Next Article in Journal
3D-Modelling of Charlemagne’s Summit Canal (Southern Germany)—Merging Remote Sensing and Geoarchaeological Subsurface Data
Previous Article in Journal
Sugarcane Productivity Mapping through C-Band and L-Band SAR and Optical Satellite Imagery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correction: Yahui, Che et al. Validation of Aerosol Products from AATSR and MERIS/AATSR Synergy Algorithms—Part 1: Global Evaluation. Remote Sensing 2018, 10, 1414
Article Menu
Issue 9 (May-1) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Assessment of Himawari-8 AHI Aerosol Optical Depth Over Land

1,2, 3,* and 1,2
Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(9), 1108;
Received: 21 March 2019 / Revised: 19 April 2019 / Accepted: 7 May 2019 / Published: 9 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Air Quality)
PDF [22238 KB, uploaded 9 May 2019]


This study conducted the first comprehensive assessment of the aerosol optical depth (AOD) product retrieved from the observations by the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard the Himawari-8 satellite. The AHI Level 3 AOD (Version 3.0) was evaluated using the collocated Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) level 2.0 direct sun AOD measurements over the last three years (May 2016–December 2018) at 58 selected AERONET sites. A comprehensive comparison between AHI and AERONET AOD was carried out, which yielded a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.82, a slope of 0.69, and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.16. The results indicate a good agreement between AHI and AERONET AOD, while revealing that the AHI aerosol retrieval algorithm tends to underestimate the atmospheric aerosol load. In addition, the expected uncertainty of AHI Level 3 AOD (Version 3.0) is ± (0.1 + 0.3 × AOD). Furthermore, the performance of the AHI aerosol retrieval algorithm exhibits regional variation. The best performance is reported over East Asia (R 0.86), followed by Southeast Asia (R 0.79) and Australia (R 0.35). The monthly and seasonal comparisons between AHI and AERONET show that the best performance is found in summer (R 0.93), followed by autumn (R 0.84), winter (R 0.82), and spring (R 0.76). The worst performance was observed in March (R 0.75), while the best performance appeared in June (R 0.94). The variation in the annual mean AHI AOD on the scale of hours demonstrates that AHI can perform continuous (no less than ten hours) aerosol monitoring. View Full-Text
Keywords: aerosol optical depth; Himawari-8; AHI; AERONE; assessment aerosol optical depth; Himawari-8; AHI; AERONE; assessment

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, W.; Xu, H.; Zhang, L. Assessment of Himawari-8 AHI Aerosol Optical Depth Over Land. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1108.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top