Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Environmental and Social Performance on Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania’s Listed Entities
Previous Article in Journal
Controversies Regarding Costs, Uncertainties and Benefits Specific to Shale Gas Development
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2015, 7(3), 2490-2512;

An Identification Key for Selecting Methods for Sustainability Assessments

Department of Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University (CML), P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Department of Environmental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen (RUN), P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Received: 2 December 2014 / Revised: 17 February 2015 / Accepted: 22 February 2015 / Published: 2 March 2015
Full-Text   |   PDF [1131 KB, uploaded 2 March 2015]   |  


Sustainability assessments can play an important role in decision making. This role starts with selecting appropriate methods for a given situation. We observed that scientists, consultants, and decision-makers often do not systematically perform a problem analyses that guides the choice of the method, partly related to a lack of systematic, though sufficiently versatile approaches to do so. Therefore, we developed and propose a new step towards method selection on the basis of question articulation: the Sustainability Assessment Identification Key. The identification key was designed to lead its user through all important choices needed for comprehensive question articulation. Subsequently, methods that fit the resulting specific questions are suggested by the key. The key consists of five domains, of which three determine method selection and two the design or use of the method. Each domain consists of four or more criteria that need specification. For example in the domain “system boundaries”, amongst others, the spatial and temporal scales are specified. The key was tested (retrospectively) on a set of thirty case studies. Using the key appeared to contribute to improved: (i) transparency in the link between the question and method selection; (ii) consistency between questions asked and answers provided; and (iii) internal consistency in methodological design. There is latitude to develop the current initial key further, not only for selecting methods pertinent to a problem definition, but also as a principle for associated opportunities such as stakeholder identification. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability assessment; sustainability question; identification key; indicator selection; method selection; aggregation; sustainability assessment tools sustainability assessment; sustainability question; identification key; indicator selection; method selection; aggregation; sustainability assessment tools

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary materials


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zijp, M.C.; Heijungs, R.; van der Voet, E.; van de Meent, D.; Huijbregts, M.A.J.; Hollander, A.; Posthuma, L. An Identification Key for Selecting Methods for Sustainability Assessments. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2490-2512.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top