161118_01_T1 | 3 December 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20061219_20161118_01_T1 | 19 December 2006 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070104_20161117_01_T1 | 4 January 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070120_20161117_01_T1 | 20 January 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070309_20161116_01_T1 | 9 March 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070410_20161115_01_T1 | 10 April 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070426_20161115_01_T1 | 26 April 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070512_20161115_01_T1 | 12 May 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070528_20161114_01_T1 | 28 May 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20070901_20161113_01_T1 | 1 September 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20071003_20161110_01_T1 | 3 October 2007 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20080208_20161101_01_T1 | 8 February 2008 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20080327_20161101_01_T1 | 27 March 2008 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20080428_20161101_01_T1 | 28 April 2008 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20080514_20161031_01_T1 | 14 May 2008 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20080530_20161031_01_T1 | 30 May 2008 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20080802_20161030_01_T1 | 2 August 2008 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20080818_20170613_01_T1 | 18 August 2008 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090125_20161029_01_T1 | 25 January 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090210_20161028_01_T1 | 10 February 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090226_20161027_01_T1 | 26 February 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090314_20161027_01_T1 | 14 March 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090330_20161027_01_T1 | 30 March 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090415_20161027_01_T1 | 15 April 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090517_20161026_01_T1 | 17 May 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090602_20161025_01_T1 | 2 June 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090720_20161027_01_T1 | 20 July 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20090922_20161020_01_T1 | 22 September 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20091024_20161024_01_T1 | 24 October 2009 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100128_20161017_01_T1 | 28 January 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100213_20161016_01_T1 | 13 February 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100317_20161016_01_T1 | 17 March 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100402_20161016_01_T1 | 2 April 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100418_20161015_01_T1 | 18 April 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100504_20161015_01_T1 | 4 May 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100520_20161015_01_T1 | 20 May 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100605_20161015_01_T1 | 5 June 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100723_20161014_01_T1 | 23 July 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100808_20161014_01_T1 | 8 August 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20100824_20161014_01_T1 | 24 August 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20101011_20161012_01_T1 | 11 October 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20101128_20161012_01_T1 | 28 November 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20101214_20161011_01_T1 | 14 December 2010 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110115_20161010_01_T1 | 15 January 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110131_20161010_01_T1 | 31 January 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110304_20161210_01_T1 | 4 March 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110405_20161208_01_T1 | 5 April 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110507_20161009_01_T1 | 7 May 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110523_20161010_01_T1 | 23 May 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110608_20161009_01_T1 | 8 June 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20110726_20161007_01_T1 | 26 July 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LT05_L1TP_123032_20111030_20161005_01_T1 | 30 October 2011 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_124032_20130410_20200913_02_T1 | 10 April 2013 | 124 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20130512_20200912_02_T1 | 12 May 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20130613_20200912_02_T1 | 13 June 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20130731_20200912_02_T1 | 31 July 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20130816_20200912_02_T1 | 16 August 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20130901_20200912_02_T1 | 1 September 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20131003_20200913_02_T1 | 3 October 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20131104_20200912_02_T1 | 4 November 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20131120_20200912_02_T1 | 20 November 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20131206_20200912_02_T1 | 6 December 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20131222_20200912_02_T1 | 22 December 2013 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140208_20200912_02_T1 | 8 February 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140413_20200911_02_T1 | 13 April 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140429_20200911_02_T1 | 29 April 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140515_20200911_02_T1 | 15 May 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140718_20200911_02_T1 | 18 July 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140803_20200911_02_T1 | 3 August 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140819_20200911_02_T1 | 19 August 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140904_20200911_02_T1 | 4 September 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20140920_20200910_02_T1 | 20 September 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20141006_20200910_02_T1 | 6 October 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20141225_20200910_02_T1 | 25 December 2014 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150110_20200910_02_T1 | 10 January 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150315_20200909_02_T1 | 15 March 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150416_20200909_02_T1 | 16 April 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150502_20200909_02_T1 | 2 May 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150518_20200909_02_T1 | 18 May 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150705_20200909_02_T1 | 5 July 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150806_20200908_02_T1 | 6 August 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150822_20200908_02_T1 | 22 August 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150907_20200908_02_T1 | 7 September 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20150923_20200908_02_T1 | 23 September 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20151009_20200908_02_T1 | 9 October 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20151126_20200908_02_T1 | 26 November 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20151228_20200908_02_T1 | 28 December 2015 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160129_20200907_02_T1 | 29 January 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160214_20200907_02_T1 | 14 February 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160301_20200907_02_T1 | 1 March 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160317_20200907_02_T1 | 17 March 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160402_20200907_02_T1 | 2 April 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160418_20200907_02_T1 | 18 April 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160504_20200907_02_T1 | 4 May 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160520_20200907_02_T1 | 20 May 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160605_20200906_02_T1 | 5 June 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160621_20200906_02_T1 | 21 June 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160707_20200906_02_T1 | 7 July 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160808_20200906_02_T1 | 8 August 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20160909_20200906_02_T1 | 9 September 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20161011_20200905_02_T1 | 11 October 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20161112_20200905_02_T1 | 12 November 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20161128_20200905_02_T1 | 28 November 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20161214_20200905_02_T1 | 14 December 2016 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170131_20200905_02_T1 | 31 January 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170304_20200905_02_T1 | 4 March 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170405_20200904_02_T1 | 5 April 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170421_20200904_02_T1 | 21 April 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170507_20200904_02_T1 | 7 May 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170523_20200903_02_T1 | 23 May 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170710_20200903_02_T1 | 10 July 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170912_20200903_02_T1 | 12 September 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20170928_20200903_02_T1 | 28 September 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20171030_20200902_02_T1 | 30 October 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20171115_20200902_02_T1 | 15 November 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20171201_20200902_02_T1 | 1 December 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20171217_20200902_02_T1 | 17 December 2017 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20180102_20200902_02_T1 | 2 January 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20180203_20200902_02_T1 | 3 February 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20180408_20201015_02_T1 | 8 April 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20180627_20200831_02_T1 | 27 June 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20181001_20200830_02_T1 | 1 October 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20181017_20200830_02_T1 | 17 October 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20181102_20200830_02_T1 | 2 November 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20181118_20200830_02_T1 | 18 November 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20181204_20200830_02_T1 | 4 December 2018 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190121_20200829_02_T1 | 21 January 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190326_20200829_02_T1 | 26 March 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190411_20200829_02_T1 | 11 April 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190513_20200828_02_T1 | 13 May 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190529_20200828_02_T1 | 29 May 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190614_20200828_02_T1 | 14 June 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190630_20200827_02_T1 | 30 June 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190817_20200827_02_T1 | 17 August 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190902_20200826_02_T1 | 2 September 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20190918_20200826_02_T1 | 18 September 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20191020_20200825_02_T1 | 20 October 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20191105_20200825_02_T1 | 5 November 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20191207_20200824_02_T1 | 7 December 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20191223_20200824_02_T1 | 23 December 2019 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200108_20200823_02_T1 | 8 January 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200124_20200823_02_T1 | 24 January 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200209_20200823_02_T1 | 9 February 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200312_20200822_02_T1 | 12 March 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200328_20200822_02_T1 | 28 March 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200413_20200822_02_T1 | 13 April 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200429_20200820_02_T1 | 29 April 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200531_20200820_02_T1 | 31 May 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200803_20200914_02_T1 | 3 August 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200904_20200918_02_T1 | 4 September 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20200920_20201005_02_T1 | 20 September 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20201006_20201016_02_T1 | 6 October 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20201022_20201105_02_T1 | 22 October 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20201123_20210315_02_T1 | 23 November 2020 | 123 | 32 |
| LC08_L1TP_123032_20201225_20210310_02_T1 | 25 December 2020 | 123 | 32 |
References
- Choumert, J.; Salanié, J. Provision of urban green spaces: Some insights from economics. Landsc. Res. 2008, 33, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beninde, J.; Veith, M.; Hochkirch, A. Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaafari, S.; Shabani, A.A.; Moeinaddini, M.; Danehkar, A.; Sakieh, Y. Applying landscape metrics and structural equation modeling to predict the effect of urban green space on air pollution and respiratory mortality in Tehran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadaverugu, A.; Rao, C.N.; Viswanadh, G.K. Quantification of flood mitigation services by urban green spaces using InVEST model: A case study of Hyderabad city, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2021, 7, 589–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callaghan, A.; McCombe, G.; Harrold, A.; McMeel, C.; Mills, G.; Moore-Cherry, N.; Cullen, W. The impact of green spaces on mental health in urban settings: A scoping review. J. Ment. Health 2021, 30, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. Urban Green Spaces and Health: A Review of Evidence; World Health Organization: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Taha, H.; Akbari, H.; Rosenfeld, A.; Huang, J. Residential cooling loads and the urban heat island—The effects of albedo. Build. Environ. 1988, 23, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Oleson, K.; Bou-Zeid, E.; Krayenhoff, E.S.; Bray, A.; Zhu, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, C.; Oppenheimer, M. Global multi-model projections of local urban climates. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2021, 11, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.A.; Armson, D.; Ennos, A.R. A comparison of the growth and cooling effectiveness of five commonly planted urban tree species. Urban Ecosyst. 2015, 18, 371–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konarska, J.; Uddling, J.; Holmer, B.; Lutz, M.; Lindberg, F.; Pleijel, H.; Thorsson, S. Transpiration of urban trees and its cooling effect in a high latitude city. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2016, 60, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Zhao, P.; Hu, Y.; Ouyang, L.; Zhu, L.; Ni, G. Canopy transpiration and its cooling effect of three urban tree species in a subtropical city—Guangzhou, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 43, 126368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shekhar, S.; Aryal, J. Role of geospatial technology in understanding urban green space of Kalaburagi city for sustainable planning. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 46, 126450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Guo, X.; Zeng, Y.; Koga, M.; Vejre, H. Variations in land surface temperature and cooling efficiency of green space in rapid urbanization: The case of Fuzhou city, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 29, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Zhao, X.; Liang, S.; Zhou, T.; Du, X.; Xu, P.; Wu, D. Assessing the thermal contributions of urban land cover types. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 204, 103927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Dan, Y.; Qiao, R.; Liu, Y.; Dong, J.; Wu, J. How to quantify the cooling effect of urban parks? Linking maximum and accumulation perspectives. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2021, 252, 112135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feyisa, G.L.; Dons, K.; Meilby, H. Efficiency of parks in mitigating urban heat island effect: An example from Addis Ababa. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, A.; Garg, A.; Mishra, V. Quantifying the local cooling effects of urban green spaces: Evidence from Bengaluru, India. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2021, 209, 104043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Z.; Lau, K.K.-L.; Ng, E.Y.Y. Urban tree design approaches for mitigating daytime urban heat island effects in a high-density urban environment. Energy Build. 2016, 114, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsoka, S.; Leduc, T.; Rodler, A. Assessing the effects of urban street trees on building cooling energy needs: The role of foliage density and planting pattern. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 65, 102633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speak, A.; Montagnani, L.; Wellstein, C.; Zerbe, S. The influence of tree traits on urban ground surface shade cooling. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 197, 103748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomey, M.L.; Collins, S.; Vargas, R.; Johnson, J.E.; Brown, R.F.; Natvig, D.O.; Friggens, M.T. Effect of precipitation variability on net primary production and soil respiration in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 17, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abel, C.; Horion, S.; Tagesson, T.; De Keersmaecker, W.; Seddon, A.W.; Abdi, A.M.; Fensholt, R. The human–environment nexus and vegetation–rainfall sensitivity in tropical drylands. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, B.; Wang, S.; Guo, L.; Wu, X. Aridity change and its correlation with greening over drylands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 278, 107663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Mejia, Z.M.; Papuga, S.A.; Swetish, J.B.; van Leeuwen, W.; Szutu, D.; Hartfield, K. Quantifying the influence of deep soil moisture on ecosystem albedo: The role of vegetation. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50, 4038–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhao, M.; Mote, S.; Mu, Q.; Kalnay, E.; Li, S. Local cooling and warming effects of forests based on satellite observations. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fan, P.; Xu, L.; Yue, W.; Chen, J. Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 165, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinda, S.; Das Chatterjee, N.; Ghosh, S. An integrated simulation approach to the assessment of urban growth pattern and loss in urban green space in Kolkata, India: A GIS-based analysis. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banskota, A.; Kayastha, N.; Falkowski, M.J.; Wulder, M.; Froese, R.E.; White, J. Forest Monitoring Using Landsat Time Series Data: A Review. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 2014, 40, 362–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Li, F.; Li, S.; Long, Y. Deciphering the recreational use of urban parks: Experiments using multi-source big data for all Chinese cities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 701, 134896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Ouyang, Z.; Meng, X.; Wang, X. Plant species composition in relation to green cover configuration and function of urban parks in Beijing, China. Ecol. Res. 2006, 21, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorelick, N.; Hancher, M.; Dixon, M.; Ilyushchenko, S.; Thau, D.; Moore, R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2017, 202, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masek, J.; Vermote, E.; Saleous, N.; Wolfe, R.; Hall, F.; Huemmrich, K.; Gao, F.; Kutler, J.; Lim, T.-K. A Landsat Surface Reflectance Dataset for North America, 1990–2000. IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett. 2006, 3, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermote, E.; Justice, C.; Claverie, M.; Franch, B. Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2016, 185, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foga, S.; Scaramuzza, P.L.; Guo, S.; Zhu, Z.; Dilley, R.D., Jr.; Beckmann, T.; Schmidt, G.L.; Dwyer, J.L.; Hughes, M.J.; Laue, B. Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 194, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, Z.; Fu, Y.; Woodcock, C.E.; Olofsson, P.; Vogelmann, J.; Holden, C.; Wang, M.; Dai, S.; Yu, Y. Including land cover change in analysis of greenness trends using all available Landsat 5, 7, and 8 images: A case study from Guangzhou, China (2000–2014). Remote. Sens. Environ. 2016, 185, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roy, D.; Kovalskyy, V.; Zhang, H.; Vermote, E.; Yan, L.; Kumar, S.S.; Egorov, A. Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 reflective wavelength and normalized difference vegetation index continuity. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2016, 185, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fassnacht, F.E.; Schiller, C.; Kattenborn, T.; Zhao, X.; Qu, J. A Landsat-based vegetation trend product of the Tibetan Plateau for the time-period 1990–2018. Sci. Data 2019, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, K.; Fawcett, D.; Cugulliere, A.; Benford, S.; Jones, D.; Leng, R. Vegetation expansion in the subnival Hindu Kush Himalaya. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 1608–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiménez-Muñoz, J.C.; Sobrino, J.A. A generalized single-channel method for retrieving land surface temperature from remote sensing data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2003, 108, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Malakar, N.K.; Hulley, G.C.; Hook, S.J.; Laraby, K.; Cook, M.; Schott, J.R. An Operational Land Surface Temperature Product for Landsat Thermal Data: Methodology and Validation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. 2018, 56, 5717–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-Muñoz, J.C.; Cristóbal, J.; Sobrino, J.A.; Soria, G.; Ninyerola, M.; Pons, X. Revision of the Single-Channel Algorithm for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval From Landsat Thermal-Infrared Data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. 2009, 47, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyapustin, A.; Wang, Y. MCD19A2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Aerosol Optical Depth Daily L2G Global 1km SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC 2018. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD19A2.006 (accessed on 24 June 2021).
- Kalnay, E.; Kanamitsu, M.; Kistler, R.; Collins, W.; Deaven, D.; Gandin, L.; Iredell, M.; Saha, S.; White, G.; Woollen, J. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1996, 77, 437–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ermida, S.L.; Soares, P.; Mantas, V.; Göttsche, F.-M.; Trigo, I.F. Google Earth Engine Open-Source Code for Land Surface Temperature Estimation from the Landsat Series. Remote. Sens. 2020, 12, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, L.; Gather, U. The identification of multiple outliers. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1993, 88, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, S.-B.; Li, Z.-L.; Li, H.; Göttsche, F.-M.; Wu, H.; Zhao, W.; Leng, P.; Zhang, X.; Coll, C. Validation of Collection 6 MODIS land surface temperature product using in situ measurements. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2019, 225, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mu, Q.; Zhao, M.; Running, S.W. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 1781–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monteith, J.L. Evaporation and environment. In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1965; pp. 205–234. [Google Scholar]
- Saha, S.; Moorthi, S.; Wu, X.; Wang, J.; Nadiga, S.; Tripp, P.; Behringer, D.; Hou, Y.-T.; Chuang, H.-Y.; Iredell, M.; et al. NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2) 6-hourly Products. Res. Data Arch. Natl. Center Atmos. Res. Comput. Inf. Syst. Lab. 2011, 10, D61C1TXF. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchhorn, M.; Lesiv, M.; Tsendbazar, N.-E.; Herold, M.; Bertels, L.; Smets, B. Copernicus Global Land Cover Layers—Collection. Remote. Sens. 2020, 12, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liang, S. Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo I: Algorithms. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2001, 76, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anees, A.; Aryal, J.; O’Reilly, M.; Gale, T. A Relative Density Ratio-Based Framework for Detection of Land Cover Changes in MODIS NDVI Time Series. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote. Sens. 2015, 9, 3359–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleveland, R.B. STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. J. Off. Stat. 1990, 6, 3–73. [Google Scholar]
- Muggeo, V.M.R. Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat. Med. 2003, 22, 3055–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Piao, S.; Myneni, R.B.; Huang, M.; Zeng, Z.; Canadell, J.G.; Ciais, P.; Sitch, S.; Friedlingstein, P.; Arneth, A.; et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seddon, A.; Macias-Fauria, M.; Long, P.R.; Benz, D.; Willis, K. Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 531, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, S.; Liu, S.; Zhou, D. Prevalent vegetation growth enhancement in urban environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6313–6318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhou, D.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, S. Remotely sensed assessment of urbanization effects on vegetation phenology in China’s 32 major cities. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 176, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Popek, R.; Przybysz, A.; Gawrońska, H.; Klamkowski, K.; Gawroński, S.W. Impact of particulate matter accumulation on the photosynthetic apparatus of roadside woody plants growing in the urban conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, J.; McBride, J.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Z. The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For. Urban Green. 2005, 3, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ow, L.F.; Ghosh, S.; Yusof, M.L.M. Growth of Samanea saman: Estimated cooling potential of this tree in an urban environment. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 41, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.A.; Moser, A.; Rötzer, T.; Pauleit, S. Comparing the transpirational and shading effects of two contrasting urban tree species. Urban Ecosyst. 2019, 22, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Z.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, G.Y. Quantifying the Evapotranspiration Rate and Its Cooling Effects of Urban Hedges Based on Three-Temperature Model and Infrared Remote Sensing. Remote. Sens. 2019, 11, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yin, J.; Wu, X.; Shen, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, C.; Xiang, H.; Shi, C.; Guo, Z.; Li, C. Impact of urban greenspace spatial pattern on land surface temperature: A case study in Beijing metropolitan area, China. Landsc. Ecol. 2019, 34, 2949–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, K.; Jia, B. The roles of landscape both inside the park and the surroundings in park cooling effect. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 52, 101864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunawardena, K.; Wells, M.; Kershaw, T. Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017, 584–585, 1040–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azevedo, J.A.; Chapman, L.; Muller, C.L. Quantifying the Daytime and Night-Time Urban Heat Island in Birmingham, UK: A Comparison of Satellite Derived Land Surface Temperature and High Resolution Air Temperature Observations. Remote. Sens. 2016, 8, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).