Next Article in Journal
Integrated Evaluation Method-Based Technical and Economic Factors for International Oil Exploration Projects
Next Article in Special Issue
Promoting Sustainability through EMS Application: A Survey Examining the Critical Factors about EMAS Registration in Italian Organizations
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Optimum Window to External Wall Ratio for Offices in a Hot and Humid Climate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Corporate Social Responsibility Applied for Rural Development: An Empirical Analysis of Firms from the American Continent
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(2), 191;

Why Companies Do Not Renew Their EMAS Registration? An Exploratory Research

Department of Business Studies, Roma Tre University, Via Silvio D’Amico 77, 00145 Rome, Italy
ISPRA—Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Via Vitaliano Brancati 48, 00144 Rome, Italy
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Manfred Max Bergman
Received: 30 December 2015 / Revised: 6 February 2016 / Accepted: 16 February 2016 / Published: 22 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 5th World Sustainability Forum - Selected Papers)
Full-Text   |   PDF [908 KB, uploaded 24 February 2016]   |  


The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) is the official Environmental Management System (EMS) issued by the European Union (EU). Italy is the country where EMAS is most widespread, accounting for over 1000 registered organizations. Since entry into the force of the Regulation in 1997, the number of registrations has constantly grown until 2008, when the figures started to drop. The phenomena are due to both the decrease of the annual registration rate and the lack of renewals. According to the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), in recent years, an increasing number of organizations decided to withdraw from EMAS registration. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the reasons of this negative trend. The first step consisted of a literature review concerning the main barriers, difficulties, and costs incurred by EMAS-registered organizations. Subsequently, this information was integrated with data about the evolution of EMAS registrations and the results of a previous survey, which involved the entire population of registered firms. The present exploratory research highlighted economic and operational domains concerning the cancellation trends that deserve a deeper investigation, which will be conducted through a questionnaire addressed to Italian firms that did not renew the registration in the last lustrum. The intended output will allow us to identify stakeholders’ priority intervention areas in order to suggest an operative strategy to reduce EMAS cancellation rates, addressed to Member States (MS) Competent Bodies. View Full-Text
Keywords: eco-management and audit scheme; EMAS; environmental management systems; EMS; ISO 14001; European Community eco-management and audit scheme; EMAS; environmental management systems; EMS; ISO 14001; European Community

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Preziosi, M.; Merli, R.; D’Amico, M. Why Companies Do Not Renew Their EMAS Registration? An Exploratory Research. Sustainability 2016, 8, 191.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top