Next Article in Journal
TopoAD: Resource-Efficient OOD Detection via Multi-Scale Euler Characteristic Curves
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Water Quality and Plankton of Artificial Culture Pond in Sea Cucumber Apostichopus japonicus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Dry Pass, Wet Fail: Ground Impedance Testing of Field-Aged PV Modules—Implications for Repowering/Revamping Within 5–10 years and for Environmental Sustainability

1
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(3), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031212 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 December 2025 / Revised: 18 January 2026 / Accepted: 23 January 2026 / Published: 25 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Abstract

The ground impedance (insulation resistance Risol) of photovoltaic (PV) modules is usually measured only in the dry state, even though arrays frequently operate under dew-wet or rain-wet conditions, when leakage paths can change. We measured dry insulation resistance Rdry and IEC 61215 MQT 15 wet leakage resistance Rwet for N = 37 field-aged crystalline-silicon modules from utility-scale plants and related the results to the IEC 40 MΩ·m2 criterion (Rwet·× A ≥ 40). The measurements used 1000 V DC and a 2 min dwell; Rwet was obtained in a salted bath with a solution resistivity < 3500 Ω·cm. The median Rdry was 42.4 GΩ, whereas the median Rwet was 462.5 MΩ, resulting in a median Rdry/Rwet ratio of ~110×. Three modules (8.1%) failed the 40 MΩ·m2 limit already in the dry state, whereas eight modules (21.6%) failed under IEC-wet conditions; five were dry-pass/wet-fail cases that would have passed dry screening. For a representative area A = 1.8 m2, a practical conservative dry triage threshold of approximately 55.5 GΩ identifies modules needing IEC-wet verification rather than serving as a stand-alone limit. Overall, combining dry and IEC-wet measurements improves safety and supports sustainability through resource-efficient repowering/revamping and end-of-life decisions in large PV fleets, particularly in hot climates.
Keywords: photovoltaics; insulation resistance/ground impedance; IEC 61215; MQT 15; wet leakage; dew; repowering/revamping; reliability; sustainability photovoltaics; insulation resistance/ground impedance; IEC 61215; MQT 15; wet leakage; dew; repowering/revamping; reliability; sustainability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Poulek, V.; Beranek, V.; Finsterle, T.; Kozelka, M. Dry Pass, Wet Fail: Ground Impedance Testing of Field-Aged PV Modules—Implications for Repowering/Revamping Within 5–10 years and for Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031212

AMA Style

Poulek V, Beranek V, Finsterle T, Kozelka M. Dry Pass, Wet Fail: Ground Impedance Testing of Field-Aged PV Modules—Implications for Repowering/Revamping Within 5–10 years and for Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability. 2026; 18(3):1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Poulek, Vladislav, Vaclav Beranek, Tomas Finsterle, and Martin Kozelka. 2026. "Dry Pass, Wet Fail: Ground Impedance Testing of Field-Aged PV Modules—Implications for Repowering/Revamping Within 5–10 years and for Environmental Sustainability" Sustainability 18, no. 3: 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031212

APA Style

Poulek, V., Beranek, V., Finsterle, T., & Kozelka, M. (2026). Dry Pass, Wet Fail: Ground Impedance Testing of Field-Aged PV Modules—Implications for Repowering/Revamping Within 5–10 years and for Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 18(3), 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop