# Improving the Quality of Satellite Imagery Based on Ground-Truth Data from Rain Gauge Stations

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Data

## 3. Methods

#### 3.1. The Thin-Plate Spline Model with Covariates

#### 3.2. The State-Space Model with Covariates

**G**. The initial state vector ${\mathbf{v}}_{0}$ is assumed to be normally distributed with mean ${\mathbf{\mu}}_{0}$ and covariance ${\mathbf{\Sigma}}_{0}$.

## 4. Results and Discussion

## 5. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

EM | Expectation-maximization |

${H}_{mean}$ | Mean humidity |

LST | Land surface temperature |

MVC | Maximum value compositing |

NDVI | Normalized difference vegetation index |

${T}_{max}$ | Maximum mean temperature |

Tps | Thin-plate splines |

TpsWc | Thin-plate splines with covariates |

TpsWoc | Thin-plate splines without covariates |

SSMWc | State-space model |

SSMWc | State-space model with covariates |

SSMWoc | State-space model without covariates |

UTM | Universal Transverse Mercator |

## References

- Eklundh, L.; Jönsson, P. TIMESAT 3.2 with parallel processing-Software Manual; Lund University: Lund, Sweden, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Jönsson, P.; Eklundh, L. TIMESAT a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data. Comput. Geosci.
**2004**, 30, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Verhoef, W.; Menenti, M.; Azzali, S. Cover A colour composite of NOAA-AVHRR-NDVI based on time series analysis (1981–1992). Int. J. Remote Sens.
**1996**, 17, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, G.; Shen, H.; Zhang, L.; He, Z.; Li, X. A moving weighted harmonic analysis method for reconstructing high-quality SPOT VEGETATION NDVI time-series data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2015**, 53, 6008–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, B.; Huang, B.; Chen, L.; Xu, B. Spatially and temporally weighted regression: A novel method to produce continuous cloud-free Landsat imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 55, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vuolo, F.; Ng, W.T.; Atzberger, C. Smoothing and gap-filling of high resolution multi-spectral time series: Example of Landsat data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf.
**2017**, 57, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gerber, F.; Furrer, R.; Schaepman-Strub, G.; de Jong, R.; Schaepman, M.E. Predicting missing values in spatio-temporal satellite data. arXiv, 2016; arXiv:1605.01038. [Google Scholar]
- Holben, B.N. Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**1986**, 7, 1417–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - MODIS. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer. Available online: https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/about/ (accessed on 23 January 2018).
- Geng, L.; Ma, M.; Wang, X.; Yu, W.; Jia, S.; Wang, H. Comparison of eight techniques for reconstructing multi-satellite sensor time-series NDVI data sets in the Heihe river basin, China. Remote Sens.
**2014**, 6, 2024–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vancutsem, C.; Ceccato, P.; Dinku, T.; Connor, S.J. Evaluation of MODIS land surface temperature data to estimate air temperature in different ecosystems over Africa. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2010**, 114, 449–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hengl, T.; Heuvelink, G.B.; Tadić, M.P.; Pebesma, E.J. Spatio-temporal prediction of daily temperatures using time-series of MODIS LST images. Theor. Appl. Climatol.
**2012**, 107, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Militino, A.; Ugarte, M.; Goicoa, T.; González-Audícana, M. Using small area models to estimate the total area occupied by olive trees. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat.
**2006**, 11, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gasch, C.K.; Hengl, T.; Gräler, B.; Meyer, H.; Magney, T.S.; Brown, D.J. Spatio-temporal interpolation of soil water, temperature, and electrical conductivity in 3D+ T: The Cook Agronomy Farm data set. Spat. Stat.
**2015**, 14, 70–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Udelhoven, T.; Stellmes, M.; Röder, A. Assessing Rainfall-EVI Relationships in the Okavango Catchment Employing MODIS Time Series Data and Distributed Lag Models. In Remote Sensing Time Series; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 225–245. [Google Scholar]
- Metz, M.; Andreo, V.; Neteler, M. A New Fully Gap-Free Time Series of Land Surface Temperature from MODIS LST Data. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 9, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wongsai, N.; Wongsai, S.; Huete, A.R. Annual Seasonality Extraction Using the Cubic Spline Function and Decadal Trend in Temporal Daytime MODIS LST Data. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 9, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Militino, A.F.; Ugarte, M.D.; Pérez-Goya, U. Stochastic Spatio-Temporal Models for Analysing NDVI Distribution of GIMMS NDVI3g Images. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wahba, G. Spline Models for Observational Data; CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics; Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM): Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Hutchinson, M.; Gessler, P. Splines—More than just a smooth interpolator. Geoderma
**1994**, 62, 45–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Militino, A.F.; Ugarte, M.D.; Pérez-Goya, U. Filling Gaps with Thin Plate Splines in Satellite Images. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2017**. under review. [Google Scholar] - USGS. U.S. Geological Survey. Available online: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 23 January 2018).
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Sellers, P.J. Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**1985**, 6, 1335–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slayback, D.A.; Pinzon, J.E.; Los, S.O.; Tucker, C.J. Northern hemisphere photosynthetic trends 1982–99. Glob. Chang. Biol.
**2003**, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tucker, C.J.; Pinzon, J.E.; Brown, M.E.; Slayback, D.A.; Pak, E.W.; Mahoney, R.; Vermote, E.F.; El Saleous, N. An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2005**, 26, 4485–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rouse, J., Jr.; Haas, R.; Schell, J.; Deering, D. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. NASA Spec. Publ.
**1974**, 351, 309–317. [Google Scholar] - Van Wijk, M.T.; Williams, M. Optical instruments for measuring leaf area index in low vegetation: Application in arctic ecosystems. Ecol. Appl.
**2005**, 15, 1462–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Benali, A.; Carvalho, A.; Nunes, J.; Carvalhais, N.; Santos, A. Estimating air surface temperature in Portugal using MODIS LST data. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2012**, 124, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wan, Z.; Dozier, J. A generalized split-window algorithm for retrieving land-surface temperature from space. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**1996**, 34, 892–905. [Google Scholar] - Wan, Z.; Li, Z.L. A physics-based algorithm for retrieving land-surface emissivity and temperature from EOS/MODIS data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**1997**, 35, 980–996. [Google Scholar] - Nychka, D.; Furrer, R.; Paige, J.; Sain, S. Fields: Tools for Spatial Data; R Package Version 9.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Durbin, J.; Koopman, S.J. Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Amisigo, B.; Van De Giesen, N. Using a spatio-temporal dynamic state-space model with the EM algorithm to patch gaps in daily riverflow series. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.
**2005**, 9, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Militino, A.; Ugarte, M.; Goicoa, T.; Genton, M. Interpolation of daily rainfall using spatiotemporal models and clustering. Int. J. Climatol.
**2015**, 35, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cameletti, M. Stem: Spatio-Temporal Models in R; R Package Version 1.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2012. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Flowchart of the process for evaluating the performance of the smoothing methods: state-space model with covariates (SSMWc), Tps with covariates (TpsWc), state-space model without covariates (SSMWoc) and Tps without covariates (TpsWoc).

**Figure 2.**Map of Navarre region, located in the north of Spain and with a common border to the south of France. Black dots correspond to the rain gauge stations used in this study.

**Figure 3.**From the top to bottom, boxplots of day LST (in Celsius), night LST (in Celsius), ${T}_{max}$ (in Celsius) and ${H}_{mean}$ (in percentages) for the 46 time periods of 2011.

**Figure 5.**Images of Navarre for the third week of February 2014. At the top, day LST and ${T}_{max}$ images (in Celsius) are presented, and at the bottom, night LST (in Celsius) and ${H}_{mean}$ (in percentages) are shown. These images show similar patterns. Black dots represent rain gauge stations.

**Figure 6.**On the left is the altitude map, and on the right is the NDVI image of Navarre on the second fortnight of February 2014. Both figures show similar patterns because they are highly correlated.

**Figure 7.**Root mean square prediction error versus outlier outbreak percentage obtained for day (on the top) and night (at the bottom). Land surface temperature (LST) by climatological seasons with the four models: space-state model (SSM) with and without covariates (SSWc in red and SSMWoc in green) and Tps with and without covariates (TpsWc in blue and TpsWoc in purple).

**Figure 8.**Root mean square error versus outlier outbreak percentage obtained for the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) by climatological season.

**Figure 9.**LST Navarra image in the fourth week of November 2011. In the upper row and from left to right, the 5% distorted image, the thin-plate spline (TpsWc) and the state-space (SSMWc) smoothed images with covariates. In the lower row and from left to right, the 20% distorted image and their respective TpsWc and SSMWc smoothed images with covariates.

**Figure 10.**At the top, boxplots of the 15% distorted images of day LST in the 46 time periods of 2011 are shown, and the bottom presents the boxplots of the smoothed day LST images by TpsWc in the same time periods.

**Table 1.**Reduction percentage of the RMSE in SSM and Tps smoothing procedures with and without covariates for day LST, night LST and NDVI for different sizes of outlier outbreaks.

SSM | Tps | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Outlier | RMSE | RMSE | |||||

Derived Variable | Out. % | Without Covariates | With Covariates | Reduction % | Without Covariates | With Covariates | Reduction % |

Day | 5 | 1.80 | 1.63 | 10.19 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 7.75 |

LST | 10 | 2.33 | 2.20 | 6.21 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 12.09 |

15 | 2.86 | 2.74 | 4.47 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 12.56 | |

20 | 3.54 | 3.44 | 2.89 | 1.37 | 1.21 | 13.31 | |

Night | 5 | 1.34 | 1.29 | 3.90 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 11.89 |

LST | 10 | 1.91 | 1.85 | 2.83 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 19.70 |

15 | 2.52 | 2.47 | 1.73 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 19.94 | |

20 | 3.12 | 3.08 | 1.28 | 1.13 | 0.94 | 20.36 | |

NDVI | 5 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 19.59 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 1.68 |

10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 15.11 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.61 | |

15 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 12.43 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.31 | |

20 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 10.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.56 |

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Militino, A.F.; Ugarte, M.D.; Pérez-Goya, U.
Improving the Quality of Satellite Imagery Based on Ground-Truth Data from Rain Gauge Stations. *Remote Sens.* **2018**, *10*, 398.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030398

**AMA Style**

Militino AF, Ugarte MD, Pérez-Goya U.
Improving the Quality of Satellite Imagery Based on Ground-Truth Data from Rain Gauge Stations. *Remote Sensing*. 2018; 10(3):398.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030398

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Militino, Ana F., M. Dolores Ugarte, and Unai Pérez-Goya.
2018. "Improving the Quality of Satellite Imagery Based on Ground-Truth Data from Rain Gauge Stations" *Remote Sensing* 10, no. 3: 398.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030398