Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Fiscal Support Policies for Village-Level Collective Economies in Frontier Regions
Previous Article in Journal
TMT’s R&D Background and Enterprise Digital Transformation—A Perspective of Power
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmental Policy and ESG Greenwashing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency

Department of Finance, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 5094; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105094
Submission received: 12 March 2026 / Revised: 1 May 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 18 May 2026

Abstract

This study examines the causal impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings on corporate green technology innovation using a panel of Saudi listed firms over the period 2015–2024. Adopting a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework, the analysis evaluates three dimensions of innovation outcomes—quantity, quality, and efficiency (CGTI1–CGTI3). The results show that ESG ratings significantly enhance green technology innovation. Dynamic evidence indicates that these effects strengthen over time, reflecting gradual adjustment in firms’ innovation strategies. Mechanism analysis reveals that ESG ratings promote innovation primarily by alleviating financial constraints and mitigating agency problems. These effects are driven by improvements in the information environment, as ESG ratings reduce information asymmetry and enhance monitoring. From a theoretical perspective, ESG ratings are conceptualized as a digital information infrastructure that reduces informational entropy and provides algorithmic evaluation signals, thereby guiding managerial decision-making in R&D investment and project selection. Robustness tests, including propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), confirm that the results are not driven by selection bias. Focusing on Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030, the findings highlight the role of ESG information systems in shaping green innovation in an emerging market context.
Keywords: ESG ratings; corporate green technology innovation; green patents; difference-in-differences; financial constraints; agency problems; Saudi Arabia ESG ratings; corporate green technology innovation; green patents; difference-in-differences; financial constraints; agency problems; Saudi Arabia

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamdouni, A.; Gafsi, N. The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105094

AMA Style

Hamdouni A, Gafsi N. The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):5094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamdouni, Amina, and Nesrine Gafsi. 2026. "The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 5094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105094

APA Style

Hamdouni, A., & Gafsi, N. (2026). The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency. Sustainability, 18(10), 5094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop