Next Article in Journal
Political Regime and Learning Outcomes of Stakeholder Participation: Cross-National Study of 81 Biosphere Reserves
Previous Article in Journal
Organic vs. Non-Organic Food Products: Credence and Price Competition
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 552;

Regional-Level Carbon Allocation in China Based on Sectoral Emission Patterns under the Peak Commitment

School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum at Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
Center for Applied GIScience, Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Vincenzo Torretta
Received: 3 January 2017 / Revised: 20 March 2017 / Accepted: 20 March 2017 / Published: 5 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Use of the Environment and Resources)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1964 KB, uploaded 6 April 2017]   |  


The Chinese government has committed to reaching its carbon emissions peak by 2030, which is a major undertaking. However, traditional carbon allocation processes may face a suite of difficulties, including the dynamics of the allocation principle, the independence of the allocation entities and data availability. Considering these difficulties, in this study, we developed a multi-level carbon allocation model that integrates five sectors and 30 provinces in China. Based on the clustering of the sectoral carbon emission of major countries (or regions), the model simulates and analyzes carbon allocation at the provincial level in China under the peak commitment. The results of this study are as follows: First, in contrast to allocating national carbon allocations (NCAs) to provinces, the grandfather principle is the only option for allocating NCAs to sectors. In the future, China’s carbon emissions pattern will be dominated by the contribution from electricity and heat production sectors. This carbon emission pattern can be further divided into three categories: Pattern M, where the manufacturing and construction sectors significantly contribute to total emissions; Pattern R, where the residential buildings and commercial and public services sectors have a significant contribution to total emissions; and Pattern T, where the contribution of the transport sector to total emissions is substantial. Second, emission patterns affect the allocation of sectoral carbon allocations at the national level (SCANs). Although the preferences vary from sector to sector, they are consistent between the national and provincial levels. Third, compared with sectoral preferences, provincial preferences are more complex. Sixteen provinces, including Hebei, Shanxi and Inner Mongolia, prefer Pattern T. There are nine provinces, for example, Guangdong, Shandong and Jiangsu, whose preferred pattern is M; and five provinces, represented by Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin, have a preference for Pattern R. Last, but not least, to achieve China’s peak commitment, different provinces face alternative peak pressures. It is worth mentioning that, in patterns R and T, provinces with a high proportion of manufacturing and construction sector emissions, such as Guangdong, Shandong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang, may have to increase the share of carbon emissions from the transport sector or from residential buildings and commercial and public services sectors to postpone their peak year. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon peak commitment; carbon allocation; sectoral emission patterns carbon peak commitment; carbon allocation; sectoral emission patterns

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, Q.; Tang, W. Regional-Level Carbon Allocation in China Based on Sectoral Emission Patterns under the Peak Commitment. Sustainability 2017, 9, 552.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top