Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Recent Research of Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor from a Sustainability Viewpoint
Previous Article in Journal
Is Sustainablity Possible in Protected Areas in Mexico? Deer as an Example of a Renewable Resource
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modular Lead-Bismuth Fast Reactors in Nuclear Power
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2012, 4(10), 2377-2398;

Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 May 2012 / Revised: 24 August 2012 / Accepted: 12 September 2012 / Published: 27 September 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Nuclear Energy)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2747 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  


The nuclear fuel cycle is the series of stages that nuclear fuel materials go through in a cradle to grave framework. The Once Through Cycle (OTC) is the current fuel cycle implemented in the United States; in which an appropriate form of the fuel is irradiated through a nuclear reactor only once before it is disposed of as waste. The discharged fuel contains materials that can be suitable for use as fuel. Thus, different types of fuel recycling technologies may be introduced in order to more fully utilize the energy potential of the fuel, or reduce the environmental impacts and proliferation concerns about the discarded fuel materials. Nuclear fuel cycle systems analysis is applied in this paper to attain a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of fuel cycle alternatives. Through the use of the nuclear fuel cycle analysis code CAFCA (Code for Advanced Fuel Cycle Analysis), the impact of a number of recycling technologies and the associated fuel cycle options is explored in the context of the U.S. energy scenario over 100 years. Particular focus is given to the quantification of Uranium utilization, the amount of Transuranic Material (TRU) generated and the economics of the different options compared to the base-line case, the OTC option. It is concluded that LWRs and the OTC are likely to dominate the nuclear energy supply system for the period considered due to limitations on availability of TRU to initiate recycling technologies. While the introduction of U-235 initiated fast reactors can accelerate their penetration of the nuclear energy system, their higher capital cost may lead to continued preference for the LWR-OTC cycle. View Full-Text
Keywords: nuclear fuel cycle; analysis; nuclear reactor technologies nuclear fuel cycle; analysis; nuclear reactor technologies

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Passerini, S.; Kazimi, M. Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options. Sustainability 2012, 4, 2377-2398.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top