Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning-Based Drivers Emotion Classification System in Time Series Data for Remote Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A New Individual Tree Crown Delineation Method for High Resolution Multispectral Imagery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Next-Generation Gravity Missions: Sino-European Numerical Simulation Comparison Exercise
Open AccessArticle

An Assessment of the GOCE High-Level Processing Facility (HPF) Released Global Geopotential Models with Regional Test Results in Turkey

Istanbul Technical University, Civil Engineering Faculty, Geomatics Engineering Department, Maslak 34469, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030586 (registering DOI)
Received: 23 December 2019 / Revised: 4 February 2020 / Accepted: 6 February 2020 / Published: 10 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing by Satellite Gravimetry)
The launch of dedicated satellite missions at the beginning of the 2000s led to significant improvement in the determination of Earth gravity field models. As a consequence of this progress, both the accuracies and the spatial resolutions of the global geopotential models increased. However, the spectral behaviors and the accuracies of the released models vary mainly depending on their computation strategies. These strategies are briefly explained in this article. Comprehensive quality assessment of the gravity field models by means of spectral and statistical analyses provides a comparison of the gravity field mapping accuracies of these models, as well as providing an understanding of their progress. The practical benefit of these assessments by means of choosing an optimal model with the highest accuracy and best resolution for a specific application is obvious for a broad range of geoscience applications, including geodesy and geophysics, that employ Earth gravity field parameters in their studies. From this perspective, this study aims to evaluate the GOCE High-Level Processing Facility geopotential models including recently published sixth releases using different validation methods recommended in the literature, and investigate their performances comparatively and in addition to some other models, such as GOCO05S, GOGRA04S and EGM2008. In addition to the validation statistics from various countries, the study specifically emphasizes the numerical test results in Turkey. It is concluded that the performance improves from the first generation RL01 models toward the final RL05 models, which were based on the entire mission data. This outcome was confirmed when the releases of different computation approaches were considered. The accuracies of the RL05 models were found to be similar to GOCO05S, GOGRA04S and even to RL06 versions but better than EGM2008, in their maximum expansion degrees. Regarding the results obtained from these tests using the GPS/leveling observations in Turkey, the contribution of the GOCE data to the models was significant, especially between the expansion degrees of 100 and 250. In the study, the tested geopotential models were also considered for detailed geoid modeling using the remove-compute-restore method. It was found that the best-fitting geopotential model with its optimal expansion degree (please see the definition of optimal degree in the article) improved the high-frequency regional geoid model accuracy by almost 15%. View Full-Text
Keywords: gravity field satellite missions; GOCE; GRACE; GOCE High-Level Processing Facility (HPF), earth gravity field; geoid; spectral enhancement method (SEM), GPS/leveling gravity field satellite missions; GOCE; GRACE; GOCE High-Level Processing Facility (HPF), earth gravity field; geoid; spectral enhancement method (SEM), GPS/leveling
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Erol, B.; Işık, M.S.; Erol, S. An Assessment of the GOCE High-Level Processing Facility (HPF) Released Global Geopotential Models with Regional Test Results in Turkey. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 586.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop