Next Article in Journal
General Resilience to Cope with Extreme Events
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Performance of East Asia Summit Countries from the Perspective of Energy Security
Open AccessArticle

Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability

1
Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology (CEFE), CNRS, 34293 Montpellier, France
2
Centre for Biodiversity Synthesis and Analysis (CESAB), FRB, 13857 Aix-en-Provence, France 
Sustainability 2012, 4(12), 3234-3247; https://doi.org/10.3390/su4123234
Received: 12 June 2012 / Revised: 5 November 2012 / Accepted: 19 November 2012 / Published: 23 November 2012
Biologists are producing ever-increasing quantities of papers. The question arises of whether current rates of increase in scientific outputs are sustainable in the long term. I studied this issue using publication data from the Web of Science (1991–2010) for 18 biological sub-fields. In the majority of cases, an exponential regression explains more variation than a linear one in the number of papers published each year as a function of publication year. Exponential growth in publication numbers is clearly not sustainable. About 75% of the variation in publication growth among biological sub-fields over the two studied decades can be predicted by publication data from the first six years. Currently trendy fields such as structural biology, neuroscience and biomaterials cannot be expected to carry on growing at the current pace, because in a few decades they would produce more papers than the whole of biology combined. Synthetic and systems biology are problematic from the point of view of knowledge dissemination, because in these fields more than 80% of existing papers have been published over the last five years. The evidence presented here casts a shadow on how sustainable the recent increase in scientific publications can be in the long term. View Full-Text
Keywords: biological sciences; file-drawer problem; information overload; meta-knowledge; peak in scientific output; peer review; publication explosion; publish or perish; scientometrics; sustainable development biological sciences; file-drawer problem; information overload; meta-knowledge; peak in scientific output; peer review; publication explosion; publish or perish; scientometrics; sustainable development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pautasso, M. Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability. Sustainability 2012, 4, 3234-3247.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop