Next Article in Journal
Community Participation in the Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas of Hong Kong, China
Next Article in Special Issue
How to Measure Carbon Emission Reduction in China’s Public Building Sector: Retrospective Decomposition Analysis Based on STIRPAT Model in 2000–2015
Previous Article in Journal
Testing Consumers’ Preferences for Environmental Attributes of Pasta. Insights from an ABR Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability
Open AccessArticle

Direct Impacts of an Urban Living Lab from the Participants’ Perspective: Livewell Yarra

Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2017, 9(10), 1699; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699
Received: 31 August 2017 / Revised: 16 September 2017 / Accepted: 18 September 2017 / Published: 22 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Urbanization Strategies in Developing Countries)
Urban living labs have emerged as transition arenas for undertaking process-oriented and reflexive experiments in the multi-stakeholder governance of sustainability. This paper evaluates Livewell Yarra, an urban living lab in Melbourne, Australia, that brought together academic researchers and community actors to engage in experiments for low-carbon living. This paper evaluates transition team experiments in governance of the lab itself and community experiments in carbon reduction that took place in people’s homes and small group settings known as decarb groups. This paper’s primary research question is: what are the direct impacts of urban living lab experiments from the participants’ perspective? The research methods utilised include action research, asset-based community development, participatory co-design and most significant change research. This paper evaluates experiments in low-carbon living through data collected via stories of change from participant interviews. The results indicate that experiments in urban living labs create opportunities for social learning and empowerment, but also raise issues of leadership and ownership of transition governance. The findings suggest that Livewell Yarra could have benefited from clearer agenda setting and continuous monitoring to feedback results. The paper concludes by suggesting future research directions that utilise the operational processes of transition management to support experiments in urban living labs. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban sustainability; urban living lab; sustainability transitions; urban experiments; action research; transition management urban sustainability; urban living lab; sustainability transitions; urban experiments; action research; transition management
MDPI and ACS Style

Sharp, D.; Salter, R. Direct Impacts of an Urban Living Lab from the Participants’ Perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699

AMA Style

Sharp D, Salter R. Direct Impacts of an Urban Living Lab from the Participants’ Perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability. 2017; 9(10):1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharp, Darren; Salter, Robert. 2017. "Direct Impacts of an Urban Living Lab from the Participants’ Perspective: Livewell Yarra" Sustainability 9, no. 10: 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop