Next Article in Journal
Biochar-Enhanced Nitrogen Removal in SBBR Under PFOA Stress: The Role of Quorum Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Green Credit Policy, Analyst Attention, and Corporate Green Innovation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Industrial Heat Island Effects and Key Influencing Factors in the Guangzhou–Foshan Metropolitan Area

Changwang School of Honors, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(8), 3363; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083363
Submission received: 5 March 2025 / Revised: 3 April 2025 / Accepted: 4 April 2025 / Published: 9 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)

Abstract

:
Industrial parks are key contributors to localized urban heat intensification, forming sub-industrial heat islands (IHIs) that influence the urban thermal environment. This study investigates the industrial heat island effect (IHIE) in the Guangzhou–Foshan metropolitan area (GFMA), with a generalized additive model (GAM) to explore the influence of park spatial patterns and land cover characteristics, using indicators such as industrial heat island intensity (IHII), industry warming area (IWA), industry warming efficiency (IWE), and industry warming gradient (IWG). The results show that (1) industrial land significantly contributes to industrial heat islands (IHIs), with heat extending up to 200 m into surrounding areas. (2) IHIE intensity varies notably across park types, with each dominated by different factors: manufacturing parks by landscape shape index (LSI); comprehensive parks by impervious surfaces (IWS) and internal building land (IB); and special parks primarily by IB. (3) In most industrial parks, park area (S), IWS, and LSI are the key factors affecting IHIE. As IWS increases, IHIE strengthens, though this trend can be mitigated by expanding park area. Conversely, a higher LSI weakens IHIE. (4) Several variables, including arable land (AL) and water body (WB), exhibited nonlinear or threshold effects, suggesting that IHIE is shaped by complex mechanisms. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing land use in urban and industrial planning to reduce IHIE and promote sustainable urban development.

1. Introduction

The urban heat island (UHI) effect, defined as a human-induced urban climate phenomenon characterized by higher temperatures in urban areas than in their rural surroundings [1], has intensified under rapid urbanization and industrialization since the beginning of the 21st century [2,3,4]. Recently, the increase in urban heat island intensity (UHII) and extreme high temperature events worldwide have not only altered local climates and air quality but also adversely affected public health, increasing both morbidity and mortality rates [5,6,7,8]. Consequently, understanding the driving factors behind the UHI effect and developing effective mitigation strategies are critical for sustainable urban development.
Existing research has demonstrated that UHI is closely related to surface biophysical composition and configuration [9,10,11], local climate background [12], and socio-economic driving factors [13,14]. These studies have significantly improved our understanding of the physical mechanism behind UHI formation and evolution, particularly the close relationship between UHII and the distribution of land cover types, a connection that is well documented and widely recognized in the literature. However, as cities expand, the intensity distribution of UHI becomes more heterogeneous, particularly in urban agglomerations where individual heat islands merge to form regional heat clusters [15,16,17]. While these studies have improved our understanding of UHI dynamics and mitigation, they often overlook the contribution of industrial zones, despite their potential to create localized “industrial heat islands” [18,19]. In contrast to the well-studied “cold islands” such as green spaces and water bodies [20,21,22], these high-temperature zones have received limited attention, despite their significances in understanding UHI influencing factors and formulating mitigation measures.
Anthropogenic heat emissions from industry, transportation, and construction are key contributors to UHI [23,24,25]. It is also well known that industrial areas, especially those with high industrial density and complex land use patterns, can intensify local warming, adversely affecting labor productivity, public health, and economic stability [26,27]. Some research has addressed the presence of IHIs and examined factors such as industrial type and park size [8,26,28,29], but these studies have mainly focused on industrial or resource-based cities and have largely neglected urban agglomerations. As a result, the role of industrial land use in shaping the spatial and temporal evolution of UHIs at a finer scale remains poorly understood.
The Guangzhou–Foshan region, located in the core of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in Guangdong Province, China, provides an ideal setting to address this knowledge gap. This area, with its subtropical climate, is particularly vulnerable to heatwaves intensified by global warming and urbanization [30]. At the same time, Guangdong is a major industrial hub with a large number of industrial parks. Since the 2000s, industrial relocation and upgrading policies have led to a redistribution of industrial activities from central urban areas to peripheral zones [31,32]. These shifts significantly influence urban thermal landscapes, resulting in more pronounced internal differentiation of UHIs and the emergence of extremely high-temperature zones. Although previous studies have examined land use change, urban expansion, and economic development in the PRD’s UHI patterns, they often treated UHIs at a macro-scale, neglecting the micro-scale patterns of industrial land-induced thermal anomalies [16,33,34,35,36]. This omission hampers a detailed understanding of urban internal thermal heterogeneity and constrains the formulation of targeted UHI mitigation measures.
To address these gaps, this study focuses on Guangzhou–Foshan region and investigates the formation and influencing factors of IHIs. Specifically, we examine how industrial park configurations (via landscape metrics), land cover characteristics inside and around these parks, and different industrial park types affect the intensity and spatial distribution of IHIs. By elucidating these relationships, our research aims to enhance the understanding of how industrial land use influences urban thermal environments, thereby providing valuable insights for industrial land planning, environmental management, and the development of effective UHI mitigation strategies in rapidly urbanizing regions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Pearl River Delta Metropolitan Region (PRDMR) and its adjacent areas are located in the coastal region of South China, which exhibits a subtropical monsoon climate. It is warm and humid all year round, with an average annual temperature of 20–24 °C (http://ncc-cma.net/cn). With its comfortable and pleasant climate and unique geographical location, since the “Reform and Opening-up” policy in 1978, PRDMR has played a leading role in China’s economic and social development and developed into one of the most economically advanced regions in China and the most densely populated area globally [16,17,37]. In 2015, the China State Council in its 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development strategically initiated the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area, with emphasis on strengthening its role in economic development [38]. PRDMR has rapid economic growth, and is a new processing industry base in China, with a large number of electronic manufacturing and assembly factories. The region is expected to evolve into a more developed urban agglomeration, possibly leading to more complex IHIE characteristics. Our study area includes Guangzhou and Foshan, which is the core area of the PRD (Figure 1).
Guangzhou is located on the northern edge of the PRD and near the estuary of the lower Pearl River Basin. As the capital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou has long been a central hub for politics, economics, culture, and education in South China. Foshan is a typical transitional manufacturing city once known as the “world factory” in the developed southern coastal region of China, with an administrative area of 3797 km2 and a population of approximately 9 million [39].
The Guangzhou–Foshan metropolitan area (GFMA) is a core development circle of the PRDMR. The two regions are geographically close, share common roots, and have strong economic ties, making the development of the GFMA closely related to the overall growth of the PRDMR [40]. With the rapid development of industry and urbanization, some environmental problems have emerged in PRDMR, and the UHI effect is one of them [33,41]. Therefore, this study selected GFMA as a typical representative of PRDMR to analyze the influencing factors and mechanisms of IHIE.

2.2. Data Source

Four main datasets were used in this study: land surface temperature (LST) data, land use and land cover data, building rooftop area data, and industrial park boundary data.
We obtained 30 m resolution Landsat Level 2 LST data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Explorer platform (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 16 January 2022)). The data were acquired on 22 October 2020 (path 122, row 44), covering the Guangdong Province region. Landsat-based LST is considered high-quality and is widely used for urban heat studies [17,42].
We utilized the annual China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) created by [43] (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4417810 (accessed on 17 January 2022)), which has a 30 m spatial resolution and provides land cover information from 1990 to 2020. CLCD was generated using multi-temporal training samples, Landsat-based temporal metrics, and a random forest classifier. Validation against independent test sets indicated an accuracy of 79.31%, outperforming other similar products (MCD12Q1, ESACCI_LC, FROM_GLC, and GlobeLand30). After comparing the CLCD dataset with high-resolution Google Maps imagery to verify data accuracy, we classified the land use and cover (LUC) in the study area into five categories: farmland, vegetation (including forest and grass), water, impervious surface, and bare land.
Data on building rooftop areas were obtained from the China Building Roof Area Dataset (CBRA), a 2.5 m resolution dataset produced by [44] using Sentinel-2 images from 2016 to 2021. CBRA is the first full-coverage, multi-annual BRA dataset for China. By employing advanced training-sample-generation algorithms and spatiotemporally aware learning strategies, CBRA achieved an F1 score of 62.55% (improving by 10.61% compared to previous BRA data) based on 250,000 urban samples and a recall of 78.94% based on 30,000 rural samples.
Industrial park boundaries were manually delineated from Google Maps satellite imagery, supplemented by expert knowledge. To ensure reliability and representativeness, we selected industrial parks meeting the following criteria: (1) an area > 60,000 m2; (2) internal green space proportion ≤ 50%; and (3) buildings coverage ≥ 20%. After screening, 94 industrial parks were retained (Figure A1). These parks represent various types, including heavy industrial, light industrial, innovative industrial parks, and so on. Considering that industrial parks differ widely in industrial structure, environmental impact, and management modes [19], we applied a more nuanced classification scheme: a function-oriented classification reflecting building type and park function, categorizing parks into Manufacturing Industrial Parks, Logistics and Trade Industrial Parks, Comprehensive Industrial Parks, and Specialized Industrial Parks (Table A1).

2.3. Methods

The integrated datasets in Section 2.2 form the foundation for analyzing industrial heat islands and understanding how land cover composition, building density, and park typologies contribute to urban thermal patterns. After calculating the IHIE indices (IHII, IWA, IWE, and IWG), park pattern indices, and different land cover areas and proportions, we used GAM to develop a framework to examine the mathematical interactions among key drivers (Figure 2). These methods provide a solid foundation for understanding the factors that influence IHIE. The following section outlines the methodologies used in this study.

2.3.1. Classification of Urban Surface Thermal Environment

To characterize anomalous thermal conditions in the city, we applied a classification approach following [45], incorporating two statistical metrics: mean surface temperature and temperature standard deviation [9,46]. Based on these metrics, LST was classified into five categories: L1 (extremely low), L2 (low), L3 (normal), L4 (high), and L5 (extremely high) (Table 1), enabling intuitive identification of urban hotspots and their overlap with industrial parks.

2.3.2. Quantifying the Industrial Heat Islands (IHIs) Effect

The selection of appropriate indicators is crucial for quantifying the IHIE of industrial parks. To achieve this, a 3600 m wide buffer zone was established around each industrial park and subdivided into 60 segments, each 60 m wide. The average LST of each buffer zone was calculated to construct LST profiles, enabling a quantitative assessment of the IHIE. As shown in Figure 3, LST decreases with increasing distance from the industrial park, with a turning point beyond which the temperature gradually stabilizes.
Based on the observed LST profiles and previous studies [25,47,48], we identified four key indicators to quantify the IHIE: Industrial Heat Island Intensity (IHII) was defined as the difference in mean LST between the industrial park and the first turning point [25]; Industrial Warming Area (IWA) referred to the maximum area experiencing warming when the first turning point appears within the buffer zone surrounding the industrial park; Industrial Warming Efficiency (IWE) was defined as the ratio of the maximum warming area to the industrial park area, reflecting the spatial extent of the IHIE; and Industrial Warming Gradient (IWG) referred to the ratio of LST reduction to the warming distance, representing the accumulated temperature increase per unit distance. The specific calculation formulas are as follows:
I H I I = T I T D ,
I W A = S b u f f e r ,
I W E = S b u f f e r S i n d u s t r y ,
I W G = D × T d 0 D T d d l D ,
where D is the distance between the first turning point and the park; T I is the average surface temperature inside the industrial park; and T D is the temperature at the first turning point. S b u f f e r is the total buffer zone area up to the first turning point. S i n d u s t r y is the area of industry park. L is the distance from the edge of the park to the first turning point.

2.3.3. Potential Explanatory Factors

Many studies have shown that landscape pattern indices and land use types have an impact on urban LST [49,50,51]. Therefore, park pattern index and land use type were used as research factors in this study.
Two commonly used landscape pattern indices, namely S and LSI, were used to quantitatively analyze the indices associated with the IHIE. Among them, the LSI was calculated as follows:
L S I = P 2 π × S ,
where P and S represent the total perimeter and area of the urban park, respectively. The larger the value of LSI, the greater the irregularity of landscape shape [52].
Land use type is also considered to be an important factor affecting the UHI [53,54]. This study calculated the area percentage of the following five land use types within each park: IWS, IB, AL, WB, and forest, shrub, and grass land (FSG), as previous studies have shown that they significantly impact the UHII [17,28,55].

2.3.4. Generalized Additive Model (GAM) Application

To investigate the relationship between IHIE indices and various industrial park characteristics, we employed the Generalized Additive Model (GAM), which is well suited for capturing both linear and nonlinear relationships. GAM has been widely applied in environmental studies due to its flexibility in modeling complex interactions [56,57,58]. In this study, four IHIE indices (IHII, IWA, IWE, and IWG) were used as dependent variables. The independent variables included park layout indices, internal land use types, and their interactions. The GAM formula used in our analysis can be expressed as Equation (6):
I H I E i n d i c e s = β 0 + s ( S ) + s ( L S I ) + s ( I W S ) + s ( I B ) + s ( A L ) + s ( W B ) + s ( F S G ) + t i ( I W S , S ) + t i ( I W S , I B ) + t i ( I W S , W B ) + + ϵ
where β 0 is the intercept; s(x) denotes a smooth spline function applied to variable x, capturing its nonlinear effect; ti ( x 1 , x 2 ) represents the interaction term between variables x 1 and x 2 ; and ϵ is the random error term. This approach allows us to capture nonlinear relationships between IHIE indicators and explanatory variables while accounting for potential spatial heterogeneity among industrial parks.

3. Results

3.1. Impact of Industrial Parks on the Urban Thermal Environment

The results reveal a strong spatial overlap between thermal hotspots and industrial park boundaries in the GFMA (Figure 4A), with 66% of extreme high-temperature zones and 31% of high-temperature zones located within park areas (Figure 4B). Additionally, the average temperature of industrial parks exceeds that of surrounding urban areas (Figure 4C), which indicates that industrial parks are islands with abnormal high temperature inside the UHI. These sub-industrial heat islands are likely driven by intensive energy use, impervious surfaces, and internal heat emissions and become a sub-industrial heat island in the UHI.
To verify whether industrial parks form new industrial heat islands inside the UHI, we analyzed the LST profiles of all industrial parks. Our findings revealed that 75 out of 94 industrial parks exhibited a significant temperature decline from the industrial park’s center to its surroundings, accounting for over 75% of the cases; our follow-up study was conducted for these 75 parks.
To illustrate typical warming patterns, we selected 10 representative parks of various types (Figure A2). We analyzed the LST differences between the industrial parks, their buffer zones, and the city’s natural surface (Figure 5). The results indicate that industrial parks generally exhibit higher temperatures than various land types. Additionally, the buffer zones surrounding industrial parks also show elevated temperatures compared to other urban areas, highlighting the warming effect of industrial activities on the local thermal climate.

3.2. Industrial Heat Island Effects

To quantify IHIE intensity and its spatial extent, we analyzed the average LST profiles of 75 identified IHI parks (Figure 6a) and calculated four IHIE indices (Figure 6b–e). The results show that the LST profiles of industrial parks consistently exhibit a downward trend from the park center to the surrounding areas across all temperature indicators, with the average warming influence extending approximately 200 m outward.
We conducted Shapiro–Wilk tests to assess the normality of the four IHIE indicators across the 75 industrial parks. The results showed that IHII (W = 0.993, p = 0.952) and IWG (W = 0.974, p = 0.119) followed a normal distribution. In contrast, IWA (W = 0.516, p < 0.001) and IWE (W = 0.371, p < 0.001) significantly deviated from normality, indicating non-normal distribution patterns (Figure 6b–e). The variations in the distributions of these indices may be attributed to the diverse types of industrial parks analyzed.
Given the variability in industrial park functions and spatial configurations, this study analyzes IHIE across park types separately. Significant differences were observed in IHIE indices (Figure 7) and internal characteristics (Figure A3). While IHII values were relatively consistent, manufacturing parks exhibited lower IWA, suggesting more concentrated thermal output. Special parks showed higher IWG, likely due to greener buffers and lower structural density. Comprehensive parks had the highest IWE, indicating stronger spatial spread of heat. These differences underscore the importance of type-based classification when analyzing IHIE drivers.

3.3. Drivers of the Industrial Heat Island Effects

In order to explore what factors (S, LSI, IWS, IB, AL, WB, FSG, and their interaction terms) affect IHIE in different types of parks (manufacturing parks, logistics trade parks, comprehensive parks, and characteristic parks), we calculated the mean p-value of all IHIE indicators versus each impact factor for the different types of parks in the model. Only a few factors were selectively retained to avoid multicollinearity (variance inflation factor < 5).
The models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, yielding average prediction errors around 0.7, which are significantly lower than the corresponding index means (typically between 4 and 6). The relatively small standard deviations indicate consistent model performance across different data partitions. These findings demonstrate that the category-based modeling approach provides robust and generalizable results in analyzing IHIE.
The results (Figure 8) showed that, manufacturing parks are most influenced by LSI, highlighting the role of spatial configuration (Figure 8a). For logistics trade parks, the correlation of all factors is close, except IWS and ti (FSG and IWS) (Figure 8b), which can be attributed to the different planning and construction standards of logistics parks. In comprehensive parks, IWS (p = 0.0344) and IB (p = 0.0395) are highly correlated with the IHIE (Figure 8c). Additionally, in special parks, the IB is strongly correlated with the IHIE (Figure 8d), emphasizing the role of built-up areas in exacerbating the IHIE. The variation in p-values among different park types emphasizes the critical role that green infrastructure, landscape configuration, and impervious surface distribution play in influencing the IHIE. These findings highlight the importance of further investigation into how these factors influence IHIE.
In this study, the factors and IHIE indices of each p-value < 0.05 in the model were analyzed (Figure A4). First, there was a positive correlation between IHII and IWS in different types of parks, which was most obvious in manufacturing parks (p = 0.04) (Figure 9a). Second, LSI was strongly correlated with each index, we found that LSI was negatively correlated with all indices (with one exception of IWG in the manufacturing parks) (Figure 9b). The interaction terms of ti (S, IWS) showed good correlation with multiple indices and influence forms are similar (Figure 9c,d). Higher IWS increased IHIE, while larger park area mitigated it—possibly due to the cooling effects of open space and green infrastructure.
Additionally, although some variables did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05), they exhibited distinct and potentially meaningful nonlinear patterns (Figure A4). For instance, LSI influenced IWE in a threshold-dependent manner, WB showed a U-shaped effect, and IB demonstrated a saturation curve, peaking at moderate values. Ti (AL and S) showed a saddle-shaped surface where IWE peaked at moderate park area and industrial land area (Figure A4E), suggesting a potential trade-off effect between park size and functional land intensity. These patterns deviate from linear assumptions commonly seen in prior studies and point to complex underlying mechanisms.

4. Discussion

4.1. Dominant Driving Factors of IHIs Vary by Park Type

Although previous studies have shown that some large industrial parks have a sub-heat island effect [18,19,59], our study found that more than 75% of the industrial parks, spanning various types and sizes, exhibited a significant IHIE. This widespread occurrence suggests that, beyond general anthropogenic heat emissions, certain structural or spatial characteristics of industrial parks may play a key role in amplifying surface thermal radiation [18,25,60,61]. In addition to this, we found that the average warming distance of the industrial park was about 200 m. It can provide effective guidance for the future planning of the park scope.
Referring to previous studies, the park pattern and land use type in the park were considered as possible influencing factors [29,34,62]. In addition, different composition types and proportional relationships can produce different thermal environments [59]. Our results revealed clear variation in IHIE drivers across park types. In manufacturing parks (the main industries in the park are hardware and steel mills), IHIE was strongly linked to LSI, consistent with studies on industrial morphology [59]. Logistics parks usually contain large areas of roads, warehouse roofs, parking lots, and other hard surfaces, with more IWS and strong heat absorption capacity [63]. As a result, for logistics trade parks, ti (S and IWS) has a strong correlation with IHIE indices. Comprehensive parks usually contain buildings with high density [64]. The height, material, and density of buildings will affect the thermal environment, which may be the cause mainly affected by IWS and IB. Due to the particularity of the building form and layout of the characteristic park, special parks are mainly affected by IB, while the role of IWS is relatively weak.
In addition, this study found that IHII was positively correlated with IWS in different types of parks, which was consistent with the results of previous studies [10,65]. LSI is negatively correlated with most indices, which is consistent with the conclusions of some studies focusing on urban form and industrial type [55,66,67]. However, we found that LSI of manufacturing parks was positively correlated with IWG, which is different from the previous studies. The planning of manufacturing parks often focuses on functional intensification and space utilization to improve land use efficiency. This compact layout can increase the complexity of the landscape pattern, which is manifested by high LSI values. The more irregular the park is, the more obvious the spillover effect of the IHI [59].
Interaction and nonlinear effects further revealed complex mechanisms. We found that an increase in the proportion of IWS aggravated IHIE, but the IHIE was alleviated to some extent as the area of the campus increased. Previous studies only found a nonlinear relationship between IWS and UHI [29,68] but did not investigate the internal factors, which were well explained in this study. Although not all variables reached statistical significance, LSI, WB, and IB displayed threshold, U-shaped, and saturation patterns, respectively. These patterns go beyond linear assumptions and highlight the need to consider interactive and nonlinear processes in future IHIE studies.

4.2. Implication for the Urban Management and Planning

Industrial heat emission is an important factor for the formation of UHI. In our study, the IHI does exist in urban agglomeration areas, which is consistent with previous studies [17]. Our research results emphasize the contribution of industrial parks to the UHI in urban agglomerations and analyze the influencing factors of IHIE from the perspective of land use type and park pattern. It is important for better planning and management of urban parks to mitigate UHI.
First of all, the formation of urban agglomerations often involves the adjustment of industrial layout and structure [69], which promotes land use change and changes the spatio-temporal dynamics of heat island [70]. For rapidly urbanizing areas, incorporating IHIE considerations into regional urban and industrial planning, including the internal structural design of different types of parks, is critical to achieving the sustainable development goals [71]. To address this, urban planners should integrate IHIE risk maps into spatial development frameworks and set IHIE control targets for new or redeveloped industrial parks.
Second, park size and land composition must be considered jointly. While higher IWS is associated with increased heat intensity, this effect can be mitigated by larger park area and sufficient green coverage. However, we acknowledge that expanding land area or allocating large green spaces may not always be feasible due to rigid land-use constraints in industrial zones. In such cases, alternative strategies such as vertical greening, green roofs, internal green courtyards, and buffer green strips can serve as effective substitutes. These space-efficient interventions can be integrated within existing layouts and help reduce localized heat buildup without compromising industrial functionality.
Third, differentiated management of industrial park types is essential. Our results show that comprehensive parks tend to exhibit the highest IWE, likely due to mixed functions and high human activity levels. In this context, urban policy should promote functional zoning within parks, limit the density of energy-intensive industries, and regulate internal building layout to enhance ventilation and thermal dispersion.
Lastly, planning guidelines should consider interaction effects, not just individual land-use indicators. For example, the compounded impact of IWS and S suggests that heat mitigation cannot rely solely on one factor. Thus, multi-factor assessment tools should be developed to evaluate IHIE risks under different park configurations. These tools can inform adaptive land-use controls and climate-responsive park design strategies.

4.3. Study Limitations and Ideas for Future Research

This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the data used in this study were confined to LST and CLCD2020 data obtained exclusively from Guangdong Province. The situation may vary in other cities. Increasing the sample size and expanding the study area can be considered in the future.
Second, the spatial resolution of the LST and CLCD data (30 m) may introduce uncertainty in capturing fine-scale spatial variation within industrial parks. Small features such as narrow green belts or roads may be missed or misclassified, leading to potential inaccuracies in land cover assignment and IHIE calculations. In particular, for parks with irregular shapes, boundary mismatches between raster and vector data could affect the precision of LSI extraction. Future studies could explore the use of higher-resolution data or downscaling methods to improve spatial accuracy.
Third, IHI and its drivers were analyzed using data from 22 October 2020 only. Future research should incorporate multi-temporal or seasonal observations to better understand the temporal variability and long-term trends of industrial heat island effects.
Furthermore, the factors that affect the IHIE are extremely complex and diverse, but we only considered land use types for areas and park pattern indices with abnormally high temperatures, without considering other factors that may affect the IHIE within the city. For instance, the impacts of diurnal temperature range and local background climates should be examined, and these can also be investigated in subsequent studies.

4.4. Limitations of Using LST as a Proxy for Surface Heat Intensity

In this study, land surface temperature (LST) derived from remote sensing imagery was used as a proxy to assess surface heat conditions and calculate the IHIE indices. While LST is widely adopted in UHI studies due to its spatial coverage and availability, it has inherent limitations that may affect the accuracy and interpretation of results.
First, LST represents the skin temperature of the Earth’s surface rather than the near-surface air temperature, which means it may not fully capture the heat stress experienced by human populations or reflect the thermal environment at pedestrian level [72,73].
Second, satellite-derived LST can be influenced by surface emissivity, atmospheric conditions, and sensor angle, which introduces uncertainties, especially in heterogeneous urban landscapes like industrial parks [74].
Despite these limitations, LST remains a practical and effective tool for comparative spatial analysis across large areas. However, future studies should consider integrating air temperature data from meteorological stations or sensor networks or applying LST correction methods to enhance the accuracy and representativeness of IHIE indices [75].

5. Conclusions

Using a novel generalized additive model (GAM), this study investigates the impact of industrial heat islands (IHIs) caused by industrial parks on the spatial distribution of urban hot patches in the Guangzhou–Foshan metropolitan area (GFMA) and identifies key influencing factors. Results show that industrial parks exhibit significantly higher land surface temperature (LST), averaging 8.6 °C higher than urban impervious surfaces and 10.45 °C higher than natural landscapes. The warming effect extends approximately 200 m beyond park boundaries, highlighting the significant thermal influence of industrial activities. IHIE intensity varied across different industrial park types due to differences in spatial configurations and land cover. The IHIE of manufacturing parks were mainly affected by landscape shape index (LSI); the comprehensive park was affected by impervious water surface (IWS) and internal building land (IB); special parks are mainly affected by IB. Notably, comprehensive parks exhibited the highest warming intensity, linked to their multifunctional land use and substantial IWS, while special parks displayed relatively moderate effects due to their unique designs that limit heat accumulation. Spatial configuration and land cover emerged as critical determinants of IHIE. Across all park types, IHII showed a consistent positive relationship with IWS, while LSI was generally negatively correlated with IHIE indices, except for IWG in manufacturing parks. Correlation analyses revealed that S and IWS had the most significant influence, with interaction effects indicating that larger parks benefit from increased green space, which mitigates the thermal impact of industrial activities. Furthermore, the study identified several nonlinear relationships and threshold effects, such as saturation patterns for IB and U-shaped trends for water bodies.
This study provides the first large-scale, high-resolution analysis of IHIE across diverse industrial park types. The results emphasize the need for green infrastructure integration, optimized land use planning, and targeted zoning strategies to mitigate IHIs. Future research should assess these patterns in other metropolitan regions, incorporate seasonal variations, and explore landscape-based interventions to reduce IHIE under diverse climatic and socio-economic conditions.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, methodology, W.J.; software, data curation, formal analysis, Y.W.; methodology, validation, supervision, M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Institute of Carbon Peaking & Carbon Neutrality of Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences (No. ZX2024SZY054), and NUIST Students’ Platform for Innovation Training Program (202410300092Z).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Here, I would like to especially thank my teacher Mengmeng Zhang for her careful guidance and the joint efforts of my team members. I would like to thank them for their help in this long-term work. The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
UHIUrban Heat Island
UHIIUrban Heat Island Intensity
IHIEIndustrial Heat Island Effect
GFMAGuangzhou–Foshan Metropolitan Area
GAMGeneralized Additive Model
LSTLand Surface Temperature
IHIIIndustrial Heat Island Intensity
IWAIndustrial Warming Area
IWEIndustrial Warming Efficiency
IWGIndustrial Warming Gradient
IHIIndustrial Heat Island
LSILandscape Shape Index
IWSImpervious Water Surface
IBInternal Building Land
SPark Area
ALArable Land
WBWater Body
FSGForest, Shrub and Grass Land
PRDPearl River Delta
PRDMRPearl River Delta Metropolitan Region
USGSUnited States Geological Survey
CLCDChina Land Cover Dataset
LUCLand Use And Cover
CBRAChina Building Roof Area Dataset

Appendix A

Table A1. Classification of manufacturing industrial parks, logistics and trade industrial parks, comprehensive industrial parks, and special industrial parks.
Table A1. Classification of manufacturing industrial parks, logistics and trade industrial parks, comprehensive industrial parks, and special industrial parks.
Park TypePark NameMain Business
ManufacturingBSCHardware (aluminum), electrical appliances, plastic, textile, more comprehensive
LTPlastic-based, electronic, and hardware
JYHardware, mechanical machinery factory, hardware innovation center
CJXMain hardware, secondary plastic
LHHardware, electronics
XYKJMain hardware, plastic
SCMain hardware, electrical appliances
HGBHardware (aluminum), rubber and plastic
HLFHardware (aluminum), logistics
CCGLHardware big factory, have food, electrical appliances
JZJXLHardware factory, small plastic factory
XB2Large hardware
NLHardware and plastic appliances
gyy4Hardware, electrical appliances, food, more comprehensive
RTMain hardware, electrical appliances
PNPZHardware mainly, there is a shipyard
MCHardware (main steel, with aluminum)
gyy10Power grid, a water purification company, you have a little hardware
XJHardware and plastic appliances
Logistics tradeDDGCMetal logistics city, trading city
DAYUANLogistics company, advertising company, metal material recycling company
LCSell furniture, send logistics
gyy8Sell and make ceramic building
HHRefrigeration equipment big factory, horticulture trading city
XNYCaohe Industrial zone (main hardware), farmers’ market, automobile trading company
LYJJSell furniture, hardware, hair logistics
JCSYFuhua Machinery City, Xinbao electrical appliance factory, logistics city
XXPlastic factory, logistics city
HHLXMain car maintenance (logistics), stationery plastic
SpecialANWLAgricultural and sideline products trading market
gyy5more integrated
NGPlastic electromechanical daily necessities
gyy9Ceramic building materials
FXGTinfoil
HMWarehouse
GZJYGuangzhou cigarette factory
ZCElectrical factory
GZGQAuto parts, stand in daylight
HSTextile, food (with electrical appliances nearby)
gyy7Pure hardware factory
gyy3Plastic, electronic
JCPure hardware is available near the airport
MYWood trade (gathering)
DCElectrical, metal products, printing, integrated type
NHHardware-based, plastic
LBHardware and plastic electrical appliances, there is a food factory
SXHardware, plastic, selling lamps (gathering)
QYHardware, electrical appliances, plastic, paint
ComprehensiveDSPure hardware factory
YBPure hardware factory
CHElectrical appliances + chemical industry, with electroplating plant (small)
WSBElectrical factory
WLYAuto parts (small), accessories
gyy6Concrete, the brick and tile company
HGWJmachine tool
MAGAluminum factory
DFHardware & plastics 1:1
QCAutomobile general factory maintenance, involving parts assembly and manufacturing
LZSHardware (aluminum), it has a toy factory
HGMain printing and dyeing clothing, with ceramics, power generation
HGARubber, building materials
SCHDHardware industrial park
XHElectronic-mechanical robot
MDXelectrical equipment
CYYPure hardware factory
MGCoating small factory
PTDLAluminum factory
SYQAppliances, printing, and locks
LLMain electrical appliances, secondary plastic
LTXLHardware, electrical appliances
XHZYHardware, electrical appliances
DYHardware and furniture manufacturing 1:1
YUXAluminum factory
YXPure hardware factory
XY2Hardware, there is a steel chemical plant
TCPrecision machinery, with a ceramic foaming factory
Figure A1. Location of the study area and industrial parks.
Figure A1. Location of the study area and industrial parks.
Sustainability 17 03363 g0a1
Figure A2. LST profiles of the 10 industrial parks.
Figure A2. LST profiles of the 10 industrial parks.
Sustainability 17 03363 g0a2
Figure A3. Histogram of impact factors in different types of industrial parks.
Figure A3. Histogram of impact factors in different types of industrial parks.
Sustainability 17 03363 g0a3
Figure A4. The effects of smoothing terms (each influencing factor and IHII (A), IWA (B), IWE (C), IWG (D)) and interaction terms (E) on warming indices trend based on GAM. The type of industry park is indicated above each subgraph.
Figure A4. The effects of smoothing terms (each influencing factor and IHII (A), IWA (B), IWE (C), IWG (D)) and interaction terms (E) on warming indices trend based on GAM. The type of industry park is indicated above each subgraph.
Sustainability 17 03363 g0a4

References

  1. Oke, T.R. City size and the urban heat island. Atmos. Environ. (1967) 1973, 7, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, J. Urban sustainability: An inevitable goal of landscape research. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 25, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaveh, D.; Md, K.; Yan, L. Urban heat island effect: A systematic review of spatio-temporal factors, data, methods, and mitigation measures. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2018, 67, 30–42. [Google Scholar]
  4. Phelan, P.E.; Kaloush, K.; Miner, M.; Golden, J.; Phelan, B.; Silva, H.; Taylor, R.A. Urban Heat Island: Mechanisms, Implications, and Possible Remedies. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2015, 40, 285–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patz, J.A.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Holloway, T.; Foley, J.A. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 2005, 438, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, X.; Leung, L.R.; Zhao, N.; Zhao, C.; Qian, Y.; Hu, K.; Liu, X.; Chen, B. Contribution of urbanization to the increase of extreme heat events in an urban agglomeration in east China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 6940–6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nidhi, S.; Saumya, S.; Mall, R.K. Chapter 17—Urban ecology and human health: Implications of urban heat island, air pollution and climate change nexus. In Urban Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 317–334. [Google Scholar]
  8. Portela, C.I.; Massi, K.G.; Rodrigues, T.; Alcântara, E. Impact of urban and industrial features on land surface temperature: Evidences from satellite thermal indices. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 56, 102100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jenerette, G.D.; Harlan, S.L.; Brazel, A.; Jones, N.; Larsen, L.; Stefanov, W.L. Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 22, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Han, L. Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of urban heat island effect and its relationship to block morphology with the geographically weighted regression model. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, X.; Ming, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yue, W.; Han, G. Influences of landform and urban form factors on urban heat island: Comparative case study between Chengdu and Chongqing. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 820, 153395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manoli, G.; Fatichi, S.; Schläpfer, M.; Yu, K.; Crowther, T.W.; Meili, N.; Burlando, P.; Katul, G.G.; Bou-Zeid, E. Magnitude of urban heat islands largely explained by climate and population. Nature 2019, 573, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peng, S.; Piao, S.; Ciais, P.; Friedlingstein, P.; Ottle, C.; Bréon, F.-M.; Nan, H.; Zhou, L.; Myneni, R.B. Surface Urban Heat Island Across 419 Global Big Cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, Y.; Huang, B.; Wang, J.; Chen, B.; Kong, H.; Norford, L. Climate-Conscious Urban Growth Mitigates Urban Warming: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 11960–11968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, H.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Qin, F.; Jiang, H.; Cai, Y. Influences of land cover types, meteorological conditions, anthropogenic heat and urban area on surface urban heat island in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yu, Z.; Yao, Y.; Yang, G.; Wang, X.; Vejre, H. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of remotely sensed region heat islands during the rapid urbanization (1995–2015) of Southern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 674, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, M.; Huang, L.; Jiang, W.; Fan, M.; Dai, W.; Han, W.; Xu, Q.; Dong, Y. Urban core greening and industrial decentralization lead to contrasting trends in surface urban heat islands in a metropolitan area in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 374, 124045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dutta, D.; Gupta, S.; Kishtawal, C.M. Linking LULC change with urban heat islands over 25 years: A case study of the urban-industrial city Durgapur, Eastern India. J. Spat. Sci. 2018, 65, 501–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rao, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Fu, M. Does subclassified industrial land have a characteristic impact on land surface temperatures? Evidence for and implications of coal and steel processing industries in a Chinese mining city. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 89, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.; Ren, Z.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, P.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W.; Bao, G. Efficient cooling of cities at global scale using urban green space to mitigate urban heat island effects in different climatic regions. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 74, 127635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, W.; Yu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, W.; Wu, T. How can urban green spaces be planned to mitigate urban heat island effect under different climatic backgrounds? A threshold-based perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 890, 164422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Y.; Cao, C.; Bogoev, I.; Deetman, C.; Dietz, G.; Hang, J.; Howard, L.; Huang, X.; Kendall, N.; Lai, J.; et al. Regulation of humid heat by urban green space across a climate wetness gradient. Nat. Cities 2024, 1, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chandler, T.; Gregory, S. The Climate of the British Isles; Longman: London, UK, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  24. Papadopoulos, A.M.; Moussiopoulos, N. Towards a holistic approach for the urban environment and its impact on energy utilisation in buildings: The ATREUS project. J. Environ. Monit. 2004, 6, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meng, Q.; Hu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z. Do industrial parks generate intra-heat island effects in cities? New evidence, quantitative methods, and contributing factors from a spatiotemporal analysis of top steel plants in China. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292 Pt B, 118383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohan, M.; Singh, V.K.; Bhati, S.; Lodhi, N.; Sati, A.P.; Sahoo, N.R.; Dash, S.; Mishra, P.C.; Dey, S. Industrial heat island: A case study of Angul-Talcher region in India. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2020, 141, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rahman, M.M.; Alam, K.; Velayutham, E. Is industrial pollution detrimental to public health? Evidence from the world’s most industrialised countries. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gao, J.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, L.; Hu, D. How does the ambient environment respond to the industrial heat island effects? An innovative and comprehensive methodological paradigm for quantifying the varied cooling effects of different landscapes. GIScience Remote Sens. 2022, 59, 1643–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ming, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gu, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. Nonlinear effects of urban and industrial forms on surface urban heat island: Evidence from 162 Chinese prefecture-level cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 89, 104350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, L.; Lee, X.; Smith, R.B.; Oleson, K. Strong contributions of local background climate to urban heat islands. Nature 2014, 511, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feng, R.; Wang, F.; Wang, K.; Wang, H.; Li, L. Urban ecological land and natural-anthropogenic environment interactively drive surface urban heat island: An urban agglomeration-level study in China. Environ. Int. 2021, 157, 106857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, J.; Qi, Y.; Song, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, R.; Su, X.; Zhu, D. The relationship between industrial transfer parks and county economic growth: Evidence from Guangdong Province, China. Habitat Int. 2023, 139, 102894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, X.; Liao, J.; Zhang, J.; Shen, C.; Chen, W.; Xia, B.; Wang, T. A Numeric Study of Regional Climate Change Induced by Urban Expansion in the Pearl River Delta, China. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2014, 53, 346–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, G.; Zhao, L.; Mochida, A. Urban Heat Island Simulations in Guangzhou, China, Using the Coupled WRF/UCM Model with a Land Use Map Extracted from Remote Sensing Data. Sustainability 2016, 8, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peng, S.; Feng, Z.; Liao, H.; Huang, B.; Peng, S.; Zhou, T. Spatial-temporal pattern of, and driving forces for, urban heat island in China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tang, C.F. A study of the urban heat island effect in Guangzhou. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1087, 012015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, J.; Nitivattananon, V.; Lin, D.; Gong, W. Integrated assessment for Sustainable Development Goals of metropolitan regions: A case study of the Pearl River Delta region, China. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2023, 20, 100299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hui, E.C.M.; Li, X.; Chen, T.; Lang, W. Deciphering the spatial structure of China’s megacity region: A new bay area—The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in the making. Cities 2020, 105, 102168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Guangdong Statistical Yearbook 2022; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2022.
  40. Huang, Y.; Lang, W.; Chen, T.; Wu, J. Regional Coordinated Development in the Megacity Regions: Spatial Pattern and Driving Forces of the Guangzhou-Foshan Cross-Border Area in China. Land 2023, 12, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; He, H. Impact of high PM2.5 nitrate on visibility in a medium size city of Pearl River Delta. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2022, 13, 101592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Miller, D.L.; Alonzo, M.; Meerdink, S.K.; Allen, M.A.; Tague, C.L.; Roberts, D.A.; McFadden, J.P. Seasonal and interannual drought responses of vegetation in a California urbanized area measured using complementary remote sensing indices. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2022, 183, 178–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, J.; Huang, X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2021, 13, 3907–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Z.; Tang, H.; Feng, L.; Lyu, S. China Building Rooftop Area: The first multi-annual (2016–2021) and high-resolution (2.5 m) building rooftop area dataset in China derived with super-resolution segmentation from Sentinel-2 imagery. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2023, 15, 3547–3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, Z.; Cai, Z.; Su, S.; Kang, M.; Ge, Y. Unraveling the association between the urban polycentric structure and urban surface thermal environment in urbanizing China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yin, C.; Yuan, M.; Lu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Y. Effects of urban form on the urban heat island effect based on spatial regression model. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yao, X.; Yu, K.; Zeng, X.; Lin, Y.; Ye, B.; Shen, X.; Liu, J. How can urban parks be planned to mitigate urban heat island effect in “Furnace cities” ? An accumulation perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peng, J.; Liu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Lyu, D.; Du, Y.; Qiao, R.; Wu, J. How to effectively mitigate urban heat island effect? A perspective of waterbody patch size threshold. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 202, 103873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Song, J.; Du, S.; Feng, X.; Guo, L. The relationships between landscape compositions and land surface temperature: Quantifying their resolution sensitivity with spatial regression models. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gao, J.; Gong, J.; Li, J. Effects of source and sink landscape pattern on land surface temperature: An urban heat island study in Wuhan City. Prog. Geogr. 2019, 38, 1770–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ding, N.; Yang, X. Spatial Pattern Impact of Impervious Surface Density on Urban Heat Island Effect: A Case Study in Xuzhou, China. Land 2022, 11, 2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, R.; Chen, L. How can urban water bodies be designed for climate adaptation? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 105, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rao, P.; Tassinari, P.; Torreggiani, D. Exploring the land-use urban heat island nexus under climate change conditions using machine learning approach: A spatio-temporal analysis of remotely sensed data. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yuan, S.; Ren, Z.; Shan, X.; Deng, Q.; Zhou, Z. Seasonal different effects of land cover on urban heat island in Wuhan’s metropolitan area. Urban Clim. 2023, 49, 101547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, G.; Teng, J. Predicting the surface urban heat island intensity of future urban green space development using a multi-scenario simulation. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 66, 102698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ravindra, K.; Rattan, P.; Mor, S.; Aggarwal, A.N. Generalized additive models: Building evidence of air pollution, climate change and human health. Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 104987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, J.; Gao, C. Socioeconomic drivers of urban heat island effect: Empirical evidence from major Chinese cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 63, 102425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nan, Y.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Zhang, B.H. Influencing Factors of Long-term Variations on Gridded PM(2.5) of Typical Regions in China Based on GAM Model. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2020, 41, 499–509. [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X. Simulating and mitigating extreme urban heat island effects in a factory area based on machine learning. Build. Environ. 2021, 202, 108051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Achmad, A.; Fadhly, N.; Deli, A.; Ramli, I. Urban growth and its impact on land surface temperature in an industrial city in Aceh, Indonesia. Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci. 2022, 15, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Berto, R.; Stival, C.A.; Rosato, P. Enhancing the environmental performance of industrial settlements: An economic evaluation of extensive green roof competitiveness. Build. Environ. 2018, 127, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xia, H.; Chen, Y.; Song, C.; Li, J.; Quan, J.; Zhou, G. Analysis of surface urban heat islands based on local climate zones via spatiotemporally enhanced land surface temperature. Remote Sens. Environ. 2022, 273, 112972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jayasooriya, V.M.; Adams, M.D. From urban heat islands to intra-urban heat islands: Role of urban fabric in redefining microclimates of tomorrow’s compact cities. Energy Build. 2024, 324, 114900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kardinal Jusuf, S.; Wong, N.H.; Hagen, E.; Anggoro, R.; Hong, Y. The influence of land use on the urban heat island in Singapore. Habitat Int. 2007, 31, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. van Hove, L.W.A.; Jacobs, C.M.J.; Heusinkveld, B.G.; Elbers, J.A.; van Driel, B.L.; Holtslag, A.A.M. Temporal and spatial variability of urban heat island and thermal comfort within the Rotterdam agglomeration. Build. Environ. 2015, 83, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ming, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X. Spatial pattern of anthropogenic heat flux in monocentric and polycentric cities: The case of Chengdu and Chongqing. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 78, 103628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rahimi, E.; Barghjelveh, S.; Dong, P. Quantifying how urban landscape heterogeneity affects land surface temperature at multiple scales. J. Ecol. Environ. 2021, 45, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shi, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, T.; Yuan, B.; Yin, P.; Jiang, D. Modeling the intensity of surface urban heat island based on the impervious surface area. Urban Clim. 2023, 49, 101529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Niu, F.; Yang, X.; Wang, F. Urban Agglomeration Formation and Its Spatiotemporal Expansion Process in China: From the Perspective of Industrial Evolution. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2020, 30, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Han, S.; Li, W.; Kwan, M.-P.; Miao, C.; Sun, B. Do polycentric structures reduce surface urban heat island intensity? Appl. Geogr. 2022, 146, 102766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Seto, K.C.; Golden, J.S.; Alberti, M.; Turner, B.L. Sustainability in an urbanizing planet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 8935–8938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vogt, J.V. Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from NOAA AVHRR Data. In Advances in the Use of NOAA AVHRR Data for Land Applications; D’Souza, G., Belward, A.S., Malingreau, J.-P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 125–151. [Google Scholar]
  73. Benali, A.; Carvalho, A.C.; Nunes, J.P.; Carvalhais, N.; Santos, A. Estimating air surface temperature in Portugal using MODIS LST data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Weng, Q. Thermal infrared remote sensing for urban climate and environmental studies: Methods, applications, and trends. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2009, 64, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tomlinson, C.J.; Chapman, L.; Thornes, J.E.; Baker, C.J. Including the urban heat island in spatial heat health risk assessment strategies: A case study for Birmingham, UK. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2011, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location of the study area and industrial parks.
Figure 1. Location of the study area and industrial parks.
Sustainability 17 03363 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart showing the data acquisition methods and data analysis methods. Here, S refers to the area of the industrial park.
Figure 2. Flowchart showing the data acquisition methods and data analysis methods. Here, S refers to the area of the industrial park.
Sustainability 17 03363 g002
Figure 3. Map and LST profile based on continuous buffers in an industrial park.
Figure 3. Map and LST profile based on continuous buffers in an industrial park.
Sustainability 17 03363 g003
Figure 4. (A) Classification of LST in the study area; (B) the area proportion of each LST category in the industrial park; (C) comparison of urban average surface temperature and 10 industrial parks’ surface temperature. The abscissa in (C) is the urban average surface temperature and the abbreviation of the industrial park name. See Table A1 in the Appendix A for specific industrial park information.
Figure 4. (A) Classification of LST in the study area; (B) the area proportion of each LST category in the industrial park; (C) comparison of urban average surface temperature and 10 industrial parks’ surface temperature. The abscissa in (C) is the urban average surface temperature and the abbreviation of the industrial park name. See Table A1 in the Appendix A for specific industrial park information.
Sustainability 17 03363 g004
Figure 5. Box plots of LST comparison between industrial parks and surrounding areas in the study area. The black line and the asterisk in the middle of the box block represent the median and mean, respectively.
Figure 5. Box plots of LST comparison between industrial parks and surrounding areas in the study area. The black line and the asterisk in the middle of the box block represent the median and mean, respectively.
Sustainability 17 03363 g005
Figure 6. (a) LST profiles of all industrial parks, where the solid black line represents the average temperature profile, while the dashed gray lines depict the average maximum and minimum temperature profiles; the distribution of industrial parks’ (b) IHII, (c) IWA, (d) IWE, and (e) IWG, where the bar represents the industrial park counts and the gray dashed line indicates the probability distribution curve, while the red solid line represents the normal distribution curve. Due to the large data range, IWA and IWE were log-transformed.
Figure 6. (a) LST profiles of all industrial parks, where the solid black line represents the average temperature profile, while the dashed gray lines depict the average maximum and minimum temperature profiles; the distribution of industrial parks’ (b) IHII, (c) IWA, (d) IWE, and (e) IWG, where the bar represents the industrial park counts and the gray dashed line indicates the probability distribution curve, while the red solid line represents the normal distribution curve. Due to the large data range, IWA and IWE were log-transformed.
Sustainability 17 03363 g006
Figure 7. Histogram of IHIE indices in different types of industrial parks.
Figure 7. Histogram of IHIE indices in different types of industrial parks.
Sustainability 17 03363 g007
Figure 8. Average p-values of impact factors of manufacturing park (a), logistics trade park (b), comprehensive park (c), and special park (d).
Figure 8. Average p-values of impact factors of manufacturing park (a), logistics trade park (b), comprehensive park (c), and special park (d).
Sustainability 17 03363 g008
Figure 9. The effects of (a) IWS on IHII, (b) LSI on IWG, (c) interaction of IWS and S on IHII trend, and (d) interaction of IWS and S on IWA trend based on GAM.
Figure 9. The effects of (a) IWS on IHII, (b) LSI on IWG, (c) interaction of IWS and S on IHII trend, and (d) interaction of IWS and S on IWA trend based on GAM.
Sustainability 17 03363 g009
Table 1. LST classification standard.
Table 1. LST classification standard.
LST LevelLevel NameLevel Range
L1Extremely Low∆T ≤ −1.5σ
L2Low−1.5σ ≤ ∆T < −0.5σ
L3Normal−0.5σ ≤ ∆T ≤ 0.5σ
L4High0.5σ < ∆T ≤ 1.5σ
L5Extremely High1.5σ ≤ ∆T
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M. Exploring the Industrial Heat Island Effects and Key Influencing Factors in the Guangzhou–Foshan Metropolitan Area. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083363

AMA Style

Jiang W, Wang Y, Zhang M. Exploring the Industrial Heat Island Effects and Key Influencing Factors in the Guangzhou–Foshan Metropolitan Area. Sustainability. 2025; 17(8):3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Wenqi, Yuanyuan Wang, and Mengmeng Zhang. 2025. "Exploring the Industrial Heat Island Effects and Key Influencing Factors in the Guangzhou–Foshan Metropolitan Area" Sustainability 17, no. 8: 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083363

APA Style

Jiang, W., Wang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2025). Exploring the Industrial Heat Island Effects and Key Influencing Factors in the Guangzhou–Foshan Metropolitan Area. Sustainability, 17(8), 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop