Next Article in Journal
AI Advice for Amateur Food Production: Assessing Sustainability of LLM Recommendations
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Probabilistic Pavement Repair Effects for Network-Level Repair Optimization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Biogas Production: Pre-Treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Biogas Plant Digestate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Waste Biomass and Environmental Sustainability

by
Lucília Sousa Ribeiro
LSRE-LCM, ALiCE, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Sustainability 2025, 17(23), 10465; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310465
Submission received: 16 November 2025 / Accepted: 20 November 2025 / Published: 21 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Waste Biomass and Environmental Sustainability)
The accelerating depletion of fossil fuel reserves, together with the growing global demand for sustainable materials and energy, has intensified the need for renewable and carbon-neutral alternatives [1,2,3]. The transition to a low-carbon and resource-efficient society requires innovative strategies that can reduce dependence on fossil resources while minimizing environmental impacts. In this context, the valorization of waste biomass has emerged as a key approach for producing sustainable fuels, functional materials, and value-added chemicals [4,5]. By converting otherwise underutilized residues into productive resources, waste biomass valorization supports circular-economy principles, contributes to carbon-neutrality targets, and enables the development of environmentally friendly technologies [6].
Recent research continues to expand the fundamental understanding of the composition, structure, and reactivity of lignocellulosic biomass, thereby supporting advanced valorization strategies [1,7]. Comprehensive analyses of the structural complexities of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin highlight how compositional variability among biomass types directly influences the severity of pretreatment, catalytic performance, and achievable yields of high-value products [5,6,8,9,10]. Such insights are crucial for designing feedstock-specific conversion routes and integrating fractionation steps into modern biorefinery systems [11,12].
Thermochemical processing, including pyrolysis, hydrothermal conversion, and liquefaction, remains a central research focus due to its versatility in transforming diverse waste streams into bio-oils, gases, and carbon-based materials [13,14,15]. Advances in catalytic pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis have improved product selectivity and carbon utilization efficiency, particularly through optimized reaction pathways and rational catalyst design [9]. Hydrothermal technologies have similarly evolved, enabling efficient conversion of wet biomass without energy-intensive drying while producing intermediates compatible with downstream catalytic upgrading [15,16,17]. These developments support scalable and energy-efficient thermochemical routes for sustainable fuel and chemical synthesis [18].
Catalytic valorization pathways also play a pivotal in the conversion of biomass-derived platform molecules into high-value chemicals [1]. Advances in acid, metal, and bifunctional catalysis continue to expand the range of renewable products accessible from carbohydrate-rich and lignin-rich feedstocks. Numerous studies highlight the role of bio-derived organic acids, furanics, and polyols as versatile intermediates for producing solvents, fuel additives, and monomers for advanced polymer systems [5,19]. Parallel efforts in lignin-first biorefineries are helping unlock the potential of lignin as a renewable aromatic feedstock by employing mild depolymerization strategies that preserve reactive monomeric structures for subsequent transformations [6].
Marine and alternative waste biomass resources also contribute to the diversification of renewable carbon sources. Studies on the thermochemical behavior of unconventional biomass, including residues with complex compositions and variable moisture contents, emphasize the importance of tailored pretreatment strategies and optimized catalytic systems to ensure consistent performance under industrial conditions [6].
Another rapidly growing research area concerns biomass-derived functional materials. Carbonaceous materials synthesized from biomass are increasingly used in energy storage, adsorption, and catalysis [20,21,22,23,24]. Recent studies demonstrate that optimized pretreatment, controlled porosity development, and tailored surface functionalities are essential for enhancing performance and enabling the development of next-generation biomaterials [9,25].
Integrated biorefinery approaches, combining biochemical, thermochemical, and catalytic processes, continue to gain importance as models for maximizing resource efficiency. The integration of fractionation, conversion, and upgrading steps enables simultaneous production of fuels, chemicals, and materials while minimizing waste and improving process economics. Recent advances on process integration highlight the need for flexible designs that can accommodate the inherent variability of biomass composition and supply chains [12,26,27].
As biomass technologies progress toward commercialization, sustainability assessment tools such as techno-economic analysis (TEA), life-cycle assessment (LCA), and hybrid environmental metrics have become indispensable [28,29,30]. Studies emphasize that accurate evaluation of energy use, emissions, carbon intensity, and social costs is essential for guiding both policy and industrial decision-making [31]. Emerging methodologies propose moving beyond process-specific assessments toward more generalizable, state-based approaches that can accelerate decision-making across technology readiness levels and biomass–product pathways [6]. Together, these tools strengthen the scientific basis for developing sustainable and economically viable biomass valorization systems.
This Special Issue, Advances in Waste Biomass and Environmental Sustainability, presents studies that highlight not only technological advances but also the environmental and societal benefits associated with waste biomass utilization. The collection includes six contributions covering diverse transformation pathways and sustainability considerations.
Ribeiro and Pereira reviewed the potential of lignocellulosic biomass as a feedstock for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), outlining catalytic strategies for upgrading biomass-derived intermediates and identifying key technological barriers along with future research directions [32]. Herrera-Rodríguez and González-Delgado evaluated a conceptual biorefinery converting avocado residues into bio-oil, chlorophyll, and biopesticide using an inherent safety index methodology, demonstrating overall acceptable safety performance while identifying operational risks requiring attention [33]. Jankovičová et al. investigated the use of biogas plant digestate as a pretreatment medium for lignocellulosic maize waste; digestate soaking increased biodegradability and significantly enhanced biogas yields, offering a simple and cost-effective strategy for improving energy recovery from agricultural residues [34].
Li et al. examined steam explosion pretreatment of bitter melon vine prior to low-temperature pyrolysis to produce biochar with enhanced adsorption capacity for dyes, illustrating its potential for wastewater purification and agricultural waste utilization [35]. Spencer et al. proposed a one-step activation method using goethite iron ore to convert waste wood into high-surface-area activated carbon, with simultaneous reduction of the iron ore to a valuable metallic co-product [36]. Kuloglija et al. applied chemical activation to sunflower-seed-derived biochar, yielding activated carbon with high specific surface area and notable CO2 adsorption capabilities, further demonstrating the viability of agro-industrial residues as precursors for high-performance adsorption materials [37].
Collectively, the contributions in this Special Issue underscore the transformative potential of waste biomass in advancing global sustainability goals. They illustrate not only technological progress, but also a broader shift in mindset: recognizing waste as a resource. Through innovations in biochar production, activated carbon synthesis, biogas enhancement, and renewable fuel development, these studies point toward a future in which biomass residues serve as integral components of sustainable energy and material systems.

Acknowledgments

L.S. Ribeiro would like to acknowledge the authors for their advanced scientific contributions to this Special Issue and the reviewers who kindly dedicated their time to providing precious scientific input. L.S. Ribeiro wishes to thank the financial resources provided by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P./MCTES through national funds: LSRE-LCM, UID/50020/2025; and ALiCE, LA/P/0045/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/LA/P/0045/2020).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Deng, W.; Wang, Y. Research perspectives for catalytic valorization of biomass. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 78, 102–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhuang, X.; Ma, L. Recent advances in synthesis strategies for biomass-derived high-energy-density jet fuels. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 202, 114715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alonso, D.M.; Wettstein, S.G.; Dumesic, J.A. Bimetallic catalysts for upgrading of biomass to fuels and chemicals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 8075–8098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Enders, L.; Casadio, D.S.; Aikonen, S.; Lenarda, A.; Wirtanen, T.; Hu, T.; Hietala, S.; Ribeiro, L.S.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Helaja, J. Air oxidized activated carbon catalyst for aerobic oxidative aromatizations of N-heterocycles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 5962–5972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ventura, M.; Marinas, A.; Domine, M.E. Catalytic Processes for Biomass-Derived Platform Molecules Valorisation. Top. Catal. 2020, 63, 846–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Segers, B.; Nimmegeers, P.; Spiller, M.; Tofani, G.; Jasiukaitytė-Grojzdek, E.; Dace, E.; Kikas, T.; Marchetti, J.M.; Rajić, M.; Yildiz, G.; et al. Lignocellulosic biomass valorisation: A review of feedstocks, processes and potential value chains and their implications for the decision-making process. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 3730–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deng, W.; Feng, Y.; Fu, J.; Guo, H.; Guo, Y.; Han, B.; Jiang, Z.; Kong, L.; Li, C.; Liu, H.; et al. Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals and fuels. Green Energy Environ. 2023, 8, 10–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, C.-H.; Xia, X.; Lin, C.-X.; Tong, D.-S.; Beltramini, J. Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fine chemicals and fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5588–5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, J.; Gu, J.; Shan, R.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Y. Advances in thermochemical valorization of biomass towards carbon neutrality, Resources. Conserv. Recycl. 2025, 212, 107905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yabushita, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Fukuoka, A. Catalytic transformation of cellulose into platform chemicals. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 145, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pandey, A.; Sharma, Y.C. Advancements in biomass valorization in integrated biorefinery systems. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2024, 18, 2078–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rodionova, M.V.; Bozieva, A.M.; Zharmukhamedov, S.K.; Leong, Y.K.; Lan, J.C.-W.; Veziroglu, A.; Veziroglu, T.N.; Tomo, T.; Chang, J.-S.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. A comprehensive review on lignocellulosic biomass biorefinery for sustainable biofuel production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 1481–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shao, S.; Ye, Z.; Liu, C.; Hu, X.; Sun, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, R. Catalytic pyrolysis of holocellulose followed by integrated aldol condensation and hydrogenation to produce aviation fuel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 264, 115644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ryu, H.W.; Kim, D.H.; Jae, J.; Lam, S.S.; Park, E.D.; Park, Y. Recent advances in catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic waste for the production of petroleum-like hydrocarbons. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 310, 123473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Perkins, G.; Batalha, N.; Kumar, A.; Bhaskar, T.; Konarova, M. Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 115, 109400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Toor, S.S.; Rosendahl, L.; Rudolf, A. Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review of subcritical water technologies. Energy 2011, 36, 2328–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Duan, P.; Wang, B.; Xu, Y. Catalytic hydrothermal upgrading of crude bio-oils produced from different thermo-chemical conversion routes of microalgae. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 186, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cronin, D.J.; Subramaniam, S.; Brady, C.; Cooper, A.; Yang, Z.; Heyne, J.; Drennan, C.; Ramasamy, K.K.; Thorson, M.R. Sustainable Aviation Fuel from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Wet Wastes. Energies 2022, 15, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ribeiro, L.S.; Órfão, J.J.M.; Pereira, M.F.R. Comparative study of different catalysts for the direct conversion of cellulose to sorbitol. Green Process. Synth. 2015, 4, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tran, L.T.; Nguyen, M.Q.; Hoang, H.T.; Nguyen, H.T.; Vu, T.H.T. Catalytic Hydrothermal Carbonization of Avocado Peel. J. Chem. 2022, 2022, 5766269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Satira, A.; Paone, E.; Bressi, V.; Iannazzo, D.; Marra, F.; Calabrò, P.S.; Mauriello, F.; Espro, C. Hydrothermal Carbonization as Sustainable Process for the Complete Upgrading of Orange Peel Waste into Value-Added Chemicals and Bio-Carbon Materials. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nicolae, S.A.; Au, H.; Modugno, P.; Luo, H.; Szego, A.E.; Qiao, M.; Li, L.; Yin, W.; Heeres, H.J.; Berge, N.; et al. Recent advances in hydrothermal carbonisation: From tailored carbon materials and biochemicals to applications and bioenergy. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 4747–4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Morais, R.G.; Rey-Raap, N.; Figueiredo, J.L.; Pereira, M.F.R. Glucose-derived carbon materials with tailored properties as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 1089–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miah, T.; Demoro, P.; Nduka, I.; De Luca, F.; Abate, S.; Arrigo, R. Orange Peel Biomass-derived Carbon Supported Cu Electrocatalysts Active in the CO2-Reduction to Formic Acid. ChemPhysChem 2023, 24, e202200589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ribeiro, L.S.; Morais, R.G.; Damas, A.C.; Órfão, J.J.M.; Pereira, M.F.R. Synthesis of Ni-W catalysts supported on fruit peel waste-derived carbons for the efficient ethylene glycol production from cellulose. Cellulose 2025, 32, 3633–3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Velvizhi, G.; Balakumar, K.; Shetti, N.P.; Ahmad, E.; Pant, K.K.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Integrated biorefinery processes for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to value added materials: Paving a path towards circular economy. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tsouko, E.; Maina, S.; Ladakis, D.; Kookos, I.K.; Koutinas, A. Integrated biorefinery development for the extraction of value-added components and bacterial cellulose production from orange peel waste streams. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 944–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, G.; Yan, B.; Chen, G. Technical review on jet fuel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 25, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kargbo, H.; Harris, J.S.; Phan, A.N. “Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Batten, R.; Karanjikar, M.; Spatari, S. A sustainable aviation fuel pathway from biomass: Life cycle environmental and cost evaluation for dimethylcyclooctane jet fuel. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2024, 8, 1924–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Madadi, M.; Elsayed, M.; Song, G.; Shafiei-Alavijeh, R.; Denayer, J.F.M.; Kargaran, E.; Azad, S.A.; Karimi, K.; Sun, F.; Gupta, V.K. Transformative biorefinery model for biomass valorization into biofuel and renewable platform chemicals. J. Energy Chem. 2025, 110, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ribeiro, L.S.; Pereira, M.F.R. Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production through Catalytic Processing of Lignocellulosic Biomass Residues: A Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Herrera-Rodríguez, T.C.; González-Delgado, Á.D. Inherent Safety Index Evaluation of an Extractive-Based Creole-Antillean Avocado Biorefinery in Montes De María, Colombia. Sustainability 2025, 17, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jankovičová, B.; Hutňan, M.; Sammarah, M. Enhancing Biogas Production: Pre-Treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Biogas Plant Digestate. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.; Jia, H.; Jiang, L.; Mou, Z.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y. Biochar Prepared from Steam-Exploded Bitter Melon Vine for the Adsorption of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution: Kinetics, Isotherm, Thermodynamics and Mechanism. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Spencer, W.; Ibana, D.; Singh, P.; Nikoloski, A.N. Sustainable Production of Activated Carbon from Waste Wood Using Goethite Iron Ore. Sustainability 2025, 17, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kuloglija, S.; Ahmed, A.E.; Jordan, C.; Golda, M.; Ipsmiller, W.; Steinacher, N.; Winter, F.; Meitner, D.; Luckeneder, A.; Harasek, M. Sustainable Activated Carbon Production from Sunflower Seeds via Chemical Activation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro, L.S. Advances in Waste Biomass and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2025, 17, 10465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310465

AMA Style

Ribeiro LS. Advances in Waste Biomass and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability. 2025; 17(23):10465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro, Lucília Sousa. 2025. "Advances in Waste Biomass and Environmental Sustainability" Sustainability 17, no. 23: 10465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310465

APA Style

Ribeiro, L. S. (2025). Advances in Waste Biomass and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(23), 10465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop