Novel Low-Temperature Fabricated Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics: Water Absorption/Retention Features and Their Application in Dryland Agriculture
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Raw Materials
2.2. CG-Based Porous Ceramic Preparation
2.3. Characterization
2.4. Measurement of the Water Absorption and Water Retention Capacity of Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics
2.5. Orthogonal Experiments
2.6. Pot Experiments with Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Raw Material Characterization
3.2. Effects of Sintering Temperature and PS Addition on the Physical Phase and Properties of Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics
3.2.1. Determination of the Sintering Temperature
3.2.2. Effects of Temperature on the Physical Phase of Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics
3.2.3. Effects of Temperature on the Properties of Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics
3.2.4. Effects of PS Addition on the Properties of Porous Ceramics
3.3. Determining Other Factors Through Orthogonal Experiments
3.4. Pot Experiments with CGPC
4. Conclusions
- Single-factor experiments identified the sintering temperature and PS (PS) content as the most critical parameters governing the ceramics’ performance. The sintering temperature of 615 °C was determined to be optimal, achieving a delicate balance where the decomposition of pore-forming agents created sufficient pores before the excessive flow of the glass phase could seal them. Furthermore, a PS addition of 25% was found to yield the highest water absorption and retention, beyond which pore coalescence led to a decline in performance. These key findings, illustrated by the systematic trends in water absorption and retention times across different temperatures and PS contents, provided the fundamental parameters for the subsequent compositional optimization.
- Guided by the single-factor results, orthogonal experiment optimization yielded a CG-based porous ceramic (CGPC) with exceptional comprehensive performance. The optimal formula (20 g CG, 25 g starch, 25 g glass powder, 11 g diatomite, 27 g PS) sintered at 615 °C achieved a water absorption rate of 149.70%, a water retention time of 57.75 h, a porosity of 77.28%, and a compressive strength of 0.55 MPa. The synergistic use of composite pore-formers and diatomaceous earth successfully constructed a graded pore structure responsible for these enhanced properties.
- The pot experiment of Chinese cabbage clearly proved the effect of CGPC, which shortened the emergence time of seedlings to less than 24 h, and significantly improved the emergence rate and early growth of seedlings (7 days).
5. Future Perspectives
- Firstly, the compressive strength of the optimized porous ceramic (CGPC, 0.55 MPa), while sufficient for handling and pot experiments, is lower than that of some porous ceramics sintered at higher temperatures [17,18,41]. This relative mechanical weakness could pose a challenge for large-scale transportation and certain mechanical stress scenarios in field applications. Future work will therefore prioritize enhancing the mechanical robustness without compromising the excellent water-absorption properties. Strategies will focus on refining the ceramic skeleton, for instance, by incorporating fibrous reinforcements or exploring alternative low-melting-point cementitious phases to strengthen the inter-particle bonding.
- A primary limitation is the short duration (7 days) and high seeding density (100 seeds/pot) of the pot trials. This experimental design, while effective for a controlled, initial screening of the material’s ability to enhance germination and early establishment, does not capture the long-term effects on plant development. The high seedling density likely induced competition for resources (light, water, nutrients) soon after emergence, which limits the interpretability of the above-ground height data and precludes any assessment of plant health, biomass accumulation, or yield in later growth stages. Consequently, the results should be interpreted as a robust indicator of the material’s positive impact on the very first critical phase of plant life, but not as evidence of sustained growth promotion. Therefore, future work must prioritize long-term pot or field experiments with realistic planting densities and longer observation periods. These studies should track key agronomic indicators over a full growth cycle, including plant biomass, root development, nutrient uptake efficiency, and ultimately, crop yield. This will be essential for validating the practical agricultural value of the CGPC.
- Investigating the material’s long-term stability and its interaction with the soil microbiome in real-field environments will be critical for assessing its durability and ecological impact, paving the way for its practical application in sustainable agriculture.
- Furthermore, the water retention performance was evaluated under stable laboratory conditions (25 °C, 93% RH). While this provides fundamental property comparisons, it does not fully replicate the high-temperature and low-humidity stress typical of real-world dryland environments. Future work should therefore include water retention tests under varied temperature and humidity regimes (e.g., 35–40 °C and 30–50% RH) to better simulate arid field conditions and more accurately predict the material’s efficacy in practical applications.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Albergel, C.; Dutra, E.; Munier, S.; Calvet, J.-C.; Munoz-Sabater, J.; de Rosnay, P.; Balsamo, G. ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: Which one performs better? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 22, 3515–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahlström, A.; Raupach, M.R.; Schurgers, G.; Smith, B.; Arneth, A.; Jung, M.; Reichstein, M.; Canadell, J.G.; Friedlingstein, P.; Jain, A.K.; et al. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science 2015, 348, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, I.M.; Mahto, S.S.; Kushwaha, A.P.; Kumar, R.; Tiwari, A.D.; Sahu, B.K.; Jain, V.; Mohapatra, P.K. Dominance of soil moisture over aridity in explaining vegetation greenness across global drylands. Sci. Total. Environ. 2024, 917, 170482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lian, X.; Piao, S.; Chen, A.; Huntingford, C.; Fu, B.; Li, L.Z.X.; Huang, J.; Sheffield, J.; Berg, A.M.; Keenan, T.F.; et al. Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 232–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papagiannopoulou, C.; Miralles, D.G.; Dorigo, W.A.; Verhoest, N.E.C.; Depoorter, M.; Waegeman, W. Vegetation anomalies caused by antecedent precipitation in most of the world. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 074016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Niu, W.; Song, X.; Han, J. Response of tomato root endophytic bacterial communities to water-oxygen coupling under micro/nanoaerated drip irrigation in slightly saline soils. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Liu, G.; Dou, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, T.; Wang, Z.; Malhi, S.; Khan, A.A. Plastic mulch increases dryland wheat yield and water-use productivity, while straw mulch increases soil water storage. J. Integr. Agric. 2024, 23, 3174–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santini, G.; Probst, M.; Gómez-Brandón, M.; Manfredi, C.; Ceccherini, M.T.; Pietramellara, G.; Santorufo, L.; Maisto, G. Microbiome dynamics of soils covered by plastic and bioplastic mulches. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2023, 60, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Zou, G.; Zuo, Q.; Li, C.; Gu, J.; Kang, L.; Ma, M.; Liang, K.; Liu, D.; Du, L. Soil bacterial community and metabolism showed a more sensitive response to PBAT biodegradable mulch residues than that of LDPE mulch residues. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macan, G.P.; Anguita-Maeso, M.; Olivares-García, C.; Le, Q.N.P.; Halsall, C.; Landa, B.B. Unravelling the plastisphere-soil and plasticplane microbiome of plastic mulch residues in agricultural soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2025, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; Haris, M.; Chen, C.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Meng, H.; Wu, X.; Liu, X.; Hu, W.; et al. Study of ceramsite-supported iron and manganese oxides for enhancing soil immobilization and reducing rice plants uptake of cadmium. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Zboon, K.K.; Al-Tabbal, J.A.; Al-Kharabsheh, N.M.; Al-Mefleh, N.K. Natural volcanic tuff as a soil mulching: Effect on plant growth and soil chemistry under water stress. Appl. Water Sci. 2019, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Li, P.; Cosgrove, T. Effect of elevated curing temperature on ceramsite concrete performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 153, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, K.-J.; An, H.-N.; Liu, C.-B.; Li, Y.-D.; Jia, L.-J.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Q.-Q.; Jiang, Y.; Song, Z.-J. Safety and environmental protection application of high performance solid waste unburned ceramsite and its lightweight high strength concrete. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Zhou, J.; Yin, X.; Zhu, X.; Wang, X. Preparation of non-sintered building materials with a high content of red mud using magnesium oxychloride cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Fan, J.; Nian, H.; Li, Y.; Xiang, H.; Zhou, Y. Sintering-resistant porous BaZrO3 ceramics using a particle-stabilized foam method for thermal insulation applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 108, e20345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Liang, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Pan, L.; Sang, S. The enhanced strength and radiation efficiency of alumina reticulated porous ceramics via coal gangue addition. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 44, 6651–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, X.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Z. Evolution mechanism of pore structure in sintered coal gangue ceramsites. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 31385–31395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhao, D.; Yang, Y.; Li, H. Preparation of a Novel Structure-Designed Porous Ceramsite for Water Retention. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 42753–42763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Hu, N.; Wu, Y.; Hou, W.; Guo, Q.; Gui, L.; Tang, R. Preparation and properties of CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 based porous insulation ceramics with addition of phosphogypsum and coal gangue. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 23559–23569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, M.; Yi, X.; Dai, Z.; Qin, H.; Guo, W.; Xiao, H. Application of metal-BDC-derived catalyst on cordierite honeycomb ceramic support in a microreactor for hydrogen production. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 29082–29093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, C.; Tian, X.; Nan, Y.; Li, D. Hierarchically porous alumina ceramic catalyst carrier prepared by powder bed fusion. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 4253–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, L.; Wu, X.; Ji, Z.; Chen, F. Effects of heat-treatment conditions in the preparation of aluminum silicate fiber-based ceramic filter element for hot-gas filtration. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 18193–18199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, D.; Zhu, R.; Hu, Y.; Liang, S.; Sun, H.; Wang, Z. Fabrication and characterization of mullite fiber-based porous ceramics with mixed fiber lengths for high-temperature gas filtration. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 23214–23223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Zhang, T.; Pan, R.; Chun, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhu, W.; Peng, H.; Zhang, Q. Sintering-free preparation of porous ceramsite using low-temperature decomposing pore former and its sound-absorbing performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 171, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guenka, T.d.N.; Machado, M.; Silva, A.; Nunes, M. Freeze-cast porous Al2O3/MgO ceramics as potential acoustic sound absorption. Appl. Acoust. 2024, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, B.; Liu, B.; Zhang, S. Highly porous ceramics production using slags from smelting of spent automotive catalysts. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Lian, W.; Han, L.; Qiao, J.; Liaw, P.K. High-strength and low-thermal-conductivity porous multi-principal cation mullite ceramic. Ceram. Int. 2024, 51, 5821–5831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Qiao, Y.; Shao, J.; Bai, C.; Li, H.; Lu, S.; Zhang, X.; Yang, K.; Colombo, P. Sodium-based alkali-activated foams from self-ignition coal gangue by facile microwave foaming route. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 33914–33925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, P.; Zhou, R.; Liu, H.; Huo, Y.; Wang, Y. Preparation of coal gangue based foamed ceramics with SiC as blowing agent and study on its thermal insulation performance. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 31680–31690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramezani, A.; Nemat, S.; Emami, S. Effects of the size of expanded polystyrene as a pore-former on the properties of insulating firebricks. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 6641–6644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.-L.; Du, Q.; Wu, J.-M.; Zhang, G.; Shi, Y.-S. Preparation of porous lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramics via vat photopolymerization combined with burnt polymer spheres technique. Addit. Manuf. 2024, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishii, K.; Shimizu, M.; Sameshima, H.; Samitsu, S.; Ishigaki, T.; Uchikoshi, T. Fabrication of porous (Ba,Sr)(Co,Fe)O3-δ (BSCF) ceramics using gelatinization and retrogradation phenomena of starch as pore-forming agent. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 13047–13053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyckfeldt, O.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Processing of porous ceramics by ‘starch consolidation’. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 18, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, R.; Chen, H.; Li, C.; Liang, X.; Hou, X.; Yang, B. Preparation of diatomite-based porous ceramics and their adsorption properties for Cu2+. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 50153–50162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, K.; Huang, Y.; Huang, T.; Gu, M.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Cheng, X. Preparation of diatomite-based porous ceramics containing interlayer porous MgO by low-temperature sintering for integration of high strength and low thermal conductivity. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Xu, L.-H.; Wu, H.-Q.; Jin, J. Preparation and properties of porous ceramics from spodumene flotation tailings by low-temperature sintering. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2021, 31, 2797–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-H.; Feng, K.-Q.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, H.-L. Effect of sintering temperature on the microstructure and properties of foamed glass-ceramics prepared from high-titanium blast furnace slag and waste glass. Int. J. Miner. Met. Mater. 2017, 24, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 14684-2022; Sand for Construction. State Administration for Market Regulation and Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2022.
- Li, Y.; Tang, W.; Sheng, H.; Yang, Y.; Mclean, A. Generation of Pyroxene-Based Porous Ceramics from Steel Refining Slag. ISIJ Int. 2021, 61, 2041–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamaludin, A.R.; Kasim, S.R.; Abdullah, M.Z.; Ahmad, Z.A. Sago starch as binder and pore-forming agent for the fabrication of porcelain foam. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 4777–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hai, O.; Xiao, X.; Xie, Q.; Ren, Q.; Wu, X.; Pei, M.; Zheng, P. Preparation of three-dimensionally linked pore-like porous atomized ceramics with high oil and water absorption rates. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 43, 4530–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Component | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | MgO | Fe2O3 | Na2O | K2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | 27.72 | 57.03 | 1.21 | 0.58 | 4.55 | 0.27 | 1.32 |
| Diatomite | 13.50 | 73.10 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 7.88 | 0.30 | 1.79 |
| Level | Factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor A (CG, g) | Factor B (Starch, g) | Factor C (Glass Dust, g) | Factor D (Diatomite, g) | |
| 1 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 2 |
| 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 5 |
| 3 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 8 |
| 4 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 11 |
| 5 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 14 |
| Experiment Number | CG (A) | Starch (B) | Glass Dust (C) | Diatomite (D) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 2 |
| 2 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 5 |
| 3 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 8 |
| 4 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 11 |
| 5 | 20 | 30 | 30 | 14 |
| 6 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 8 |
| 7 | 30 | 15 | 20 | 11 |
| 8 | 30 | 20 | 25 | 14 |
| 9 | 30 | 25 | 30 | 2 |
| 10 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 5 |
| 11 | 40 | 10 | 20 | 14 |
| 12 | 40 | 15 | 25 | 2 |
| 13 | 40 | 20 | 30 | 5 |
| 14 | 40 | 25 | 10 | 8 |
| 15 | 40 | 30 | 15 | 11 |
| 16 | 50 | 10 | 25 | 5 |
| 17 | 50 | 15 | 30 | 8 |
| 18 | 50 | 20 | 10 | 11 |
| 19 | 50 | 25 | 15 | 14 |
| 20 | 50 | 30 | 20 | 2 |
| 21 | 60 | 10 | 30 | 11 |
| 22 | 60 | 15 | 10 | 14 |
| 23 | 60 | 20 | 15 | 2 |
| 24 | 60 | 25 | 20 | 5 |
| 25 | 60 | 30 | 25 | 8 |
| Experiment Number | Water Absorption Rate | Water Retention Time (h) | Apparent Porosity | Compressive Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.60% | 63.75 | 73.70% | 0.39 |
| 2 | 116.04% | 49.75 | 75.26% | 0.21 |
| 3 | 131.40% | 48.25 | 77.68% | 0.10 |
| 4 | 149.70% | 57.75 | 77.28% | 0.55 |
| 5 | 108.81% | 35 | 70.92% | 1.60 |
| 6 | 91.36% | 30.75 | 73.88% | 0.11 |
| 7 | 93.53% | 33.5 | 74.17% | 0.11 |
| 8 | 118.54% | 38.75 | 76.36% | 0.32 |
| 9 | 104.51% | 44.5 | 77.04% | 0.29 |
| 10 | 185.96% | 33.25 | 77.88% | 0.05 |
| 11 | 100.40% | 39 | 72.73% | 0.06 |
| 12 | 105.95% | 41 | 72.53% | 0.29 |
| 13 | 129.56% | 57.75 | 77.39% | 0.14 |
| 14 | 144.40% | 42.75 | 77.21% | 0.03 |
| 15 | 154.21% | 37.5 | 77.70% | 0.02 |
| 16 | 116.67% | 49.5 | 72.80% | 0.10 |
| 17 | 79.32% | 50.75 | 67.51% | 0.48 |
| 18 | 85.19% | 49.25 | 70.84% | 0.11 |
| 19 | 93.36% | 36.5 | 70.89% | 0.08 |
| 20 | 107.63% | 60 | 74.35% | 0.17 |
| 21 | 97.94% | 39 | 71.91% | 0.18 |
| 22 | 132.34% | 37.5 | 72.66% | 0.04 |
| 23 | 112.45% | 39 | 74.02% | 0.07 |
| 24 | 131.12% | 39.75 | 74.72% | 0.10 |
| 25 | 128.87% | 49.75 | 75.12% | 0.13 |
| References | Sintering Temperature | Water Absorption | Water Retention Time | Apparent Porosity | Compressive Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [40] | 1060 | 31.62% | — | 44.5% | — |
| [41] | 1250 | — | — | 81% | 0.93 MPa |
| [19] | 1000 | 51.3% | 56 h | — | 1.3 MPa |
| [42] | 720 | 90% | — | 50% | 2.4 MPa |
| This work | 615 °C | 149.7% | 57.75 h | 77.28% | 0.55 MPa |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, P.; Wang, Y. Novel Low-Temperature Fabricated Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics: Water Absorption/Retention Features and Their Application in Dryland Agriculture. Sustainability 2025, 17, 10111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210111
Wang H, Zhang H, Zhao P, Wang Y. Novel Low-Temperature Fabricated Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics: Water Absorption/Retention Features and Their Application in Dryland Agriculture. Sustainability. 2025; 17(22):10111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210111
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Hao, Haozhong Zhang, Peng Zhao, and Yongzhen Wang. 2025. "Novel Low-Temperature Fabricated Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics: Water Absorption/Retention Features and Their Application in Dryland Agriculture" Sustainability 17, no. 22: 10111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210111
APA StyleWang, H., Zhang, H., Zhao, P., & Wang, Y. (2025). Novel Low-Temperature Fabricated Coal Gangue-Based Porous Ceramics: Water Absorption/Retention Features and Their Application in Dryland Agriculture. Sustainability, 17(22), 10111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210111

