Next Article in Journal
Build-Up/Wash-Off Monitoring and Assessment for Sustainable Management of First Flush in an Urban Area
Next Article in Special Issue
The Institutional Challenges of Payment for Ecosystem Service Program in China: A Review of the Effectiveness and Implementation of Sloping Land Conversion Program
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resilience Assessment of Lowland Plantations Using an Ecosystem Modeling Approach
Open AccessArticle

Knowledge Brokerage for Impact Assessment of Land Use Scenarios in Inner Mongolia, China: Extending and Testing the FoPIA Approach

1
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
2
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, 100101 Beijing, China
3
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
4
Mercator Institute for China Studies, Klosterstr. 64, 10179 Berlin, Germany
5
Berkeley Department of Geography, University of California, 507 McCone Hall, Berkeley, 94702 CA, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Yu-Pin Lin
Sustainability 2015, 7(5), 5027-5049; https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055027
Received: 30 December 2014 / Revised: 2 April 2015 / Accepted: 16 April 2015 / Published: 24 April 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Land Use and Ecosystem Management)
While land serves numerous societal functions and contributes to sustainable development, it is often unclear how these functions are affected by political decisions and common drivers of land use change, such as economic development, climate change and demographic change. This study evaluates alternative land use scenarios in reference to a rural region of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (China), where various processes and decisions have historically triggered unsustainable development. The scientifically tested “Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA)” method is developed further to address specific features of the case study region, and its function as a knowledge-brokerage (KB) tool is evaluated. Three scenarios are developed and analysed in expert workshops. “Land intensification: Agriculture” and “Land intensification: Mining” scenarios are found to have mainly negative environmental and social effects and positive economic impacts, while the “Environmental conservation and tourism” scenario is found to more positively affect all three sustainability dimensions. Assessments of methodological phases show that the FoPIA primarily serves to establish the KB process and that the framework particularly benefits from early examinations of scientific results by policy makers. View Full-Text
Keywords: landscape functioning; sustainable development; impact assessment; expert knowledge; knowledge brokerage; policy support landscape functioning; sustainable development; impact assessment; expert knowledge; knowledge brokerage; policy support
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

König, H.J.; Podhora, A.; Zhen, L.; Helming, K.; Yan, H.; Du, B.; Wübbeke, J.; Wang, C.; Klinger, J.; Chen, C.; Uthes, S. Knowledge Brokerage for Impact Assessment of Land Use Scenarios in Inner Mongolia, China: Extending and Testing the FoPIA Approach. Sustainability 2015, 7, 5027-5049.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop