Next Article in Journal
Institutions, Globalization and the Dynamics of Opportunity-Driven Innovative Entrepreneurship
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Customized Bus Services: A Data-Driven Framework for Joint Demand Analysis and Route Optimization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 18
Issue 1
10.3390/su18010251
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Correction to Sustainability 2025, 17(19), 8716.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Yu et al. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716

by
Qunjia Yu
1,
Yiyang Wang
1,
Xuefang Zhang
1,
Yanhua Li
1,
Guangyi Lv
1,
Andreas Wilkes
2 and
Chengjie Wang
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, College of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China
2
Values for Development Limited, 107 Green End Road, Cambridge CB4 1RS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(1), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010251
Submission received: 1 December 2025 / Accepted: 19 December 2025 / Published: 26 December 2025
Browse Figures
Versions Notes
The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
Subgraphs 1 and 4 are the same, so the author wants to replace subgraph 4 with another one, so we need to replace the original Figure 3:
Sustainability 18 00251 g002
Figure 3. Changes in vegetation community characteristics under different restoration measures from 2023 to 2024. Note: EN denotes enclosure; EF refers to enclosure with bio-organic fertilizer application; MG represents moderately grazed degraded grassland (serving as control). Blue lines indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2023, while red lines represent significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2024. Black lines denote significant differences (p < 0.05) for the same treatment across the two years.
Figure 3. Changes in vegetation community characteristics under different restoration measures from 2023 to 2024. Note: EN denotes enclosure; EF refers to enclosure with bio-organic fertilizer application; MG represents moderately grazed degraded grassland (serving as control). Blue lines indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2023, while red lines represent significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2024. Black lines denote significant differences (p < 0.05) for the same treatment across the two years.
Sustainability 18 00251 g002
With:
Sustainability 18 00251 g003
Figure 3. Changes in vegetation community characteristics under different restoration measures from 2023 to 2024. Note: EN denotes enclosure; EF refers to enclosure with bio-organic fertilizer application; MG represents moderately grazed degraded grassland (serving as control). Blue lines indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2023, while red lines represent significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2024. Black lines denote significant differences (p < 0.05) for the same treatment across the two years.
Figure 3. Changes in vegetation community characteristics under different restoration measures from 2023 to 2024. Note: EN denotes enclosure; EF refers to enclosure with bio-organic fertilizer application; MG represents moderately grazed degraded grassland (serving as control). Blue lines indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2023, while red lines represent significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments in 2024. Black lines denote significant differences (p < 0.05) for the same treatment across the two years.
Sustainability 18 00251 g003
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Yu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Lv, G.; Wilkes, A.; Wang, C. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Lv, G.; Wilkes, A.; Wang, C. Correction: Yu et al. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716. Sustainability 2026, 18, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010251

AMA Style

Yu Q, Wang Y, Zhang X, Li Y, Lv G, Wilkes A, Wang C. Correction: Yu et al. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716. Sustainability. 2026; 18(1):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Qunjia, Yiyang Wang, Xuefang Zhang, Yanhua Li, Guangyi Lv, Andreas Wilkes, and Chengjie Wang. 2026. "Correction: Yu et al. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716" Sustainability 18, no. 1: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010251

APA Style

Yu, Q., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Lv, G., Wilkes, A., & Wang, C. (2026). Correction: Yu et al. Sustainable Restoration of Typical Degraded Grasslands: An Evaluation of Ecological Benefits from Bio-Organic Fertilizer Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8716. Sustainability, 18(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010251

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop