Next Article in Journal
Estimating the Speed of Ice-Going Ships by Integrating SAR Imagery and Ship Data from an Automatic Identification System
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Raft Labeling for Remote Sensing Images via Dual-Scale Homogeneous Convolutional Neural Network
Open AccessArticle

Consideration of Radiometric Quantization Error in Satellite Sensor Cross-Calibration

1
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., 1 Enterprise Pkwy, Hampton, VA 23666, USA
2
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23666, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(7), 1131; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071131
Received: 8 June 2018 / Revised: 9 July 2018 / Accepted: 9 July 2018 / Published: 18 July 2018
The radiometric resolution of a satellite sensor refers to the smallest increment in the spectral radiance that can be detected by the imaging sensor. The fewer bits that are used for signal discretization, the larger the quantization error in the measured radiance. In satellite inter-calibration, a difference in radiometric resolution between a reference and a target sensor can induce a calibration bias, if not properly accounted for. The effect is greater for satellites with a quadratic count response, such as the Geostationary Meteorological Satellite-5 (GMS-5) visible imager, where the quantization difference can introduce non-linearity in the inter-comparison datasets, thereby affecting the cross-calibration slope and offset. This paper describes a simulation approach to highlight the importance of considering the radiometric quantization in cross-calibration and presents a correction method for mitigating its impact. The method, when applied to the cross-calibration of GMS-5 and Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors, improved the absolute calibration accuracy of the GMS-5 imager. This was validated via radiometric inter-comparison of GMS-5 and Multifunction Transport Satellite-2 (MTSAT-2) imager top-of-atmosphere (TOA) measurements over deep convective clouds (DCC) and Badain Desert invariant targets. The radiometric bias between GMS-5 and MTSAT-2 was reduced from 1.9% to 0.5% for DCC, and from 7.7% to 2.3% for Badain using the proposed correction method. View Full-Text
Keywords: quantization; calibration; GMS-5; MODIS quantization; calibration; GMS-5; MODIS
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Bhatt, R.; Doelling, D.; Haney, C.; Scarino, B.; Gopalan, A. Consideration of Radiometric Quantization Error in Satellite Sensor Cross-Calibration. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1131.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop