Next Article in Journal
From Diversified Development to Sustainable Destination Management: Mechanisms Linking Tourist Psychological Identity and Cultural Tourism Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Projecting Türkiye’s CO2 Emissions Future: Multivariate Forecast of Energy–Economy–Environment Interactions and Anthropogenic Drivers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Sword or Futility? Blockchain-Based Competition in Refurbished Market Considering Consumer Reference Behaviors

1
School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
2
Quality Control Department, Shandong LuShangTong Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(1), 472; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010472
Submission received: 25 November 2025 / Revised: 24 December 2025 / Accepted: 29 December 2025 / Published: 2 January 2026

Abstract

In addition to competition from independent refurbishers, consumer distrust of refurbished product quality is a major bottleneck for brand manufacturers when selling refurbished products. This paper focuses on a duopoly competition consisting of a brand manufacturer and an independent refurbisher. Considering the direct and indirect reference quality effects triggered by consumers’ reference quality behavior in such an environment and their interaction with consumers’ prevalent reference price behavior, this paper explores the effectiveness of manufacturers’ responses to quality disclosure using blockchain and its impact on the competition in the refurbished market. The results show that when the market competitiveness increased by blockchain is high enough, it increases competition in the quality dimension by facilitating the brand manufacturer to improve the quality of the original product but reduces competition in the price dimension through the brand premium effect. When the degree of refurbishment by the brand manufacturer is high and the direct reference quality effect is large, the implementation of the blockchain manifests itself as an advertising effect that expands the market size but fails to combat the independent refurbisher. Conversely, when the brand manufacturer has a low degree of refurbishment and the direct reference quality effect is dominant, the adoption of blockchain can be used as a competitive tool for the brand manufacturer to combat the independent refurbisher in the refurbishment market. For consumers, the application of blockchain may not necessarily result in a more cost-effective refurbished product. Furthermore, whether consumer surplus and social welfare can be improved after the implementation of blockchain depends on the degree of refurbishment by the brand manufacturer and the reference quality effect.
Keywords: refurbished market; quality and price competition; reference behaviors; consumer distrust; blockchain technology refurbished market; quality and price competition; reference behaviors; consumer distrust; blockchain technology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, D.; Yin, H.; Hu, J.; Li, W. Sword or Futility? Blockchain-Based Competition in Refurbished Market Considering Consumer Reference Behaviors. Sustainability 2026, 18, 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010472

AMA Style

Ma D, Yin H, Hu J, Li W. Sword or Futility? Blockchain-Based Competition in Refurbished Market Considering Consumer Reference Behaviors. Sustainability. 2026; 18(1):472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Deqing, Haoyu Yin, Jinsong Hu, and Wei Li. 2026. "Sword or Futility? Blockchain-Based Competition in Refurbished Market Considering Consumer Reference Behaviors" Sustainability 18, no. 1: 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010472

APA Style

Ma, D., Yin, H., Hu, J., & Li, W. (2026). Sword or Futility? Blockchain-Based Competition in Refurbished Market Considering Consumer Reference Behaviors. Sustainability, 18(1), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop