# A Method for Robust Estimation of Vegetation Seasonality from Landsat and Sentinel-2 Time Series Data

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

#### 2.1. Study Area and Data Description

#### 2.2. Assumptions and Modelling Principles

#### 2.3. Implementation

#### 2.3.1. Model Function and Shape Priors

#### 2.3.2. Base Level

#### 2.3.3. Determining the Shape Prior

#### 2.3.4. Determining a Model Function That Accounts for Intra-Seasonal Variations

#### 2.3.5. Data Storage and Compression

#### 2.3.6. Evaluating the Robustness of the Method

## 3. Results

## 4. Discussion

## 5. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Wulder, M.A.; White, J.C.; Loveland, T.R.; Woodcock, C.E.; Belward, A.S.; Cohen, W.B.; Fosnight, E.A.; Shaw, J.; Masek, J.G.; Roy, D.P. The global Landsat archive: Status, consolidation, and direction. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2016**, 185, 271–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Justice, C.O.; Townshend, J.R.G.; Holben, B.N.; Tucker, C.J. Analysis of the phenology of global vegetation using meteorological satellite data. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**1985**, 6, 1271–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H. Variation and trends of landscape dynamics, land surface phenology and net primary production of the Appalachian Mountains. J. Appl. Remote Sens.
**2012**, 6, 061708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - White, M.A.; De Beurs, K.M.; Didan, K.; Inouye, D.W.; Richardson, A.D.; Jensen, O.P.; O’Keefe, J.; Zhang, G.; Nemani, R.R.; Van Leeuwen, W.J.D.; et al. Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006. Glob. Chang. Biol.
**2009**, 15, 2335–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, X.; Friedl, M.A.; Schaaf, C.B.; Strahler, A.H.; Hodges, J.C.F.; Gao, F.; Reed, B.C.; Huete, A. Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2003**, 84, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jin, H.X.; Jönsson, A.M.; Bolmgren, K.; Langvall, O.; Eklundh, L. Disentangling remotely-sensed plant phenology and snow seasonality at northern Europe using MODIS and the plant phenology index. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2017**, 198, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fisher, J.I.; Mustard, J.F.; Vadeboncoeur, M.A. Green leaf phenology at Landsat resolution: Scaling from the field to the satellite. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2006**, 100, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Melaas, E.K.; Friedl, M.A.; Zhu, Z. Detecting interannual variation in deciduous broadleaf forest phenology using Landsat TM/ETM+ data. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2013**, 132, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wulder, M.A.; White, J.C.; Coops, N.C.; Butson, C.R. Multi-temporal analysis of high spatial resolution imagery for disturbance monitoring. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2008**, 112, 2729–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kennedy, R.E.; Yang, Z.; Cohen, W.B. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr—Temporal segmentation algorithms. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2010**, 114, 2897–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhu, Z.; Woodcock, C.E.; Olofsson, P. Continuous monitoring of forest disturbance using all available Landsat imagery. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2012**, 122, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fisher, J.I.; Mustard, J.F. Cross-scalar satellite phenology from ground, Landsat, and MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2007**, 109, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Elmore, A.J.; Guinn, S.M.; Minsley, B.J.; Richardson, A.D. Landscape controls on the timing of spring, autumn, and growing season length in mid-Atlantic forests. Glob. Chang. Biol.
**2012**, 18, 656–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Melaas, E.K.; Sulla-Menashe, D.; Gray, J.M.; Black, T.A.; Morin, T.H.; Richardson, A.D.; Friedl, M.A. Multisite analysis of land surface phenology in North American temperate and boreal deciduous forests from Landsat. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2016**, 186, 452–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Friedl, M.A.; Gray, J.M.; Melaas, E.K.; Richardson, A.D.; Hufkens, K.; Keenan, T.F.; Bailey, A.; O’Keefe, J. A tale of two springs: Using recent climate anomalies to characterize the sensitivity of temperate forest phenology to climate change. Environ. Res. Lett.
**2014**, 9, 054006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Melaas, E.K.; Sulla-Menashe, D.; Friedl, M.A. Multidecadal changes and interannual variation in springtime phenology of North American temperate and boreal deciduous forests. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2018**, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jönsson, P.; Eklundh, L. TIMESAT—A program for analysing time-series of satellite sensor data. Comput. Geosci.
**2004**, 30, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Eklundh, L.; Jönsson, P. TIMESAT 3.3 with Seasonal Trend Decomposition and Parallel Processing Software Manual; Lund University: Lund, Sweden, 2017; p. 88. [Google Scholar]
- Roerink, G.J.; Menenti, M.; Verhoef, W. Reconstructing cloudfree NDVI composites using Fourier analysis of time series. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2000**, 21, 1911–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ivits, E.; Cherlet, M.; Mehl, W.; Sommer, S. Ecosystem functional units characterized by satellite observed phenology and productivity gradients: A case study for Europe. Ecol. Indic.
**2013**, 27, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhu, Z.; Woodcock, C.E. Automated cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection in multitemporal Landsat data: An algorithm designed specifically for monitoring land cover change. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2014**, 152, 217–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Muller-Wilm, U.; Louis, J.; Richter, R.; Gascon, F.; Niezette, M. Sentinel-2 level 2A prototype processor: Architecture, algorithms and first results. In Proceedings of the 2013 ESA Living Planet Symposium, Edinburgh, UK, 9–13 September 2013; pp. 9–13. [Google Scholar]
- Claverie, M.; Masek, J.G.; Ju, J. Harmonized Landsat-8 Sentinel-2 (HLS) Product User’s Guide. 2017. Available online: https://hls.gsfc.nasa.gov (accessed on 15 February 2018).
- Vermote, E.; Wolfe, R. MOD09GA MODIS/Terra Surface Reflectance Daily L2G Global 1 km and 500 m SIN Grid V006. 2015. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD09GA.006 (accessed on 9 January 2018).
- Holben, B.N. Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**1986**, 7, 1417–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Klisch, A.; Atzberger, C. Operational Drought Monitoring in Kenya Using MODIS NDVI Time Series. Remote Sens.
**2016**, 8, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fischer, A. A model for the seasonal variations of vegetation indices in coarse resolution data and its inversion to extract crop parameters. Remote Sens. Environ.
**1994**, 48, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jönsson, P.; Eklundh, L. Seasonality extraction by function fitting to time-series of satellite sensor data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2002**, 40, 1824–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beck, P.S.A.; Atzberger, C.; Hogda, K.A.; Johansen, B.; Skidmore, A.K. Improved monitoring of vegetation dynamics at very high latitudes: A new method using MODIS NDVI. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2006**, 100, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beck, P.S.A.; Jönsson, P.; Hogda, K.A.; Karlsen, S.R.; Eklundh, L.; Skidmore, A.K. A ground-validated NDVI dataset for monitoring vegetation dynamics and mapping phenology in Fennoscandia and the Kola peninsula. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2007**, 28, 4311–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nielsen, H.B. Separable Nonlinear Least Squares, Technical Report IMM-REP-2000-01, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling (IMM); Technical University of Denmark: Lyngby, Denmark, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Coleman, T.F.; Li, Y. An Interior, Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds. SIAM J. Optim.
**1996**, 6, 418–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Eklundh, L.; Jin, H.X.; Schubert, P.; Guzinski, R.; Heliasz, M. An Optical Sensor Network for Vegetation Phenology Monitoring and Satellite Data Calibration. Sensors
**2011**, 11, 7678–7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Cai, Z.Z.; Jönsson, P.; Jin, H.X.; Eklundh, L. Performance of Smoothing Methods for Reconstructing NDVI Time-Series and Estimating Vegetation Phenology from MODIS Data. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 9, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hird, J.N.; McDermid, G.J. Noise reduction of NDVI time series: An empirical comparison of selected techniques. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2009**, 113, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Atkinson, P.M.; Jeganathan, C.; Dash, J.; Atzberger, C. Inter-comparison of four models for smoothing satellite sensor time-series data to estimate vegetation phenology. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2012**, 123, 400–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Geng, L.; Ma, M.; Wang, X.; Yu, W.; Jia, S.; Wang, H. Comparison of Eight Techniques for Reconstructing Multi-Satellite Sensor Time-Series NDVI Data Sets in the Heihe River Basin, China. Remote Sens.
**2014**, 6, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, J.; Jönsson, P.; Tamura, M.; Gu, Z.H.; Matsushita, B.; Eklundh, L. A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2004**, 91, 332–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Atzberger, C.; Eilers, P.H.C. A time series for monitoring vegetation activity and phenology at 10-daily time steps covering large parts of South America. Int. J. Digit. Earth
**2011**, 4, 365–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Eilers, P.H.C. A Perfect Smoother. Anal. Chem.
**2003**, 75, 3631–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Fisher, A. A simple model for the temporal variations of NDVI at regional scale over agricultural countries. Validations with ground radiometric measurements. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**1994**, 15, 1421–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Akaike, H. Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J. Econom.
**1981**, 16, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Baumann, M.; Ozdogan, M.; Richardson, A.D.; Radeloff, V.C. Phenology from Landsat when data is scarce: Using MODIS and Dynamic Time-Warping to combine multi-year Landsat imagery to derive annual phenology curves. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs.
**2017**, 54, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Richardson, A.D.; Jenkins, J.P.; Braswell, B.H.; Hollinger, D.Y.; Ollinger, S.V.; Smith, M.-L. Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Oecologia
**2007**, 152, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Melaas, E.K.; Richardson, A.D.; Friedl, M.A.; Dragoni, D.; Gough, C.M.; Herbst, M.; Montagnani, L.; Moors, E. Using FLUXNET data to improve models of springtime vegetation activity onset in forest ecosystems. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2013**, 171, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Study area in Central Sweden. The image to the left is a false color composite from Sentinel-2, acquired on 8 July 2016. The white line marks the area of the MODIS data used, and the blue line marks the area of the Sentinel-2 and Landsat data used.

**Figure 2.**Landsat observations for 2006–2014 extracted for a pine forest pixel (60.0863°N, 17.4795°E) denoted as “Clear” or “Other” (i.e., assigned another QA class than clear-sky in the FMASK algorithm). Note the large proportion of non-clear observations and the weak seasonal dynamics for this pixel.

**Figure 3.**Shape prior for time series data from Landsat NDVI 2000–2005. The base level has, after analyzing the histogram for this pixel, been fixed to NDVI = 0.59. As the shape prior does not describe individual years, its main use is for stabilizing the fitting procedure during data-sparse periods.

**Figure 4.**(

**a**) Double logistic fits with free seasonal parameters. Note the unrealistically short second growing season due to lack of clear observations at the end of the season (arrow); (

**b**) fit where the right inflexion point and the parameter determining the fall time are constrained and taken as the corresponding values of the shape prior.

**Figure 5.**Seven regions in which data points must exist, according to Table 2, to allow free parameters to be used. Circles denote levels 0.01, 0.25, 0.75 and 0.99 of the amplitude to the left and right of the center.

**Figure 6.**Examples of time series over deciduous (

**top**), coniferous (

**middle**), and agricultural (

**bottom**) areas from Landsat (

**left**) and S2 (

**right**).

**Figure 7.**Phenology data from Landsat (

**top row**) and Sentinel 2a (

**bottom row**). Left hand images show estimated start of season (unit: day-of-year, DOY), and the center images show zoom-ins over an agricultural area. The right hand top image shows a false color composite (FCC) from Landsat 8 for comparison, and the bottom right image shows pixels where shape prior was used for estimating parameter ${x}_{1}^{i}$, determining the start of season. Coordinates of the study area are shown in Figure 1.

**Figure 8.**Reduced RMSE and bias when estimating start of season (

**left**) and end of season (

**right**) for 2016 from simulated S2 NDVI data by double logistic function fitting without shape prior (SP; blue dots) as compared to fitting with shape prior (red dots). Parameters from simulated S2 data are plotted against reference data of SOS and EOS from daily MODIS NDVI. Equations and statistics of the linear relationships are printed in the graph in blue (no SP) and red (with SP).

No. | Source | Time Period | No. of Scenes/Tiles |
---|---|---|---|

1 | Landsat 5 and 7 | January 2000–December 2014 | 452 |

2 | Landsat 8 (HLS) | March 2013–April 2017 | 352 |

3 | Sentinel-2 | July 2015–July 2017 | 109 |

4 | MODIS MOD09GA 500 m | January 2011–December 2016 | 2190 |

**Table 2.**Parameters in Equations (1) and (2), and the corresponding regions in Figure 5, in which at least one point is required to allow the parameter to vary freely. If no points are found in a region, the corresponding parameter from the shape prior is used.

Parameter | Seasonal Region (Figure 5) |
---|---|

${\mathit{c}}_{\mathit{i}}$ | 4 OR (2 AND 3 AND 5 AND 6) |

${\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{1}}^{\mathit{i}}$ | 2 OR (1 AND 3) |

${\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{2}}^{\mathit{i}}$ | 1 AND 3 |

${\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{3}}^{\mathit{i}}$ | 6 OR (5 AND 7) |

${\mathit{x}}_{\mathbf{4}}^{\mathit{i}}$ | 5 AND 7 |

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Jönsson, P.; Cai, Z.; Melaas, E.; Friedl, M.A.; Eklundh, L.
A Method for Robust Estimation of Vegetation Seasonality from Landsat and Sentinel-2 Time Series Data. *Remote Sens.* **2018**, *10*, 635.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040635

**AMA Style**

Jönsson P, Cai Z, Melaas E, Friedl MA, Eklundh L.
A Method for Robust Estimation of Vegetation Seasonality from Landsat and Sentinel-2 Time Series Data. *Remote Sensing*. 2018; 10(4):635.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040635

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Jönsson, Per, Zhanzhang Cai, Eli Melaas, Mark A. Friedl, and Lars Eklundh.
2018. "A Method for Robust Estimation of Vegetation Seasonality from Landsat and Sentinel-2 Time Series Data" *Remote Sensing* 10, no. 4: 635.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040635