Next Article in Journal
Inter-Calibration of Passive Microwave Satellite Brightness Temperatures Observed by F13 SSM/I and F17 SSMIS for the Retrieval of Snow Depth on Arctic First-Year Sea Ice
Previous Article in Journal
Vertical Accuracy Simulation of Stereo Mapping Using a Small Matrix Charge-Coupled Device
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010034

Comprehensive Evaluation of Two Successive V3 and V4 IMERG Final Run Precipitation Products over Mainland China

1
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
Beijing Water Science and Technology Institute, Beijing 100048, China
3
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
4
Beijing Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100038, China
5
College of Environment and Resource, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China
6
School of Geography and Environment Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 13 November 2017 / Revised: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 20 December 2017 / Published: 25 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Atmosphere Remote Sensing)
Full-Text   |   PDF [9187 KB, uploaded 25 December 2017]   |  

Abstract

The Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement Final Run (IMERGF) product has now been upgraded to Version 4 (V4), which has been available since March 2017. Therefore, it is desirable to evaluate the characteristic differences between the V4 and the previous V3 products. A comprehensive performance evaluation of the errors of the successive V3 and V4 IMERGF products is performed with a comparison of the China daily Precipitation Analysis Products (CPAP) from March 2014 to February 2015. The version 6 Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) research product (which is another Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) based precipitation product) is also used as a comparison in this study. Overall, the IMERGF-V4 product does not exhibit the anticipated improvement for China compared to the IMERGF-V3 product. An analysis of the metrics of annual daily average precipitation over China for the IMERGF-V3 and IMERGF-V4 products indicates a decrease of the relative bias (RB) from 3.70% to −7.18%, a decrease of the correlation coefficient (CC) from 0.91 to 0.89, an increase of the fractional standard error (FSE) from 0.49 to 0.56, and an increase of the root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 0.63 mm to 0.72 mm. Compared to the IMERGF-V3 product, the IMERGF-V4 product exhibits a significant underestimation of precipitation in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau with a much lower RB of −60.91% (−58.19%, −65.30%, and −63.74%) based on the annual (summer, autumn, and winter) daily average precipitation and an even worse performance during winter (−72.33% of RB). In comparison, the GSMaP product outperforms the IMERGF-V3 and IMERGF-V4 products and has the smallest RMSE (0.47 mm/day), highest CC (0.95), lowest FSE (0.37), and best performance of the RB (−2.39%) in terms of annual daily precipitation over China. However, the GSMaP product underestimates the precipitation more than the IMERGF-V3 product for the arid XJ region. View Full-Text
Keywords: IMERG; version 3; version 4; GSMaP; evaluation; precipitation; China IMERG; version 3; version 4; GSMaP; evaluation; precipitation; China
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, H.; Yang, S.; You, S.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Q. Comprehensive Evaluation of Two Successive V3 and V4 IMERG Final Run Precipitation Products over Mainland China. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 34.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top