Next Article in Journal
Reliability Limits of Hydrogen Storage Systems Under Variable Production: A Dimensionless Regime Map Approach
Previous Article in Journal
From Diversification to Digitalisation: The Impact of Strategic Survival Models on Construction Business Resilience in Emerging Markets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review

by
Laura Constanza Gallego Cossio
*,
Aracelly Buitrago Mejía
,
Mario Samuel Rodríguez Barrero
and
Ludivia Hernandez Aros
Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Accounting Sciences, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Ibagué-Tolima 730001, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 5006; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 February 2026 / Revised: 20 March 2026 / Accepted: 24 March 2026 / Published: 15 May 2026

Abstract

Climate finance has become a major means of fostering sustainability in the construction industry, which encounters higher pressures to mitigate its environmental footprint without sacrificing economic viability. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this study employs a hybrid approach, integrating a systematic literature review (SLR) and bibliometric analysis, to provide a comprehensive overview of the role and mechanisms of climate finance for sustainable practices in the construction industry. From 2019 to 2025, 176 papers were identified in the Scopus (73) and Web of Science (103) databases. The SLR enables both systematic collection and qualitative analysis of financial instruments, policy frameworks, and sustainability performance metrics, and bibliometric analysis provides a report of publication behavior, geographic distribution, and thematic network. Findings suggest intense clustering of research in countries, with India, China, and the United States as key focus areas, and that construction firms predominantly accessed climate finance on instruments including green bonds, sustainability-linked loans, public–private partnerships, and multilateral climate funds. Sustainability performance is commonly assessed using indicators such as carbon emissions, energy efficiency, lifecycle costs, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics. The findings also highlight the critical role of public policies, such as green procurement, carbon pricing, and fiscal incentives, in enabling sustainable construction practices. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the understanding of how financial mechanisms, policy frameworks, and sustainability metrics interact to drive sectoral transformation. Future research should focus on standardizing sustainability metrics, evaluating financing impacts, and expanding studies in emerging economies.
Keywords: climate finance; sustainable construction; green finance; ESG; construction projects climate finance; sustainable construction; green finance; ESG; construction projects

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cossio, L.C.G.; Buitrago Mejía, A.; Barrero, M.S.R.; Aros, L.H. Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006

AMA Style

Cossio LCG, Buitrago Mejía A, Barrero MSR, Aros LH. Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cossio, Laura Constanza Gallego, Aracelly Buitrago Mejía, Mario Samuel Rodríguez Barrero, and Ludivia Hernandez Aros. 2026. "Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006

APA Style

Cossio, L. C. G., Buitrago Mejía, A., Barrero, M. S. R., & Aros, L. H. (2026). Financial Instruments, Metrics, and Public Policies in Climate Finance in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 18(10), 5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop