Next Article in Journal
Striving for Sustainable Development and the Coordinating Role of the Central Government: Lessons from Swedish Housing Policy
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmental Management and Sustainable Labels in the Ski Industry: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal
Analyzing the Drivers of Advanced Sustainable Manufacturing System Using AHP Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill

Comparison of European Olive Production Systems

Department of Economics CeSETEA, University of Foggia, Via R. Caggese n. 1, 71121 Foggia, Italy
RodaxAgro Ltd., Kottou 48, Metamorphosis, 14452 Athens, Greece
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Zenon Foltynowicz, Alessandro Ruggieri and Samuel Petros Sebhatu
Sustainability 2016, 8(8), 825;
Received: 30 May 2016 / Revised: 16 August 2016 / Accepted: 17 August 2016 / Published: 22 August 2016
(1) Background: Spain, Italy, and Greece are the world’s top olive oil producers. In recent decades, these countries have gradually diversified their farming system in the olive groves. The element of innovation with respect to the state of the art is that this paper aims to compare the environmental performance of different farming systems in a European context by performing a simplified Life Cycle Assessment; (2) Methods: Environmental performance was calculated according to the methodology of Life Cycle Assessment and the “Guidance for the implementation of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF)”. Average data were considered in order to describe a system with a great degree of complexity and high spatial heterogeneity; (3) Results: The study highlights the difficulty of identifying the farming method that presents the best environmental performance in each of the impact categories considered. In Greece, the lowest use of diesel, electricity, and water brings about advantages for many impact categories, albeit with low yields. While the highest olive yield obtained in Italy has positive consequences in terms of global warming, the highest use of fertilisers, in many cases, entails higher environmental impacts. On the other hand, in Spain the highest use of organo-phosphorous pesticides entails the highest impacts of eco-toxicity; (4) Conclusion: the reduction of the use of fertilizers and pesticides, as well as water conservation, are important issues which require the optimization of timing and techniques in order to achieve environmental advantages. View Full-Text
Keywords: life cycle assessment; product environmental footprint; olive farming system life cycle assessment; product environmental footprint; olive farming system
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Russo, C.; Cappelletti, G.M.; Nicoletti, G.M.; Di Noia, A.E.; Michalopoulos, G. Comparison of European Olive Production Systems. Sustainability 2016, 8, 825.

AMA Style

Russo C, Cappelletti GM, Nicoletti GM, Di Noia AE, Michalopoulos G. Comparison of European Olive Production Systems. Sustainability. 2016; 8(8):825.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Russo, Carlo, Giulio Mario Cappelletti, Giuseppe Martino Nicoletti, Alfredo Ernesto Di Noia, and George Michalopoulos. 2016. "Comparison of European Olive Production Systems" Sustainability 8, no. 8: 825.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop