Next Article in Journal
Financing High Performance Climate Adaptation in Agriculture: Climate Bonds for Multi-Functional Water Harvesting Infrastructure on the Canadian Prairies
Next Article in Special Issue
Collaboration for Sustainability in the Food Supply Chain: A Multi-Stage Study in Italy
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploratory Assessment of Significant Tourism Sustainability Indicators for a Montane-Based Route in the Drakensberg Mountains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Governance of Organic Food Production When Market Forecast Is Imprecise
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(7), 1236;

Achieving Sustainability beyond Zero Waste: A Case Study from a College Football Stadium

Bioengineering Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Truman School of Public Affairs, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 6 March 2017 / Revised: 30 June 2017 / Accepted: 11 July 2017 / Published: 14 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in Food Supply Chain and Food Industry)
Full-Text   |   PDF [9167 KB, uploaded 14 July 2017]   |  


Collegiate sporting venues have been leading efforts toward zero-waste events in pursuit of more sustainable operations. This study audited the landfill-destined waste generated at the University of Missouri (MU) football stadium in 2014 and evaluated the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) and energy use associated with waste management options, including options that do and do not comply with zero-waste definitions. An estimated 47.3 metric tons (mt) of waste was generated, the majority (29.6 mt waste) came from off-site, pre-game food preparation activities; of which over 96 percent (%) was pre-consumer and un-sold food waste. The remaining 17.7 mt originated from inside the stadium; recyclable materials accounting for 43%, followed by food waste, 24%. Eleven waste management strategies were evaluated using the Waste Reduction Model (WARM). Results indicate that scenarios achieving zero waste compliance are not necessarily the most effective means of reducing GHG emissions or energy use. The two most effective approaches are eliminating edible food waste and recycling. Source reduction of edible food reduced GHGs by 103.1 mt (carbon dioxide equivalents) CO2e and generated energy savings of 448.5 GJ compared to the baseline. Perfect recycling would result in a reduction of 25.4 mt CO2e and 243.7 GJ compared to the baseline. The primary challenges to achieving these reductions are the difficulties of predicting demand for food and influencing consumer behavior. View Full-Text
Keywords: zero waste; green events; waste management; sustainability; food waste; compost; athletics zero waste; green events; waste management; sustainability; food waste; compost; athletics

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Costello, C.; McGarvey, R.G.; Birisci, E. Achieving Sustainability beyond Zero Waste: A Case Study from a College Football Stadium. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1236.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top