Street Orientation, Aspect Ratio, and Tree Species Interactions on Heat Exposure in Temperate Monsoon Climate
Abstract
1. Introduction
- How do different street spatial morphologies (e.g., street orientation and aspect ratio) influence human thermal comfort in livable streets during summer?
- What are the mechanisms and differences in the effects of common street tree species on thermal comfort improvement under varying street spatial conditions?
- How can an optimized strategy for street tree species selection and configuration be developed for livable streets in temperate monsoon cities?
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Framework
2.2. Study Area
2.2.1. Selected Area
2.2.2. Data Collection and Processing
2.2.3. Human Thermal Comfort
2.3. Numerical Model Construction
2.3.1. Simulation Domain Parameters
2.3.2. 3D Plant Modeling and Structural Parameter Setting
2.3.3. LAD Distribution Function and LAI Calibration
2.3.4. Model Validation
2.4. Field Validation Design and Instrument Calibration
2.4.1. Field Validation Site and Measurement Layout
2.4.2. Instrument Calibration and Data Consistency Control
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. ENVI-Met Model Validation
3.2. Street Morphology and Thermal Comfort Simulation Results
3.3. Comparison Between Tree Species Thermal Comfort Simulations and Subjective Questionnaire Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects of Street Morphology on Microclimate Regulation Mechanisms
4.2. Structural Differences of Street Tree Species and Their Multidimensional Regulatory Capacity
4.3. Consistency Between Subjective Thermal Perception and Simulation Results, and Sources of Deviation
4.4. Integrated Strategy Recommendations for Greening Optimization in Cold-Region Streets
4.5. Limitations and Further Study
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CBH | Crown base height |
| CFD | Computational fluid dynamics |
| CH | Crown height |
| CW | Crown diameter width |
| HT | Height of the tree |
| LAI | Leaf area index |
| LAD | Leaf area density |
| LCZs | Local climate zones |
| LiDAR | Light detection and ranging |
| MAE | Mean absolute error |
| MRT | Mean radiation temperature |
| RH | Relative humidity |
| RMSE | Root mean square error |
| SVF | Sky view factor |
| SOLWEIG | Solar and longwave environmental irradiance geometry model |
| Ta | Air temperature |
| TCVs | Thermal comfort votes |
| TH | Trunk height |
| TM | Transmissivity of downward radiation (%) |
| UTCI | Universal thermal climate index |
| WS | Wind speed |
Appendix A
| Plant Name | Height | Crown Width | LAD 1 | LAD 2 | LAD 3 | LAD 4 | LAD 5 | LAD 6 | LAD 7 | LAD 8 | LAD 9 | LAD 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pagoda Tree | 12 | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.22 |
| Ginkgo | 11 | 7 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.56 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 1.16 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.74 | 0.30 |
| Golden Elm | 13 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.10 |
| Yinzhong Poplar | 14 | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Chinese Willow | 11 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.15 |
| Effect | Grouping | ΔUTCI Definition | n (Paired Units) | Mean ΔUTCI (°C) | 95% CI (°C) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orientation | All H/W (0.6–1.4) × all species | SE–NW − E–W | 25 | −2.41 | −3.14 to −1.69 | <0.001 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | SE–NW | H/W = 0.6 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 1.1 | 0.53 to 1.68 | 0.006 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | SE–NW | H/W = 0.8 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 0.57 | 0.20 to 0.94 | 0.013 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | SE–NW | H/W = 1.0 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 0.58 | 0.52 to 0.65 | <0.001 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | SE–NW | H/W = 1.4 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 0.45 | 0.12 to 0.78 | 0.020 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | E–W | H/W = 0.6 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 0.7 | 0.10 to 1.31 | 0.032 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | E–W | H/W = 0.8 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 0.33 | −0.08 to 0.75 | 0.090 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | E–W | H/W = 1.0 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 0.46 | 0.41 to 0.50 | <0.001 |
| Aspect ratio (vs 1.2) | E–W | H/W = 1.4 − H/W = 1.2 | 5 | 0.7 | 0.26 to 1.14 | 0.011 |
Appendix B

References
- Biljecki, F.; Arroyo Ohori, K.; Ledoux, H.; Peters, R.; Stoter, J. Population Estimation Using a 3D City Model: A Multi-Scale Country-Wide Study in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, M.; Sun, R.; Yang, X.; Yan, M.; Chen, L. Remote sensing-based morphological analysis of core city growth across the globe. Cities 2022, 131, 103982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Ding, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, A. The Impacts of Morphology of Traditional Alleys on Thermal comfort: A case study of Da Long Wang Xiang in Zhenjiang, China. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 283, 02045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Kong, Y.; Chen, C.; Lin, J.; Lin, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. The impact of urban morphology on thermal environment under extreme heat: A case study in Nanjing, China. Urban Clim. 2024, 58, 102178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.A.; Hartmann, C.; Moser-Reischl, A.; von Strachwitz, M.F.; Paeth, H.; Pretzsch, H.; Pauleit, S.; Rötzer, T. Tree cooling effects and human thermal comfort under contrasting species and sites. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 287, 107947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.A.; Moser, A.; Gold, A.; Rotzer, T.; Pauleit, S. Vertical air temperature gradients under the shade of two contrasting urban tree species during different types of summer days. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narimani, N.; Karimi, A.; Brown, R.D. Effects of street orientation and tree species thermal comfort within urban canyons in a hot, dry climate. Ecol. Inform. 2022, 69, 101671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Abreu-Harbich, L.V.; Labaki, L.C.; Matzarakis, A. Effect of tree planting design and tree species on human thermal comfort in the tropics. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 138, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smithers, R.J.; Doick, K.J.; Burton, A.; Sibille, R.; Steinbach, D.; Harris, R.; Groves, L.; Blicharska, M. Comparing the relative abilities of tree species to cool the urban environment. Urban Ecosyst. 2018, 21, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, S.; Guldmann, J.-M.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, L. Influence of trees on the outdoor thermal environment in subtropical areas: An experimental study in Guangzhou, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 42, 482–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klemm, W.; Heusinkveld, B.G.; Lenzholzer, S.; van Hove, B. Street greenery and its physical and psychological impact on thermal comfort. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 138, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.Y.; Lee, D.K.; Krayenhoff, E.S.; Heo, H.K.; Ahn, S.; Asawa, T.; Murakami, A.; Kim, H.G. A multilayer mean radiant temperature model for pedestrians in a street canyon with trees. Build. Environ. 2018, 141, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aminipouri, M.; Knudby, A.J.; Krayenhoff, E.S.; Zickfeld, K.; Middel, A. Modelling the impact of increased street tree cover on mean radiant temperature across Vancouver’s local climate zones. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 39, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Wu, C.; Teng, M.; Lin, Y. Impacts of Tree Canopy Cover on Microclimate and Human Thermal Comfort in a Shallow Street Canyon in Wuhan, China. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krayenhoff, E.S.; Jiang, T.; Christen, A.; Martilli, A.; Oke, T.R.; Bailey, B.N.; Nazarian, N.; Voogt, J.A.; Giometto, M.G.; Stastny, A.; et al. A multi-layer urban canopy meteorological model with trees (BEP-Tree): Street tree impacts on pedestrian-level climate. Urban Clim. 2020, 32, 100590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stojakovic, V.; Bajsanski, I.; Savic, S.; Milosevic, D.; Tepavcevic, B. The influence of changing location of trees in urban green spaces on insolation mitigation. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 53, 126721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Q.; Fan, X.; Guo, Y.; Li, S.; He, W.; Deng, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, P.; Wu, C. Tree form characteristics as criteria for tree species selection to improve pedestrian thermal comfort in street canyons: Case study of a humid subtropical city. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 105, 105339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohajeri, N.; Gudmundsson, A.; Kunckler, T.; Upadhyay, G.; Assouline, D.; Kämpf, J.H.; Scartezzini, J.L. A solar-based sustainable urban design: The effects of city-scale street-canyon geometry on solar access in Geneva, Switzerland. Appl. Energy 2019, 240, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shareef, S.; Abu-Hijleh, B. The effect of building height diversity on outdoor microclimate conditions in hot climate. A case study of Dubai-UAE. Urban Clim. 2020, 32, 100611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acero, J.A.; Koh, E.J.Y.; Ruefenacht, L.A.; Norford, L.K. Modelling the influence of high-rise urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort in Singapore. Urban Clim. 2021, 36, 100775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- T/UPSC 0013-2023; Street Design Guidelines. Urban Planning Society of China (UPSC): Beijing, China, 2023. Available online: https://en.planning.org.cn/upsc/ (accessed on 1 May 2022).
- Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Luo, Z.; Chan, P.W. The urban cool island phenomenon in a high-rise high-density city and its mechanisms. Int. J. Climatol. 2016, 37, 890–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achour-Younsi, S.; Kharrat, F. Outdoor Thermal Comfort: Impact of the Geometry of an Urban Street Canyon in a Mediterranean Subtropical Climate—Case Study Tunis, Tunisia. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 216, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muniz-Gäal, L.P.; Pezzuto, C.C.; Carvalho, M.F.H.d.; Mota, L.T.M. Urban geometry and the microclimate of street canyons in tropical climate. Build. Environ. 2020, 169, 106547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, S.H.; Lee, D.K.; Piao, Z.G.; Park, C.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, E.S. Developing a three-dimensional urban surface model for spatiotemporal analysis of thermal comfort with respect to street direction. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 97, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali-Toudert, F.; Mayer, H. Numerical study on the effects of aspect ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort in hot and dry climate. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, C.; He, X.; Gao, Z.; Chen, W.; He, B.J. Assessing the vertical synergies between outdoor thermal comfort and air quality in an urban street canyon based on field measurements. Build. Environ. 2023, 227, 109810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, E.; Cheng, V. Urban human thermal comfort in hot and humid Hong Kong. Energy Build. 2012, 55, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, D.; Gao, Y.; Wei, L.; Gu, X.; Li, T.; Xu, J.; Yao, L.; Liu, Z. Street canyon microclimate effect on thermal comfort at entrances and exits of underground commercial streets: Measured and ENVI-met simulation. Buildings 2025, 15, 4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, H.; Wang, B.; Han, B. Study on environment regulation of residential in severe cold area of China in winter: Base on outdoor thermal comfort of the elderly. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, C.; Lian, W.; Liu, L.; Dong, Q.; Han, Y. The impact of street geometry on outdoor thermal comfort within three different urban forms in severe cold region of China. Build. Environ. 2022, 222, 109342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, C.; Li, P.; Huang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Chen, W.; Yu, S. Coupling outdoor air quality with thermal comfort in the presence of street trees: A pilot investigation in shenyang, northeast China. J. For. Res. 2023, 34, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo, R.; Chang, W.-S.; Yu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Guo, H. Overheating of residential buildings in the severe cold and cold regions of China: The gap between building policy and performance. Build. Environ. 2022, 225, 109601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shenyang-Meteorological-Bureau. Precipitation-Related Geological Hazard Meteorological Risk Warning Results for Shenyang 2020. Available online: https://zrzyj.shenyang.gov.cn/zwgkzdgz/fdzdgknr/yjya/index_22.html (accessed on 1 May 2022).
- GB50096; Residential Design Code. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2011.
- Morakinyo, T.E.; Kong, L.; Lau, K.K.-L.; Yuan, C.; Ng, E. A study on the impact of shadow-cast and tree species on in-canyon and neighborhood’s thermal comfort. Build. Environ. 2017, 115, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Li, G.; Gao, T. Summer Thermal Comfort Effects of Typical Street Trees in Harbin and the Regulation Mechanism of Morphological Characteristics. Landsc. Archit. 2016, 12, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Havenith, G.; Fiala, D.; Blazejczyk, K.; Richards, M.; Brode, P.; Holmer, I.; Rintamaki, H.; Benshabat, Y.; Jendritzky, G. The UTCI-clothing model. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brode, P.; Fiala, D.; Blazejczyk, K.; Holmer, I.; Jendritzky, G.; Kampmann, B.; Tinz, B.; Havenith, G. Deriving the operational procedure for the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI). Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiala, D.; Havenith, G.; Brode, P.; Kampmann, B.; Jendritzky, G. UTCI-Fiala multi-node model of human heat transfer and temperature regulation. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruse, M.; Fleer, H. Simulating surface–plant–air interactions inside urban environments with a three dimensional numerical model. Environ. Model. Softw. 1998, 13, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simon, H.; Lindén, J.; Hoffmann, D.; Braun, P.; Bruse, M.; Esper, J. Modeling transpiration and leaf temperature of urban trees–a case study evaluating the microclimate model ENVI-met against measurement data. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 174, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahmy, M.; Sharples, S. On the development of an urban passive thermal comfort system in Cairo, Egypt. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 1907–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleksandrowicz, O.; Saroglou, T.; Pearlmutter, D. Evaluation of summer mean radiant temperature simulation in ENVI-met in a hot mediterranean climate. Build. Environ. 2023, 245, 110881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinić Branković, M.; Igić, M.; Đekić, J.; Ljubenović, M. Impact of urban densification on outdoor microclimate and design of sustainable public open space in residential neighborhoods: A study of niš, serbia. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, T.; Draxler, R.R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci. Model Dev. 2014, 7, 1247–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salata, F.; Golasi, I.; de Lieto Vollaro, R.; de Lieto Vollaro, A. Urban microclimate and outdoor thermal comfort. A proper procedure to fit ENVI-met simulation outputs to experimental data. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2016, 26, 318–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Lin, D.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Z.; Sha, X.; Zhou, S.; Chen, C.; Yu, Z. Quantifying tree canopy coverage threshold of typical residential quarters considering human thermal comfort and heat dynamics under extreme heat. Build. Environ. 2023, 233, 110100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, E. Influence of urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort in a hot dry climate: A study in Fez, Morocco. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 1326–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oke, T.R. Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Energy Build. 1988, 11, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raymond, C.; Matthews, T.; Horton, R.M. The emergence of heat and humidity too severe for human tolerance. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaw1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morakinyo, T.E.; Lau, K.K.-L.; Ren, C.; Ng, E. Performance of Hong Kong’s common trees species for outdoor temperature regulation, thermal comfort and energy saving. Build. Environ. 2018, 137, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Liu, R.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Z. Assessing seasonal thermal environment of two tree species: Integrating modeling and in-situ data in hot-summer and cold-winter climates. Build. Environ. 2025, 269, 112394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morakinyo, T.E.; Ouyang, W.; Lau, K.K.-L.; Ren, C.; Ng, E. Right tree, right place (urban canyon): Tree species selection approach for optimum urban heat mitigation-development and evaluation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 719, 137461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, V.; Ng, E.; Chan, C.; Givoni, B. Outdoor thermal comfort study in a sub-tropical climate: A longitudinal study based in Hong Kong. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Zhao, L.; Bruse, M.; Meng, Q. Evaluation of a microclimate model for predicting the thermal behavior of different ground surfaces. Build. Environ. 2013, 60, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kántor, N.; Unger, J. The most problematic variable in the course of human-biometeorological comfort assessment—The mean radiant temperature. Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. 2011, 3, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Sun, R.; Chen, L. Identifying sensitive population associated with summer extreme heat in Beijing. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 83, 103925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Tuller, S.E.; Jo, M. Application of Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) for microclimatic analysis in urban thermal environments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 125, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gál, C.V.; Kántor, N. Modeling mean radiant temperature in outdoor spaces, A comparative numerical simulation and validation study. Urban Clim. 2020, 32, 100571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bizjak, M.; Žalik, B.; Štumberger, G.; Lukač, N. Large-scale estimation of buildings’ thermal load using LiDAR data. Energy Build. 2021, 231, 110626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Yu, X. LiDAR technology for wind energy potential assessment: Demonstration and validation at a site around Lake Erie. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 144, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Weng, Q.; Zheng, Y. A Hybrid Approach for Three-Dimensional Building Reconstruction in Indianapolis from LiDAR Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voogt, J.A.; Oke, T.R. Effects of urban surface geometry on remotely-sensed surface temperature. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 19, 895–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Xu, W.; Hu, C.; Zhao, C.; Yang, T.; Xi, T.; Wang, Q. Differences in outdoor thermal comfort between local and non-local tourists in winter in tourist attractions in a city in a severely cold region. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broede, P.; Blazejczyk, K.; Fiala, D.; Havenith, G.; Holmer, I.; Jendritzky, G.; Kuklane, K.; Kampmann, B. The Universal Thermal Climate Index UTCI compared to ergonomics standards for assessing the thermal environment. Ind. Health 2013, 51, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatzidimitriou, A.; Yannas, S. Microclimate development in open urban spaces: The influence of form and materials. Energy Build. 2015, 108, 156–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holscher, M.; Ignell, D.; Lewis, M.; Stiroh, K. Climate Change and the Role of Regulatory Capital: A Stylized Framework for Policy Assessment; Finance and Economics Discussion Series; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teshnehdel, S.; Akbari, H.; Di Giuseppe, E.; Brown, R.D. Effect of tree cover and tree species on microclimate and pedestrian comfort in a residential district in Iran. Build. Environ. 2020, 178, 106899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elwy, I.; Ibrahim, Y.; Fahmy, M.; Mahdy, M. Outdoor microclimatic validation for hybrid simulation workflow in hot arid climates against ENVI-met and field measurements. Energy Procedia 2018, 153, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Administrative Region | Street Name | Street Height (m) | Street Width (m) | Street Aspect Ratio | Street Orientation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heping District | Shiwuwei Road | 24 | 20 | 1.2 | E–W |
| Siping Street | 21 | 18 | 1.2 | S–N | |
| Nansijing Street | 18 | 20 | 0.9 | S–N | |
| Nanwujing Street | 24 | 18 | 1.3 | S–N | |
| Zhenxing Street | 21 | 15 | 1.4 | EN–WS | |
| Jiaxing Street | 21 | 15 | 1.4 | EN–WS | |
| Yunji Street | 21 | 18 | 1.2 | S–N | |
| Tiexi District | Guihe Street | 21 | 25 | 0.8 | EN–WS |
| Beisizhong Road | 21 | 25 | 0.8 | SE–NW | |
| Jingxing North Street | 20 | 32 | 0.6 | EN–WS | |
| Xingshun Street | 18 | 22 | 0.8 | EN–WS | |
| Beisanzhong Road | 18 | 26 | 0.7 | SE–NW | |
| Xiaobeisanzhong Road | 18 | 31 | 0.6 | SE–NW | |
| Xiaobeisizhong Road | 18 | 22 | 0.8 | SE–NW | |
| Xiaobeierzhong Road | 18 | 30 | 0.6 | SE–NW | |
| Qixianbei Street | 18 | 34 | 0.5 | EN–WS | |
| Shenhe District | Changqing Road | 18 | 26 | 0.7 | E–W |
| Fengle Third Street | 21 | 23 | 0.9 | S–N | |
| Fengle First Street | 21 | 23 | 0.9 | S–N | |
| Wenfu Road | 24 | 23 | 1.0 | S–N | |
| Wencui Road | 21 | 26 | 0.8 | E–W | |
| Nanta East Street | 21 | 20 | 1.1 | S–N | |
| Wenfu North Road | 21 | 21 | 1.0 | E–W | |
| Huanggu District | Tianshan Road | 21 | 30 | 0.7 | E–W |
| Yushan Road | 21 | 24 | 0.9 | E–W | |
| Cangshan Road | 21 | 18 | 1.2 | E–W | |
| Jinshui Street | 18 | 24 | 0.8 | EN–WS | |
| Minglian Road | 18 | 30 | 0.6 | E–W | |
| Dadong District | Liaoshen Third Street | 24 | 20 | 1.2 | EN–WS |
| Ruyi Second Road | 18 | 21 | 0.9 | EN–WS | |
| Liaoshen 1st Street | 18 | 20 | 0.9 | S–N | |
| Jixiang 4th Road | 24 | 22 | 1.1 | EN–WS | |
| Xinsheng 2nd Street | 24 | 27 | 0.9 | S–N | |
| Xinsheng 3rd Street | 15 | 25 | 0.6 | S–N | |
| Liaoshen 2nd Street | 18 | 20 | 0.9 | S–N | |
| Jixiang 2nd Road | 24 | 21 | 1.1 | EN–WS |
| Instrument Photos | Measurement Parameters | Measuring Range | Accuracy | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Wind speed | 0.6–40 m/s | ±3% | 0.1 m/s |
| Air temperature | −29–70 °C | 1 °C | 0.1 °C | |
| Relative humidity | 5–95% | 3% | 0.1% |
| Street Name | Types of Roadside Trees | Street Tree Spacing (M) | Average Crown Size (M) | Average Tree Height (M) | Average Height Below Branches (M) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heping District | Shiwuwei Road | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 6.8 | 12.3 | 2.9 |
| Siping Street | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 7.1 | 13.0 | 2.9 | |
| Nansijing Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 5.6 | |
| Nanwujing Street | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 6.3 | 11.7 | 2.6 | |
| Zhenxing Street | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 6.4 | 11.9 | 2.8 | |
| Jiaxing Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 6 | 6.5 | 12.0 | 2.8 | |
| Yunji Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 10.2 | 15.1 | 5.7 | |
| Tiexi District | Guihe Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 8.6 | 13.8 | 3.8 |
| Beisizhong Road | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 9.0 | 14.1 | 4.2 | |
| Jingxingbei Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 9.2 | 14.2 | 4.1 | |
| Xingshun Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 4 | 8.4 | 13.6 | 3.5 | |
| Beisanzhong Road | Ginkgo | 4 | 8.2 | 13.2 | 3.4 | |
| Xiaobeisanzhong Road | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 6.2 | 11.3 | 3.3 | |
| Xiaobeisizhong Road | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 8.4 | 13.7 | 3.6 | |
| Xiaobeierzhong Road | Pagoda Tree | 7 | 8.2 | 13.3 | 3.5 | |
| Qixianbei Street | Ginkgo | 4 | 8.4 | 13.7 | 3.5 | |
| Shenhe District | Changqing Road | Chinese Willow | 4 | 7.3 | 13.2 | 3.1 |
| Fengle 3rd Street | Golden elm | 5 | 6.5 | 11.8 | 3.6 | |
| Fengle 1st Street | Chinese Willow | 5 | 5.5 | 11.4 | 2.5 | |
| Wenfu Road | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 6.2 | 12.8 | 2.5 | |
| Wencui Road | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 5.4 | 11.2 | 2.4 | |
| Nantadong Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 6.8 | 12.2 | 2.8 | |
| Wenfubei Road | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 9.3 | 14.3 | 4.2 | |
| Huanggu District | Tianshan Road | Chinese Willow | 5 | 8.7 | 13.8 | 3.8 |
| Yushan Road | Pagoda Tree | 6 | 6.6 | 12.0 | 2.8 | |
| Cangshan Road | Chinese Willow | 6 | 6.4 | 12.1 | 2.7 | |
| Jinshui Street | Pagoda Tree | 6 | 8.6 | 13.8 | 3.9 | |
| Minglian Road | Pagoda Tree | 6 | 7.2 | 13.2 | 3.0 | |
| Dadong District | Liaoshen 3rd Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 5.8 | 12.0 | 2.6 |
| Ruyi 2nd Road | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 6.7 | 12.3 | 2.8 | |
| Liaoshen 1st Street | Pagoda Tree | 5 | 10.0 | 14.9 | 5.5 | |
| Jixiang 4th Road | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 9.1 | 14.2 | 4.0 | |
| Xinsheng 2nd Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 10.2 | 15.3 | 5.7 | |
| Xinsheng 3rd Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 5.4 | 11.3 | 2.5 | |
| Liaoshen 2nd Street | Yinzhong Poplar | 4 | 7.2 | 13.3 | 3.2 | |
| Jixiang 2nd Road | Yinzhong Poplar | 5 | 9.5 | 14.6 | 4.7 |
| Tree Species | Average Crown Width (m) | Average Height (m) | Average Crown Base Height (m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sophora japonica (Pagoda Tree) | 6.8 | 12.4 | 2.9 |
| Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgo) | 6.5 | 11.4 | 3.5 |
| Ulmus pumila ‘Iinye’ (Golden Elm) | 6.2 | 12.8 | 2.5 |
| Populus alba × P. berolinensis (Yinzhong Poplar silver) | 9.1 | 14.2 | 4.3 |
| Salix matsudana (Chinese Willow) | 5.7 | 11.3 | 2.5 |
| Simulation Parameter | Assigned Value | UTCI Range (°C) | Thermal Perception | Physiological Stress Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | <9 | Very Cold | Strong Cold Stress |
| Age | 35 years | 9–26 | Comfortable | No Thermal Stress |
| Height | 1.75 m | 26–32 | Warm | Moderate Heat Stress |
| Weight | 75 kg | 32–38 | Hot | Strong Heat Stress |
| Body Surface Area | 1.91 m2 | >38 | Very Hot | Extreme Heat Stress |
| Walking Speed | 1.34 m/s | |||
| Metabolic Rate (Met) | 164.49 W/m2 |
| Indicator | Golden Elm | Chinese Willow | Pagoda Tree | Yinzhong Poplar | Ginkgo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average thermal comfort score | 0 | 0 | −1 | −1 | −2 |
| Air Temperature | Humidity | Wind Speed | Others | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of perceived factors (%) | 28% | 16% | 52% | 4% |
| No. of questionnaires | 42 | 24 | 78 | 6 |
| Parameter Settings | Value Setting |
|---|---|
| Simulation date | 1 August 2022 |
| Start time | 00:00 |
| Simulation duration/h | 24 |
| Wind speed at 10 m/s | 2.0 |
| Wind direction at 10 m | South wind |
| Initial temperature/°C | 28.7 |
| Parameter settings | Value setting |
| Initial humidity/% | 60.6 |
| 2500 m relative humidity/(g.kg) | 8 |
| Cloud cover | None |
| Street Aspect Ratio | Pagoda Tree | Ginkgo | Golden Elm | Yinzhong Poplar | Chinese Willow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 0.8 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 1.0 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 1.2 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 1.4 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Plant Name | Filed Photograph | Plant Model | Adjusted Crown Width | Adjusted Height | Adjusted Clear Trunk Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pagoda Tree | ![]() | ![]() | 7 m | 12 m | 3 m |
| Ginkgo | ![]() | ![]() | 7 m | 11 m | 4 m |
| Golden Elm | ![]() | ![]() | 5 m | 13 m | 3 m |
| Yinzhong Poplar | ![]() | ![]() | 9 m | 14 m | 4 m |
| Chinese Willow | ![]() | ![]() | 5 m | 11 m | 3 m |
| Tree Species | SE–NW Orientation | E–W Orientation |
|---|---|---|
| Pagoda Tree | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Ginkgo | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Golden Elm | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Yinzhong Poplar | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Chinese Willow | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Tree Species | SE–NW Orientation (Ranking of H/W) | E–W Orientation (Ranking of H/W) |
|---|---|---|
| Pagoda Tree | 1.2 > 1.4 > 0.8 > 1 > 0.6 | 1.2 > 0.8 > 1.0 > 0.6 > 1.4 |
| Ginkgo | 1.2 > 0.8 > 0.6 > 1 > 1.4 | 1.2 > 0.8 > 0.6 > 1.0 > 1.4 |
| Golden Elm | 1.2 > 1.4 > 1 > 0.8 > 0.6 | 1.2 > 1.4 > 1.0 > 0.8 > 0.6 |
| Yinzhong Poplar | 1.2 > 1.4 > 1 > 0.8 > 0.6 | 1.2 > 0.8 > 1.0 > 0.6 > 1.4 |
| Chinese Willow | 1.2 > 1.4 > 1 > 0.8 > 0.6 | 1.2 > 1.4 > 1.0 > 0.8 > 0.6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lin, H.; Lan, T.; Shao, J.; Lei, T.; Jin, R.; Li, J. Street Orientation, Aspect Ratio, and Tree Species Interactions on Heat Exposure in Temperate Monsoon Climate. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073177
Chen X, Zhang Y, Song Z, Wang Z, Lin H, Lan T, Shao J, Lei T, Jin R, Li J. Street Orientation, Aspect Ratio, and Tree Species Interactions on Heat Exposure in Temperate Monsoon Climate. Sustainability. 2026; 18(7):3177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073177
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Xiaoou, Yuhan Zhang, Zipeng Song, Zhenyuan Wang, Haomu Lin, Tianxiao Lan, Junkai Shao, Tongtong Lei, Rixue Jin, and Jingang Li. 2026. "Street Orientation, Aspect Ratio, and Tree Species Interactions on Heat Exposure in Temperate Monsoon Climate" Sustainability 18, no. 7: 3177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073177
APA StyleChen, X., Zhang, Y., Song, Z., Wang, Z., Lin, H., Lan, T., Shao, J., Lei, T., Jin, R., & Li, J. (2026). Street Orientation, Aspect Ratio, and Tree Species Interactions on Heat Exposure in Temperate Monsoon Climate. Sustainability, 18(7), 3177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073177





































