Next Article in Journal
Integration of Machine Learning and Open Access Geospatial Data for Land Cover Mapping
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrological Response of Dry Afromontane Forest to Changes in Land Use and Land Cover in Northern Ethiopia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Progressive Cascaded Convolutional Neural Networks for Single Tree Detection with Google Earth Imagery
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Airborne Lidar Sampling Strategies to Enhance Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation from Landsat Imagery

Department of Environmental Resources Engineering, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(16), 1906;
Received: 2 July 2019 / Revised: 10 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 15 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Active Remote Sensing of Forests)
PDF [8110 KB, uploaded 15 August 2019]


Accurately estimating aboveground biomass (AGB) is important in many applications, including monitoring carbon stocks, investigating deforestation and forest degradation, and designing sustainable forest management strategies. Although lidar provides critical three-dimensional forest structure information for estimating AGB, acquiring comprehensive lidar coverage is often cost prohibitive. This research focused on developing a lidar sampling framework to support AGB estimation from Landsat images. Two sampling strategies, systematic and classification-based, were tested and compared. The proposed strategies were implemented over a temperate forest study site in northern New York State and the processes were then validated at a similar site located in central New York State. Our results demonstrated that while the inclusion of lidar data using systematic or classification-based sampling supports AGB estimation, the systematic sampling selection method was highly dependent on site conditions and had higher accuracy variability. Of the 12 systematic sampling plans, R2 values ranged from 0.14 to 0.41 and plot root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 84.2 to 93.9 Mg ha−1. The classification-based sampling outperformed 75% of the systematic sampling strategies at the primary site with R2 of 0.26 and RMSE of 70.1 Mg ha−1. The classification-based lidar sampling strategy was relatively easy to apply and was readily transferable to a new study site. Adopting this method at the validation site, the classification-based sampling also worked effectively, with an R2 of 0.40 and an RMSE of 108.2 Mg ha−1 compared to the full lidar coverage model with an R2 of 0.58 and an RMSE of 96.0 Mg ha−1. This study evaluated different lidar sample selection methods to identify an efficient and effective approach to reduce the volume and cost of lidar acquisitions. The forest type classification-based sampling method described in this study could facilitate cost-effective lidar data collection in future studies. View Full-Text
Keywords: systematic sampling; classification-based sampling; forest types; data fusion; regression; random forest systematic sampling; classification-based sampling; forest types; data fusion; regression; random forest

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Quackenbush, L.J.; Im, J. Airborne Lidar Sampling Strategies to Enhance Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation from Landsat Imagery. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1906.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top