Next Article in Journal
Correction: Mõttus, M. et al. Measurement of Diurnal Variation in Needle PRI and Shoot Photosynthesis in a Boreal Forest. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1019
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Three-Hourly TMPA Rainfall Products Using Telemetric Rain Gauge Observations at Lai Nullah Basin in Islamabad, Pakistan
Previous Article in Journal
Crustal Deformation Prior to the 2017 Jiuzhaigou, Northeastern Tibetan Plateau (China), Ms 7.0 Earthquake Derived from GPS Observations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation and Hydrological Utility of the Latest GPM IMERG V5 and GSMaP V7 Precipitation Products over the Tibetan Plateau
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of the GPM IMERG Final Precipitation Product to RADOLAN Weather Radar Data over the Topographically and Climatically Diverse Germany

Department of Geography, LMU Munich, Luisenstraße 37, 80333 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(12), 2029; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122029
Received: 15 October 2018 / Revised: 2 December 2018 / Accepted: 2 December 2018 / Published: 13 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation)
Precipitation measurements provide crucial information for hydrometeorological applications. In regions where typical precipitation measurement gauges are sparse, gridded products aim to provide alternative data sources. This study examines the performance of NASA’s Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (IMERG, GPM) satellite precipitation dataset in capturing the spatio-temporal variability of weather events compared to the German weather radar dataset RADOLAN RW. Besides quantity, also timing of rainfall is of very high importance when modeling or monitoring the hydrologic cycle. Therefore, detection metrics are evaluated along with standard statistical measures to test both datasets. Using indices like “probability of detection” allows a binary evaluation showing the basic categorical accordance of the radar and satellite data. Furthermore, a pixel-by-pixel comparison is performed to assess the ability to represent the spatial variability of rainfall and precipitation quantity. All calculations are additionally carried out for seasonal subsets of the data to assess potentially different behavior due to differences in precipitation schemes. The results indicate significant differences between the datasets. Overall, GPM IMERG overestimates the quantity of precipitation compared to RADOLAN, especially in the winter season. Moreover, shortcomings in detection performance arise in this season with significant erroneously-detected, yet also missed precipitation events compared to the weather radar data. Additionally, along secondary mountain ranges and the Alps, topographically-induced precipitation is not represented in GPM data, which generally shows a lack of spatial variability in rainfall and snowfall estimates due to lower resolution. View Full-Text
Keywords: precipitation; weather; radar; GPM; RADOLAN; QPE precipitation; weather; radar; GPM; RADOLAN; QPE
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramsauer, T.; Weiß, T.; Marzahn, P. Comparison of the GPM IMERG Final Precipitation Product to RADOLAN Weather Radar Data over the Topographically and Climatically Diverse Germany. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 2029.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop