Next Article in Journal
Tales of the Suburbs?—The Social Sustainability Agenda in Sweden through Literary Accounts
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom
Previous Article in Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitiveness within SMEs of the Fashion Industry: Evidence from Italy and France
Previous Article in Special Issue
Governing Sustainability: A Discourse-Institutional Approach
Open AccessArticle

Institutionalizing Strong Sustainability: A Rawlsian Perspective

Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Philosophisches Seminar, Leibnizstr. 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Sustainability 2014, 6(2), 894-912;
Received: 17 October 2013 / Revised: 12 February 2014 / Accepted: 13 February 2014 / Published: 21 February 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Institutional Change)
The article aims to provide some ethical orientation on how sustainability might be actualized by institutions. Since institutionalization is about rules and organization, it presupposes ideas and concepts by which institutions can be substantiated. After outlining terminology, the article deals with underlying ethical and conceptual problems which are highly relevant for any suggestions concerning institutionalization. These problems are: (a) the ethical scope of the sustainability perspective (natural capital, poverty, sentient animals), (b) the theory of justice on which ideas about sustainability are built (capability approach, Rawlsianism), and (c) the favored concept of sustainability (weak, intermediate, and strong sustainability). These problems are analyzed in turn. As a result, a Rawlsian concept of rule-based strong sustainability is proposed. The specific problems of institutionalization are addressed by applying Rawls’s concept of branches. The article concludes with arguments in favor of three transnational duties which hold for states that have adopted Rawlsian strong sustainability. View Full-Text
Keywords: theories of justice; strong sustainability; institutionalization; deliberative democracy theories of justice; strong sustainability; institutionalization; deliberative democracy
MDPI and ACS Style

Ott, K. Institutionalizing Strong Sustainability: A Rawlsian Perspective. Sustainability 2014, 6, 894-912.

AMA Style

Ott K. Institutionalizing Strong Sustainability: A Rawlsian Perspective. Sustainability. 2014; 6(2):894-912.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ott, Konrad. 2014. "Institutionalizing Strong Sustainability: A Rawlsian Perspective" Sustainability 6, no. 2: 894-912.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop