This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessSystematic Review
Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review
Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Accounting Sciences, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Ibagué-Tolima 730001, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 5006; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 February 2026
/
Revised: 20 March 2026
/
Accepted: 24 March 2026
/
Published: 15 May 2026
Abstract
Climate finance has become a major means of fostering sustainability in the construction industry, which encounters higher pressures to mitigate its environmental footprint without sacrificing economic viability. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this study employs a hybrid approach, integrating a systematic literature review (SLR) and bibliometric analysis, to provide a comprehensive overview of the role and mechanisms of climate finance for sustainable practices in the construction industry. From 2019 to 2025, 176 papers were identified in the Scopus (73) and Web of Science (103) databases. The SLR enables both systematic collection and qualitative analysis of financial instruments, policy frameworks, and sustainability performance metrics, and bibliometric analysis provides a report of publication behavior, geographic distribution, and thematic network. Findings suggest intense clustering of research in countries, with India, China, and the United States as key focus areas, and that construction firms predominantly accessed climate finance on instruments including green bonds, sustainability-linked loans, public–private partnerships, and multilateral climate funds. Sustainability performance is commonly assessed using indicators such as carbon emissions, energy efficiency, lifecycle costs, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics. The findings also highlight the critical role of public policies, such as green procurement, carbon pricing, and fiscal incentives, in enabling sustainable construction practices. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the understanding of how financial mechanisms, policy frameworks, and sustainability metrics interact to drive sectoral transformation. Future research should focus on standardizing sustainability metrics, evaluating financing impacts, and expanding studies in emerging economies.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Cossio, L.C.G.; Buitrago Mejía, A.; Barrero, M.S.R.; Aros, L.H.
Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5006.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006
AMA Style
Cossio LCG, Buitrago Mejía A, Barrero MSR, Aros LH.
Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):5006.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006
Chicago/Turabian Style
Cossio, Laura Constanza Gallego, Aracelly Buitrago Mejía, Mario Samuel Rodríguez Barrero, and Ludivia Hernandez Aros.
2026. "Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 5006.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006
APA Style
Cossio, L. C. G., Buitrago Mejía, A., Barrero, M. S. R., & Aros, L. H.
(2026). Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 18(10), 5006.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.