Next Article in Journal
Shoreline Extraction from WorldView2 Satellite Data in the Presence of Foam Pixels Using Multispectral Classification Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection and Classification of Non-Photosynthetic Vegetation from PRISMA Hyperspectral Data in Croplands
Previous Article in Journal
Bayesian Calibration of the Aquacrop-OS Model for Durum Wheat by Assimilation of Canopy Cover Retrieved from VENµS Satellite Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Semi-Automated Roadside Image Data Collection for Characterization of Agricultural Land Management Practices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimates of Conservation Tillage Practices Using Landsat Archive

by
Peter C. Beeson
1,*,
Craig S.T. Daughtry
2 and
Steven A. Wallander
3
1
Global Conservation Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87506, USA
2
Agriculture Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
3
Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC 20250, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(16), 2665; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162665
Submission received: 11 July 2020 / Revised: 30 July 2020 / Accepted: 15 August 2020 / Published: 18 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Crop Residue and Non-photosynthetic Vegetation)

Abstract

The USDA Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) provides financial assistance to encourage producers to adopt conservation practices. Historically, one of the most common practices is conservation tillage, primarily the use of no-till planting. The objectives of this research were to determine crop residue using remote sensing, an indicator of tillage intensity, without using training data and examine its performance at the field level. The Landsat Thematic Mapper Series platforms can provide global temporal and spatial coverage beginning in the mid-1980s. In this study, we used the Normalized Difference Tillage Index (NDTI), which has proved to be robust and accurate in studies built upon training datasets. We completed 10 years of residue maps for the 150,000 km2 study area in South Dakota, North Dakota, and Minnesota and validated the results against field-level survey data. The overall accuracy was between 64% and 78% with additional improvement when survey points with suspect geolocation and satellite tillage estimates with fewer than four dates of Landsat images were excluded. This study demonstrates that, with Landsat Archive available at no cost, researchers can implement retrospective, untrained estimates of conservation tillage with sufficient accuracy for some applications.
Keywords: crop residue cover; plant litter; non-photosynthetic vegetation; soil disturbance; normalized difference tillage index (NDTI); environmental quality incentives program (EQIP) crop residue cover; plant litter; non-photosynthetic vegetation; soil disturbance; normalized difference tillage index (NDTI); environmental quality incentives program (EQIP)
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Beeson, P.C.; Daughtry, C.S.T.; Wallander, S.A. Estimates of Conservation Tillage Practices Using Landsat Archive. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2665. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162665

AMA Style

Beeson PC, Daughtry CST, Wallander SA. Estimates of Conservation Tillage Practices Using Landsat Archive. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(16):2665. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Beeson, Peter C., Craig S.T. Daughtry, and Steven A. Wallander. 2020. "Estimates of Conservation Tillage Practices Using Landsat Archive" Remote Sensing 12, no. 16: 2665. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162665

APA Style

Beeson, P. C., Daughtry, C. S. T., & Wallander, S. A. (2020). Estimates of Conservation Tillage Practices Using Landsat Archive. Remote Sensing, 12(16), 2665. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop