Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Forest Utilization Patterns to Improve Life Satisfaction and Policy Directions
Previous Article in Journal
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Analysis of e-methane in Japan and China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impacts of Quality Management on Green Material Utilization: A Small- and Medium-Sized Chinese Enterprises’ Perspective

1
Queen’s Business School, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
2
Business School, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
3
School of Logistics, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(8), 3688; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083688
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 11 April 2025 / Accepted: 16 April 2025 / Published: 18 April 2025

Abstract

Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in China’s sustainable development. With the increasing green awareness among SMEs, they have become more environmentally conscious, and many of them are considering the utilization of green materials as an effective method to reduce environmental impact. At the same time, Chinese SMEs must also ensure product quality when deciding to utilize green materials. Based on quality management theory, we developed a model to empirically explore the impact of quality training and quality standards on the utilization of green materials by SMEs. Firstly, we conducted an exploratory case study with four Chinese SMEs to identify important and common attributes and levels associated with SMEs’ utilization of green materials. Secondly, building on these case studies, we designed a discrete choice experiment (DCE). We conducted a survey involving 313 Chinese SMEs to collect data, which we analyzed using a random parameter logit model. The results show that quality training promotes SMEs’ green material utilization, while quality standards hinder it. In addition, both quality training and quality standards enhance the positive effects of heavy metal toxicity reduction and recycling rates on utilization, while weakening the positive effect of sewage reduction on utilization.

1. Introduction

Chinese SMEs make a significant contribution to Chinese industries, and they act not only as an essential part of the supply chains of large enterprises, but also as key players in the low-end product market [1,2]. This is largely attributable to their strong emphasis on product quality and the sustained focus on quality management (QM) in their operations. Ensuring quality is a crucial factor for maintaining long-term cooperative relationships with existing customers [3]. However, as environmental awareness continues to grow globally, products with only high quality can no longer meet customer demands. Many SMEs have started incorporating environmentally friendly elements into their products to attract customers [4]. The use of green materials has been regarded as an effective method [5]. Utilizing green materials plays a significant role in environmental protection due to their environmentally friendly properties. It significantly contributes to reducing waste [5], minimizing harmful effects on human health and the ecological environment [6], and reducing various pollutant emissions during processing or use [4]. Thus, green materials are gradually being recognized and adopted by many companies, due to their positive impacts on both environmental and business performance [7]. On the other hand, the use of green materials poses challenges in maintaining product quality stability, especially when they are applied to critical components [8]. As a result, ensuring product quality while utilizing green materials remains a significant challenge [9]. Many failure cases have been observed due to low levels of product quality when using green materials. For instance, Adidas introduced the Futurecraft Loop series, a line of shoes constructed entirely from recyclable materials. While these shoes were widely recognized for their environmental credentials, some customers reported that their durability and performance were inferior to those of traditional shoes. That large enterprises have also experienced many failures in the application of green materials, and that SMEs generally lack the abilities and resources to manage such risks [10]. Thus, many SMEs tend to adopt a conservative or even resistant attitude toward the utilization of green materials [11]. This has led to green material utilization among Chinese SMEs remaining in its initial phase, with these materials consistently not being used on a large scale, as they are in larger companies [10]. To alleviate the concerns of Chinese SMEs about the quality uncertainty impacts associated with green material utilization, reconsidering the impact of QM on green material utilization has become necessary and urgent.
Does QM facilitate or hinder green material utilization? The existing literature on this topic is limited, and there are mixed arguments regarding the relationship between QM and green material utilization [9,12]. Furthermore, some studies have adopted an integrated approach, viewing QM as a single concept and examining its influence on green material utilization [13]. Previous research on QM has distinguished between two aspects embedded within QM: “hard” and “soft” [14,15]. The hard aspect of QM pertains to production techniques, whereas the soft aspect of QM focuses on human factors [16,17]. However, most of these studies emphasize the hard aspects of QM, such as process management and quality control, while the soft aspect of QM is often overlooked. However, many researchers argue that soft QM is an essential and necessary dimension for the implementation of QM practices, and for ensuring the success of hard QM practices [9,18]. El Manzani et al. [19] suggested paying greater attention to exploring the influence of soft QM on green material utilization, particularly quality trainings and quality standards, as these are highly relevant to the application to green material utilization. For instance, the awareness and capabilities enhanced through quality training are often similar to those required for green material utilization [20]. Additionally, quality standards provide essential capabilities for firms planning to utilize green materials [19]. To develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the impact of quality training and quality standards on green material utilization by Chinese SMEs, the first research question is, ‘How do quality training and quality standards influence green material utilization within the context of Chinese SMEs?
In addition, researchers argue that the attributes and functions of green materials influence firms’ decisions to utilize them. For instance, price is a key attribute considered in green material utilization [21]. Firms also frequently consider the environmental functionality of green materials, such as renewability [22], recyclability [23], low toxicity [6], and low pollution [21]. Most previous studies have separately examined the impacts of soft QM and green material attributes on green material utilization [7,24]. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the moderating effect of soft QM practices on the relationship between the environmental functionality of green materials and their utilization. Thus, the second research question is, ‘How do quality training and quality standards affect the impact of the environmental functionality of green materials on SMEs’ purchasing decisions?
In order to address these two research questions, this study aims to empirically investigate the influence of quality training and quality standards on green material utilization by Chinese SMEs. The findings of this study address the literature gap concerning the impact of soft QM on the green transformation of Chinese SMEs [13]. Additionally, this study provides new insights into the environmental functionalities considered by SMEs when purchasing green materials in the context of existing soft QM practices among Chinese SMEs.

2. Literature Review and Research Hypotheses

2.1. Green Materials

Green materials refer to materials that have a reduced environmental impact throughout their lifecycle [25]. Green materials are typically characterized as renewable [22], recyclable [23], low in toxicity [5], and low in pollution [6].
Green materials are widely used in companies and are increasingly recognized as a key factor in environmental management [26]. Many studies have indicated that green materials are widely used because they reduce environmental impact and protect the environment in various ways, such as minimizing pollution from waste gas and sewage and reducing waste production. For instance, Glew et al. [27] compared the environmental impact of biomaterial and petrochemical products, concluding that biomaterial products are more easily recyclable and can reduce carbon emissions by up to 90% compared to petrochemical products. In addition, Kabir et al. [28] further highlighted that degradable plastics demonstrate enhanced biodegradability, with significant potential to conserve natural ecosystems and prevent ecological destruction. Degradable plastics can also avoid the toxic pollutants produced by thermal treatments, mitigating ecological deterioration. Another reason for regarding green material utilization as a vital aspect of green transformation is its widespread acceptance by firms. Many studies have shown that green materials not only reduce environmental impacts, but also benefit business operations [25,29]. For instance, Dangelico and Pujari [25] conducted a multiple-case study involving 12 companies, and found that 50% of the firms selected green materials as their primary green transformation practice. The study indicated that utilizing green materials enhances market competitiveness and creates opportunities to increase market share. Moreover, Tanksale et al. [30] also indicated that using green packaging materials can minimize carbon emissions and maximize waste recycling, while also reducing costs, attracting environmentally conscious customers, opening new market opportunities, and then achieving traditional profit maximization.
Even though green materials significantly contribute to environmental protection and business performance, some studies still show that many companies adopt a conservative and cautious approach to green material utilization [31]. Many firms are concerned about the potential negative impacts of green materials on product quality, including durability [32], functional quality [33], and changes to production processes [34]. For example, Gursel et al. [32] highlighted that the difference in durability is one of the major reasons why companies hesitate to use green materials. In addition, Dicker et al. [7] also specified that green materials often exhibit limited durability and rapid performance degradation, such as in mechanical properties and flexural strength, which risks reducing customer satisfaction and loyalty and can even lead to customer loss. To mitigate such risks, many companies cautiously use green materials only in less critical product components. In contrast, firms that use green materials in critical product components face higher risks.
To maximize the benefits of green materials and minimize associated risks, firms tend to consider both material-related factors and firm-related factors when they make a decision to utilize green materials [7,32]. With respect to material-related factors, many studies have found that some attributes of green materials have a significant impact on the green material utilization of firms. For example, Aftab et al. [35] indicated that low-toxicity materials are frequently considered by firms when they select green materials, and heavy metals are the main attributes of toxic materials. Moreover, Tansel [36] indicated that product use times have become shorter, causing waste quantities to increase, which has led to some raw materials being in short supply, making more firms pay greater attention to the recycling rate of materials. On the other hand, numerous studies have also found that many firm-related factors impact green material utilization. For instance, Rustam et al. [37] indicated that firms’ environmental awareness is one of the main prerequisites for companies to adopt green materials. Huang and Chen [38] indicated that institutional pressure promotes firms’ green material utilization. However, most studies focus on simple drivers, and previous studies have seldom considered the interaction impact between material-related factors and firm-related factors on green material utilization. Hence, this study attempts to fill this gap.

2.2. Quality Management

Quality management (QM) refers to the process of overseeing all activities and tasks aimed at maintaining a desired level of excellence in a firm’s products [39]. QM has been a topic of significant attention for a long time. With changes in market demand, technological advancements, and management philosophies, QM has continually evolved and developed. It has transitioned from simple quality inspection to a total management system and integrated environmental management into QM [11,40]. QM is divided into two dimensions, hard QM and soft QM, which differ in focus and methods of implementation [9]. Hard QM refers to practices focused on controlling processes and products using techniques and tools aimed at meeting product quality requirements [9,15]. Hard QM has long been regarded as the mainstream of QM, receiving substantial attention in research [19]. Studies on hard QM practices have thoroughly examined various tool- and technique-oriented QM practices, with process management and the use of quality information being the most representative practices [41,42]. With continuous development, research on hard QM has significantly advanced, resulting in a highly mature body of research.
In comparison, soft QM has not received the same level of attention as hard QM [24]. El Manzani et al. [43] explained that this is because soft QM is informal and reactive and has a short-term outlook, lacking professionals and experts to manage them. Soft QM focuses on practices related to involvement and commitment management, employee evaluation, training, and internal cooperation or teamwork [44]. Many researchers still highlight the importance of soft QM [9,18]. For example, Rahman and Bullock [45] stated that improving hard QM alone does not necessarily lead to successful QM, as “people make quality happen”. Similarly, Zeng et al. [9] indicated that neglecting soft QM may lead to the failure of QM implementation. As QM research has become more in-depth, researchers have increasingly recognized the importance of soft QM [44,46]. Consequently, this study focuses on soft QM.
The relationship between green material utilization and soft QM has been extensively studied by researchers. However, the assessment of this relationship remains inconclusive. Some studies have adopted an optimistic perspective and contended that soft QM promotes green material utilization [44,47]. This view suggests that soft QM helps establish teamwork, enhances knowledge and awareness, encourages creative ideas from employees, and promotes a communicative environment, thereby facilitating green material utilization. In contrast, some studies hold a pessimistic view of the relationship between soft QM and green material utilization. They argue that the primary aim of soft QM is to improve quality performance, and that it does not directly relate to green material utilization [9]. Furthermore, studies believe that the varying results in the relationship between soft QM and green material utilization are due to differences in the specific practices of soft QM. They propose that soft QM should be regarded as a multidimensional concept [16,17].
In the literature on soft QM, many studies have examined it from a top organizational perspective, primarily focusing on larger enterprises. For instance, Georgiev and Ohtaki [48] comprehensively identified critical factors for soft QM implementation, highlighting that top management involvement, leadership, and policy and strategy are the three crucial elements for the successful implementation of QM practices. Additionally, Teoman and Ulengin [49] investigated the influence of managers’ transformational leadership styles on quality performance, and found that this leadership style is a key determinant of success in all QM practices. Similarly, Valmohammadi and Roshanzamir [50] concluded that organizational culture is an antecedent of QM practices, with different types and strengths of culture significantly impacting the successful implementation of QM practices.
On the other hand, soft QM in SMEs places more emphasis on employee-level perspectives. Addis [10] explained that most SMEs use a large labor force relative to capital equipment, which is characterized by low labor productivity. Soft QM practices relating to employees play a critical role in helping to improve productivity and ensure quality. Quality training and quality standards are two of the main practices in the employee aspects of soft QM [51,52,53]. Quality training is defined as educational tools and training for improving employees’ skills, awareness, and competencies, aiming to improve the overall QM levels of enterprises [54], and quality standards are the process of assessing product quality [15]. Employees are rewarded or penalized based on the evaluation results, aiming to ensure quality performance, thereby enhancing the overall company performance [48]. Many studies highlight the importance of these two soft QM practices in SMEs. For example, Georgiev and Ohtaki [48] found that quality standards give employees incentive or encouragement, driving them to become involved with ensuring product quality. In addition, Zeng et al. [9] explored the function of employees’ training and quality standards in QM implementation. They found that quality training aims to update employees’ skills and knowledge to maintain a workforce with cutting-edge skills and abilities, help employees to better perform their tasks, and also transform workers into flexible problem-solvers. This study conducts research in the context of Chinese SMEs. It considers the characteristics of SMEs and the soft QM practices that SMEs frequently adopt, focusing on quality training and quality standards.
There are also some studies on the relationship between two practices of soft QM and green material utilization. With respect to QM training, most researchers believed it had a positive relationship with green material utilization [12,13,55]. Some researchers argued that some awareness and capabilities enhanced through quality training are indeed similar to those required for green transformation, and help us to better comprehend green material utilization and assist in promoting green material utilization. For example, Al-Dhaafri and Al-Swidi [20] found that quality training enhances employees’ awareness related to saving waste and energy and preventing pollution, which has commonality with green protections that drive firms to utilize green materials. In addition, Wang et al. [56] argued that quality training helps employees to strictly follow quality standards and then reduces the quality uncertainty associated with the use of green materials. In addition, Shahzad et al. [55] also indicated that quality training elevates awareness and capabilities with respect to continuous improvement, which support employees’ ability to innovate or improve existing products with green materials. For quality standards, one of the most under-researched aspects of soft QM, the results are also mixed [48]. For example, Wei et al. [57] believed that quality standards can help employees enhance their skills and awareness, which provides essential capabilities when they plan to utilize green materials.

2.3. Research Hypotheses

2.3.1. The Effect of Quality Training on Green Material Utilization

We argue that quality training has a positive impact on green material utilization. Chinese SMEs are increasingly focusing on both the environmental and the business benefits of green transformation [4]. The use of green materials reduces environmental impact, enhances brand image and attracts more customers [21]. However, the effective utilization of green materials depends not only on top management support, but also on the motivation and capabilities of employees, which relates to their environmental awareness, knowledge, and skills [58].
Over time, quality training has evolved from basic quality control to more comprehensive approaches, incorporating concepts like lean management, continuous improvement, and sustainable development. Therefore, it plays a critical role in enhancing employees’ motivations and capabilities regarding environmental protection. Quality training, for example, enhances employees’ awareness of value creation and waste elimination, helping SMEs increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve customer satisfaction [59]. This approach aligns closely with green transformation principles, encouraging SMEs to minimize operational waste through discarded materials, the consumption of energy, or water usage [26]. Similarly, training on sustainable development raises environmental awareness among employees, especially top managers, making them more likely to adopt green materials. Lastly, quality training strengthens employees’ problem-solving skills and process knowledge [60], enabling them to address issues with experimental green materials and facilitating a smoother transition to green production [56]. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1. 
Quality training encourages Chinese SMEs to utilize green materials.

2.3.2. The Effect of Quality Standards on Green Material Utilization

We argue that quality standards are negatively associated with green material utilization. Due to fierce competition, many Chinese SMEs focus on OEM and ODM models rather than building brand identity, which reduces their brand attractiveness [31]. Thus, in order to maintain market competitiveness and build customer loyalty, most SMEs prioritize stable and high product quality. Thus, they often set and use various quality standards to require or encourage employees to follow specific procedures to ensure the high quality of products. However, transitioning to green materials brings risks, including quality uncertainties [25,61]. The uncertainties in quality performance associated with green materials can harm SMEs’ reputation and market share, which runs counter to the objective of establishing quality standards.
Furthermore, Chinese SMEs limit resources, have a high level of cost sensitivity, and focus on short-term benefits, and most quality standards focus on short-term goals, such as yield rate and productivity [62]. However, utilizing green materials represents a long-term objective that requires ongoing investment, planning, and resources, and may negatively impact short-term operations, which is contrary to quality standards [63]. Thus, SMEs often adopt a conservative approach to avoid the additional costs associated with potential product returns or recalls resulting from green material use [29,31].
In addition, quality standards reward or penalize employees based on yield and productivity, which is directly linked to the employees’ financial benefit [31]. Green material utilization is a long-term activity with a longer transition period and uncertain quality performance [64], which both create obstacles to employees achieving yield rate. To meet the short-term yield rate and avoid reducing financial benefit, employees tend to adopt a conservative attitude in selecting raw materials to avoid any risks that may affect the quality performance, rather than tending to utilize green materials [61]. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 2: 
Quality standards hinder Chinese SMEs from utilizing green materials.

2.3.3. The Moderating Role of Quality Management

Sewage and gaseous pollution, waste, and toxicity are the primary pollutants or harmful substances generated during the production or use of products made from traditional materials. Environmental functionality refers to the positive functions or reduced negative impacts that a material, product, or system has on the environment throughout its lifecycle [5]. Green materials with a higher level of environmental functionality can significantly reduce sewage and gaseous waste during the production process. Additionally, these materials enhance the utilization rate of waste materials and reduce harm to the health of producers and users caused by product toxicity. Therefore, firms are more likely to utilize green materials with higher levels of environmental functionality. However, green materials with higher environmental functionality also carry higher risks of causing quality uncertainties [29,61]. SMEs, which generally have weaker risk management capabilities, must carefully balance the trade-off between quality uncertainties and the environmental performance of green materials. This study posits that quality training enhances the influence of the environmental functionality of green materials on SMEs’ adoption decisions. As the level of quality training increases, it extends beyond merely teaching how to meet quality standards. It emphasizes additional product attributes such as sustainability and environmental protection, fostering greater environmental awareness among enterprises. This shift in focus leads companies to prioritize not only product quality, but also the adoption of green materials with higher-level environmental functionality.
On the other hand, quality standards primarily focus on ensuring product quality. Green materials with higher levels of environmental functionality often carry a greater risk of quality uncertainty [25,61], which conflicts with the core principles of quality standards. While the use of green materials can protect the environment, attract new customers, and enhance market competitiveness [65], if these materials introduce quality uncertainty that contradicts the fundamental advantage of SMEs in delivering high-quality products, SMEs with stricter quality standards are more likely to prioritize quality over environmental functionality [36]. This leads to SMEs selecting materials with lower environmental functionality. Moreover, stricter quality standards make employees reluctant to allow material-related quality uncertainties to influence their quality assessments or the economic benefits tied to quality performance. This reluctance shifts their motivation and attention toward reducing product quality uncertainty, further deprioritizing the environmental functionality of materials in decision-making processes. Consequently, SMEs are likely to prioritize reducing quality uncertainty and keeping product quality while not considering the environmental functionalities of green materials when making decisions. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypotheses.
Hypothesis 3a: 
Quality training enhances the impact of the environmental functionality of the recycling rate on green material utilization.
Hypothesis 3b: 
Quality training enhances the impact of the environmental functionality of heavy metal toxicity reduction on green material utilization.
Hypothesis 3c: 
Quality training enhances the impact of the environmental functionality of sewage reduction on green material utilization.
Hypothesis 3d: 
Quality training enhances the impact of the environmental functionality of waste gas reduction on green material utilization.
Hypothesis 4a: 
Quality standards weaken the impact of the environmental functionality of the recycling rate on green material utilization.
Hypothesis 4b: 
Quality standards weaken the impact of the environmental functionality of heavy metal toxicity reduction on green material utilization.
Hypothesis 4c: 
Quality standards weaken the impact of the environmental functionality of sewage reduction on green material utilization.
Hypothesis 4d: 
Quality standards weaken the impact of the environmental functionality of waste gas reduction on green material utilization.
The research framework is presented in Figure 1.

3. Research Methods

In this study, we used the discrete choice experiment (DCE) method [66] and conducted a stated preference (SP) experiment to explore Chinese SMEs’ preferences between some hypothetical sets of green materials [67]. We conducted the DCE with a five-step process: (1) identify attributes and measure variables, (2) specify attribute levels, (3) create the experimental design, (4) administer a survey and present alternatives and choice tasks, and (5) estimate the choice model [68].

3.1. Identify Attributes and Measure Variables

This study identified attributes, specified attribute levels, and developed the measurement of variables through an exploratory multiple case study method. We collaborated with the Shaoxing General Chamber of Commerce (http://sxgcc.sx.gov.cn/) and explained the objectives of the research. The officials introduced the cases accordingly, and we used a theoretical sampling approach, selecting four cases who are SMEs in the manufacturing industries in Shaoxing City, China. The descriptive information about the four cases is provided in Appendix A.
We then collected data via semi-structured interviews [69]. We reviewed a large number of papers and developed an interview protocol that contained questions relating to the SMEs’ products and technologies, their processes of decision-making, and the quality training and quality standards they were using; all questions are listed in Appendix B. All data were collected through two rounds of interviews with SME owners, and all interviews were in Chinese and audiotaped. After the interview, the research teams transcribed and translated it into English within 24 h. Moreover, we also used some associated methods, including viewing documents, conducting field visits, and obtaining different features of green materials via the internet, to collect additional information for testing the reliability and validity of the interviews through cross-reference. For instance, when the cases introduced green materials that they were using, we conducted a field visit to check their green material utilizing situation. This study analyzed data using an open coding method via a multistep iterative process and NVivo 12. Based on the analysis of the interview data, we ultimately identified six key attributes. Among them, two attributes were related to the basic usage of green materials, while the remaining four were associated with the environmental impact of green materials. The detailed descriptions are provided sequentially in Section 3.1.1, Section 3.1.2, Section 3.1.3, Section 3.1.4, Section 3.1.5 and Section 3.1.6, and the details are shown in Appendix C.

3.1.1. Price

The case evidence suggests that the price of green materials is an important factor when Chinese SMEs are selecting them, and all cases mentioned that they tended to compare the price of green materials with that of traditional materials. For example, firm A indicated that they tended to compare green materials with traditional materials. As firm A commented, “when we decided whether to select green materials, we need to consider its price, as we need to long-term use this material, which maybe significant impact of our cost”. In addition, firm B also mentioned that they prefer a price of green materials that does not have a large difference from traditional materials. In addition, firm D also emphasized the importance of the price for green materials, and firm C also indicated this was more significant for important parts: “if we used green materials in some important partswe will think more about price difference between green materials and traditional materialsas it impacts our costeven relates to attract customersthat is why we focus on it”.

3.1.2. Weakened Product Performance

Some cases also paid attention to the impact on product performance when they considered selecting green materials. All cases mentioned that they were concerned about using some green materials as parts of products, especially some key parts. For example, firm A explained that one of the main reasons for using silicone instead of traditional rubber was that silicone does not weaken product performance. As firm A explained, “Comparing with traditional rubberSilicone also have good durabilityso it does not weak our product performance”. In addition, firm B also discussed green material utilization showing the possibility of weakening their product’s performance. As firm B commented, “Some traditional materials have good improvement effectfor example, normally, we used Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) casing and fiberglass with halogenwhich has Good fire resistanceif we used green materials which does not have halogenits performance of fire resistance will become weakerso we need to consider”. Moreover, firm C also mentioned that using green materials impacted product performance to some extent, and gave an example: “Now we used eco-friendly solders, it is difficult to weld, and it also weaken our product performance such as rotational speedit is troubling to us”.

3.1.3. Heavy Metal Toxicity Reduction

The case evidence suggests that toxicity was frequently considered by Chinese SMEs, and most cases indicated that the main factor causing toxicity was heavy metals. For example, firm B explained that those heavy metals could enter the environment in various forms, and cause environment pollution and bodily harm. In addition, firm C also had the same view, and explained, “We need to use a solderand employees’ skin always touch itmany heavy metals can be absorbed into the skinharm health”. Moreover, firm D also considered toxicity with heavy metals when they selected paints, and firm D explained, “we used a large number of paints… if will be absorbed into the body when we use it… in addition, when paints are weariedwhen paint is frayed or chippedit also has possibility to take toxicity”.

3.1.4. Recycling Rate

The recycling rate is another important attribute when firms consider selecting green materials, and is closely related to the low-carbon and circular economy, so it is noticed by society. Most cases mentioned that they pay attention to material recycling when they select certain materials, especially packaging. For example, firm A believed the recycling rate was an important reason to switch from rubber to silicone. As firm A explained, “silicone can be recycled easilyunlike rubberwe can recycle old products with silicone and renew or remanufacturing itit can reduce our cost”. Firm A also mentioned that they considered the recycling rate when they selected packaging materials. As firm A explained, “now we prefer select package materials which can be recycled easilyfor examplewe limited to use single-use plastic bags to package productsand we prefer to use cartoncan reduce waste”. In addition, firm C also indicated that they preferred to use packaging that could be recycled. For example, firm C tended to use packaging that was easy to recycle and reuse, such as cardboard box packaging and plastic turnover boxes. Moreover, firm D also agreed and commented that “if customer is closed to our firm and we frequently send product to themwe tend to select turn over box although it is plasticwe can 100% recycle these boxes which will not cause waste and solid pollution caused by non-degradable plastics”.

3.1.5. Sewage Reduction

Sewage reduction refers to reducing sewage produced during the manufacturing process. Sewage reduction is the main feature that drives Chinese SMEs to utilize green materials, and most cases commented that they used different green materials, aiming to reduce the amount and variety of sewage. For example, firm A utilized environmentally friendly silicone surface treatment adhesive when aiming to reduce sewage creation. As firm A explained, “our sewage mainly comes from washing and spitting processesso we used environmentally friendly silicone surface treatment adhesive for reduce organic matter in sewage”. In addition, firm B also mentioned that the main target of green material utilization was to reduce sewage production. They gave an example: “our main pollution is sewage, so our most green material utilization aims to reduce sewage. For example, one aim we selected environmentally friendly solder and heavy metal free PCB ink is to avoid produce sewage with heavy metal after following cleaning process. In addition, we used halogen-free solvent as we want to reduce Halogenated organic pollutants in sewage”. Furthermore, firm C also believed that they used some green materials that could reduce sewage production, especially paints and cleaning agents. Moreover, firm D indicated that they created a lot of sewage during their manufacturing processes, especially the steel pretreatment process, so they selected a green cleaning agent that did not seriously harm the environment. For example, firm D used a pickling agent, which had less impact on the environment and was not harmful to personal health like oxalic acid, to replace traditional cleaning agents such as vitriol.

3.1.6. Waste Gas Reduction

Waste gas reduction is another target that Chinese SMEs use green materials for, and all cases mentioned it. Firstly, firm A mentioned that they utilized a green silicone surface treatment adhesive aiming to reduce waste gas. As firm A explained, “Traditional silicone surface treatment adhesive produces a great number of waste gas, and the main pollutant in waste gas is VOCsthus, now we utilized green silicone surface treatment adhesive which is low or no VOC solventsit can reduce air pollution”. In addition, firm B also indicated that they used environmentally friendly paint and eco-friendly solder, both for limiting waste gas production. As firm B explained, “We have a large number of welding processesso there are a lot of waste gas produced during welding processesand it contains heavy metal particles”. Moreover, firms B, C, and D all mentioned that they used environmentally friendly paints to reduce air pollution. As firm B explained, “Traditional paints have pungent smelland it has various Chemical substance such as formaldehydenot only harm body healthbut also cause air pollution”. In addition, firm C also commented “Paints cause serious air pollutionand environmental friendly paints can reduce the air pollution causedas they limit pollutant content including VOCs, particulate matter, heavy metal particles…”. Additionally, firm D also mentioned, “We pay attention to air pollution, and our main source of air pollution is paintsso we selected environmental friendly paintsthey does not contain a lot of pollutant”.

3.2. Specify Attribute Level

3.2.1. Price

As each case used different green materials and the prices of the different green materials varied widely, increasing the difficulty in specifying price levels, we decided to investigate the price of the coating that was widely used by all cases. According to the cases’ annual reports and material purchasing history, we found that, on average, A spent CNY 8000, B spent CNY 50,000, C also spent CNY 8000, and D spent CNY 12,000 each time they purchased eco-friendly paints.
In addition, we also double-checked the prices of the eco-friendly paints on the market. Thus, based on the case evidence and market information, we specified the attribute levels of prices as CNY 50,000, 80,000, and 100,000.

3.2.2. Weakened Performance, Toxicity, and Sewage Reduction

Based on the interviews, the cases did not quantify the level of toxicity, weakened performance, and sewage reduction with precise values, and they all mentioned that they were difficult to measure. Moreover, they all indicated that they used qualitative measures to evaluate toxicity, sewage reduction, and weakened performance. Therefore, we used “Positive, None, Negative” to describe weakened performance and “High, Medium, Low” levels to describe toxicity and sewage reduction.

3.2.3. Recycling Rate

The case evidence shows that the recycling rates for green materials used by firms A, B, C, and D were 75%, 70%, 50%, and 100%. Thus, we specified the attributes of the recycling rate as 50%, 70%, and 100%. Six attributes and the levels of each attribute are shown in Table 1.

3.3. Questionnaire Design

The questionnaire included three parts. First, we provided participants with a concise overview of the survey’s objectives and detailed information regarding pollution control equipment and its attributes. Additionally, we introduced various levels of the attributes. This ensured that respondents had a comprehensive understanding of the concepts presented on the choice card, which is a tool used in DCE to present a set of product or service options to respondents, after which they are asked to select one from these options [67].
Secondly, we used Sawtooth software (https://sawtoothsoftware.com/) to design and generate 30 versions of the choice card to help us reduce the complexity of a full factorial design and optimize respondent engagement [68]. Each choice card presented three hypothetical pollution control equipment types and a no-purchase option [70].
The last part of the questionnaire focused on measuring quality training and quality standards, and was developed based on the case study [64]. All cases mentioned that they had regular quality training. For instance, firm A stated, “Although our process is simple but we still have some quality training… in order to ensure that employee consistently recognize the importance of product quality and prevent them to be complacent about that”. Moreover, firm B also mentioned, “Quality training is an effective method that assist both managers and employees enhance awareness about keeping high level product quality in addition, training also can improve employee’s capability in producing and sampling about ensuring product quality that is why we regularly organize quality trainings”. Firm C also stated “ensuring high level of quality is the first target of our company it requires the efforts of all employees however, not all employees consistently strive to maintain product quality in order to reduce the occurrence of such situations, quality trainings has become necessary and important it can frequently remind employees to make effort to ensure product quality…”
The cases also commented that they provided various types of quality training. For example, firm A mentioned that their quality training mainly focused on enhancing employees’ awareness about product quality. Additionally, firm B also recorded the specific variety of quality training, which included enhancing the awareness of all employees and top managers about quality and improving the skills of the employees responsible for production. Moreover, firm C mentioned “Employees also need another capability like how to save raw material and how to solve problems in producing such as repairing machine these all relate to production quality so only enhance awareness is not enough”. Furthermore, firm D also mentioned that their quality training related not only to ensuring product quality, but also to how to reduce raw material waste. Thus, based on the cases, we undertook training for employees related to improving their ability to effectively ensure product quality, reduce raw material waste, and solve production problems, and we undertook training for both employees and top managers related to enhancing awareness about product quality to measure the quality training. The average of the five items was used to gauge the quality training.
The evidence also shows the importance of quality standards in each case, and describes the quality standard items applied in their daily operations. For example, firm A described specific items of their quality standards, and stated that quality standards were the key point that ensured their product quality. In addition, firm B also described their detailed quality standard: “we have a very detailed quality performance evaluationand every process has evaluationand we also have target of product compliance for employeesif employees perform very well in the quality performance audits, we will reward them; conversely, they will receive certain penalties if their performance is poorif so, most of them pay more attention to product quality”. Furthermore, firm C also emphasized the necessity of quality standards for firm operation, and also listed the details of their quality performance evaluation: “Every process has their own product qualification rate and we record and summary each monthand we used incentive mechanism if employees exceed the specified product pass rate…”. In addition, firm D also believed quality performance evaluation was the key point in ensuring product quality.
Thus, based on the case interviews, we used a target product qualification rate, recording the frequency and incentive or mechanism for reaching the product qualification rate to measure the quality standard. The average of the three items was used to gauge the quality standard. An example of the questionnaire is shown in Appendix D.

3.4. Survey Administration

We conducted this experiment in November 2023 through an internet-based platform named SO JUMP (https://www.wjx.cn), and respondents completed the questionnaire with a survey link. Prior to the formal launch of the experiment, we conducted a pre-test aiming to estimate the time required to complete the questionnaire and rectify any design flaws. Based on the pre-tested questionnaire, it took 10–15 min to complete the survey, and there were no difficulties in comprehension when completing the survey.
We used random sampling selection. With the support of the Shaoxing General Chamber of Commerce, we randomly selected 10 Chinese business associations in different industries and invited their members to participate in the questionnaire. In the questionnaire, we first asked respondents to indicate their position and provide basic information about their companies to ensure that they were owners or top managers of SMEs, were all deeply involved in Chinese management, understood their firms’ current statements, and participated in the decision-making of Chinese SMEs. If members provided a valid questionnaire response, they received a gift, up until the point at which a sufficient number of questionnaires were received.
In total, we distributed 1000 questionnaires; 494 respondents completed the survey, and we double-checked the questionnaire answers and deleted 181 respondents when there were missing values, or respondents did not belong to a manufacturing company or were not SMEs. Ultimately, 313 surveys were used. The general characteristics of the samples are summarized in Table 2, and the regions of responders are summarized in Table 3.

3.5. Estimation of the Choice Model

In accordance with random utility theory, SMEs choose the alternative with the maximum utility among a series of choice sets. Typically, the utility (U) obtained by an SME consists of the observable deterministic term (V) and the unobservable stochastic term (ε). The utility functions of different pollution control equipment are as follows:
Umaterial1 = Vmateiral1 + εmaterial1 = ASCmatrial1 + βpr1Pprice + βtox1Ptox + βweak1Pweak + βrecy1Precy + βsew1Psew + βgas1Pgas + βtrainZtrain + βstandZstand + βtrtox1ZtrainPtox + βtrrecy1ZtrainPrecy + βtrsew1ZtrainPsew + βtrgas1ZtrainPgas + βsttox1ZstandPtox + βstrecy1ZstandPrecy + βstgas1ZstandPgas + βstsew1ZstandPsew + εmaterial1
Umaterial2 = Vmateiral2 + εmaterial2=ASCmaterial2 + βpr2Pprice + βtox2Ptox + βweak2Pweak + βrecy2Precy + βsew2Psew + βgas2Pgas + βtrainZtrain + βstandZstand + βtrtox2ZtrainPtox + βtrrecy2ZtrainPrecy + βtrsew2ZtrainPsew + βtrgas2ZtrainPgas + βsttox2ZstandPtox + βstrecy2ZstandPrecy + βstgas2ZstandPgas + βstsew2ZstandPsew + εmaterial2
Umaterial3 = Vmateiral3 + εmaterial3 = ASCmaterial3 + βpr3Pprice + βtox3Ptox + βweak3Pweak + βrecy3Precy + βsew3Psew+ βgas3Pgas + βtrainZtrain + βstandZstand + βtrtox3ZtrainPtox + βtrrecy3ZtrainPrecy + βtrsew3ZtrainPsew + βtrgas3ZtrainPgas + βsttox3ZstandPtox + βstrecy3ZstandPrecy + βstgas3ZstandPgas + βstsew3ZstandPsew + εmaterial3
UNopurchase = VNopurchase + εNopurchase = εNopurchase
Here, the observable deterministic term includes an alternative-specific constant (ASC), six attributes of materials (i.e., price (Pprice); toxicity reduction (Ptox); weakened performance (Pweak); recycling rate (Precy); sewage reduction (Psew) and gas reduction (Pgas), and two QM practice attributes including quality training (Ztrain) and quality standards (Zstand). In addition, as we postulate that the influence of QM practices (quality training and quality standards) alters the effect of environmental functionality (heavy metal toxicity reduction; weakened performance; recycling rate; sewage reduction, and gas reduction) on SMEs’ decision to utilize green materials, we include the impacts of the interaction terms of ZtrainPtox, ZtrainPrecy, ZtrainPsew, ZtrainPgas, ZstandPtox, ZstandPrecy, ZstandPgas, and ZstandPsew on the SMEs’ utility, and Table 4 shows the description of all variables in the utility functions.
We used a random parameter logit (RPL) with maximum likelihood estimation to analyze the data using Nlogit 6 [66,70]. We used 200 scrambled Halton sequences to estimate the models. The RPL followed random utility theory in that Chinese SMEs will choose alternatives with the maximum utility among a series of choice sets [70], and it considered heterogeneity in the preferences of Chinese SMEs, which can overcome the IIA property and reflect preference heterogeneity [66]. In the case of green material utilization, the probability (P) that an SME selects alternative (i) among four alternatives (j) (i.e., material 1, material 2, material 3, no purchase) is
P ( i ) = e v i j = 1 4 e v j f ( β / θ ) d θ
where f(β|θ) is the density function of β.

4. Empirical Results

Table 5 presents the estimation results. Model 1 captures the direct impact of green material attributes on the utilization decisions of Chinese SMEs. The results indicate that price has a non-significant effect on purchasing intention (β = 0.022, p > 0.05). On the other hand, all functional indicators have significant impacts. Specifically, heavy metal toxicity reduction (β = 0.016, p < 0.001) and recycling rate (β = 2.539, p < 0.001) both have positive effects. Additionally, sewage reduction (β = 0.225, p < 0.001) and waste gas reduction also positively influence green material utilization. Conversely, the impact of product performance has a negative effect (β = −0.241, p < 0.001). The results further show that quality training has a positive impact on green material utilization by Chinese SMEs (β = 2.056, p < 0.001), supporting H1. On the other hand, quality standards have a negative impact on green material utilization decisions (β = −1.533, p < 0.001), providing support for H2.
Model 2 to Model 5 reveal the moderating effects of quality training on the relationship between environmental functionality attributes and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs. Model 2 shows the positive moderating effect of quality training on the relationship between heavy metal toxicity reduction and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = 0.319, p < 0.01). In addition, Model 3 also shows the positive moderating effect of quality training on the relationship between the recycling rate and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = 0.324, p < 0.05). Furthermore, Model 4 shows that quality training has a non-significant moderating effect on the relationship between waste gas reduction and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = −0.022, p > 0.05). Moreover, Model 5 reveals the positive moderating effect of quality training on the relationship between sewage reduction and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = 3.718, p < 0.001). Thus, H3a, H3b, and H3d are supported. Model 6 to Model 9 reveal the moderating effects of quality standards on the relationship between different green material environmental attributes and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs. Model 6 shows the positive moderating effect of quality standards on the relationship between heavy metal toxicity reduction and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = 0.300, p < 0.01). In addition, Model 7 also shows that there is a positive moderating effect of quality standards on the relationship between recycling rate and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = 0.335, p < 0.01). Moreover, Model 8 shows the non-significant moderating effect of quality standards on the relationship between sewage reduction and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = −0.185, p > 0.05). Furthermore, Model 9 shows that there is a negative moderating effect of quality standards on the relationship between sewage reduction and green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (β = −2.915, p < 0.01). Thus, these findings support H4d, but not H4a, H4b, and H4c.
This study also conducted a robustness check by using the Monte Carlo sampling method. This is a random sampling method that selects samples by generating random numbers [66]. The results are presented in Table 6. The findings are consistent with the results reported in Table 5.

5. Discussion

This study determined that different soft QM practices play different roles in green material utilization in Chinese SMEs, and enhancing soft QM practices has an impact on the relationship between green material environmental factors and green material utilization. Specifically, quality training plays a positive role in green material utilization in Chinese SMEs (H1); this is consistent with the existing studies [71]. In addition, our results suggest that quality standards have a negative impact on green materials (H2), which confirms the findings of studies such as those by Zhou et al. [31] and Tseng et al. [61].
The results also show that quality standards enhance the impacts of heavy metal toxicity reduction and the recycling rate on green material utilization. This contradicts our hypothesis (H4a, H4b). This may be attributed to varying levels of customer sensitivity toward different attributes of green materials. With the growing awareness of environmental protection, Chinese consumers are gradually becoming more attentive to and accepting of green products. Among various aspects, the use of green materials has emerged as a particularly prominent area of consumer concern [26,30].
In recent years, the use of green materials has not only become a prevailing trend, but also gradually entered a phase of rapid growth [5,6]. To attract these customers, a large number of companies engage in greenwashing, using green claims as a means of marketing rather than demonstrating a true commitment to reducing environmental impact [42]. For example, Coca-Cola has been accused of greenwashing, as its claim that the bottles are “100% recyclable” may mislead consumers [72]. This is because most consumers’ attention to green materials is primarily directed toward environmental attributes that can be readily perceived [73], such as toxicity and the recycling rate. These two attributes are directly related to the customer’s experience. The higher level of perceived attributes of using green materials increases customer satisfaction, attracts new customers, keeps current customers, and further impacts Chinese SMEs’ brand reputation, market competitiveness, and even business performance [73]. This leads these companies to place a greater emphasis on heavy metal toxicity reduction and the recycling rate.
At the same time, higher quality standards can provide stronger assurance of the environmental attributes of heavy metal toxicity reduction and the recycling rate, thereby enhancing their appeal for consumers. The primary aim of quality standards is to ensure that employees’ work performance meets the organization’s quality objectives. Many specific practices associated with quality standards help Chinese SMEs minimize product quality uncertainties [62]. Quality standards involve regularly recording the latest product quality information and changes after utilizing green materials, allowing Chinese SMEs to promptly identify and address quality problems, thereby reducing quality uncertainty [74]. Additionally, quality standards include regular inspections of product quality, with rewards or penalties based on quality outcomes [13]. This approach motivates employees or puts pressure on them to maintain quality throughout the production process [75], enhancing the company’s overall quality performance and minimizing quality uncertainty. This assurance further supports Chinese SMEs in confidently utilizing green materials. With more effective quality standards in place, Chinese SMEs gain greater confidence in product quality and adopt a more positive attitude toward selecting green material attributes with higher levels of customer sensitivity, so as to attract and retain customers. On the other hand, many companies show little enthusiasm for environmental factors that do not directly appeal to customers, such as sewage reduction. Thus, as quality standards rise, customers tend to prioritize ensuring product quality over placing greater emphasis on issues such as sewage reduction (H4d).
Interestingly, there is an insignificant moderating effect of waste gas reduction on both quality training and quality standards’ influence on green material utilization in Chinese SMEs. The potential cause of the insignificant moderating effect may be because of the characteristics of waste gas. Much waste gas is invisible. In the production environment, Chinese SME employees, even top managers, often perceive pollution through sight, smell, or other senses. Because much waste gas is colorless and odorless, it is difficult for Chinese SMEs to notice waste gas reduction during production utilizing green materials, which leads to them being insensitive to the results. In addition, sewage needs to be collected before treatment, and sewage reduction during production is able to reduce the frequency of operation of sewage purification equipment, reducing the operation cost. On the other hand, the treatment and discharge of waste gas are both instantaneous and continuous, which is not the case for solid waste and sewage, which can be collected before treatment. Thus, waste gas reduction during production is unable to contribute to the operating cost of waste gas treatment equipment. Thus, these reasons cause both the insignificant moderating effect of waste gas reduction on quality training and quality standards’ influence on Chinese SME green material utilization. In addition, another possible explanation for the insignificant moderating effect lies in external factors, particularly institutional pressure. In China, the government places great emphasis on carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, and has imposed substantial regulatory pressure on enterprises to comply with environmental standards [76]. Many related policies have been implemented, including the establishment of the carbon trading market and carbon emission quota systems, which effectively place strict limits on corporate CO2 emissions [77]. In this context, regardless of whether a firm has implemented high-level QM practices, it must respond to external institutional pressures by actively controlling air pollutant emissions and reducing environmental pollution. As a result, companies generally place a high level of importance on the issue of reducing air pollution. This widespread external pressure may have led to the moderating effect of quality management practices becoming insignificant.

5.1. Research Implications

This study contributes to the green transformation literature in two ways. Firstly, the results reveal that the relationship between QM and green material utilization is contingent on the specific type of QM practices. Existing studies report inconclusive results on the relationship between QM and green material utilization. This study reveals that this is because different QM practices have different goals and areas of emphasis. Previous studies mainly identified soft QM as a single concept [9,24], but did not consider the complexity of soft QM. In addition, the impacts of green material utilization may vary with the different specific practices of soft QM. Thus, it is necessary for soft QM to be considered concretely and separately. In addition, we also explored the specific practices of soft QM that Chinese SMEs frequently utilize, which provides a comprehensive and deep understanding of soft QM in Chinese SMEs. Existing studies did not explore in detail the soft QM of Chinese SMEs. With the limitations and special characteristics of Chinese SMEs, the practices of Chinese SMEs may show some differences from larger enterprises [48]. Thus, identifying Chinese SMEs’ soft QM practices is also necessary for these studies. We found that only quality training encourages Chinese SMEs to utilize green materials, while quality performance evaluation places barriers to Chinese SMEs’ green material utilization. Therefore, this offers a potential cause of the mixed results regarding the relationship between QM and green transformation. This study provides new insights that allow a deeper understanding of the relationship between QM and green transformation.
Secondly, this study provides empirical evidence that both quality training and quality performance evaluation have different moderating effects on the relationship between different green materials’ environmental features and green material utilization. Previous studies did not focus on these aspects. This finding highlights the importance of the functions of different green materials, provides new insight into promoting Chinese SME green transformation, and suggests that researchers should consider the attributes of green transformation practices.

5.2. Managerial Implications

This study provides guidelines for Chinese SMEs to develop green transformation. We recommend that Chinese SMEs use their current soft QM practices to improve their green transformation. SMEs should be aware that some of their current soft QM practices can be barriers to adopting green materials. Chinese SMEs can improve their current soft QM practices to enhance willingness to utilize green materials. For example, they can place greater emphasis on environmental awareness in quality training, and they can design a special QM evaluation method for products with green materials. In addition, Chinese SMEs should also be aware that the function of green materials can moderate the impact of the influence of soft QM practices on green material utilization. Thus, we recommend that they consider the variety and function of green materials, and consider which part of the product to use green materials in and the impact they have on product quality.

6. Conclusions

In this study, we answered two research questions. For the first research question, we empirically explored the inter-relationship between soft QM and green material utilization. We found that quality training and quality standards have opposite effects on green material utilization. Specifically, we found that quality training has a positive effect, while quality standards have a negative effect, on the green material utilization of SMEs. For the second research question, we found that quality training positively moderates the relationship between two environmental features (heavy metal toxicity reduction and sewage reduction) and green material utilization. In addition, quality standards positively moderate the relationship between two environmental features (heavy metal toxicity reduction and recycling rate) and green material utilization, while they negatively moderate the relationship between sewage reduction and green material utilization.
This study still has some limitations, which provide ideas for future research. Firstly, we only focused on two soft QM practices, namely, quality training and quality standards. Existing studies have proven that other soft QM practices also have a close relationship with green transformation, such as top management leadership and employee involvement [13,78]. Therefore, in the future, we can explore the impacts of other soft QM practices on green material utilization. Secondly, although this study has provided a detailed description of the industry and the regional characteristics of the sample, it did not examine how these characteristics may influence the research results. In future studies, we will expand the scope of sample coverage by increasing the number of SMEs and covering different industries and regions to ensure the representativeness of the samples. We also plan to add industry and regional factors as variables to further analyze how the findings may vary across different contexts. Thirdly, the measurements of quality training and quality standards in this study were derived from four case studies, and remain relatively general. In future research, we plan to refine these measurement indicators by integrating insights from the existing literature and conducting interviews with a broader range of SMEs. This will help us develop a more precise measurement framework and improve the accuracy of the research findings. Lastly, we relied solely on quantitative methods to obtain results, which may pose certain limitations in terms of the depth of the discussion of the results. In the future, we could consider incorporating case studies to discuss the results, thereby enhancing the discussion and explanation of the findings and improving the explanatory power and credibility of the conclusions. Thus, exploring the impact of soft QM practices on various green transformation practices can be an interesting topic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.W., M.Z. and H.C.; Methodology, L.W., M.Z. and H.C.; Formal analysis, L.W. and M.Z.; Resources, M.Z. and T.T.; Data curation, L.W.; Writing–original draft, L.W., M.Z. and H.C.; Writing–review & editing, M.Z., H.C. and T.T.; Visualization, H.C.; Project administration, T.T.; Funding acquisition, H.C. and T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study is granted an ethical review exemption according to the ethical review policy of the University of Jinan. The research activity meets the criteria for exemption from formal ethical review. Specifically, the study constitutes low-risk social science research, involves voluntary participation by adult respondents, does not involve the collection of identifiable or sensitive personal data, and ensures full assurance of anonymity and confidentiality in data handling.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Description of the Cases

Description
Firm AFirm A’s main product is silicone, and its main market is China. Firm A’s annual sales are CNY 2,000,000, and it has 10 employees.
The main harmful substances during silicone production are dust in the cutting stage and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during the curing stage. The water used in the silicone production process is only for cooling the products and cleaning the molds. Firm A is equipped with activated carbon adsorption units and dust removal equipment. It also installed primary sedimentation tanks, which are essential sewage purification equipment.
Firm BFirm B’s main product is the circuit board; its main markets are Europe and China. Its annual sales are CNY 20,000,000, and it has 30 employees.
The main pollution is sewage, which contains various polluted substances such as heavy metals, acid and alkali sewage, organic pollutants, and suspended solid particles. Firm B has implemented activated carbon adsorption units. It also installed a comprehensive sewage control system, including primary sedimentation tanks, secondary biological treatment and tertiary treatment, and pollution discharge pipelines.
Firm CFirm C’s main product is electrical motors; its main markets are the Middle East and China. Its annual sales are CNY 60,000,000, and it has 80 employees.
Firm C has many large machines, most of which produce gaseous waste and a lot of noise during operation. For example, the shot blasting machine produces a lot of dust. The welding machine is necessary for production. However, it is malodorous and produces sulfide gas, greenhouse gas, and VOCs. Firm C has implemented dust removal equipment, desulfurization and denitrification equipment, and activated carbon adsorption units. Additionally, firm C installed solid pollutant collection equipment, such as scrap metal collection equipment, to sort and recycle scrap metal, and noise control equipment, such as silencers and sound barriers, to reduce the noise level.
Firm DFirm D’s main product is the rotor, and its main market is China. Its annual sales are CNY 30,000,000, and it has 25 employees.
The forging of rotors requires high temperatures and a significant amount of oil, and the production process generates a large amount of dust and oil mist. Firm D uses water for cooling, so the main components of the sewage are oil and dust. Firm D has implemented industrial oil mist purification equipment, dust removal equipment, and activated carbon adsorption units. Firm D also installed sewage purification equipment, which comprises primary sedimentation tanks.

Appendix B. Semi-Structured Interview Protocol

  • Please introduce your product, material using, market and supply chain.
  • Have you adopted green practices in your operation? if yes, could some example?
  • Have you adopted green materials? if yes, could you description the essential information and environmental functionality of green materials.
  • How do you make decision about green materials utilization? When you consider green materials utilization, which is the important factors for you when you consider the green materials utilization?
  • Could you describe the scenario in which you choose green materials?
  • Do you have quality trainings and quality standard in daily operation, if yes could described the details of quality trainings and quality standard?
  • Whether quality trainings have impact when you make decision about green materials utilization?
  • When you make decision about green materials utilization will you consider the quality standard?

Appendix C. Coding Scheme for Attributes

ItemsEvidence
PriceWhen we decided whether to select green materials, we need to consider its price, as we need to long-term use this material, which maybe significant impact of our cost
In fact if the price of green materials are much higher than tradition materials, we are unable to acceptbut there are limited difference, we are willing to utilize green materials”.
If we used green materials in some important partswe will think more about price difference between green materials and traditional materialsas it impacts our costeven relates to attract customersthat is why we focus on it”.
When we select materials, price is the most important partit relate to our cost and product priceif price is highit is difficult to attract customereven it is green materials”.
Weakened product per-formanceComparing with traditional rubberSilicone also have good durabilityso it does not weak our product performance
Some traditional materials have good improvement effectfor example, normally, we used Polyvinyl Chlo-ride (PVC) casing and fiberglass with halogenwhich has Good fire resistanceif we used green materials which does not have halogenits performance of fire resistance will become weakerso we need to consid-er
Now we used Eco-friendly solders, it is difficult to weld, and it also weaken our product performance such as rotational speedit is troubling to us
We tend to utilize green material cautiously, especially in some core partas we dont know how its impact product performanceit is the essential factors of attracting customers…”
Heavy metal toxicity re-ductionMany materials contain heavy metals, such as welding rods, in order to achieve better performancebut heavy metals enter the environment through various waste gases and wastewater during manufacturing processcause environment pollution and harm body
We need to use a solderand employeesskin always touch itmany heavy metals can be absorbed into the skinharm health
We used a large number of paintsif will be absorbed into the body when we use itin addition, when paints are weariedwhen paint is frayed or chippedit also has possibility to take toxicity
Recycling rateRecycle rate is a critical attributes when we select materialsespecially packaging materialsit related to circular economy and pollution
We select silicone can be recycled easilyunlike rubberwe can recycle old products with silicone and renew or remanufacturing itit can reduce our costwe also have services to recycle silicone
Now we prefer select package materials which can be recycled easilyfor examplewe limited to use sin-gle-use plastic bags to package productsand we prefer to use cartoncan reduce waste”.
All of our package are easily to be recycled and reusedsuch as cardboard box package, and plastic turn over boxreduce waste and pollution
If customer is closed to our firm and we frequently send product to themwe tend to select turn over box although it is plasticwe can 100% recycle these boxes which will not cause waste and solid pollution caused by non-degradable plastics”.
Sewage re-ductionOur sewage mainly comes from washing and spitting processesso we used environmentally friendly silicone surface treatment adhesive for reduce organic matter in sewage”.
Our main pollution is sewage, so our most green materials utilization aims to reduce sewage. For example, one aim we selected environmentally friendly solder and heavy metal free PCB ink is to avoid produce sewage with heavy metal after following cleaning process. In addition, we used halogen-free solvent as we want to reduce halogenated organic pollutants in sewage”.
We use clean paints and cleaning agents because they come into contact with water and can easily cause water pollution
We used a pickling agent which has less impact on environment and not be harmful to personal health such as oxalic acid to replace traditional cleaning agent such as vitriol. as we have a great number of sewages during manufacturing processpickling agent can reduce sewage
Waste gas reductionTraditional silicone surface treatment adhesive produces a great number of waste gas, and the main pollutant in waste gas is VOCsthus, now we utilized green silicone surface treatment adhesive which is low or no VOC solventsit can reduce air pollution
We have a large number of welding processesso there are a lot of waste gas produced during welding processesand it contains heavy metal particles”.
Traditional paints have pungent smelland it has various Chemical substance such as formaldehydenot only harm body healthbut also cause air pollution”.
Paints cause serious air pollutionand environmentally friendly paints can reduce the air pollution causedas they limit pollutant content including VOCs, particulate matter, heavy metal particles…”
We pay attention to air pollution, and our main source of air pollution is paints… so we selected environ-mental friendly paintsthey does not contain a lot of pollutant

Appendix D. A Version of the Questionnaire

Table A1. Choice card.
Table A1. Choice card.
Green Material AttributesGreen Material 1Green Material 2Green Material 3
Price1258
Weaken performanceNegativeNoNo
Toxicity of heavy metal reductionLowHighMedium
Recycle rate70%50%100%
Sewage reductionHighMediumLow
Waste gas reductionLowHighMedium
Please choose the one you are most satisfied with
Questions to measure quality training and quality standard
Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following statements
1.
What is the company’s target pass rate?
(1) Below 80% (2) 80–85% (3) 85–90% (4) 90–95% (5) Above 95%
2.
How frequently does the company record defect rates?
(1) Very rarely (2) Relatively rarely (3) Sometimes (4) Relatively frequently (5) Very frequently
3.
What is the severity of penalties for not meeting defective product targets?
(1) Very light (2) Relatively light (3) Moderate (4) Relatively severe (5) Very severe
4.
How much emphasis does the company place on operational skills training for general employees?
(1) Very negligent (2) Relatively negligent (3) Neutral (4) Relatively focused (5) Very focused
5.
How much emphasis does the company place on quality supervision training for supervisors?
(1) Very negligent (2) Relatively negligent (3) Neutral (4) Relatively focused (5) Very focused
6.
How much emphasis does the company place on quality philosophy training for all employees?
(1) Very negligent (2) Relatively negligent (3) Neutral (4) Relatively focused (5) Very focused
7.
How much emphasis does the company place on training employees’ ability to solve production problems?
(1) Very negligent (2) Relatively negligent (3) Neutral (4) Relatively focused (5) Very focused
8.
How much emphasis does the company place on training employees’ skills to reduce material waste?
(1) Very negligent (2) Relatively negligent (3) Neutral (4) Relatively focused (5) Very focused

References

  1. Cheng, L.; Wu, L. Firms’ Position in the Supply Chain Network, R&D Input, and Innovation Output: Striving for the Top or Settling in the Corner? Implications for Sustainable Growth and Adaptive Capacity. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kiani, A.; Bullini Orlandi, L.; Chen, Q. Greening the path to disruptive innovation: The roles of CEOs characteristics, green organizational identity, and green product competitiveness. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2024, 33, 6139–6155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Čater, T.; Čater, B. Product and relationship quality influence on customer commitment and loyalty in B2B manufacturing relationships. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2010, 39, 1321–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, J.; Liu, L. Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: The mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 119, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Duan, F.; Yang, F.; Mu, B.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, A. Production of functional materials from clay minerals and plants for natural resource utilization and sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 474, 143586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saleh, T.A. Protocols for synthesis of nanomaterials, polymers, and green materials as adsorbents for water treatment technologies. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 101821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dicker, M.P.; Duckworth, P.F.; Baker, A.B.; Francois, G.; Hazzard, M.K.; Weaver, P.M. Green composites: A review of material attributes and complementary applications. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 56, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sapuan, S.M.; Mansor, M.R. Design for Sustainability: Green Materials and Processes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherland, 2021; pp. 57–80. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zeng, J.; Phan, C.A.; Matsui, Y. The impact of hard and soft quality management on quality and innovation performance: An empirical study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 162, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Addis, S. An exploration of quality management practices in the manufacturing industry of Ethiopia. TQM J. 2020, 32, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lim, W.M.; Ciasullo, M.V.; Douglas, A.; Kumar, S. Environmental social governance (ESG) and total quality management (TQM): A multi-study meta-systematic review. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2022; ahead-of-print. 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Makhlouf, H.; Chatti, N.; Lakhal, L. The impact of TQM and green innovation on corporate sustainability: The mediating role of green supply chain management. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2023, 40, 2592–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abbas, J. Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ali, K.; Johl, S.K.; Muneer, A.; Alwadain, A.; Ali, R.F. Soft and hard total quality management practices promote industry 4.0 readiness: A SEM-neural network approach. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wilkinson, A. The other side of quality: ‘soft’ issues and the human resource dimension. Total Qual. Manag. 1992, 3, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Babatunde, O.K. Mapping the implications and competencies for Industry 4.0 to hard and soft total quality management. TQM J. 2021, 33, 896–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, J.K. Identifying critical success factors of total quality management via comprehensive assessment of soft and hard factors. TQM J. 2024, 36, 679–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L.J.; Barrales-Molina, V.; Kaynak, H. The role of human resource-related quality management practices in new product development: A dynamic capability perspective. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2018, 38, 43–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. El Manzani, Y.; El Idrissi, M.; Chouchane, R.; Sony, M.; Antony, J. A meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Prod. Plan. Control. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Dhaafri, H.S.; Al-Swidi, A.K.; Yusoff, R.Z.B. The mediating role of total quality management between the entrepreneurial orientation and the organizational performance. TQM J. 2016, 28, 89–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, S.A.R.; Yu, Z.; Farooq, K. Green capabilities, green purchasing, and triple bottom line performance: Leading toward environmental sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 2022–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hadjadj, R.; Deák, C.; Palotás, Á.B.; Mizsey, P.; Viskolcz, B. Renewable energy and raw materials–The thermodynamic support. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kazancoglu, I.; Kazancoglu, Y.; Yarimoglu, E.; Kahraman, A. A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 1477–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Escrig-Tena, A.B.; Segarra-Ciprés, M.; García-Juan, B.; Beltrán-Martín, I. The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 200, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dangelico, R.M. Green product innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2016, 25, 560–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hallam, C.; Contreras, C. Integrating lean and green management. Manag. Decis. 2016, 54, 2157–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Glew, D.; Stringer, L.C.; Acquaye, A.A.; McQueen-Mason, S. How do end of life scenarios influence the environmental impact of product supply chains? Comparing biomaterial and petrochemical products. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 29, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kabir, E.; Kaur, R.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.H.; Kwon, E.E. Prospects of biopolymer technology as an alternative option for non-degradable plastics and sustainable management of plastic wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dangelico, R.M.; Pontrandolfo, P. From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 1608–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tanksale, A.N.; Das, D.; Verma, P.; Tiwari, M.K. Unpacking the role of primary packaging material in designing green supply chains: An integrated approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 236, 108133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, C.; Qi, S.; Li, Y. Environmental policy uncertainty and green transformation dilemma of Chinese enterprises. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gursel, A.P.; Maryman, H.; Ostertag, C. A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of “green” concrete mixes with rice husk ash. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 823–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hong, Z.; Guo, X. Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega 2019, 83, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Naqi, A.; Jang, J.G. Recent progress in green cement technology utilizing low-carbon emission fuels and raw materials: A review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aftab, J.; Abid, N.; Cucari, N.; Savastano, M. Green human resource management and environmental performance: The role of green innovation and environmental strategy in a developing country. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 1782–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tansel, B. Increasing gaps between materials demand and materials recycling rates: A historical perspective for evolution of consumer products and waste quantities. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 276, 111196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rustam, A.; Wang, Y.; Zameer, H. Environmental awareness, firm sustainability exposure and green consumption behaviors. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 122016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, Y.C.; Chen, C.T. Institutional pressure, firm’s green resources and green product innovation: Evidence from Taiwan’s electrical and electronics sector. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2023, 26, 636–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Flynn, B.B.; Schroeder, R.G.; Sakakibara, S. A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. J. Oper. Manag. 1994, 11, 339–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lameijer, B.A.; Boer, H.; Antony, J.; Does, R.J.M.M. Continuous improvement implementation models: A reconciliation and holistic metamodel. Prod. Plan. Control 2023, 34, 1062–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Phan, A.C.; Nguyen, H.A.; Trieu, P.D.; Nguyen, H.T.; Matsui, Y. Impact of supply chain quality management practices on operational performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing companies in Vietnam. Supply Chain. Manag. An. Int. J. 2019, 24, 855–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pimonenko, T.; Bilan, Y.; Horák, J.; Starchenko, L.; Gajda, W. Green brand of companies and greenwashing under sustainable development goals. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. El Manzani, Y.; El Idrissi, M.; Lissaneddine, Z. Soft quality management practices and product innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of market orientation ambidexterity. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2023, 26, 1333–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zeng, J.; Zhang, W.; Matsui, Y.; Zhao, X. The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 185, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rahman, S.U.; Bullock, P. Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organizational performance relationships: An empirical investigation. Omega 2005, 33, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Carnerud, D.; Mårtensson, A.; Ahlin, K.; Slumpi, T.P. On the inclusion of sustainability and digitalization in quality management–an overview from past to present. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2025, 36, 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fok, L.; Morgan, Y.C.; Zee, S.; Mock, V.E. The impact of organizational culture and total quality management on the relationship between green practices and sustainability performance. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2023, 40, 1564–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Georgiev, S.; Ohtaki, S. Critical success factors for TQM implementation among manufacturing SMEs: Evidence from Japan. Benchmarking An. Int. J. 2020, 27, 473–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Teoman, S.; Ulengin, F. The impact of management leadership on quality performance throughout a supply chain: An empirical study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2018, 29, 1427–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Valmohammadi, C.; Roshanzamir, S. The guidelines of improvement: Relations among organizational culture, TQM and performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 164, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gadenne, D.; Sharma, B. An investigation of the hard and soft quality management factors of Australian SMEs and their association with firm performance. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2009, 26, 865–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ghobadian, A.; Gallear, D.N. Total quality management in SMEs. Omega 1996, 24, 83–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, C.C. The effectiveness analysis of the practices in five quality management stages for SMEs. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2020, 31, 955–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sadikoglu, E.; Zehir, C. Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2010, 127, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shahzad, M.; Qu, Y.; Zafar, A.U.; Appolloni, A. Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 4206–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, M.; Liu, Q.; Yu, J.; Liu, M. Study on the Influencing Factors of Green Quality Management System in Manufacturing Enterprises. Ind. Eng. Innov. Manag. 2023, 6, 59–65. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wei, L.Q.; Liu, J.; Herndon, N.C. SHRM and product innovation: Testing the moderating effects of organizational culture and structure in Chinese firms. Int. J. Human. Resour. Manag. 2011, 22, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tuan, L.T. Fostering green product innovation through green entrepreneurial orientation: The roles of employee green creativity, green role identity, and organizational transactive memory system. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 639–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Singh, R.K.; Kumar Mangla, S.; Bhatia, M.S.; Luthra, S. Integration of green and lean practices for sustainable business management. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 353–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Iwao, S.; Marinov, M. Linking continuous improvement to manufacturing performance. Benchmarking An. Int. J. 2018, 25, 1319–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tseng, M.L.; Wang, R.; Chiu, A.S.; Geng, Y.; Lin, Y.H. Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 40, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Iqbal, A.; Asrar-ul-Haq, M. Establishing relationship between TQM practices and employee performance: The mediating role of change readiness. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 203, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abdullah, M.; Zailani, S.; Iranmanesh, M.; Jayaraman, K. Barriers to green innovation initiatives among manufacturers: The Malaysian case. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2016, 10, 683–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Geng, Y. Green supply chain management in China: Pressures, practices and performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2005, 25, 449–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Song, M.; Wang, S. Market competition, green technology progress and comparative advantages in China. Manag. Decis. 2018, 56, 188–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hensher, D.A.; Johnson, L.W. Applied Discrete-Choice Modelling; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2018; pp. 23–60. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hensher, D.A.; Rose, J.; Greene, W.H. The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes. Transportation 2005, 32, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Victorino, L.; Verma, R.; Plaschka, G.; Dev, C. Service innovation and customer choices in the hospitality industry. Manag. Serv. Qual. An. Int. J. 2005, 15, 555–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018; pp. 181–257. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lehmann, N.; Sloot, D.; Ardone, A.; Fichtner, W. The limited potential of regional electricity marketing–Results from two discrete choice experiments in Germany. Energy Econ. 2021, 100, 105351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hassan, A.S.; Jaaron, A.A. Total quality management for enhancing organizational performance: The mediating role of green manufacturing practices. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 308, 127366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Coca-Cola and Nestle Accused of Misleading Eco Claims. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67343893 (accessed on 7 November 2023).
  73. Keiningham, T.; Aksoy, L.; Bruce, H.L.; Cadet, F.; Clennell, N.; Hodgkinson, I.R.; Kearney, T. Customer experience driven business model innovation. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gunasekaran, A.; Subramanian, N.; Ngai, W.T.E. Quality management in the 21st century enterprises: Research pathway towards Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 207, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Prajogo, D.; Toy, J.; Bhattacharya, A.; Oke, A.; Cheng, T.C.E. The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 199, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wei, Y.M.; Chen, K.; Kang, J.N.; Chen, W.; Wang, X.Y.; Zhang, X. Policy and management of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality: A literature review. Engineering 2022, 14, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. An, Q.; Zhu, K.; Xiong, B.; Shen, Z. Carbon resource reallocation with emission quota in carbon emission trading system. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 327, 116837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Graham, S.; Cadden, T.; Treacy, R. Examining the influence of employee engagement in supporting the implementation of green supply chain management practices: A green human resource management perspective. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 4750–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research framework.
Figure 1. Research framework.
Sustainability 17 03688 g001
Table 1. Green material attributes and levels.
Table 1. Green material attributes and levels.
AttributeNo. of LevelsLevels
Price35, 8, 10 (CNY 10,000)
Weakened performance3Positive, None, Negative
Heavy metal toxicity reduction3Low, Medium, High
Recycling rate350%, 70%, 100%
Sewage reduction3Low, Medium, High
Waste gas reduction3Low, Medium, High
Table 2. Firm characteristics.
Table 2. Firm characteristics.
Firm Characteristics FrequencyPercentage
Annual sales (CNY)Less than 10 million4012.88%
10–50 million13342.39%
50–100 million9730.99%
More than 100 million4313.74%
Number of employeesLess than 50 employees319.92%
50–100 employees13422.04%
100–150 employees5517.57%
150–200 employees6520.76%
200–250 employees9229.71%
The ratio of foreign customersLower than 10%11637.06%
10–20%9129.07%
20–30%6621.09%
30–40%288.95%
More than 40%123.83%
IndustryElectronic and electrical7624.29%
Mechanical manufacturing7523.96%
Food185.75%
Raw material manufacturing278.63%
Textile216.71%
Auto247.67%
Chemical engineering216.71%
Medical185.74%
Home decoration3310.54%
Table 3. Regions of responders.
Table 3. Regions of responders.
ProvinceNumber of SurveysPercentage
Zhejiang3812.15%
Guangdong3611.50%
Shanghai257.99%
Beijing247.67%
Jiangsu196.07%
Hebei185.75%
Henan175.43%
Sichuan175.43%
Hubei154.79%
Anhui144.47%
Guangxi144.47%
Shandong144.47%
Hunan134.15%
Fujian103.19%
Shaanxi103.19%
Liaoning82.56%
Chongqing82.56%
Heilongjiang20.64%
Jilin20.64%
Neimenggu20.64%
Shanxi20.64%
Yunnan20.64%
Jiangxi10.32%
Qinghai10.32%
Tianjin10.32%
Table 4. Description of variables in the utility functions.
Table 4. Description of variables in the utility functions.
VariableExplanationCoefficient
PpriceMaterial attribute: priceβpr1, βpr2, βpr3
PtoxMaterial attribute: heavy metal toxicity reductionβtox1, βtox2, βtox3
PweakMaterial attribute: weakened performanceβweak1, βweak2, βweak3
PrecyMaterial attribute: recycling rateβrecy1, βrecy2, βrecy3
PsewMaterial attribute: sewage reductionβsew1, βsew2, βsew3
PgasMaterial attribute: gaseous waste reductionβgas1, βgas2, βgas3
ZtrainQuality management attribute: quality trainingβtrain
ZstandQuality management attribute: quality standardsβstand
ZtrainPtoxInteraction term between quality training and heavy metal toxicity reductionβtrtox1, βtrtox2, βtrtox3
ZtrainPrecyInteraction term between quality training and recycling rateβtrrecy1, βtrrecy2, βtrrecy3
ZtrainPsewInteraction term between quality training and sewage reductionβtrsew1, βtrsew2, βtrsew3
ZtrainPgasInteraction term between quality training and waste gas reductionβtrgas1, βtrgas2, βtrgas3
ZstandPtoxInteraction term between quality standards and heavy metal toxicity reductionβsttox1, βsttox2, βsttox2
ZstandPrecyInteraction term between quality standards and recycling rateβstrecy1, βstrecy2, βstrecy3
ZstandPsewInteraction term between quality standards and sewage reductionβstsew1, βstsew2, βstsew3
ZstandPgasInteraction term between quality standards and waste gas reductionβstgas1, βstgas2, βstgas3
Table 5. Results of hypothesis testing.
Table 5. Results of hypothesis testing.
AttributesModel 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6Model 7Model 8Model 9
Price0.0220.0300.0170.0220.0720.0270.0170.0250.043
Weakened performance–0.292 ***−0.319 ***−0.296 ***−0.292 ***−2.187 **−0.313 ***−0.294 ***−0.304 ***−1.816 ***
Heavy metal toxicity reduction0.224 ***−1.005 *0.212 ***0.225 ***1.154 **−0.950 *0.210 ***0.246 **0.963 **
Recycling rate2.749 ***2.946 ***1.481 **2.759 ***14.67 ***2.910 ***1.407 **2.916 ***12.96 ***
Sewage reduction0.262 ***0.270 ***0.258 ***−0.263 ***−12.964 ***0.273 ***0.257 ***0.286 ***13.409 ***
Waste gas reduction0.368 ***0.389 ***0.358 ***0.4582.033.0.389 ***0.360 ***1.1231.944 ***
Quality training2.056 ***2.135 ***1.997 ***2.069 ***15.377 **2.110 ***1.949 ***2.21613.083 ***
Quality standards−1.533 ***−1.598 ***−1.489 ***−1.542 ***−11.347 **−1.582 ***−1.456 ***−1.652−9.733 ***
Quality training * heavy metal toxicity reduction 0.319 **
Quality training * recycling rate 0.324 *
Quality training * waste gas reduction −0.022
Quality training * sewage reduction 3.718 ***
Quality standards * heavy metal toxicity reduction 0.300 ***
Quality standards * recycling rate 0.335 **
Quality standards * waste gas reduction −0.185
Quality standards * sewage reduction −2.915 ***
Log-likelihood−1031.125−1025.217−1016.438−1025.263−1016.835−1028.753−1027.552−1030.585−1013.320
p > 0.05 non-significant. p < 0.05 *. p < 0.01 **. p < 0.001 ***.
Table 6. Robustness check.
Table 6. Robustness check.
AttributesModel 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6Model 7Model 8Model 9
Price0.0250.0290.0200.0240.0480.0260.0190.0270.043
Weakened performance−0.306 ***−0.305 ***−0.302 ***−0.296 ***−1.099 **−0.300 ***−0.300 ***−0.304 ***−1.271 ***
Heavy metal toxicity reduction0.221 ***−0.781 *0.205 ***0.216 ***0.551 **−0.7190.202 ***0.234 ***0.733 ***
Recycling rate2.776 ***2.887 ***1.428 ***2.767 ***7.924 ***2.853 ***1.361 **2.909 ***9.434 **
Sewage reduction0.261 ***0.263 ***0.252 ***0.254 ***−6.672 **0.265 ***0.251 ***0.276 ***9.271
Waste gas reduction0.366 ***0.381 ***0.356 ***0.2951.058 ***0.381 ***0.358 ***1.046 ***1.343 ***
Quality training2.264 ***2.007 ***2.011 ***2.032 ***6.669 **1.988 ***1.971 ***2.155 ***9.528 *
Quality standards−1.687 ***−1.501 ***−1.498 ***−1.514 ***−4.987 **−1.489 ***−1.472 ***−1.604−6.989 ***
Quality training * heavy metal toxicity reduction 0.257 **
Quality training * recycling rate 0.345 **
Quality training * waste gas reduction 0.017
Quality training * sewage reduction 1.905 **
Quality standards * heavy metal toxicity reduction 0.236 **
Quality standards * recycling rate 0.355 ***
Quality standards * waste gas reduction −0.167
Quality standards * sewage reduction −2.029 ***
Log-likelihood−1028.139−1031.203−1029.280−1032.869−1019.350−1031.456−1028.963−1032.425−1024.033
p > 0.05 non-significant. p < 0.05 *. p < 0.01 **. p < 0.001 ***.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Zhang, M.; Cao, H.; Teng, T. The Impacts of Quality Management on Green Material Utilization: A Small- and Medium-Sized Chinese Enterprises’ Perspective. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083688

AMA Style

Wang L, Zhang M, Cao H, Teng T. The Impacts of Quality Management on Green Material Utilization: A Small- and Medium-Sized Chinese Enterprises’ Perspective. Sustainability. 2025; 17(8):3688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083688

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Liecheng, Min Zhang, Hongwei Cao, and Teng Teng. 2025. "The Impacts of Quality Management on Green Material Utilization: A Small- and Medium-Sized Chinese Enterprises’ Perspective" Sustainability 17, no. 8: 3688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083688

APA Style

Wang, L., Zhang, M., Cao, H., & Teng, T. (2025). The Impacts of Quality Management on Green Material Utilization: A Small- and Medium-Sized Chinese Enterprises’ Perspective. Sustainability, 17(8), 3688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083688

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop