Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Shenzhen China
Next Article in Special Issue
Open Innovation in Value Chain for Sustainability of Firms
Previous Article in Journal
Tailor-Made Feedback to Reduce Residential Electricity Consumption: The Effect of Information on Household Lifestyle in Japan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Public Debt, Corruption and Sustainable Economic Growth
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 524;

Policy Analysis to Reduce Climate Change-Induced Risks in Urban and Rural Areas in Korea

Department of Urban Planning & Real Estate, Chung Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
Department of Public Service, Chung Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
Division of Climate Change and Interdisciplinary Research, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong 30147, Korea
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: JinHyo Joseph Yun and Tan Yigitcanlar
Received: 22 December 2016 / Revised: 24 March 2017 / Accepted: 25 March 2017 / Published: 30 March 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [1105 KB, uploaded 30 March 2017]   |  


The purpose of this paper was to project changes in climate change-induced risks over time and to investigate policy alternatives to mitigate the risks from increases in sea level, heavy rains, and heat waves in urban and rural areas. System dynamics simulation was used to build a model and conduct policy analysis for a simulation period over the years 2000–2050. The model was built with a focus on the interaction among three factors: damage restoration costs from heavy rains, heat waves, and sea level rise; the total cost of food imports due to decreases in arable land and agricultural productivity; and changes in the government budget to respond to climate change problems. A policy experiment was conducted with the model under four scenarios mainly based on the government budget for climate change. The results indicated, firstly, that the climate budget needs to be increased to at least 13 trillion Korean Won (US $11.6 billion) per year. Secondly, an earlier budget increase would more effectively reduce the total disaster restoration cost than a delayed budget increase. Third, if an earlier budget increase is difficult, the next best alternative would be to allocate a greater fraction of the climate budget to urban rather than to rural areas. Lastly, an early response to climate change would more effectively reduce food import costs, maintain agricultural productivity, and improve infrastructure for climate change adaptation than a delayed response. In conclusion, an earlier increase in the climate change budget would be more effective than a delayed budget increase of the same amount, and allocating a larger fraction of the climate budget to urban areas could be more cost-effective than increasing the budget, if urban and rural parties could agree on the method of allocation. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate change policy; risk management; system dynamics simulation; urban and rural areas climate change policy; risk management; system dynamics simulation; urban and rural areas

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Moon, T.H.; Kim, D.-H.; Park, C.S.; Lee, D.-S. Policy Analysis to Reduce Climate Change-Induced Risks in Urban and Rural Areas in Korea. Sustainability 2017, 9, 524.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top