Next Article in Journal
Responsible Supply Chains Through ESG Factors and Transformative Trajectories
Previous Article in Journal
Regional Differentiation of Precision Agriculture in Poland—Economic Aspects and Limitations of Its Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Urban Green Space and Mental Health: Mechanisms, Methodological Advances, and Governance Pathways for Sustainable Cities

1
Department of Computer Science, The University of Suwon, Hwaseong 18323, Republic of Korea
2
School of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China
3
Department of Information and Telecommunications Engineering, The University of Suwon, Hwaseong 18323, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(7), 3341; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073341
Submission received: 9 February 2026 / Revised: 12 March 2026 / Accepted: 18 March 2026 / Published: 30 March 2026

Abstract

Urban green space (UGS) is a critical component of sustainable cities and a modifiable determinant of mental health (MH). This review synthesizes 93 empirical studies and 929 bibliometric records to map theoretical advances, methodological evolution, and governance implications in the UGS–MH field. We integrate the following six validated pathways into a unified socio-ecological framework: attention restoration, stress recovery, behavioral activation, physiological regulation, social cohesion, and environmental buffering. Methodological trends indicate a shift from static greenness proxies to street-view and multimodal exposure measures, and from cross-sectional correlations to models that address spatial heterogeneity, causal identification, and AI-enabled prediction. Bibliometric mapping reveals increasing interdisciplinarity, geographic diversification, and growing attention to dynamic exposure science. Persistent challenges include spatial and temporal misalignment between exposure and outcome measures, reliance on single-modality indicators, limited causal inference, and constrained cross-cultural generalizability. Building on these findings, we propose a governance-oriented framework to support sustainable and healthy cities through equitable green access, behavior-informed planning, nature-based interventions, and data-driven decision support. Overall, this review strengthens the bridge from evidence to action at the interface of urban sustainability and population mental health.
Keywords: urban green space; mental health; dynamic exposure; mechanism integration; causal inference; spatial equity urban green space; mental health; dynamic exposure; mechanism integration; causal inference; spatial equity
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Fu, Z.; Wang, L.; Byun, H. Urban Green Space and Mental Health: Mechanisms, Methodological Advances, and Governance Pathways for Sustainable Cities. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073341

AMA Style

Wang J, Fu Z, Wang L, Byun H. Urban Green Space and Mental Health: Mechanisms, Methodological Advances, and Governance Pathways for Sustainable Cities. Sustainability. 2026; 18(7):3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jianying, Zunwei Fu, Liang Wang, and Heejung Byun. 2026. "Urban Green Space and Mental Health: Mechanisms, Methodological Advances, and Governance Pathways for Sustainable Cities" Sustainability 18, no. 7: 3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073341

APA Style

Wang, J., Fu, Z., Wang, L., & Byun, H. (2026). Urban Green Space and Mental Health: Mechanisms, Methodological Advances, and Governance Pathways for Sustainable Cities. Sustainability, 18(7), 3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop