Next Article in Journal
Improved Hydrological Decision Support System for the Lower Mekong River Basin Using Satellite-Based Earth Observations
Next Article in Special Issue
Side-Scan Sonar Image Mosaic Using Couple Feature Points with Constraint of Track Line Positions
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of TRMM/GPM Blended Daily Products over Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Compressive Sound Speed Profile Inversion Using Beamforming Results
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Underwater Acoustic Pulsed Source Localization with a Pair of Hydrophones

1
Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Crete, GR 70013 Heraklion, Greece
2
Technological Education Institute-Crete, Crete, GR 71410 Heraklion, Greece
3
School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, CA V8W 2Y2, USA
4
Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, Terpsichoris 21, 16671 Vouliagmeni, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(6), 883; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060883
Received: 17 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 May 2018 / Published: 6 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Undersea Remote Sensing)
A series of underwater acoustic localization experiments were conducted in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea to test the performance of a Bayesian method for localization of pulsed acoustic sources exploiting time differences between direct and surface-reflected arrivals at two hydrophones of known depth. The experiments involved a controlled source (pinger) at various depths/ranges as well as vocalizing sperm whales encountered off southern Crete. The localization method provides primarily range and depth information. In addition, if the location of the hydrophones in the horizontal is known, horizontal localization can be performed as well, subject to left–right ambiguity; this was applied for whale localization. The localization results confirmed the anticipated behavior of range, depth, and bearing estimation errors, which, according to theory, depend mainly on the source azimuth. In particular, range and depth estimation errors are larger for source locations close to broadside to the array and smaller towards endfire, and they increase with range. Conversely, bearing estimation errors are larger close to endfire and smaller towards broadside. Localizations in this paper were performed to ranges of about 3.5 km. The limiting factors for localization to longer ranges were the loss of ability to resolve direct and surface-reflected arrivals as well as the self-noise of the hydrophones. View Full-Text
Keywords: underwater acoustic localization; passive localization; pulsed source localization; Bayesian inversion; ray theory underwater acoustic localization; passive localization; pulsed source localization; Bayesian inversion; ray theory
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Skarsoulis, E.K.; Piperakis, G.; Kalogerakis, M.; Orfanakis, E.; Papadakis, P.; Dosso, S.E.; Frantzis, A. Underwater Acoustic Pulsed Source Localization with a Pair of Hydrophones. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 883.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop